User Reviews

Once again, PBS does it again. This time showing Watergate in 20/20 hindsight, reminding those who still care on how corrupt the Nixon Whitehouse really was. Even though I knew most of the story this documentary doesn't disappoint, it simply filled in all the gaps. Once again, excellent narration by Will Lyman along with historical footage, both still and video. The most stirring video highlight is watching Erlichman sweat under Congressional testimony, even today he looks like such a despicable villain. Bill Bradley of the Washington Post says it best "The Watergate story had this town by the throat!". This documentary is for anyone interested in how the whole scandal unfolded. Watch how all these strange characters with shocking access to the powers of the president (to include Nixon of course) describe their role in the cover-up. Finally, PBS uncovers a secret at the end (Sorry, not who Deepthroat was/is) that is almost anti-climatical but interesting nonetheless. I give this doc a FIVE STAR rating! PS: John Dean, if you're out there. I believe your statement at the end of this documentary is wrong but you know more than me.

In the 1976 feature film, "All the President's Men", based on the book by reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, Robert Redford (as Woodward) says to undercover informant "Deep Throat" (Hal Holbrook), "All we've got are pieces. We can't seem to figure out what the puzzle is supposed to look like." To which Holbrook replies with the infamous line "Follow the money." I have been fascinated with Watergate for going on 25 years. I had read several books on the subject and seen other documentaries and movies. But even after 30 years prior to this film, the exact picture of the Nixon administration scandal was never quite complete in my mind. "Watergate Plus 30" fills in all the missing pieces and offers just about as clear a picture of one of the strangest episodes in American political theatre.

What fills in much of the gaps are the interviews with surviving members of the Nixon administration who were solicited for this project. John Dean, Jeb McGruder, Alexander Butterfield, Hugh Sloan, and Bud Krogh, all members of the Nixon White House who were involved in the cover-up, disclose the mind of Richard Nixon in terms of the Watergate scandal. And they affirm what Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward had been imparting all along: that the actual Watergate Break-in was only the tip of the iceberg of a huge mosaic of criminal and immoral activity against people Richard Nixon had named as "political enemies".

The documentary discloses not just the how, which is widely known, but the why of Richard Nixon's fanatical obsession with political enemies. As one interviewee points out, there is a significant difference between an opponent and an enemy. Nixon, however, believed they were one and the same. If someone disagreed with Nixon's policies and the means to voice that opinion on a large scale was available to that individual, such as a leader of the anti-war movement, or a political leader of the opposing party, they became an enemy of the administration in Nixon's mind. And these individuals were put on a list to be targeted, sometimes with violent intentions. The president's condoning and encouraging criminal acts against political opponents was his downfall, and this documentary, through the voices of those that worked with him and his two top aids, H.R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman.

In a very ironic twist, the documentary shows the poignant speech given to his staff before his departure from the White House by helicopter. He advises his staff that hating people that hate you leads to destruction. I think Nixon honestly believed, prior to Watergate, that he was hated by political opponents, despite having won a sweeping victory in 1972. Prior to the scandal, many people probably hated many of his policies but probably did not hate him as a person. He earned their hate when the scandal became subject to public scrutiny.

A couple of months after his resignation, a former aid visits him. Nixon asks him if he should plead guilty. The former aid inquires if the former president feels guilty. The response was no. Nixon still did not understand, maybe to his grave, that what he did was wrong. This documentary explains to the best of its ability why Nixon lost his presidency, and why his loss of power was justifiable. There is only a hint as to whether present and future administrations will learn the lessons of Watergate. Or, has the public learned the lessons of Watergate, and will they learn not to tolerate unethical and criminal acts by the person who holds the highest elected office of the United States.

Although I was only a 4 years old when the Watergate hearings were held, I can still remember how "that show" was "always" on TV at my house, and can even recollect when Nixon was on TV announcing that he was resigning; but of course, I had no understanding of anything going on. Through 12 years of private school and 4 years of college, taking both required and elective classes in US History, I was taught nothing of Watergate. In retrospect, i realize now that none of those classes even touched on the Korean War, let alone any events in the 1960s, 1970s, or more recent; it seemed that we always ran out of time. I include my backstory only to emphasize how much I learned from this documentary - the events that transpired, how those involved behaved both before and during the hearings, how the President's paranoia destroyed his presidency in spite of his foreign successes in the USSR and in China, etc. - and in many cases, was able to hear how the 30 years between the acts that took place and the interviews for this documentary afforded the participants the opportunity to reflect on their behavior and the ramifications of that behavior, for themselves, for the president, and for the country. I've watched it several times to try to see all of the details, and I heartily recommend it to others.