Megalodon (Video 2002) Poster

(2002 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
50 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Well, I appreciate the effort
Vomitron_G22 February 2006
It's easy to pick on MEGALODON and call it a bad movie. It's not original, it lacks a bit suspense every now and then, the acting is just average and you can tell that the budget was low, to name only a few things. But if you manage to look beyond its mediocrity, you can see that the film-makers really tried to make it as decent as possible. And you can only appreciate that. Now , if it wasn't for CGI-technology, this movie simply would not have been made. Only the actors and a few sets were real, the rest all CGI. It looks real good most of the time(the helicopter in the beginning and the sailboat at the end,...) but sometimes it fails desperately (that same helicopter crashing on the platform).

You already know that this movie is about a prehistoric mega-shark rising from the depths and terrorizing the crew of an oil-rig. And with it's title being MEGALODON, I thought the mega-shark was considerably lame. There's only one fairly decent attack-scene when he bursts through the ice. Decent in terms of that he finally does something. The rest of its screen time you see him swimming around bumping into things. Well at least they didn't make him roar or something. And the explosion at the end was ridiculous: They just disappeared!? But still, this movie never becomes really boring, 'cause the CGI frequently provides nice images to look at, with the 'cave-exploring'-sequence being a good example (nice glowing flubbery creatures). There are a few other shots worth mentioning. They're pretty pointless, but stylish. It was when they showed that smaller dinosaur-fish with the sharp teeth. The creature-designer actually made a real good-looking sculpture (no CGI) for this one.

I admit, to some MEGALODON may not live up to its humble 4-star-rating, but I think you should at least appreciate the effort the film-makers made for trying to make it work. And even if it can't compete with most of the underwater-creature-flicks, it still is way better than that Casper Van Dien SHARK ATTACK-tripe.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
You get what you expect!
chrisjan14 October 2006
I just saw this movie last night. I bought it for 3 euros on DVD so you can't go wrong there. The reason I bought it is simple: I like movies about sharks and there are only a few about the Meg(alodon). Too few, but I heard that Jan de Bont wants to film the book Meg (great book) so lets hope that will happen. About this film: You get what you expect: A cheap-looking, low-budget (horror?)film. It takes about 45 minutes before we get to see the shark, so until then the viewer is bored with mediocre acting, simple character- and story building and cheap SE. The thing that bothered me the most were the computer generated effects. I hate that sooooo much and this whole movie comes from the computer: The snow, the helicopter, the oil rig and the shark. I understand that the budget was low but a computer isn't the solution. The other thing was that there were only a few actors in the movie: Should I believe that a handful of people operate a huge oil platform? Yeah right! The movie is about a shark, but the shark isn't convincing either. It looks good standing stil, but the way it moves, swims attacks etc etc isn't very good. And the climax...You almost have to see it to believe: It left me with unbelief...so dumb and simple.

It's a short movie (1 hr 12) minutes, the sound was horrible (DTS!), full screen, but what killed the movie were the computer effects....so not worth your time or money.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Now, that's one big shark...
paul_haakonsen16 June 2016
Usually shark movies are fairly horrible, much like most zombie movies. And "Megalodon" is not really an exception from the standards of shark movies. It has everything you expect it would; fake shark and bad CGI effects. Check and check.

The story in "Megalodon" is about an oil drilling company which has built a massive rig which will revolutionize the oil drilling business. Being capable of drilling at depths which are previously unreachable, then they invoke the anger of environmentalists. Whilst drilling at over 5000 feet, they find a massive subterranean underwater cave which has a myriad of previously undiscovered aquatic creatures. But living in the cave is a massive Carcharodon megalodon.

While the story is straight forward and fairly generic for a movie of this genre, then the movie actually turned out to be semi-alright, in terms of being watchable and providing some entertainment for the audience. However, it just was bludgeoned to death by horrible CGI effects and fairly bad acting.

The concept idea for the drilling rig was quite good, and they managed to show it in a fairly adequate manner, although the CGI effects could have been better. And the combination of CGI effects and real props did work out well enough in favor of the movie.

While on the topic of effects, then I will admit that the luminescent aquatic creature designs were really impressive and looked really good on the screen. So thumbs up to the CGI special effects team on this achievement.

"Megalodon" has no one familiar on the cast list, and I can't really claim that people were doing great jobs with their given roles and characters. Now, whether this was the fault of the restrictive script or the talents (or lack thereof) of the actors, I do not know.

"Megalodon" is not an impressive movie in any way, and it is the type of movie that you watch once and laugh about it, then never put it back in your movie player again. For a shark movie, then this movie was lacking action, shark attacks and the sense of fear, that we saw in "Jaws", for example.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
So-So Shark Fare
Nick_Dets26 August 2005
"Megalodon" is a technical failure. Its visual effects are about four or five years obsolete (minus a couple well-done, but scattered bits). The sound mixing is atrociously amateur. The biggest offense, however, is the editing. Let's just say there are many needless "filler" shots as well as frequently, overly, held out ones. From the start you will question the ineptitude of the filmmakers.

But I will direct this review at fans of underwater terror, being that they will be the few that should happen to read it. Good movies in this sub-genre are hard to find. Of course there isn't always a "Deep Blue Sea" to go see in the theaters, so its fortunate most video stores carry a plethora of shark flicks. As I stated above, this one is by no means a triumph in film-making- but that doesn't make it a bad movie. It moves quickly and nicely leads up to its good scenes. Also, the plausibility of the prehistoric creature is surprisingly well-done. With these good attributes at hand, "Megalodon" is mostly a guilty, fun time. The complications that arise are suspenseful, (if you can withstand genuinely bad CGI effects) but they don't do nearly enough with the good story they have.

With a bigger budget and a better filmmaker, this could have been great. But it isn't...so try and enjoy what you can of this watchable, but obviously generic film.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
At least it's better than the Shark Attack movies, still doesn't leave me thirsty for sharks though
TheLittleSongbird18 November 2013
Megadolon is more a mediocre movie than a terrible one. It is also at least better than the Shark Attack movies(then again almost anything is), now those are examples of terrible movies. There are things to like, the acting is decent especially from Mark Sheppard, there are some nice underwater sequences, there is one cool attack scene and much of the CGI is not bad(the helicopter crash agreed was an exception), not great but could have been worse. Also the movie doesn't fall into the dull category, the pace is quite brisk and there are glimpses of great entertainment. Megadolon is let down by a number of things. The standard of the CGI was better than expected, but there could have been much less of it at the same time. The editing has times where it's hurried and others where it's sloppy, the dialogue at best is a load of exposition and cornball and the characters are shallow and development is next to nil. The story is not badly paced, but it is very predictable and the suspense and horror is severely lacking(they're exchanged with unintentional comedy, some of which is funny but others are frustrating), and the repetitive attack scenes and anticlimactic and quite ridiculous ending hinder it further. The shark is a very mixed bag design wise, there are times where it has a very menacing great white shark look but there are other times where it is like an over-sized plastic toy you'd find in the bathroom(coming from someone who used to have one, it could sing too!). The lack of personality is a big problem, there was definitely a big effort to make it authentic but generally it needed to be more fearsome and have more variety in movement and how it reacted to things. Overall, mediocre but did have its merits. 4/10 Bethany Cox
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Recomandation
dahntheboss3 May 2005
If you plan to watch this movie hoping to see another good action-thriller movie, with bad shark attacking movie, just forget this one: bad acting, bad story, awful FX. It has nothing but a good name. I was hoping to see another Deep Blue Sea-like movie, only with greater shark and better feeling. Well I'm very disappointed. I tried to watch the entire movie, but after 15 minutes I've started to fast-forward the movie and watch only the key scenes. Moreover the famous Megalodon, is poorly designed and animated. The outdoor scenes seems to be computer-rendered and the overall feeling of the movie compares with the HBO made movies. Bottom line: if you want to see a shark movie watch again Deep Blue Sea - You'll be more satisfied.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
can I vote with a below zero value
ricferr14 July 2005
This is simply one of the worst movies I have ever seen. This is not a B movie series, this is a Z movie. Lousy actors interaction, lousy CGI (final fantasy, where are you), and the more than predictable ending takes out any interest on the movie. The low budget shouldn't serve as an excuse to produce low quality movies. If you don't have enough money to build a sky scraper, you don't save on the concrete and all the other building materials. You just don't build it. I tried to give this movie a -10 vote but IMDb system only allows rates between 1 and 10. Let this be a warning to you. Just don't waste your time watching this movie.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Movie Ever!!
yogsottoth9 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Definitely one of the worst I've ever seen!! When my cousin called me up to let me know that Megalodon was on TV, I immediately performed an acrobatic run towards the TV room, not knowing that it was going to turn into a total disaster...

I just adore sharks, so I love shark movies (even if they're not very good) but this was just total and utter waste of time!

Where to begin? The thing that irritated me the most was the rapid movements of Meg. A Megalodon can't move that fast. He should be slow and heavy. But he was wagging his tail like a little fish! How could you dare make a fool out of the coolest fish ever?!

The acting, the story building and the ending were way below average.

*Spoiler*

The guy disappeared after the explosion. Not a single part of his ship could be seen in the crystal clear water after his completely pointless suicide mission, I mean he could have got away easily.

And the Meg, broken into two, bleeding like a broken jar of strawberry jam. Ahh, a very very bad scene.

The only nice thing about the movie was the final scene where we see the Meg's silhouette under the boat.

*spoiler*

Overall it was an awful movie with no real shots (all done in computer), no good actors and no interesting or thrilling scenes. So don't even think about watching it.You'll just waste your time.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
What did you expect? But not too bad!
mtess-11 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
From the DVD cover itself, I wasn't expecting much, but I rented this movie anyway because I love the general subject matter (monsters, sharfks, etc). The first thing I was impressed with was the CGI of the drilling platform and helicopter, and from there the acting. Considering some of the crap I have rented in my life I found this acting was not poor because of the actor's talent, rather because of what was (in places) a poorly written script. And on that note, wasn't htis the same plot as Deep Star Six (a superior, similar film)? What about Leviathan too? ANyway, this point aside, the acting and the CGI were acceptable (suprisingly). The pacing was good until about an hour in, when I relaized the shark hadn't yet made an appearance! When it did, I closed my eyes, expecting Deep Blue Sea-type crap cgi, but the shark was done pretty well. From there, however, things went downhill. The characters did not act as I might imagine people would act trapped in an elevator beneath the ocean with a giant shark amongst them; the method by which the shark was destroyed made no sense (was not explained); the scene on the ice flow when the shark attacks the minisub was poor cgi. Backtracking a moment -- what happened when the shark was destroyed? The minisub vanished! I laughed out loud at that point.

ANyway, all in all for four bucks and expecting crap I was mildly surprised by the entertainment value of this movie. I love that there are still producers etc., making these types of movies and story lines. My humble, final constructive criticism: TAKE YOUR TIME and watch the final version before shovelling it out the door. A FEW touch-ups to the CGI, a few inserted scene to clarify things, and this would have been a pretty good Saturday afternoon monster movie. How about some personality for the shark, too -- Jaws had personality.

See it, but only for the fun of the storyline. Some better, similar flicks include, Deep Star Six and Leviathan.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Worst than most of all
radursm17 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Watching this movie is challenging… I mean it challenges your patience, even your ego, because the makers offend human intelligence with the so- predictable script. The CGI are made to show themselves as CGI, and not to create a setting or a specific background. Low budget shows the shark as a poor victim of some fish-tank. Low mobility of the monster, lesser thrilling moments than any other horror movies (I totally dislike them), the whole movie looks like a project of a junior student in cinematography studies. Don't watch it, it's not even a B category! I should, though, pay my respect to the actors, that didn't suck, even though the directing, the images and the script were totally under any level of tolerance. So, I salute them and I wish them much better movies to play in. 3/10 (5/10 for the CGI, 7/10 for the actors, 1/10 script, 2/10 editing, 2/10 director, 1/10 music- bad plagiarism of "Jaws" theme)
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Why did they bother????
kimhess-19 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, maybe I did like Deep Blue Sea, and maybe I have been wanting to see a movie based on Meg by Steve Alten. BUT this movie is total CRAP!!!! The acting is horrible, the CGI is so so and the explanations for the megalodon are totally stupid. Why did Isaacs bother? I'm guessing he thought he'd try and make a buck off the success of Alten's Meg, but he FAILED, and FAILED terribly. I understand that Leighann Litrell is married to a Backstreat Boy and good for her, but her acting is totally shitty. I hope the Backstreat Boy's new CD does well--otherwise this poor girl will starve. Okay, anyway I am really looking forward to "Meg" being made into a movie and I hope it's done right.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
MegaGood film!
redhead989823 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, 'Megalodon' is better then other films about other films such as 'Shark attack 3: Megalodon' and 'Shark Hunter'.

It opens up with a newscast where Maria Barrera is doing a report about shark attack and and oil stuff. With interviews from the head of it 'Peter Brazier' and 'Robert Amstrong' she ends up saying reporter 'christen Giddings' will be there for a week. The crew gets eaten to. The cgi and sound is great! I l o v e this m o v i-e it does not s u c k you h e a r that????? It i s a g r e a t s h a r k a t t a ck m o vi e! Watch it! I hope you will enjoy it as much as i did. It will be better then most shark attack films you will ever see. It goes next to Deep blue sea and shark attack 2!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the more decent shark movies.
jhpstrydom17 December 2007
Despite what others think, this film is one of the better shark movies in years, it has a good developing storyline, and a couple of likable characters, and at least the megalodon doesn't consist of discovery channel stock footage, like in that other pile of junk called shark attack 3, the film's CGI is acceptable and the cast does a great job with their performances, the storyline is slow moving but not boring in the slightest.

Final verdict, its a decent shark movie with great CGI effects, great storyline and a great cast, you won't be disappointed.

7 out of 10.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If Ed Wood had been able to use CGI
bergma15@msu.edu3 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I recently picked up this thing at my local supplier (Video to Go in Lansing) hoping to get my fix with a really bad movie. In this undertaking, there was some degree of success, but not extremely so.

The plot is that an oil tycoon is building a huge platform near one of the poles to exploit an oil pocket that was previously unreachable. He invited a TV reporter and her camera guy along to make a documentary about his new rig. During the drilling process, they open up an underground cavern where prehistoric fish have survived for millenia (presumably). This releases the Megalodon (the ancestor of the great white shark) and the thing proceeds to try and make the crew of the rig its lunch.

The acting is OK and the plot has been recycled so many times you can predict who will live and who will die. The whole thing looks like a producer and his friends got together and decided to play around with some new CGI technology they got for Christmas. On top of this, the damn Megalodon doesn't even appear until the movie is half way over. They tried to throw some environmentalist views into this thing, but it just seemed to add to an already lack-luster film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better then you expect * minor spoilers*
cujo220 October 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I have seen my share of crap animals run havoc flicks. I have bitten myself through octopus, crocodile,bloodsurf, spiders 1 and 2 and countless others..and of course Sharkhunter. This latter movie making a run for the crappiest of the crappiest in a race with spiders 2.

These films all show, to a various degree how hard it is to make a decent big animal or animals causing havoc on a tight budget. Even if you have one of the biggest killing machines - a 70 foot shark- that ever lived it is hard..sharkhunter again.

So with fear I started to watch this one, believing that the oke looking trailer was just a smoke screen for another crap outing. One hour and 18 minutes later ( the rest are the titles, short flick this one) I was pleasantly surprised. It is obvious the producers had very little money to start with, and they made the best of it. Setpieces and CGI ( because of the costs almost everything you see is CGI right upon the oil rig itself) are decent and working and the acting is believable too. The story - basically a way to present el sharko- is good enough to be believed and the whole act leading to this is very well made.

SO is there anything to nag about? *spoiler*

Sure; - Where the CGI fails is the shark itself, very little movement and not enough shark action..when you see the shark ( he people at least you see the thing, this is not as common in this genre) it doesn't do that much.

  • the female reporter thingy and the environmental take on things don't work at all.


  • and what does that funny looking alien fish beasty doing in the beginning, with a monster strong enough to hold its own flick ripping off the alien baby monster was a mistake.


---------- All in all well worth the price of a rental, you wont be disappointed.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst of the shark movies
seekbambam28 August 2021
I bought it mistaken it for shark attack 3 Megalodon. I watched it, snapped the DVD and threw it in the bin so that copy could not hurt anyone else.

I love love fun shark movies. This... This is bad. I appreciate movies being made.... This.... This is bad. It should not be viewed. The poster is cool though.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely dire 1/2 * out of *****
Welshfilmfan16 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoy B Movies so I decided to watch 'Megalodon' on an obscure Cable Channel, merely down to it's title, I wasn't expecting a lot & my Expectations were rock bottom as it was, I thought it might be Trashy but Watchable, like the Sci-Fi Channel productions, or something in the vein of 'Shark Attack'.... Nothing could prepare me for this virtually unwatchable pile of steaming crap.

It's set on a oil rig supposedly staffed by a mere 22 people....if you thought that wasn't many....actually in this entire movie you only see SIX of them throughout (probably as the budget only covered half a dozen 'actors' at $500 a pop) The acting was actually worse than I expected, The 'Actors' here was so awful they wouldn't even make it as bit players in a Steven Segal Movie... but I Don't mind bad acting as long as it's action filled....erm... this isn't.......NOTHING HAPPENS, It's all filmed in a broom cupboard of about 8 square feet.

There is No Tension & No Action - I was bored out of my mind while watching, but persevered To the end, so I could save others from this dreadful fate by writing this review.

Everything in this movie is fake, from the oil rig, to the snow, to the helicopter and and even the boat at the end (which does look like the kind of boats kids push in the city lake near where I live) and also obviously the shark using the worst possible computer generated effects.

I would be amazed if more than a $100k was spent on this dire & painful mess.

1/2 * out of *****
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Quite possibly the worst movie ever
lsparlin3 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was Stellar, as long as you're looking for something completely unbelievable, poorly filmed, with no concept and no plot. We enjoyed the fact that on a bottle of wine this movie was HILARIOUS, simply because it was so bad. Did anyone else notice the fact that the music never changed? The shark didn't look big, the water didn't look real, and come on, honestly? the sailboat with the giant shark? you've got to be kidding me. How did anyone think this movie might actually sell or be watched by anyone? It's terrible. It's called Megalodon but we don't see the shark until well after the fact, and they really don't seem to freak out about the fact that the shark is supposedly prehistoric but now lives in our ocean. The best part for me was when the half shark body floated across the screen. The whole movie was just so bizarrely bad, it was nearly surreal.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dull underwater menace movie with some terrible CGI
Leofwine_draca7 May 2015
MEGALODON - retitled SHARKZILLA to tie it in to the more recent wave of zero-budget shark attack movies - is a low rent, low impact piece of nonsense in which the crew of a deep sea oil rig find themselves menaced by a massive prehistoric shark which has designs on the crew members. What could have been an eerie and claustrophobic underwater fear flick along the lines of LEVIATHAN soon turns into something much, much worse with very poor effects and questionable acting.

The TV movie cast to deliver straight performances but I'm not quite sure how they manage to keep straight faces given the nonsense going on here. The titular menace is animated by some ultra-poor CGI effects and the underwater action is devoid of creativity to say the least. Various "red shirt" characters are killed off screen, leading to our heroes trying to devise a way to combat the beast.

Unfortunately for much of the film very little happens and there's a distinct lack of menace which is a surprise given the plot line. I have to say that the film-makers did a very poor job here; given the budget and set-up I'm sure even I could have done a better job.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the Funniest Movies I have ever seen
Cramball4 January 2007
I have to say to everyone here that if you are out to find a terrifying movie, this is not for you at all. This movie, i would have thought, would come under the genre of Comedy. Everything and i mean absolutely everything in this movie was very very bad quality. But all this added to the comedy side of the film. I could not help but laugh during the shark attack scenes, all they had done was take cuttings of sharks obviously attacking seals, or sharks moving through the water. The MEGALODON shark was obviously footage of a Great White, just zoomed in on. The FX were so bad they were laughable throughout the film. The acting, so atrocious that it is funny and embarrassing for you at the same time. And for some reason the voices of the characters were not always in sync with the film and most of the actors had slight Mexican accents even when they were not Mexican. The continuity of this film is atrocious.

So when i say that this film is horrible, i mean it. By no means should you not view this movie, just do not watch it under the pretense that it will be scary. In fact go buy some popcorn, hire the movie out, get some friends around and get ready for non stop laughs. I honestly found this movie to be one of the funniest i have watched this year.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I wish everyone would jump into it's mouth.
Saturnfly3 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Hmm, so many words describe this film, but only one will sum it up.

crap.

First off you see a man going diving, I wasn't paying much attention at that point so I wasn't completely aware of what he was doing, anyway man dies as you would expect, 6 months later man finds tooth, searches tooth on internet and decides that over the 5 or 6 species of sharks that this tooth is not there and therefor is a complete mystery and the shark obviously ends up a dinosaur.

Anyway, this movie felt like a incomplete replica of the jaw movie's. y'know with your basic skinny dippers, shark eats through boat and swallows men, and also eventually gets blown up.

However, what they didn't include in this movie (which in my opinion the first war of the worlds used better technology and special effects) was good actors, a good script, emotion, half the time it looked like the lady was smiling when she was obviously supposed to be doing the opposite.

There was plenty of boob showing which probably got this film up to two (down from -0).

But I can honestly say I had never laughed so hard at people being chewed up by this incredibly big shark which looked as though it was used from a completely different film.

if I could I would give it a zero, that's what it needs, and by golly I hope the actors NEVER act again.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Big shark gets loose, kills people
emob822 November 2005
I sat down to watch this expecting a b movie, not great but one that was still entertaining - I didn't get that, I watched it with a friend of mine and we didn't talk to each other for half an hour after it finished simply because we were in shock at how bad it was.

Considering it was the most expensive oil rig ever you'd think they'd have paint in more colours than battleship grey, you'd think the dining room table for 24 people wouldn't be the size to seat 6, and you'd expect a couple of other actors floating here and there! Maybe if the script had of been half decent it would of stood a chance, but in one scene 2 minutes is wasted on the female lead asking where the toilet is!?!!!!

To be fair there are a couple of memorable lines, but the kind you remember because you can never understand how anyone ever thought they were good!

Basically if you wish to watch it, its an experience that you will never ever forget, but we actually felt ourselves getting stupider whilst watching it, it seriously drained all enthusiasm for life out of us!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
PLEASE release this for sale DIGITALLY! This movie deserves the exposure.
tailsofthewind1 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I cannot wait to add this to my digital library, and I've been checking in, every once in awhile to see if it's been released yet. So far, no-go. :(

I love, love, love shark movies, so I should have added this one long before I added, "The Meg".

I'm wondering if maybe the hesitancy is because Al Sapienza's character Ross Elliot's anti-environmentalist speech might actually make perfect sense to a bit too many people (in some people's opinion). Maybe they didn't want to give-up yet.

Personally, I sometimes feel this way when I become exhausted, so I printed it out and framed it for my bedroom wall. It goes like this:

Environmentalists. As if their priorities aren't screwed up already. It's too late. We've lost. Over the last 150 years we have polluted this planet far beyond what anyone could fathom and we continue to do so daily. Billions of gallons of gasoline are consumed; natural gas; coal... We pump tons and tons of sewage and chemicals into our oceans day after day and it goes on and on and on. Yet they tell us if we recycle a Pepsi can or don't cut down a tree then we could help."

"So what your saying is: conservation doesn't matter. We should just pollute ourselves into extinction."

"It doesn't matter what I say, and it doesn't matter what you think - it's exactly what we are doing."

  • Ross Elliot in an Interview ("Megalodon")
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Meglaodon - Not a bad film
solair1307 May 2012
Okay if you look at this film for a fine polished movie then you are going to be sadly mistaken. This movie is 'b' movie, and taken in that scale, not a bad one to boot. Yes at time the acting can be a tad annoying and wooden. And the special effects can rather lame. But there is a story line there, and I think is this is redone as a modern film with a good amount of money for the special effects and a tidy up of the script, you would have a cracking little movie. Because at the moment the film is a diamond in the rough, I would advise you watch it, just to see what I mean.

You get a feel for some of the people within the movie itself, more so then some of the newer films.

All in all I would give it 6 out of 10, as a middle of the road type of film, take your brain out of gear sit back and watch.....

EDIT 11/08/2013

Watching the film again the other day, I thought about the book MEG with is a cracking title by Steve Alten. This film if it were given a remake with a good budget and a rewrite, keeping some of the story line, but expanding it passed the events on the oil rig, I think you could have a fair movie. The storyline on this as I said before is a tad flimsy, and the oh so special effects, but you start to get a feel for some of the characters, which should be expanded.

If you did all of this, then you should have a movie to watch and play at the movies.

Will it happen,, I don't think so, which is a shame
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
rubbish
sams-small4 August 2007
i thought that the director and the designers and the producer could of come up with something better then that it was awful. The computer graphics did nothing for the film and the producer really didn't think it through, i mean the scale of the shark was just ridiculous and most of the film was in computer graphics i think in total there was bout half an hour that wasn't done by computer.You could only just tell the shark was swimming in the water and it kept blinking while it was "swimming" so since when did fish start to blink, and it was poorly made, i mean come on its the 21st century all the technology there is these days the director and the producer could have made it much better that even the shark in jaws looked more real then the Megolodon did! my summary of the film is that it was rubbish and should of been scraped!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed