Lacrimosa (1970) Poster

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
When progress fails to encompass everything and everyone
Rodrigo_Amaro3 June 2023
Not sure in which part of the extense Marginal Tietê the film was shot and covered with great detail in a long one-shot sequence that lasts unil its arrival on a certain neighborhood - the express way covers a great deal of the city of São Paulo, in several extremes. While the first half of the short consists of this long sequence, slightly uninteresting just because of the ugliness of the city filmed up until the houses start to appear, the other half is the one that keeps us shocked, sad and thinking of several things at the same time because it shows an area surrounding the highway where there's nothing but misery and poverty, expressed here by a group of kids observing the camera and living their lives in a devastating manner in the middle of tiny shackles and plenty of garbage in the surroundings.

Progress certainly can cross bridges and unite the extremes of the city but zero assistance or the developments of housing in such areas existed back in the 1970's and onwards. As for the future, or then present, who can tell what happened to those areas if it was taken over to give space to acomodations to the poor or became an area habitated by companies, businesses or housing for people with acquisitions. All we know is that Marginal Tietê managed to expand all the way to similar areas where people had nothing (school, hospitals, assistance) yet it was the little they had to inhabit there.

While most of its images are shown in a silent manner, it's way later on that Mozart's sad requiem "Lacrimosa" dominates everything and the deep thinking and analysis of everything shown comes back to haunt us. Another great examples of how the cinema of Aloysio Raulino captures the dimensions of a gigantic city and its social economical contradictions where those who have and those who have not are united by narrow divisions which collapses in itself time and again. That was then, one can say but it is still now, it changed just a little bit. 6/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed