Pseudo documentary about the making of a low-budget post-nuke sci-fi/action splatter movie.Pseudo documentary about the making of a low-budget post-nuke sci-fi/action splatter movie.Pseudo documentary about the making of a low-budget post-nuke sci-fi/action splatter movie.
Chris Britton
- Narrated by
- (voice)
- (as Christopher Britton)
Paul James Saunders
- Fang
- (as Paul Saunders)
Patricia Aldridge
- Amazon
- (as Patti Aldridge)
Glenna Sims
- Amazon
- (as Glenna Simms)
Terry Howson
- Mutant
- (as Terry Houson)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaIt took 20 takes for the actress to say her "I fucked his brains out" line.
- ConnectionsReferences The Nesting (1981)
Featured review
A documentary about a film: mutants, nudity, cheesy FX
Well, this is the end of the line for splatter fanatics. This is the documentary to a film being made. A film which, if you asked me, looks like it was a sham. I have never seen this mutant flick anywhere, and it could be that it's so rare, I haven't seen it. But, judging from the FX in this "documentary", I probably could do without seeing this mutant flick.
The main point of this film is to show the audience how gross effects are sometimes engineered. The flesh-and-blood effects, however, seem off slightly. They just don't look real enough to be all that impressive. The filmmakers chose to throw some nudity in, as well, to keep the viewer from getting bored.
And, then there is the action scenes. That's when I said to myself,"This isn't a real film," The documentary refuses to give real plot points away, making me doubt.
But, hey, more people have seen the MAKING OF DEMON LOVER that they have seen DEMON LOVER. So, that's just my opinion, but if you take a look at SPLATTER, doesn't it seem just a bit too irreverent?
OK. So, my point is taken. There is nothing of the Tom Savini, or Stan Winston, variety here. It's strictly amateur hour. But, what a funny, entertaining hour it is.
The main point of this film is to show the audience how gross effects are sometimes engineered. The flesh-and-blood effects, however, seem off slightly. They just don't look real enough to be all that impressive. The filmmakers chose to throw some nudity in, as well, to keep the viewer from getting bored.
And, then there is the action scenes. That's when I said to myself,"This isn't a real film," The documentary refuses to give real plot points away, making me doubt.
But, hey, more people have seen the MAKING OF DEMON LOVER that they have seen DEMON LOVER. So, that's just my opinion, but if you take a look at SPLATTER, doesn't it seem just a bit too irreverent?
OK. So, my point is taken. There is nothing of the Tom Savini, or Stan Winston, variety here. It's strictly amateur hour. But, what a funny, entertaining hour it is.
- silentgpaleo
- May 30, 2000
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Splatter: Arhitektones tou fovou
- Filming locations
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada(main location)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- CA$150,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 15 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content