"Dead of Night" Return Flight (TV Episode 1972) Poster

(TV Series)

(1972)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A decent watch, just a little hum drum.
Sleepin_Dragon14 August 2018
After the superb opening episode, The Exorcism, Return Flight is a little bit of a let down in comparison.

I must admit, I was delighted to see the name of Peter Barkworth here, a wonderful actor, who's work I still love to this day, a great voice, with a unique style of delivery, he's very good here. As a concept I think it's great, a brilliant, imaginative storyline, one that could certainly be used to form the basis for a film in present day.

The issue I have here, is not with the acting, or the concept, but with the delivery, it lacks any sort of build up, or any real big moments, until the rather excellent conclusion that is. Not enough is made of the ghostliness of the tale, too much of the mundane. I found myself getting a little bored towards the middle. The Exorcism set the bar so high, this is a little hum drum in comparison.

It's still very good viewing, and once again, it makes me sad to think that there are missing episodes from this series out there somewhere. 7/10
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disappointing ending
ebeckstr-124 March 2019
Of the three currently available episodes of this show, this is the only one that left me feeling frustrated. The episode is well-written and well-acted, but when the end credits rolled I found myself wondering what the point was. We spend 50 minutes watching a story unfold in a style similar to one of the more sedate but entertaining hour-long Twilight Zone episodes, and then whole thing ends suddenly and anticlimactically. You can see shades of the thematic density and character development present in the other two episodes available from the series, but this one never quite brings it home, and ends on too much of an ellipsis...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not particularly creepy, but well-written, well-acted and well-made
dr_clarke_218 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The second episode of Dead of Night - and one of only three that still survives in the archives - is written by Robert Holmes, arguably classic Doctor Who's greatest scriptwriter. Like the other episodes, it's a ghost story of sorts, but it proves to markedly different from the preceding episode.

'Return Flight' sees aeroplane pilot Captain Hamish Rolph under investigation after his plane almost collides with another; the problem is that the other craft didn't show up on radar and nobody else saw it. With Rolph having undergone a recent bereavement and nearing the end of his career, investigator Samuels wonders if the plane was merely a figment of Rolph's tormented imagination, but as the episode unfolds it becomes apparent that he's actually being haunted by the spectre of a wartime Lancaster bomber.

If there is a problem with 'Return Flight', it is that it unlike 'The Exorcism' it isn't particularly creepy. It is, however, very well written, as anyone familiar with Holmes' work might expect. His knack for characterisation is in evidence, with Rolph proving very sympathetic and entirely believable, and his friendship with Frank Warley feeling very realistic. One nice touch is the fact the death of Rolph's wife has caused Rolph to reflect on the fact that he was her second husband, the first having been a wartime fling, which leads the viewer to wonder if he has imagined the Lancaster as a result. Another nice touch is the fact that Samuels is not only far more human and sympathetic than he could have been, but more so than dramatic conventions might lead one to expect.

The great Peter Barkworth stars as pilot Captain Hamish Rolph and gives the sort of totally naturalistic, convincing performance that was typical of his career, whilst Artro Morris and Bernard Brown give strong support as Samuels and Frank. Denis Lill also impresses as Rolph's increasing nervous co-pilot Froggat. And whilst 'Return Flight' doesn't chill like 'The Exorcism' did, it carries real horror in the ending, as the ghosts that haunt Rolph inevitably result in tragedy.

Rodney Bennett's direction is polished and it helps that the aeroplane sets - especially the cockpit - are pretty impressive. The close-ups of Barkworth's sweaty face near the end as Rolph hears the crew of the Lancaster are particularly effective. Anyone expecting a spine-tingling episode of Dead of Night in the mould of the opening episode will find 'Return Flight' disappointing, but anyone wanting a well-written, well-acted and well-made slice of vintage supernatural drama won't be left wanting.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The least essential episode of Dead of Night
Red-Barracuda31 July 2016
'Return Flight' is one of only three episodes from the TV series Dead of Night to survive the infamous archive purges the BBC carried out in the 1970's. A highly unfortunate state of affairs, as this was a very worthwhile series on the strength of the episodes that survive. In fairness, however, 'Return Flight' is easily the weakest of those that remain, the other two, 'The Exorcism' and 'A Woman Sobbing', both being well acted, atmospheric, clever and involving. This instalment on the other hand is not very well thought out and the writing is a bit muddled and lacking. Like the others in the series it focuses on a troubled individual who is haunted. In this case he is a commercial pilot who is haunted by a dead World War 2 pilot. His real life insecurities and psychological problems become intertwined with the ghostly goings on, so much so that others wonder if he is simply ill. By the end though, it's clear that some supernatural force is at work.

While this episode does have some atmosphere and the setting aboard an aircraft is a good one, it's just a little too uneventful for its own good. The acting performances are all perfectly good but the script and execution are what let it down. There is certainly the basis for a much better story here if it had been rethought out a little better. Still, despite being the least interesting surviving instalment of Dead of Night, this is still a decent enough watch and it does at least further indicate that this was a commendably serious-minded horror anthology series.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
slow and not uplifting
pilot100930 July 2021
Basically trite and no real explanasion of why this guy has the issues he does.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dull of Night
zeppo-212 July 2009
Well,it's not quite as bad as my fellow reviewer makes out,I've seen much, much worse stuff but it is pretty dull. Nothing really happens and the supposed shock ending is just tagged on and doesn't make a lot of sense. Peter Barkworth does his best with what he has to work with and turns in a decent performance which the script doesn't actually deserve. The other actors just make up the cast list and try to push the story to it's sorry conclusion. There's a good plot trying desperately to escape from this dinner party ghost story but it never manages it. Perhaps with better writing,this tale of a man haunted by a dead WW2 pilot might have been far better. A lot of programme tapes were wiped by the BBC to be used again and some are sadly missed. In this case the other episodes in this series won't be missed at all.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed