Killer Instinct (2001) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Well, I managed to sit through it without changing the channel.
capkronos12 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
College student members of the "dare club" break into an abandoned asylum to have a scavenger hunt using their own underwear. No one has as much as a backpack on them, but suddenly about five thousand candles appear all over the house to illuminate their fun and games and right when you get into double digits counting the fake slap-on-the-shoulder scares, a psycho pops up to plant lethal booby traps everywhere.

**SPOILERS** (If you've never seen a horror film before)

The victims turn out to be the children of lynch mob members who hung a man outside the asylum 15 years earlier, who've been lured there and trapped inside. Meanwhile, name value stars Corbin Bernsen and Dee Wallace Stone sit around a lot and talk about the deed to the place, the murder and other things. Attempts at characterization include a black guy who dies first and a sexy/tough lesbian who masturbates while watching another couple have kinky sex through one-way glass.

One interesting touch has all the women outliving the men, but that's probably only because they're slightly better actors and willing to go topless once in awhile to relieve several boring stretches where nothing of plot relevance is happening. I give this film a little credit because it DOES pick up a bit by the end, but otherwise it's typical slasher nonsense, done with little creativity and flair.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A blast from the past
sol-kay11 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS**** Uneven revenge movie that tries very hard to be effective but ends up empty and unconvincing in trying to make any kind of sense and by the time the movie ends it makes you even more confused then you already were before.

The movie "Killer Instinct" is about an event that happened in the small town of Perrystown some fifteen years earlier. Matthew Hackett, Gregory Wood, a inmate in the towns Braxton Asylum broke out and murdered eight people until he was caught and lynched by a number of the towns outrage citizens. The revenge for Hackett's killing came fifteen years later with a fiery holocaust at the very same asylum that Hackett was a patient in. The movie starts off like a teenage slasher flick with a number of Perrystown teenagers partying and getting drunk then breaking into the long closed Braxton Asylum with the thought of spending the night there.

Like in all these slasher movies the very over-sexed and drunk or high teenagers get killed off one by one but unlike in these movies there's no one of the teenagers around to be a hero and kill the unknown and unseen killer at the end of the film. There's also a parallel story in the film about the danger of the town's local meat plant, the Meadow Meat Packing Plant, being gobbled up by a big food conglomerate, Ornell Food, and costing the jobs of hundreds of Perrystown workers.

The president of Meadow Meats J. W. Wilhite, Corbin Bernsen, as well as his companies majority stock-holders are dead set against selling out to Ornell Food and they tell the Ornell Food rep. Sarah Fairchild, Dee-Wallace Stone, that in no uncertain terms. Fairchild becomes a real pain in the neck when she tracks down a story about Matthew Hackett being railroaded into the asylum, where he really became insane by being abused there, by the asylums founder Dr. Braxton where he escaped and killed eight people and then was captured and killed by a lynch mob. It turns out that Hackett owned the land where the Meadow Meat Packing Company was later built on. Even more surprising is that the mob that lynched Hackett was non-other then P.W Wilhite and the people who founded that plant! On top of all that the teenagers killed in the burning down of the Braxton Asylum, that night fifteen years later after all this happened were the children of,yes you guessed it, P.W Wilhite and those who lynched Hackett.

I could not for the life of me understand the part of Sarah Fairchild in the movie. She acted like a hard-nose private investigator instead of a corporate representative. Tracking down the truth about Hackett's death the president and co-owners of the Meadow Meat plant tried to murder her before she wrecked everything that they worked, and killed, so hard to get.

The big and brawny P.W Wilhite looked and acted ridicules as he tried to kill Fairchild in her motel room only to have, the small and fragile looking, Fairchild kicked the hell out the him. Fairchild is also very unbelievable in that after she was attacked she still stayed in Perrystown and didn't even bother to call the police for help! Even though she knew that her life was in danger.

Very off-the-wall ending with Fairchild getting together with the teenagers killer to screw J.W Wilhite and his cohorts in crime out of their meat packing plant. Thus punishing them for their crimes by having then work for the minimum wage for the rest of their lives. Which was nothing for, at least, Fairchild to brag about in seeing that justice was done. Since that was her plan, the takeover of the Meadow Meat Plant Company, in the first place before she ever knew about the crimes J.W Wilhite & Co. committed.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Should have been called "Killer Stink"
stormruston30 October 2005
The big problem with this movie is it takes it self seriously and the acting is pretty good.

That puts it in a category like "ghost ship" and this just does not compare.

The Special effects are few and far between and with the exception of a pretty cool bed death scene, all the special effects were cheaply done. Very little gore, the 18A is for titties.

Corbin Beansen is still good looking and can still act, but see him in "The dentist" not this very average slasher movie.

On a positive note, the one dimensional story has a nice end twist.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What do you expect from Tony "Toolbox Murders" Didio?
webmistress-18 February 2002
Warning: Spoilers
"Killer Instinct" stinks, but in a stupid, fun, 70s drive-in kind of way. It's a "sins of the father are visited upon the son" type of slasher flick, with a bunch of teenagers who try to spend a night in an abandoned asylum (while on a scavenger hunt for each other's underwear -- don't ask).

Dee Wallace (ET) stars as a realtor/business tycoon trying to buy land upon which a secret crime was committed long ago. As she spends the night researching the town history, the teens meet grisly fates elsewhere. To be honest, it feels like Wallace's role occurs in a completely different movie -- she only brushes with the main plot at the very end. The script was penned by Wallace's late husband -- some say it was the last thing he wrote before he died.

Another trash luminary appearing in this flick is Corbin Bernsen, whom many remember best as The Dentist.

"Killer Instinct" reminded me a whole lot of Roberta Findlay's solo work ("Blood Sisters" especially), with a dash of "Kolobos" for good measure. It ranged from feeling like a cliché parade to being surreally illogical/improbable. Every teen cast member is an idiot (they even "split up"). Allow me to outline the high/low points (minor spoilers):

* The beginning makes no sense, and folks who worked on the film claim it was heavily edited. The movie opens with a blood-drinking psycho, and a subsequent lynching by the townsfolk. The screen reads "11 years later," which is followed by ...

* ... A COMPLETELY GRATUITOUS SEX SCENE-- replete with BARE BREASTS -- five minutes into the film! No one dies - -it's completely pointless.

* A bunch of teens spend a night in an abandoned asylum that looks like an ordinary house ... wait, didn't MTV use this same tired premise to launch a TV show? And guess what? They get locked in. Ooh -- and there's a killer who watches "McGuiver". Cue the lightning! Cue the thunder! Cue the rain (until said rain could be used to extinguish a fire)!

* A weird GROUP UNDERWEAR FETISH is introduced for no good reason.

* Foot fetish introduced for no good reason.

* A silver vibrator is also introduced for no good reason, and it isn't even exploited as a lethal weapon later :(

* A guy is hung by his feet and locked in a room with a poisonous coral snake!

* There's a perky, chubby chick with no detectable acting ability ... to such an extreme that the viewer can tell she's only in the movie to flash her breasts.

* A quasi S&M scene, followed by a shower scene, ends with a bound teen boy getting impaled by giant shards of glass.

* Some moron is boiled to death, though it's not clear how. There's a silly beheading, too.

* Plot holes all over the place -- to a painful degree. At least three half-developed subplots are left unresolved.

* Dee is in a different movie, I swear.

* The killer wins at the end (no, I won't spoil the 'twist;' it works very well).

The main GOOD thing I'd like to point out is that, unlike the "Scream" genre of self-aware teen slash-em-ups, this was no Gen X fest. It was a traditional 70s/80s "hunted teens flick," with a few known veteran character actors and a bunch of fresh-faced unknowns willing to get splattered/go topless to star in a movie. All parties involved should be proud of their work; this is a rare modern example of classic, low-budget exploitation.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Don't Judge it Till you See It!
pawprivate18 August 2001
A Sleeper in it's type, gets better and better as it goes on. Good Dark and Stormy Night Film - with a Well Done Ready for Sequel Ending. But the Proof is in the Watching. Stay with it - if you like your Horror with a High Body Count - at least until the bars drop on the doors! (Nuff Said) Judge this one for yourself - don't let then Dumpers stop you.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Eight teenagers locked in an asylum with only their wits and their sexually aroused hormones...
Little-Mikey14 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Your typical teen-aged horror flick follows the same formula:

1. A murder occurs at some location many years ago.

2. Next, we move to the present time where a bunch of oversexed teenagers whose sex drives are inversely proportional to their intelligence, decide to party at that same location.

3. One by one, the teenagers meets a violent death.

4. The situation gets really horrifying, so horrifying, in fact, that the remaining teenagers decide that perhaps it might be a good idea to re-frame from the sex and the booze and try to survive the horrifying ordeal.

5. Because nobody has thought of simply jumping into his/her/the parent's car and simply vacating the premises as fast as possible, the casualty count of beheaded teenagers, continues to increase, until...

6. A lone surviver, usually a female, emerges, alive, but totally out of her mind.

KILLER INSTINCT pretty much follows this same formula, but with a few twists and turns that actually make this movie one of the better horror flicks.

For starters, the insane asylum was not haunted nor was there any "Jason"-like predators who allegedly return to the scene of the crime on the anniversary of whatever took place. The asylum was closed down but not abandoned. And the mysterious malicious person who remained hidden, closed the windows and locked all the doors before the body count takes place. When it became apparent that something was wrong, the teenagers actually decided that the sex and the booze would have to wait. First thing on the agenda was to get the hell out of that asylum, easier said than done.

the movie did not end with a lone survivor. It ended with a shocking proposal.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It had some promise, but...
Wizard-84 December 2001
There are actually some good ideas buried in here, ideas that, if focused on and properly executed might have resulted in a fairly interesting movie. But as it is, this is a really bad movie. Among other complaints:

(1) The tired and offensive stereotype of the token black member of the group being the first victim

(2) Repulsive protagonists, who come off as utter jerks. Not just jerks, but stupid jerks, making mistakes like wandering off alone, etc.

(3) A cheap and shoddy look. Now I know this was a low budget direct-to-video movie, but that's no excuse - I've seen other low budget direct-to-video movies that managed to look very slick

(4) No scares, no suspense, not even good splatter

(5) Two separate storylines that really don't fit together well.

By the way, despite what's pictured on the front and the back of the video and DVD box, there are NO skeletons to be found anywhere in the movie!
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent Horror Film
NICK C27 August 2001
I must say that my main motivation at first for renting this flick was to see the locations in and around my hometown forever immortialized on celluloid. But as I was watching the film, I soon saw that it was a very well done film and genuinely scary. If you enjoy this movie, be sure to visit the Chef's diner in Downingtown, PA (which was also the location for the 1958 classic 'The Blob')
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
*1/2 out of 4.
brandonsites198114 August 2002
Group of teens holed up in an abandoned house conducting a scavenger hunt are murdered off while drinking and having sex. Dee Wallace Stone thinks the house has something to do with a past murder and a respected town citizen (Corbin Bernsen). Wallace still looks good after all these years and it is nice to still see her working, but this flick is just terrible. The ending is a complete mess and the teens are of your typical garden variety. A bit more violence and sex then usual however.

Rated R; Strong Sexual Content, Graphic Violence and Profanity.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a great alternative to "I know what you did last summer"
xone0025 October 2001
I thought this was one of the best horror movies I've seen in a while, and it has a unique ending which may leave you cheering for the "bad guy."

The casting is very good. I get the feeling the cast had fun doing the filming, and you don't get that plastic character feel so common nowadays, like in lame movies like Virus and Event Horizon. There are also some cool visual transition effects and the play of two stories running on a parallel timeline. Just a cool sleeper horror flick.

Expect some gore and nudity in what I think is a good ole hack-and-slay, Friday-the-13th style film, set square in modern 2000.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hey, nice box cover!
Punch-31 July 2002
This steaming turd of a `film,' scripted by a TV writer whose only other credit is `The New Lassie,' and directed by truck driver-cum-director, Ken Barbet, with all the subtlety of. well, a truck driver, gives soft-porn thrillers a bad name. A group of attractive young people - four boys and four nymphets - play a game of `find the panties' in a deserted insane asylum. They take off their clothes, have sex, take showers, and - Horrors! - get picked off one by one. Turns out that they're all descendants of a mob that, years ago, lynched a man who escaped from or owned (I kept dozing off) the very same insane asylum. Dee Wallace and Corbin Bernsen slum in this absolute waste of time, presumably for a paycheck.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The nicest thing that I can say about this film is "This is the dumbest and most terrible 'horror' movie that I have ever had the misfortune of seeing".
Jack the Ripper188817 July 2002
And this is a horror movie? I think not. A group of young, hormone-driven teens, sneak into an abandoned asylum (which is basically just a really old house as there are no cells in the so-called "asylum"). And they decide to play a game of "hide the undies" from each other. The kills are totally unoriginal and stupid. Many sex scenes, which I would normally consider good, but are just stupid and pointless here.

To be brutally honest, I can't even remember what Corbin Bernsen and Dee Wallace Stone had to do with the film, I kept on losing interest. I even started dusting the TV screen when it wasn't dusty. That should tell you how terrible this film is. If you haven't seen this, please don't. It may be dangerous to your health. The bottom line: "Bring this film to the garage and smash as many times as you can with a sledge hammer". KILLER INSTINCT gets 1/2* out of 5.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A terrible film, do not watch if you have a soul.
Static_Matt21 September 2001
TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE. A downright bad movie with no redenmning value whatsoever. If you look up the term cliche in the dictionary you will find "see: Killer Instinct". And continuitity errors? you bet. Good acting? If you think Kevin Costner is a quality actor, sure. Special Effects? Who needs them. Senseless nudity with no purpose whatsoever? You bet your ass. Clever kills? Sure glass that defies the laws of physics. If you find this movie at your local movie store, rent it and burn it. This is the type of film that ruins the horror genre. Once again, please, please, please, do not give money to the wannabee filmakers who made this trash.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Almost the worst movie ever made
mrfrane1 October 2001
Absolutely the biggest waste of cash and time I've spent in years. It's not even fun the way a good Bad Movie can be; just stupid. Some gratuitous nudity, oh yes, but plot? Huh? Plot? Horrible acting, mindless "action". Not even faintly scary. Stinker.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This Flick ROCKED!
MrG-122 October 2001
This movie far exceeded my expectations, I figured it'd be a typical slasher flick, which in a way I sort of got my slasher film, but it also was a revenge type flick in the vein of THE COUNTE OF MONTE CRISTO. The tag names on this are Dee Wallace Stone (good to see her again!) and Corben Bernsen, however this movie is put in the hands of the young cast (looking it up I see names PAIGE MOSS, BRIGITTE BROOKS, SCOTT ROMAN, TIM CARR etc etc), all of them do carry the film, and take us for a long bizarre and exciting ride. I think this film may find it's way into "CULT STATUS" but probably not for a few years. I recommend it!
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A new level of exquisite boredom...
RareSlashersReviewed19 February 2004
Killer Instinct opens with a horde of vigilantes chasing a bloodied someone through some smartly lighted woodland. After he stops off to stab an unfortunate fellow that has his back turned, they eventually catch up with him and quite literally bundle him! (I was actually expecting one of them to shout ‘Bundles!') He must've really upset these townsfolk because out comes the noose and the man is hung by the neck until the screen fades. Clichés abound when the words 15 years later pop up on the screen and we're introduced to a troupe of banal teens that discuss a massacre that occurred as many years earlier. (Round a bonfire no less!) Meanwhile, the backdrop gives us a subplot concerning a businesswoman (Dee Wallace Stone) who wants - or is trying to purchase - some property from a ‘played to be' sadistic Corbin Bernsen. Anyway back to the teens, who are now (extremely unoriginally) talking about spending the night in the abandoned asylum where the slayings took place. Their posse consists of the all the typical ingredients that are now solidly encrypted into the slasher movie guidebook. Annoying guy, slut, randy couple and girl that can sense the danger that lies ahead, you know the drill! Surprisingly however, I hadn't yet picked out an obvious ‘surviving heroine'; none of the offerings were shy, reclusive or virginal. Hmmm! They finally make their way into the desolate building, which really looks a lot more like a normal house. It's also worth noting that for a place that has been left to rot for fifteen years, it's extremely well preserved! There are no light bulbs so an unusually large amount of candles give us our lighting (but where on Earth did they get them?), meanwhile unbeknown to them, their chances of leaving have just taken a downslide due to the doors and windows locking mysteriously. Before long it's decided that a game is in order, preferably one that'll split the group up so they can wonder off to their doom! They choose to take off their underwear and put it in a bag so someone else can hide them around the location, before they all separate to search the garments out (seriously!). But before they leave, Wendy (Paige Moss) digs through the briefs and shows them off so that everyone can have a giggle at what their friends were wearing (I'm not kidding, I swear!) It's hardly shocking when we learn that a masked killer seems to think that their numbers need trimming and sets traps so that they stumble on to their impending fate!

Killer Instinct boasts some competent photography and lighting and the darkened set locations manage to look fairly spooky. The methods of murder are authentic and also pretty interesting. My favourite was when a guy lying on a bed was showered with broken glass from a trap door above him, one piece slicing straight through his stomach and is next seen sticking to the floor below the mattress! There was also a smart decapitation and the use of a venomous snake, which is at least, a new one on me. When the killer is unmasked at the end, you'll be fairly surprised at the conclusion. I must admit that it wasn't one that I'd have immediately guessed. But it has to be said that it was rather impossible for him to commit the murders before changing clothes inexplicably quickly so as to keep up the appearance of innocence. Credit should be given to the director for killing off the most annoying character first. If we'd have had to suffer his painful gurning any longer, I'm sure pressing the eject switch would've become a glaring temptation.

`Every cliché has a grain of truth in it.' Mouths one dim-witted character, which could only have been included in the script as an attempt to excuse the director's blatant purloining from previous genre pieces. Here it looks like he's been watching the housebound slashers of yesteryear like House of Death and House on Sorority row, using them as subject matter for this obvious amalgamation. The cast is just what you've come to expect from this grade of movie, lame, untalented and uninspired. Page Moss was probably the most convincing, but she was still fairly weak. She did manage to prove to be the best looking of the bunch, which really wasn't a tough challenge. Bernsen and Stone were equally unconvincing, really slumming it and adding yet another nail to their rapidly closing career coffins. There's a large amount of nudity that'll please younger teenagers, but here it looks especially gratuitous with one girl giving an orgasmic performance that could keep Jenna Jameson checking her shoulders!

The film's main flaws are its horrendous lack of pacing and equally poor efforts at generating any kind of interest. The two separate plot lines seem as if they have very little in common with each other and I found it hard to keep track of the names of any of the characters, because they were so instantly forgettable. I really couldn't find anything to be excited about in either the gore-less murders or the leisurely paced showdown. At one point the house caught fire, which sparked some amusing shots of a scaled model burning that were so obviously fake, it was pitiful! Offerings as mediocre as Killer Instinct are killing off the slasher genre. Although famous for its staggering repetition, the loveable sub-category needs ambition and reinvention if it's going to survive many more years. I bought this because I read somewhere that it was gory with a healthy production, but it's not, it's just lame.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed