Leprechaun 6: Back 2 Tha Hood (Video 2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
72 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Silly, but Funny in Some Moments
claudio_carvalho31 July 2008
The hairdresser Emily Woodrow (Tangi Miller) finds a fortune in golden coins and she shares the amount with her close friends. However, the owner is the evil Leprechaun (Warwick Davis) that returns from Hell to get his treasure back, killing each member of the greedy group.

"Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood" is silly, but funny in some moments. The problem is that the pothead and drug-dealer characters are non-likable and extremely ambitious, with the exception of Emily and Lisa; therefore the devilish Leprechaun becomes not as bad as he should be. The scene with the leg of the policeman is hilarious. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): "O Duende Perverso" ("The Wicked Leprechaun")
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Only hardcore fans may find merit in this film.
Crazyfarts3 June 2006
The evil Leprechaun is back to reclaim his gold but this time he's got to resist the temptation of... smoking a bong?!? Leprechaun meets the boyz in the hood and proves that he's got what it takes to be the baddest mofo around. Lep is back to the hood and up to no good... again.

I'm not an avid Leprechaun fan. In fact, I've never paid much attention to these movies until this year came around. I've seen Leprechaun 1, 2, 3 and now 6 (Back 2 Tha Hood) and I'd say that "Leprechaun: Back 2 Tha Hood" would have to be the best of the series. I had seen some parts of part 3 and about half of Leprechaun 4 a couple of years ago but I don't think I'd seen enough to pass judgment.

What attracts me to this film the most is that it's so different from the rest of the series. When I say this, I'm thinking of how Jason X was to the rest of the Jason movies. I mean, the Leprechaun isn't used to dealing with these smart-ass ghetto thugs. The jokes used in the movie aren't very original and are either hit or miss. You either like this kind of humor or just think that it's been done before and move on. For me, it was a guilty pleasure.

None of the characters in this movie are likable except for the Leprechaun, but if he wasn't likable, he wouldn't have gotten to this many sequels, would he? For the most part, I was happy to see these smart-asses get beaten up and impaled by bongs, stabbed with sharp objects and all harmful acts that happened during the movie. Some of the slow motion was well-placed and made the film evermore funny (i.e. Lep's eye incident) but for the most part, it didn't suit the movie all that well but didn't really harm it either..

The Leprechaun looked so much better in this film, he looks a lot creepier than he used to. Every time I'd see a Leprechaun film, I'd wonder if people actually got scared of him because he was always so comical with his appearance and annoying rhymes. Luckily, I only remember the Leprechaun blubbering out one rhyme in this movie which was a welcomed change, instead of rolling my eyes at another lame one-rhymer.

When it all comes down to it, this is an average horror film but a good addition to the Leprechaun series. If you're bored and want some horror fun, check out this film because you got about a 50/50 chance of splitting your sides in laughter like I did or just staring blankly at the screen. I say, give it a chance.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Finally some improvement
FilmFanInTheHouse28 June 2009
Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood

directed by

Steven Ayromlooi

After some very bad sequels, a Leprechaun film has been made which can happily conclude the Irish monster's saga. It might have a reference to the hood in the title, but hardly similar to the previous attempt. Here they have created a worthy sequel. There may still be the problems with some of the characters and their dialogue, as well as some obvious plot holes, but Lep 6 actually worked on building up the characters, as well as a back story for the Leprechaun. Speaking of Leprechaun, Davis also manages to finish of his Leprechaun story, with one of his best Lep performances.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not the best, but an improvement
Sean10221815 January 2004
Leprechaun Back 2 Tha Hood Written and Directed by: Steven Ayromlodi

Yep, everyone's favorite evil elf is back in the 6th installment in this classic horror series.

Parts 4 and 5 are universally viewed as two of the worst movies of all time (Despite them being two films I love, they are admittedly terrible) Steven Ayromlodi was still able to convince someone to give him the money to make a 6th movie.

This time the Lep comes back to the hood in search of his gold once again. This time it is discovered by some down and out friends in the ghetto. They spend their fortunes and have fun...until the little Irish monster shows up and starts killing off the people that took his gold.

Yeah, pretty cookie-cutter..but that's how the whole series is and you can't expect much more. But you gotta give director Ayromlodi credit for pulling out a couple of new turns, and making a solid entry into the series.

I still think 3 is my favorite of the series, but this is definitely an improvement on 4 and 5 in all aspects. Sure, the acting is a bit cheesy at times, and it lacks in the gore department and the kills are less creative, but overall I was satisfied with this movie, and can only hope for a 7th.

Definitely only for fans of the series though.

**/4
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lep in the Hood pt 2
kairingler15 June 2009
Well this one does pick up where the first one left off. this one is campy, very funny, got lots of wanna be gangsters,, the lep firing off guns,, lot's of funny moments,, for instance when the Leprechaun steals a cop car and he says,, aww hell,, he looks down realizes he can't reach the gas pedal,, and when he tries to get a date with one of the brother's friends,, he describes himself to the girl on the phone,, the she asks him for his height,, he says 3 ft. 6 , she hangs up..the storyline has to do with a fortune teller who tells the black youths not to give in to the wealth of all the gold that they find,, but of course these teens are dumb, stupid they don't listen, and get caught up in the Leprechauns' schemes once again,, this one i would say is more on the funny side,, not to be taken seriously by anyone really.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
He should have stayed outta Compton.
BA_Harrison10 February 2017
Hairdresser from tha hood Emily Woodrow (Tangi Miller) and her ghetto pals discover a chest full of gold coins and, ignoring a warning from a psychic woman to deny their newfound wealth, find themselves threatened by a malevolent leprechaun.

What has made the Leprechaun sequels bearable thus far is their blatant silliness and camp characters, with the focus on twisted humour rather than genuine horror. Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood plays everything a little too straight for its own good, with not nearly enough in the way of knowingly dumb nonsense: the death scenes are forgettable, and with some of the least likable protagonists of the whole franchise (drug smoking, gun toting thugs with few redeeming qualities), Back 2 tha Hood proves to be quite the painful experience.

The funniest scene in the whole sorry mess is when Leprechaun (Warwick Davis, returning for the paycheck) smokes a bong, but we already saw the little guy get stoned in the previous film (which handled the whole 'G' thang with a lot more fun).
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Decline In Quality Drops Further
Grojniar18 August 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This wasn't bad, but it was hard to get into. The opening with the book was cool and I'd love to buy an actual copy of it, but aside from that this didn't have much to talk about for me. I will say that since Leprechaun in Space, I've been finding the Leprechaun easier to side with. Like, he doesn't really hurt anyone until his gold is stolen which I can't blame him for. Overall he's just applying justice where it's needed. The writing was okay but there was definitely something missing, I'm just not sure what. The atmosphere, once again, matched every scene the way I'd imagine they wanted it to.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Yeah, it's stupid, but I was looking for a good laugh
Smells_Like_Cheese9 August 2006
I know that the Leprechaun is a lame villain, but I like him. He's funny and actually somewhat scary, you have to admit that he's scarier than Chucky. While this has the most racial stereotypes, it's still a very funny movie to watch. You have got to admit that it was hilarious when the leprechaun picks up Watson's phone and starts to have a little "chat" with his girlfriend. I know it was cheesy and predictable, but this was still good for laughs. Also, I think this was the bloodiest Leprechaun movie out of the 6, so a little gore is cool for horror fans. So, for a good laugh and just a fun time with the Leprechaun, give it a chance.

5/10
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unfortunately, this movie ain't worth looking under the hood for, my ninja. It has no gold standard.
ironhorse_iv18 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The string of bad luck continues as the sixth film in the Leprechaun series & the last one to feature Warwick Davis felt like another tiresome rethread. The plot is mostly the same generic outline where the titular antagonist Lubgan (Warwick Davis) goes around killing people to reclaim his gold. Despite that it's a little less cringe worthy then the horny walking talking symbol of St. Patrick trying to bone somebody concept from 1994 movie 'Leprechaun 4' and 1997's flick 'Leprechaun 4: In Space'. I take this over that any day. Still the movie written and directed by Steven Ayromlooi doesn't add much of anything unique to stealing the pot concept. It sucks because 1995's film 'Leprechaun 3' & 2000 movie 'Leprechaun in the Hood' at least try to give new life to the franchise by introducing new urban locations and McGuffins such as the gold medallion that turn the walking talking symbol of St. Patrick Day into stone. Yet this movie abandoned that along with the talent given flute. For a flick that was billed as a sequel. It kinda of a sham there is no mention of those items nor the characters. Nevertheless, the movie should had been a prequel as it fit with the franchise's confusing timeline; regardless of this picture's billing number and under title. Yet again it might have been better if the same highly gimmicky settling was not undertaken at all even if this film used the hood location much better. Everything about this felt tiresome. To tell you the truth I kinda wish Lionsgate studio and the producers of this film went with their original choice of having the movie take place on a vacation island during Spring Break with Eartha Kitt as the fortune teller. Leprechaun's fairytale powers versus voodoo spells would had been more interesting and creative than we got here. Sadly, Lubgan barely use any of his unique magic besides that scene. Don't get me wrong he does jump around from place to place and use his healing factor. Yet the kills from him are not really that special. Most of the them are pretty standards with other cheaply below average badly made slasher films. The bloodless chokeholds and offscreen deaths to save money on effects like the jaw ripping moment was truly a letdown. Once in a while, the audience might be treated with a cheesy fake looking homage to the Friday the 13th movies with a visual heart or leg being rip out gore effect. However, the repetitive shots of the Leprechaun doing the gut stab really get annoying as the film goes on. The action scenes are disappointing unbalance as the Irish gnome's power level is all over the place. He has the power to rip body parts although struggles with a very thin woman on top of him. It's surreal that one four leaf clover could stop Lubgan in the first flick. Yet in this movie hollow point bullets full of them are powerfulness against him. While, the animation prologue in the beginning was well made, the film doesn't stick to the lore that the previous films and themselves established. How to kill the Leprechaun was all mess up. To add onto that, nothing against Warwick Davis's acting, but his performance here is weakest in the franchise. His character didn't have much cool rhythm or clever funny one-liners. Most of the dialogue is repetitive broken record whinny. The filmmakers pretty much wasted his talent here. Despite that the makeup effects for the creature were still top notch. Plus, the new wardrobe for Lubgan look pretty awesome with the gothic demonic style. As for the human characters; most of the victims were unlikeable one dimensional near offensive stereotypes not worth seeing. All of the silly street jargon and slangs were hard to listen to. Yet witnessing them die was somewhat of a joy. Kinda wish they add the forced unfunny comedy relief Jamie Davis (Page Kennedy) and horrible boyfriend material Rory Jackson (Laz Alonso) to the mix. If anything, I wouldn't mind the whole idea of Emily Woodrow (Tangi Miller) being the final girl. I would rather see her run off by herself in the sunset off to college rather than the horrible motorcycle riding with her abusive lover that we got. Hate that her schooling subplot dreams went nowhere. To add onto that, the terrible music that doesn't fit the mood of what is happening on scene. It's so jarring much in the same way Jamie is out of jailtime without any explaining. I hate that Steven Ayromlooi over exposition certain moments of the film like where the creature came from, yet leave other plot holes a mystery. It's bad writing. To make it worst, all the horrible editing makes the film really hard to figure out what is a flashback, dream or present. The comic page lift wipes effect that went along with most of the end of the cuts made it more confusing. Are we in a story within the story!? Who knows! Overall: These movies always struck me as a poor's man parody of the horror genre rather than a serious attempt at being a legit comedic horror film. They hardly laughable. If anything, they make me feel green around the gills. I think I'm going to toss this movie like a hot potato in the trash. After all, Lep in the Hood, come to do no good. That's true indeed.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Breathe of Fresh Air
mattressman_pdl31 May 2004
IMO this may well be the best in the series. Most movies attempt to integrate humor and horror and end up a calamity while this one blends them very well. The film features Warwick Davis as the malevolent Leprechaun who stalks a group of friends from the inner city after stealing his gold. The actors do exemplorary jobs and there is enough blood and laughs to make it quite enjoyable. It is certainly a breathe of fresh air when put along the likes of Leprechaun 3 and 4. This Film also features Sticky Fingaz and Tangi Miller. Hesitance toward giving this film a chance is quite normal, but believe me it's worth it. Once in a while you find a straight-to-video gem, this is one of those times. If your a fan of Leprechaun, Check it out!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Leprechaun, again, in the hood, again
Horrorible_Horror_Films19 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Wow. OK, African-Americans in the united states have invented or contributed to some of the most creative and profound art in the history of mankind (Jazz for example). But why on earth would anyone, of any color for that manner, want to be involved in an incredibly steaming pile of crap like this? I think the producers of Leprechaun ran out of ideas (not that were many great ideas rolling out of these masterminds to begin with), and decided to tap into a different market than just stupid white people from the suburbs watching bad movies like this. There are a few entertaingly bad scenes, like at the party, especially when mr. Leprechaun is on screen, but when he's not I suggest you hit your self in the head with a hammer for awhile, as that would actually be more enjoyable than watching this crap.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Superb Leprechaun movie
savoie_marc18 January 2004
This is a great movie! It has some very funny scenes and is one of the best Leprechaun movies out there. The Leprechaun seems much more evil in this one and no longer rhymes but he is still the reason to watch the movie. The deaths, although without the usual amount of gore, are still quite good. This movie will most probably spawn another sequel which will have to live up to this ones expectations. If you want a great Horror/Comedy you have to look no further this installment in the Leprechaun franchise will not disappoint!
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a good leprechaun flick
jlwqqqq26 September 2006
more bloody than the rating, it is a weird story not like the other ones the, leprechaun 2 is the best, i like the grisly images in that movie, but this one focuses on the gold, but not just that its s lot of killing too and the leprechaun can take more than just a blow, he takes stabs , gunshots, hits ,kicks, etc. it is unrealistic story but what do u expect? fun horror movie Rated R for Strong Violence/Gore, Language, Drug use, and brief sexuality have fun watching it but do not expect too much, if u like this kind of bad horror movies i recommend leprechaun 2, its the best out of the pot of gore leprechuan series, i also recomned fear of clowns, thats a good one too
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Leprechaun Back 2 tha Hood: Not exactly going out in style
Platypuschow4 December 2017
Leprechaun In Tha Hood (2000) was arguably the worst of the Leprechaun movies (Except the remake) so another one had me fearing the worst.

This was also the last official Leprechaun movie, the last one to feature Warwick Davis and it's hardly a fitting end for the little fella.

It tells the story of a group who find the Leprecauns gold and become stalked by him. Pretty formulaic stuff, but the main difference here is how dark is.

The Leprechaun movies are comedy horrors and aren't to be taken seriously, with over the top death scenes and regular quips they are supposed to be silly fun. This has minimal comedy, Leprechaun doesn't quip and the deaths are far from comedic. That was a really strange decision by it's creators and in this guys opinion and a really really stupid one.

If you enjoyed Leprechaun In Tha Hood you might enjoy this but as a final entry to the series this was somewhat undeserving.

The Good:

Has its moments

The Bad:

The lack of comedy hurts the film

I struggled to care about anyone

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

No Leprechauns were harmed in the making of this motion picture. The Leprechauns featured in this production were handled with care and concern for their safety and well-being
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oh, but he's back!
jaywolfenstien17 March 2004
`. . . he's the man behind the mask!' Oh wait, that's the song from F13pt6. Nevermind.

Here we are on another visit to the land of horror, where the monsters never die and no two sequels explain the title character the same way, but this is a given for anyone remotely familiar with franchise horror. No, you don't get a cookie for guessing that other than the title character and on-screen references, this film has no narrative connection to its predecessors.

In reviewing Leprechaun 5, I expressed my overall disappointment, but stated that `Leprechaun still has enough moments to get my rental at least for one more film.' Well, the Lep's second trip to the hood is far more entertaining than the first. The humor is fresher, more precisely delivered, with plenty of little nudges at the Leprechaun's height which I found the funniest – especially coming from Warwick, himself, with quite a bit of enthusiasm so it's all in good humor. Okay, that and an ancient creature discovering our technology and customs is interesting (and not painfully done as in the first ‘Hood' Leprechaun movie).

The script/characters are more intelligent than some previous films (don't get your hopes up; it's not saying much) . . . overall it's one of the more entertaining Leprechaun sequels (again, that's not saying much.)

I dunno ‘bout other fans of the series, but Warwick Davis is my interest in the Leprechaun films and anything else that isn't hideous is a bonus. Other than typical complaints and shortcomings that all horror sequels showcase, I didn't have much to gripe about . . . so the sixth Lep outing satisfied my expectations.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The only honest review!!
Marynewcomb201311 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Thought the last movie in this series was bad, this goes worse & more stupid!! You actually find yourself pulling for the little Lep to whip the cast out!! Here are some of the problems with this, the cussing is completely uncalled for!! You don't hear this kind of cussing in the first few movies combined!! The pot again!! It's not funny to see an evil leprechaun high, it just shows the lack of imagination of any kind from the writers!! The cops being bad cops!! That's been old for 20 years now!! Putting wax on the cartridges!! They would jam in the gun right off!! Changing the clothes of the leprechaun was silly!! The "magic" lady was the stupid icing on the cake!! Has to be one of the worst ending ever!!! Don't watch this garbage!! I wish I could forget this and the one before it!!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Better than the last for what it's worth
rivertam264 March 2020
This is more of what I wanted from the last installment. Its still not a good movie but I like the way it combines the leprechaun folk lore with the urban setting. The characters are also decently developed and so is their reasoning for taking the gold. In the end it's still basically the same movie we've seen countless times before at this point. But the small differences do make a difference. I do wish it would have been a bit more focused and not so messy but it's still pretty decent.

2.5/5
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dead man's chest leprechaun style
TheLittleSongbird22 November 2018
It took me some time to get round to watching the 'Leprechaun' franchise, with so much going on in my vocal and operatic studies course and personal life and having a long watch and review list. Saw the films mainly for curiosity to see whether they would be guilty pleasures or deserving of their dubious reputation. Also have an appreciation for horror, and ones with splashes of comedy, and had gotten into watching a few horror franchises that had interested me for a long time.

The first 'Leprechaun', while understanding why people would find it a guilty pleasure, didn't do it for me. The second and third films was a marginal improvement but just as flawed with the same flaws, while the fourth and fifth films were very weak. Saw the sequels as a franchise completest (just in case why anybody is wondering why if the first film didn't it for me why the rest of the films were watched too). While it was still not a good film 'Leprechaun: Back 2 the Hood' for me is one of the best sequels and one of the best of the series, better than the previous two films by far.

Davis is the best thing about 'Leprechaun: Back 2 the Hood'n as with the previous films. He is both amusing and grotesquely creepy, doing the best he can, successfully, with an again goofy look, some terrible lines (though actually they are better than the ones he is given in the previous film) and less than tasteful horror which must have been hard to do and shows how conscientious and talented he is.

There are sporadically mildly amusing moments that don't come anywhere near enough. The second half does have entertaining moments and with a bigger budget than most of the sequels the film looks less cheap with a more expansive location and slicker photography, while still not being exactly high art because the effects are weak.

On the other hand, the rest of the cast is very poor, with insufferably bland leads and an assortment of irritating supporting roles. The characters display very little personality when they aren't being insufferably annoying with their dumb antics and illogical decision making.

'Leprechaun: Back 2 the Hood' is still lacking in the story and script, like all the previous films. The dialogue is repetitive and childish, very little of it is amusing let alone funny, and the humour and whimsicality are forced. Having gratuitous gore was not enough to cover up for the complete lack of scares and suspense, nothing bit my nails, nothing made my heart pound or skip, nothing made my palms or forehead sweat, nothing made me jump. It's not just because it is so intelligence insultingly dumb, excessively predictable and unintentionally comical, but the story, while picking up a little in the second half, is very thin with a very dull first half. The kills are neither creative or scary, a few distasteful, and the direction is pretty leaden.

Summarising, mediocre but still manages to be one of the best of the series. 4/10 Bethany Cox
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What's Up Ninjas?
EndlessUniverse19 March 2019
The last Leprechaun film to star Warwick Davis, Back 2 tha Hood is both the worst and best film in the series.

The story follows 4 inner city youths who discover a chest full of gold, only for its owner, the titular Leprechaun, to hunt them down to retrieve it. It's the basic Leprechaun story that anyone familiar with the series knows by heart already.

What makes this film different from the rest is the complete lack of quality on nearly every level. Other films in the series were at least mediocre on the technical side. Here, the shoddy craftsmanship is so noticeable, you'd think it was made by a first time director/writer with absolutely no budget (which may not be too far from the truth).

There's horrible editing with reused shots in the same scene, terrible direction with shots messed up on the day of filming that were later remedied with horrible cgi, and dialogue so bad that it comes across as the writer having seen Boyz in the Hood once and writing a screenplay based on what little he remembered from that film. Hell, even the characters are one note and complete stereotypes.

The one bright spot is the cast, that while held back by the material, come off as genuine and seem like decent actors overall. Warwick Davis is of course the standout of the group, delivering his lines with the same energy and humor he's known and loved for. The actor has always been a constant positive in these shoddy sequels.

That said, for as bad as the film is, it's incredibly entertaining on a so-bad-it's-good level. You have scenes with the Leprechaun getting high, getting shot up by a group of gangbangers, and reapeatedly getting hit by moving cars that generate the right amount of laughs. They're obvious gags but still funny.

Most of the other sequels in the series were bad films as well, but they tended to drag on top of that (namely 3 and 4). Back 2 tha Hood is thankfully short by comparison and keeps a brisk pace, allowing the humor to be more consistent.

It's a terrible film overall but one that knows that and simply tries to give you a few laughs along the way. For the sixth film in a series, you could do worse. I personally had fun.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Stupid again
ericstevenson14 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Well, I'm going to say that this was the worst movie I've seen for Direct To Video Month. I skipped the previous one where he went to the hood first, but I don't care in the slightest. This movie features people in the ghetto finding the leprechaun's gold and he horribly kills them one by one. What makes this movie so stupid is that nothing in it makes any sense. We get a lot of scenes in the beginning that just focus on the human characters and it's all pointless. It's said that the leprechaun's weaknesses are his gold and four leaf clovers. They do in fact use a four leaf clover against him and nothing happens.

Well, he gets shot by them but the bullets float out of his body like little yellow orbs. What? At one scene near the end, the leprechaun's gold is thrown into a furnace which should kill him, but for some reason it doesn't? We see the leprechaun melt and then he's back to normal. His gold should have been destroyed, but it's okay too. The leprechaun's chest of gold has this new ability. Whenever it's emptied, it magically refills. Why than, is the leprechaun afraid when people throw the gold coins out? It can just replenish them.

I couldn't understand anything in this dumb movie. The leprechaun gives off more gory deaths including a police officer whose leg is ripped off and he doesn't even notice it at first. He also literally rips a girl's upper jaw off. Nice, huh? I admit it did kind of make me laugh with how stupid it was, particularly with how the leprechaun was shot over and over and never died. There's this psychic who tries fighting the leprechaun even though she knows she can't. I understood nothing and didn't want to. *
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This is more like it!
FiendishDramaturgy15 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Finally, there is a good Leprechaun movie out there. Back 2 tha Hood is much superior to the entire rest of the line, combined. The kills are convincing, the Leprechaun makeup is much better, the camp is all but gone, and it almost... almost...acts like a real horror attempt.

I don't know about anyone else, but I watch these movies for Warwick Davis. He's the man! And while this was a much better finished product, there just was not enough of the man in this movie. Perhaps he was busy with Harry Potter 2. But at any rate, he didn't get enough screen time to suit me.

At least it seems like someone is trying a little harder with these movies. Since this was straight to video, I have no idea what the budget was; whether it increased or decreased, but it appears to have improved. At least, the execution has.

I'm tentatively anticipating a 7th installment. I rate it higher than most critics simply because this time, they tried.

It rates a 5.8/10 from...

the Fiend :.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sadly the last entry to star Warwick Davis in the title role but not a good one.
Fella_shibby5 November 2019
Saw this for the first time few months back while on a marathon of the series. The film is once again set in the hip hop area but nowhere connected with the earlier one. Here we get to see the origins of leprechauns in animation. In the present day we see a priest gets hold of the gold while managing to send off the leprechaun back to the hell pit before succumbing to his injuries. His intention of building a youth centre gets sidelined due to his untimely death. One year later few friends enjoying a barbecue at an abandoned youth centre discovers the leprechaun's gold and they use it to fulfill their fantasies unaware that none can enjoy the leprechaun's gold. Jokes n nudity is missing but it has some gore but nothing memorable. Stabbing by a bong, jaw gets removed, stabbing by a flashlight, a heart gets ripped off but the best is the ripping off the entire leg of a karate kicker. This time our leprechaun does get a beating, he gets kicked, he gets mowed down by a bike n later by a car, his eyeball gets removed, he gets shot by a shot gun, automatic machine guns n a pistol, he is punched, fried n concretised in a pool of cement.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A true work of art
carolinagirl33726 August 2018
The fact that this movie had 5 that came before it should tell you that all these films are a piece of cinematic art. I found all of the dialogue enlightening and deep. The way the director told the story was truly delightful. I suggest every person watch this film.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Much better than the last one.
toysoldier_johnnybanks30 December 2003
I know Leprechaun In The Hood wasn't all that great. Leprechaun Back 2 tha Hood was actually an improvement. It was very low budget, and it showed all through the movie, but that definately doesn't mean anything. The story was pretty decent, and the acting was quite good for what it was. Overall its a step in the right direction, Leprechaun 7 would be a good idea if the series continues to improve. 7 out of 10.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Why...Why...Why ?!
jeffreyhillen-364-9453816 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Why ?! I can ask it too many times to the film studios but why did even make a 6th one ? And also one who is almost a copy of the previous one. I would have understand that decision if the 5th one was a success, but it was terrible. And this one was, if possible, more terrible than the last one.

What can you further about the last part of this terrible franchise. The storyline was again a huge fail. The leprechaun has a few moment and is defeated again so easily, they can blow him of the roof without having any difficulties with killing it.

The acting was to laugh about as well so I rate this film 1/10
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed