The Charlie Chaplin Festival (1941) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Re-visiting 1917
TheLittleSongbird21 July 2018
Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors.

From his post-Essanay period after leaving Keystone, the short films from 1917 that form 'The Charlie Chaplin Festival' ('The Immigrant', 'Easy Street', 'The Cure' and 'The Adventurer) showed a noticeable step up in quality though from his Keystone period, where he was still evolving and in the infancy of his long career, from 1914, The Essanay and Mutual periods were something of Chaplin's adolescence period where his style had been found and starting to settle. Something that can be seen in all four shorts forming 'The Charlie Chaplin Festival', all of which are great and among the best of this year and period.

The stories are more discernible than before and are never dull, though sometimes a bit too busy and manic. Perhaps a bit episodic too.

On the other hand, 'The Charlie Chaplin Festival' looks pretty good, not incredible but it was obvious that Chaplin was taking more time with his work and not churning out countless shorts in the same year of very variable success like he did with Keystone. Appreciate the importance of his Keystone period and there is some good stuff he did there, but the more mature and careful quality seen here and later on is obvious here in 'The Charlie Chaplin Festival' and the four 1917 short films that form it.

While not one of his most hilarious or touching, all four, especially 'The Immigrant', are still very funny with some clever, entertaining and well-timed slapstick and has substance and pathos that generally were not there with Keystone. 'The Charlie Chaplin Festival' moves quickly and there is no dullness in sight.

Chaplin directs more than competently, if not quite cinematic genius standard yet in this 1917 period. He also, as usual, gives amusing and expressive performances and at clear ease with the physicality and substance of the roles. The supporting cast acquit themselves well in all four, Eric Campbell and Edna Purviance especially.

In summary, a great festival. 9/10 Bethany Cox
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Even as an escaped con, you can't help but root for Chaplin!
mark.waltz13 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Even though these films are over 100 years old, it's difficult not to view Charlie Chaplin's early works through the eyes of Robert Downey Jr. Who received an Oscar nomination for playing him in a 1992 movie. That's not to dismiss Chaplin himself, because Chaplin himself is timeless and his films in spite of their obvious age have such a modern quality to them that has stood the passing of over a century. Even if the characters around him look like something archaic, Chaplin's little tramp is someone who can touch you deeply because you still see characters like him on the street who while they seem down and out are absolutely filled with the heart that Chaplin creates in each of the characters he's played.

As the European immigrant in the first segment, Charlie makes you root for him as you see all of the things he goes through on the ship on his way to New York, and his efforts to find money for a meal. It's hysterical to watch him eat a plate of beans, taking one being on a fork and eating them one at a time. The reaction of the person sitting next to him is hysterical. Then there is his treating Edna Purvience to a meal, and realizing that he's unable to pay, doing everything he can to find a coin to cover the meal so they won't be violated like one customer who was $.10 short.

There's of course ballet utilized in his role as the escaped convict, dealing with prison guards and running up and down hills effortlessly, eventually ending up at a boardwalk where a bunch of other people fall into the murky waters. Chaplin's antics include rolling around so he won't be accidentally struck or spotted, and the timing of each character is perfect turning just as he does, and even though it happens over and over several times, it's funny each time.

This marathon of four Essany shorts (released in 1917 originally) gives you plenty of opportunity to appreciate Chaplin the artist. He never fails to disappoint, and he only will laugh at appropriate times so most of his actions you know his character is taking seriously. The women for the most part are fragile and vulnerable, although the shot of a wealthy older woman getting a scoop of ice cream down her back is definitely one of the classic Chaplin moments.

The two films of compilations came out as he was being discovered by 30's and 40's audiences, compiled after the success of "Modern Times" and "The Great Dictator". This is the second one, and the addition of sound effects and original music adds greatly to the impact. His films are definitely worthy of being seen in museums on bigger screens with an audience because to hear the laughter of other people will increase your own, as I found when I saw a double bill of "City Lights" and "Modern Times" at MOMA.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Successful Charlie Chaplin
Single-Black-Male27 October 2003
Although this film is a compilation of his earlier work rather than an original story, it is a testimony to the success that Chaplin achieved as an actor, writer, director and producer of his own material. He set the precedent for subsequent film-making careers. Sometimes an actor has to write their own material to advance themselves creatively.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed