Ring Around the Rosie (Video 2006) Poster

(2006 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
59 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Could have been good, but fell way short.
jaie-111 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I gave this a 4 out of ten, and I am being quite generous for one thing and one thing only.

My wife and I were able to break the code! After our conversations following the movie it made it better to watch and understand.

The reason this movie COULD have been good is because it showed promise of having a 6th Sense type of feel. The dead ghost helping you live out part of your life, but no one knows he's dead type of thing.

Well in this movie, it was the sister "Wendi" instead of Bruce Willis.

This movie fell short in so many ways, the build up was way to vague and slow, there were a lot of beautiful shots, a lot of moments where we thought, "hey where did they film this, we'd like to go drive that route"...

In the movie the lead actress obviously had some demons in her past, and were all tied to the house left to her upon granny's death.

The director showed that the lead actress had problems with intimacy and a man, each time they were about to do the dirty, she had some bizarre vision. Well to make an extremely long boring story short.... here is my official synopsis.

The lead actress and her sister "Wendi" were obviously molested and sexually abused by Grandpa, this lead to intimacy issues...

When she goes back to the house to prepare it for sale, she was forced to face the demons that she tried so hard to suppress...

She saw visions, had nightmares and battled other emotional issues. She met the grounds keeper who turns out to be a mere presence of a "young grandpa"... yes the ground-keeper didn't exist as the story leads you to believe... he is in fact grandpa, her face turns very concerned every time she gets a good look at him as if there was something strangely familiar about this guy.

Few scenes later kid sister Wendy shows up, says "you started without me", Big sis is surprised enough to see Wendi that she drops all of the pictures and runs down to hug her, she exclaims profoundly how she is glad to see her again and how she misses her... the next line out of Wendi's mouth was a BIG BIG hint... she say's "wow this place is just like I remember it" to which big sister replies, "that's funny it seems a lot smaller" As the movie progresses, "wendi" grows quite fond of this grounds-keeper, the relationship comes to a frightening end when the grounds-keeper says to Wendi, "you can't dance worth sh**, let's see what you can do better than dance" Our best guess is that these are words that Grandpa actually uttered while he was molesting one or both of the girls in their youth.

The lead actress faces her demons of a fear of horses, saves sister, has a confrontation with the grounds-keeper, in their battle Wendi falls over the railing and dies... grounds-keeper gets killed, pretty run of the mill.

In some of the final scenes of the movie, boyfriend comes back, rain stops, he gives the most boring reveal ever in a movie "Wendi has been dead for 17 years" It's then and ONLY then can you start to piece together this puzzle that had a lot of potential, but because of the Juvenile brain of the director, it never made it to your television... how sad.

Oh by the way, the reason the place seemed just the same to Wendi and not her sis is because... obviously wendi only has memories of it as a kid since she died as a kid.

But now that you've seen what I had to say, Watch it again, think about these words... the movie will be much better for you.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Non-Sense, Absurd, Confused and Unintelligible
claudio_carvalho17 December 2006
When the grandmother of the publicist Karin (Gina Phillips) dies, she inherits her property in the fields. She travels with her boyfriend Jeff (Randall Batinkoff) for the weekend, but she decides to stay along the week cleaning up the place and packing the stuffs. Karin has horrible nightmares and visions of ghosts of her past, while she stays in the house with the creepy housekeeper Pierce (Tom Sizemore) and her younger sister Wendy (Jenny Mollen).

"Ring Around the Rosie" has a non-sense, absurd, confused and unintelligible screenplay. The motives and actions of Karin, who behaves like a moron in spite of being a successful publicist, are never well explained. It seems that she had a traumatic experience in the house many years ago, and when she returned, she recalled and lived it again, blending nightmares with reality, but the director Rubi Zack was never able to explain the story. It seems also that each one of the four writers wrote one part of the story, but they forgot to interact and put the ideas together. My vote is two.

Title (Brazil): "O Mistério de Rosie" ("The Mystery of Rosie")
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Don't waste your time like I did.
photorevolution16 April 2006
The plot lacks substantial development of character history or resolution of ideas. It has a sudden abrupt ending I saw coming a mile away, but lacked substance and leaves many questions vital to the plot unanswered. To discuss more would reveal spoilers.

I guess one would have to read the book to understand what actually happens... I seams as if the true story was discarded and stomped all over to get some cheap thrills in. The thrills, BTW are not too believable or exciting.

The only good thing I have to say is Sizemore is creepy as hell. Otherwise the acting is completely unbelievable.

"Original" musical scores blatantly composed to sound as if from "The Grudge" and "The Ring" so much so that one has to wonder if plagiarism just occurred. I was fooled into thinking it was the same composer from "The Ring". I see from the message boards I am not alone in this opinion.

I am so disappointed I wasted my time on this movie. The trailer proved to be more exciting. Don't waste your money.
38 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Rent it if you're desperate, watch it if that feeling gets worse
kolsky14 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Sob,

why, why, why did I rent this?

Cut to the chase: Do not, under no circumstances watch this film.

Where, where, where is the plot? Remember that thing called a plot? And it took FIVE writers to produce this drivel?

And the amount of stupid, stupid stuff!

1. The cisco IP phone that she's using at the office is not connected... The phone's screen is BLANK.

2. When she gets to the house she find three rats in the breadbox. HOW did three rats find their way into a CLOSED bread box?

3. She starts removing covers from furniture in a house that has not been used in years - not a single speck of dust.

4. When you cut the head of a chicken, there's a TON of blood...

5. Constant makeup on the protagonist. Like, everyone goes to bed with lip gloss...

...

OK, the WORSE movie ever - or a good challenger to the throne
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worse Dreck Ever!!!
efix-227 April 2006
This has to be the stupidest, incoherent bunch of crap ever to waste 90 minutes of my life! Absolutely worthless! Obviously, Tom Sizemore was hired as a "name", which after his problems with Heidi Fleiss and drugs, he hardly is anymore. But, this drivel needed every chance it could get.

It's like the six, yes that's six, writers really couldn't agree on a plot, so they just kind of threw everything together.

Don't waste your time. Trust me, when it is over, you will be scratching your head saying, "What the f***?" If you want a really scary, atmospheric movie, just rent "The Ring" again! And as someone pointed out in the forums, this movie actually ripped off music from "The Ring" and "The Grudge" - Two completely superior movies.
25 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
it makes no sense!
shalaidah_rain25 April 2006
i rented this movie last night hoping for a scary movie, something that would keep me entertained, and maybe i have watched too many scary movies and have become desensitized but this movie was bordering on hilarious rather than hair-standing-on-end scary. and i just didn't get it, nothing tied in together. this movie just provided you with a bunch of shots about a girl hallucinating and then in the end didn't explain any of it, and then added another ending scene that just seemed pointless. sure maybe it is supposed to make you think, but it just seemed....like a bunch of loose ends that never tied together. definitely a waste of time. i said in the first 13 minutes that i hoped it was only an hour and a half film. if you want a really good suspense film i say watch the skeleton key.
24 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible!!!
darthimmortal7 April 2006
Avoid this tripe at all costs. After 20 minutes of stupid dream sequences and Gina Philips' boyfriend sneaking up behind her, Tom Sizemore suddenly shows up. He just happens to be living on this property too but she never tells the boyfriend about him when we see him next. Even the music is dumb with plenty of loud shocks and it shows up when something stupid frightens the Gina Philips.

The sex sequence is stupid too. I'm expecting something hot as Gina Philips shows up in a nightie but she never takes it off. They actually have sex with their clothes on!! Finally, I had enough and turned this off; I wasted enough time on it.

For better entertainment get a bucket of ice and watch it melt.
26 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
watch stupid movie, throw TV out window
CarlB196126 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I've watched my share of dumb horror movies. Everything from cheaply-produced crap like "Zombie Chronicles" to somewhat-decently-produced crap like "House of the Dead 2", and after each dismal viewing I come away with the foolish belief that the worst is behind me. And with every new trip to Blockbuster I am proved wrong.

"Ring Around the Rosie" tells the tale of "Karen", a successful young business woman who inherits her grandparents' summer cottage following the death of her grandmother.

She goes up with her dorky boyfriend to clean the place up to sell it... and that's when the terror starts. For me, that is.

Gina Philips, (who played an obnoxious college student in "Jeepers Creepers" tops that character here in terms of complete and utter obnoxiousness. Here she's a frigid, immature ----- who treats her boyfriend like crap and behaves like a 13-year-old girl (watch how she freaks out upon discovering rats in the breadbox). She's so unlikable it's hard to elicit any sympathy for her at all) Her mentally-unstable character starts having hallucinations/flashbacks/dreams about how she and her sister Wendy were sexually molested by their grandfather when they were young (it's not actually said right out, but it's suggested).

Enter Tom Sizemore as "Pierce", a creepy psychotic caretaker who becomes taken by Karen and her pointless sister "Wendy" and begins to stalks them in an increasingly suspenseful game of cat-and-mouse. In other words, it's Tom Sizemore as every other character he's ever played in a movie ever.

Things go increasingly downhill from there, with Karen going crazy, Pierce becoming more obsessed with her and Wendy, and Wendy basically just taking up space. All of this leading up to an ending that makes no sense and doesn't explain a darn thing.

Is it all a dream? A hallucination? Karen coming to terms with her past? Is Pierce supposed to be a subconscious manifestation of her abusive grandfather? I don't care and neither should you.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sucks
lagriff0516 June 2007
Boy, I must be unlucky. Two banal and pointless movies in one week (the other being the extremely bland "Shallow Ground", for reference). I don't think I've been this unfortunate in a long time. Anyway, this is the story of a woman, Karen, who moves back into her grandparents' home after her grandmother dies, following her last wish. She's going to clean up the house and then sell it and marry her boyfriend. But what happens when she starts reliving the horrors of her past every single night?

This seemed promising, like some kind of Amityville Horror or The Shining-type of film. It had the lead actress from Jeepers Creepers, which I thought was a good movie overall. So this one was a good pick for me, and I didn't bother reading reviews or anything. But ehh...it's just mediocre at best, if not flat out awful. The acting is...terrible...especially from Gina Phillips, who was nowhere near this horrible back in Jeepers Creepers. Maybe it's the awful script. She screams way too much and they go on for too long. The caretaker is meant to 'become increasingly more violent', but it's actually more like one moment he's nice and kind and the next moment he's a freak. Doesn't make much sense. By the end it's barely even a horror movie. I don't know what to call it, but this was one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

I did give it a point or two extra for making me think, because there is a really intriguing idea buried here if you look hard enough. The ending of the movie seemed trite and lame to me, until I thought about it, and realized exactly what the whole thing meant. All the hazy, distorted flashbacks, the missing pages in the kids' book, and Pierce's sexually violent nature...all of it leads up to something that I think I'll let you figure out yourself. This may be a terrible film, but I had to give it a point for making me think and realize the meaning behind some stuff here.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Movie diarrhea
bloomquist_218 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Originally, my roommates and I were seeking a horror and a comedy to rent this evening... looks like we got both with "Ring-Around-the-Rosie"... only without the horror!!!!! At the beginning of the film we thought the actress had to be on LSD, and then, before the conclusion we thought maybe it was us for selecting it!!! It was the most incoherent verbal and visual diarrhea we agree we have ever seen on screen. I can see now how her fears were revisited... nature does have a way with scary wind (which by the way never blew out the candles all along her dresser, but some how managed to scatter the photos in her hand and heave her out the open window). After watching the film we found to our "astonishment" that there were no deleted scenes, as they were obviously all used in the film. Those 30 second fillers... we don't know what we enjoyed more- the angry wind, her clinging to the baseball bat like it was a French baguette, or the consecutive flashes of shaking black boots. I don't know about the rest of you movie credits but there has to something scary about a horse standing and a barely sloping hill. We do recommend it though, for any group of people who need a good laugh and a rescue from the reality of real horror flicks. The ones you pay to see. Finally, to add to the comment of an earlier critic... we agree brother... "nope. wrong. all wrong."
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
boring and predictable
nfv2312 April 2007
these should be the words that best describe this film, although silliness and non sense have quite a strong presence here.

it's pointless to even attempt to describe the film's plot - there isn't a coherent one! the acting isn't all that bad, but one gets easily fed up with the never ending scenes that depict nothing at all and are simply confusing.

the scenes (painfully!) march slowly along towards an end that brings nothing new and unexpected to the genre. there are better films who manage to accomplish the effect this one tries (and fails!) to achieve, so i'd say there should be no reason for people to watch this film, unless they wish to decide for themselves just how poor can a film be.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very good movie....you actually have to WATCH it.
smokskren19 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Having read the other reviews I am surprised at the number of people who apparently didn't understand the fairly clear plot.

This is the story of Karen who has been charged with having to sell her grandparents house, in which she spent a lot of time as a child. Upon returning to the house she begins to have episodes which we (the audience) can't yet determine to be dreams or hallucinations or entire psychotic breaks. Through subtle and ingeniously creepy camera work they soon reveal to you that Karen was molested by her Grandfather as a child. That particular inference was, apparently, very difficult for a portion of the audience to determine. I thought it was very clear.

Once you begin to understand that you do have to THINK to comprehend this movie you begin to second guess yourself as to what is actually going on. I found this (and the cool camera work) to be part of what kept us 'unsettled' during the movie. You're never quite sure what's real and what is in Karen's mind.

Karen's sister, Wendy, unexpectedly shows up just as Pierce (Sizemore) is becoming a bit to close for comfort.

Scary stuff ensues and the movie ends with Karen coming to terms with the past her Grandfather put her through and we (the audience)'discover' that her horrid experience as an adult was all a function of her mind finally accepting the past. We thought it was fairly obvious that Sizemore was the manifestation of Karen's guilt for her inability to stop her sister's accident years ago. (we also think that may not have been an accident, but a suicide because Grandpa moved on to Wendy, but couldn't find anything to confirm our suspicions).

It has been years since I've enjoyed a horror movie that I hadn't figured out halfway through. It wasn't until just before the very end in Ring Around the Rosie that we did figure it out. It kept us interested and guessing and quite startled throughout the entire movie.

The fact that this was not your run-of-the-mill horror movie is confirmed for me, not only because I truly enjoyed it but because my boyfriend managed to watch the whole thing without falling asleep!! (That NEVER happens!)
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
jfc
edazl2 September 2006
this movie is a complete waste of money, time, and film-making effort you should only watch this movie if it is your LAST option

i'm not going to tell you how it ended, but i'll let you know that you WILL be disappointed and i'm going to say it right now: i'm sorry. i'm sorry for whatever this movie cost you and i wish you could have it back

this movie was below horrible it made no sense it had a horrible plot the actors were horrible basically, anything that could have gone wrong with this movie DID. if you are about to seriously contemplate watching this movie, please consider some of the following alternate options: 1. death 2. gouging your own eyes out so no one can make you watch this stupid movie 3. number 1 again

i hate this movie
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This movie is half baked.
meccamar24 October 2006
A movie has to be really bad for me to fail to see some redeeming quality in it. This is that movie. It has no redeeming qualities. None. The acting is bad. The story (or lack of same) is bad. There is no resolute ending. It is about a woman who must come to terms with a lifetime of night terrors and the cause of them. When her grandmother dies and leaves to her the house where she spent her summers as a little girl, the opportunity for her to deal with her nightmares presents itself. She goes to the house to stay until she can sell it. She transforms from successful business woman to disoriented, annoying screamer as soon as she enters the house. Apparently everything she sees, hears, feels, thinks is symbolic of a childhood trauma. Unfortunately, there is never a foundation developed to which one can relate the symbols. Nothing relates to anything. Nothing makes sense, except we know that she is terrified, maybe guilt ridden from some childhood experience(s). None of her actions are logical, even if you can manage to suspend disbelief, which for this movie is required to even sit through the whole thing. I'd like to see a finished version of this movie, because this version is obviously half baked.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Memories fueled by fear.
michaelRokeefe12 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Karin(Gina Philips)is an advertising exec that honors her dying grandmother's wish of returning to the crumbling estate on which she was raised until she was thirteen and prepare it for sale on the real estate market. She has bad memories from her past, but reluctantly goes to the rundown estate. Thinking she is alone, she realizes there is caretaker named Pierce(Tom Sizemore)living on the grounds. Pierce is not just a little creepy, he is cruel and dangerous. Karin's sister Wendy(Jenny Mollen)arrives to help put things at ease...but things begin to go horrifically wrong. The caretaker becomes a sadistic madman and near impossible to appease. Miss Philips is very easy to look at; Sizemore will make you shiver.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of the worst movies I have seen
nikolatosic19 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie reminds me of Ed Wood movies but it lacks the "charm".

Directing is very lazy. It seams like whenever there was a choice of doing something in a harder and better or easier and worst way director made a choice for the second.

The movie projects no energy and creates no interest - for me at least - seams like this aesthetic suits other people very well but I had to fast forward a lot of scenes and I actually skipped last 20mins to the end which was an even bigger disappointment: Another movie that ends with discovery that main character imagined everything.

I like this ending in Alice in Wonderland but it seams to be very trendy with thrillers and horrors lately and - for me - it ruins the whole thing and seams very easy and cheap way justify the story.

Sorry I am not very constructive but I cant say much more - it was a waste of money to rent this film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
1 star
luckyfoshizzle18 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
If it was possible to give this pathetic excuse of a movie absolutely no stars I would have. This movie definitely ranks up there with one of the absolute worst movies I have ever seen.

For one, it was extremely boring. For like 5 minutes every 20 minutes it'd seem like it was going to get interesting but nope it just went nowhere.

The acting was horrible. I, myself, seem like a golden globe winner compared to the acting in this movie.

Oh, and don't even get me started on the plot. The whole makes-no-sense plot was all suppose to lead to a "surprisingly good ending", but nope definitely did not. Once the ending was revealed I thought that they were at least going to explain why this girl dreamed the whole movie up, but nope. They didn't explain how her sister died.

To sum it all up, if you have a choice between this movie and any other movie on the face of planet, get the other movie. I wasted 3 bucks to rent this movie cause with the title "Ring Around the Rosie" I thought it was going to be about a bunch of creepy kids (which absolutely scares the hell out of me). The title didn't enough have anything to do with the movie. This movie was just the very definition of crap!
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Had Good Potential, But Turned Into a Confusing Mess.
drownsoda9021 April 2006
After seeing the trailer for this on a DVD, it looked like a pretty promising movie. I was led to believe it was a supernatural thriller, which it was... or at least I think it was.

"Ring Around the Rosie" is about a woman named Karen (played be Gina Phillips from "Jeepers Creepers") who goes to clean out her grandparent's secluded old summerhouse after her grandmother passes away. She spends the weekend there with her boyfriend, and he leaves to go back to work while she spends a few more days there to finish up packing. She has some strange visions and dreams about the house, and some odd occurrences take place. While staying there, she is introduced to the caretaker of the place, Pierce (played by Tom Sizemore), who seems nice enough, if not a little strange. Her sister Wendy shows up to help, and as time progresses, Pierce begins to become violent, threatening the girl's lives.

The main problem with this movie is that it can't decide whether or not it's a supernatural horror film or a dramatic thriller. Or maybe it is one of the two, but I just didn't pick up on it. I thought it was some sort of supernatural story for the first 45 minutes or so, and then it turned into a thriller from there. Then when the dream-like twist ending wrapped things up, it seemed to combine the supernatural and thriller elements together - leaving the viewer very, very confused. On the plus side, the acting was pretty good, and it had some good moments. But it doesn't make up for the tangled, confusing plot.

I still don't exactly know what happened, it makes no sense to me. If you watch this film, you will see how many questions are left unanswered, leaving the viewer with the attitude like "What in the hell was that!?". This movie could have been decent, but as it progressed, things got too confusing and it ruined the movie. Perhaps someone else may understand the plot better than I, but it just didn't work for me. 4/10.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't see it!
ridesupondragons9 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I never thought I would see a movie that trumped American Werewolf in London for stupidity, but I have, and this is certainly it.

You know how you're watching a movie and you're not really sure what's going on for the first few minutes? Well, thats what happened in this film, except it only makes sense five minutes before it ends. That is literally the only reason I finished watching this.

First of all, I don't care how hot the lead character is, she's an idiot. She's alone at a house with only this creepy grounds keeper and he's like "lets go for a walk in the forest by the cliff where no one can hear you scream" and she's all like "ok". She's an idiot. Seriously.

I watched this with my mom. She figured out early on *major spoiler* that the girl was raped by her grandfather when she went to the house each summer 17 years ago. ***end spoiler*** Now, you may have watched this movie and be wondering what I was talking about. Well, this is because they never ever mention that specifically. It's like they think they've left you enough clues to figure it out but they haven't.

Finally, the 'frightening' scene with the girl in the reflection. At first I thought this was very well done, but then I rewound it. If you watch closely, you actually she the girl duck down slowly. Yeah, real spooky.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
stupid flick
balamutt61314 October 2006
The plot is rather stupid and raw. A few questions arise after watching, and if it had been a good, solid horror film, it would hint, give a clue where to find the answers. But, unfortunately, it is not. I bought this film because of Tom Sizemore in a lead. I really love this guy! He is the most smashing dude I have ever seen, especially when he plays bad guys and freaky military men. But I this flick, hmmm... Tom! Were you really so short of cash to agree to "star" in this sh...! I was really disappointed by this movie! It turned to be worse than "Ticker"! Peope,if you really care for Mr. Sizemore, don't watch this film, he will be grateful!
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If you have the choice between eating lead paint and watching this movie...strongly consider the paint.
arricha4 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Dear Viewer,

This movie is quite possibly one of the worst movies in all existence. If you've ever seen Plan 9 From Outer Space or Slaughterhouse of the Rising Sun and enjoy those movies for their terrible acting, you'll probably still hate this movie. It's completely incoherent... I've never seen a movie with no plot, shoddy camera-work, AND bad acting (the three mainstays of horror) while being devoid of any attempt at some sort of final explanation or solution. It is without a doubt a complete waste of time. Many people exaggerate when they label something "a waste of time", but if you make the mistake of seeing this movie, be forewarned that something deep inside you will be sucked out...never to be replaced or validated by any means.

(Upcoming Spoiler) The only reason why I'm giving this movie two out of ten is because Jenny Mollen (Wendy) is really hot and you get to see her in a white tank top while it's raining. (End of Spoiler)
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
wouldn't wanna be in her shoes
thestarofme18 March 2006
this movie fits into those other thrillers where bad memories come back and bite you in the butt. This one is different though, it has Gina Phillps. she is an incredible actress and very believable. It's about Gina Phillips going to her grandparents summer home, to sell it. While she's there her recent dreams turn into nightmare. She meets the grounds keeper and he looks over her. She obviously gets the creeps from him, but that doesn't matter at that point.

When her sister surprisingly shows up, things take a turn for the worst. Pierce (grounds keeper) becomes more and more violent and develops personal and sexual feelings for the girls. Thats when the truth is revealed..

I thought this movie was really good because it was more believable then the rest of the films in that genre. It keeps you watching until the end. It wasn't amazing but you really do want to see how it ends
30 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
didn't find it all that good, I'm afraid
Hart070829 March 2006
Not very well acted (except perhaps by John Sizemore) and a story that just failed to grab me. After a while, Gina Philips haunted looks as she gets out of bed for the umpteenth time, really started to irritate me.

Also, if I suspect there's an intruder in the house, I wouldn't yell from upstairs: "Hello, is anybody there...?" as if that intruder would actually give an answer...

It's not the worst movie I've ever seen, but it's just one of those "thirteen in a dozen" films. If you've seen one, you've seen them all.

Goof: When Gina is holding a baseball bat with which to defend herself, she holds it upside down. In the next shot she suddenly holds it right side up.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worse Than Horrible - Avoid Like the Plague
JesterMalcolm19 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Where do you start with such a steaming pile of waste masquerading as a film? The scenario is as follows, some gal's grandmother dies and leaves here the family home. Tells her to "clean it up and sell it".

Through a series of plodding hallucinations and misadventures the audience is slowly lulled into a boredom-induced coma. By the end, you really don't care what happens. In fact, I wanted the protagonist to be murdered 20 minutes into the film. She is truly that annoying.

So, I'm watching this thing, praying for death (hers or mine)and NOTHING HAPPENS. There's a shot of here screaming and then a shot of a badly painted door, she opens the door to reveal... clothing.

5 minutes later; there's a shot of her screaming and then a shot of a badly painted door, she opens the door to reveal... clothing...

Shot of her screaming, a shot of a badly painted door, open the door, clothing.

I'd have rather spent the hour and a half I suffered through this snore-fest in a dentists chair. At least I'd have gotten some Novocaine.

At the end of the misery, there is a completely underwhelming "reveal" that means nothing in the context (or out of the context) of the film.

This travesty had five (5) writers credited at the end. It took five separate people to screw this thing up as badly as they did.

Based on the no-name talent, it looks like they spent all their money on Tom Sizemore and they wasted it there.

One good actor cannot save a huge floating turd such as this. Tom, while capable and talented was completely unbelievable in this role. He was not creepy, scary, disturbing or even mildly annoying. in What's really disturbing is that someone, somewhere thought this was a great idea and dumped huge amounts of money into it. What's wrong with these people? To sum up: Don't see it, don't even look at the DVD box. Just pass it by.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Only Scene That Was Good
timehri223 May 2006
The best scene in the whole pathetic and ridiculous movie was when Karen got beat up! She was so immature and such a whining sissy that I was happy when she got slammed around. I wanted it to happen almost as soon as she got to the place. She was so spoiled and childish she actually deserved it.She overreacted to everything and she also was a b-tch to her boyfriend.He should have dumped her.This movie really sucked. It has major holes throughout.There are so many unanswered questions. Anyone that has given this thing a good review probably is somehow connected to it and wants to help it save face. It's that bad! Don't waste your time. The cover looks good but don't be fooled.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed