Lust for Dracula (Video 2004) Poster

(2004 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Lesbian porn and vampires...what could go wrong? Apparently, everything!
The_Void10 January 2007
This is my third film from Seduction Cinema (the other two, coincidentally also directed by Tony Marsiglia), and it's by far the worst. For some reason, the director has attempted to mix mysterious Gothic horror with soft-core lesbian action and the result is truly ridiculous. A lot of the film doesn't make sense, and what does make sense is often hard to decipher because it's all damn boring! If it wasn't for the fact that the film stars the oddly compelling Misty Mundae, I doubt I ever would have seen...it is, therefore, unfortunate that she stars in it. The plot line isn't important; but it has something to do with a bunch of lesbian vampires, one of which is called Countess Dracula. There are some nods to Bram Stoker's classic tale - including character names and a few lines of dialogue, but none of it is clever and it's clear that this is just a lame excuse to film some porn. I'm sure Bram Stoker wouldn't have approved! Aside from Mundae, the film stars some other Seduction Cinema 'luminaries' such as Julian Wells, Andrea Davis and Darian Caine, who is definitely the worst 'Dracula' ever...but on the plus side, she is pretty damn hot! Overall, I really can't recommend this film. There are better vampire films out there, better lesbian porn films out there; and better vampire-lesbian porn films out there. Don't bother!
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poor Editing and Muddied Concept
tabuno15 January 2019
3 February 2015. While this apparently sexy Dracula porn horror movie had promise, this movie is way too uneven and lost it ways trying to be too clever and photogenic forgetting the consistency of the nature of sexy seductive vampire movies. The story is close to incomprehensible. The erotica of the vampire myth is ignored as used as an excuse for presenting supposedly interesting and appealing sex scenes. While music is mostly sensual, the actual sex scenes are too high quality and missing the erotic nature of the vampire and seductive appeal of this genre. The results is a sometimes pretty but boring and unwatchable movie for the most part.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Little Bat Bat - What are you on?
Dr. Gore1 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*

Well, it finally happened. The filmmakers finally snapped after filming too many lesbian sex scenes.

Oh my. What have we here? Couldn't do one more sex version of Dracula eh? Couldn't bear it? "Lust for Dracula" is, to put it mildly, screwed up. It's trying to be some sort of surreal, dreamlike flick. When I saw Julian Wells trying to have sex with Misty Mundae like a man, I knew the movie was out of control. Dracula comes to visit Misty who's upset she can't have a child. After that, the movie flies off into the filmmakers mad dreams. Little Bat Bat is way too comfortably numb.

When will they learn? As far as sex movies go, it's all been done before. There is not a position you can come up with that hasn't been filmed before. The only thing that changes are the girls who sigh and moan. So to make up for the monotony of sex scenes, (at least in the filmmakers mind), we are treated to such scenes as Misty reading a bedtime story to a potato. I submit to you that this is not a good trade off. Instead of a bedtime story, how about a bedtime orgy?

Well, the good news is that the sex scenes are pretty good. Misty and Dracula go at it near the pool and two other girls roll around near a beachfront cemetery. Julian Wells has to be the man of the group and is denied a lot of the action. In these movies, it's always ladies night.

So there are a few decent sex scenes hiding amongst the dreamlike ramblings. It may be worth a look. Besides, isn't it better to see one more lesbian vampire flick even if it is insane?
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Reason Never to Rent a Movie by the picture on the box
pup32j3 May 2005
OH Gawd! The WORST! Lame everything...so boring and brainless it reminded me of how easy it might be to give an adolescent filmmaker an 8mm camera and a 500 dollar budget. I rented this one because I liked the box cover...MISTAKE? Perhaps... Every expectation I had for a watchable horror flick was not met, it was murdered in cold blood. It seemed as if the script, if you want to call it that, was ad-libbed and the acting was so forced, it was like watching a high school production of 'The Music Man' (only with lesbians on Xanax). I see the director has made other things. For his sake, he'd better keep hiring the same "box designer" and make his name in the credits really, really small.

I firmly believe that this might be the worst movie I have ever seen.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
When Dracula meets lesbian porn...
Boba_Fett113825 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
To say it kindly; this movie was absolutely terrible.

The story is impossible to follow because nothing in it makes really sense. It makes this movie a very annoying one to watch. The movie is just a lame excuse to shoot some lesbian porn sequence's. And what was with the ending? Was it supposed to be a surprise ending? Anyway I didn't understood one thing about this movie, including the ultra-odd ending.

Darian Caine is the most boring Dracula in movie history. It made me mad that they let her say classic Dracula lines, like; Listen to them, children of the night, what music they make! Her delivery of those lines is so absolutely horrible, she says it like a..well, porn actress. And why was Jonathan Harker played by a female? It was plain odd and the scene in which Mina finds out that Johnathan is in fact a lady is hilarious! And Van Helsing (also a female character in this movie) shares the bed with Dracula? I don't think so...

OK, the cinematography and the directing really ain't that bad and the music is also pretty good, although the main theme is ripped off from Wojciech Kilar's "Dracula" from 1992. This movie is style over substance you may say, only problem is that the style doesn't compensate for the substance.

Yep, it bites...

1/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Holy Vampsturbation!
stevebowtie24 February 2005
Didn't understand a bit of it - but with babes like that who cares? I used to think that being a vampire meant living in a damp cellar and flying around at night biting people. Oy Vay - did I pick de wrong vampire!! Apparently these girls have anorexia, which means they spend hardly any time feasting and what sucking they do is on each other's clitorises. When they ain't pleasuring each other they're doing it to themselves - with fingers, not lips - they're vampires, not contortionists. In fact it's a good job vampires can fly because these girls must be so sore that walking would be out of the question. If you miss the first few minutes you could be forgiven for thinking that you'd tuned into the porno channel - but keep watching and you'll be drawn into a suffocating dreamworld by the superb quality of the direction, the soundtrack and the filming (almost said "shooting" but there's only one man in the film and he's dead before he can rise to the occasion. So no hairy arses pumping up and down - excellent). The acting is retrained and creates a nightmarish atmosphere that is compelling. I couldn't stop watching, but then I'm a guy. Misty Mundae, mmmmm ..... tastier than Ice Cream Sundae .
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Visually, the best Seduction Cinema movie ever made
B-MovieDork16 June 2005
Plotwise, on the other hand, I will have to get back to you on that as soon as I figure it out for myself. I finally got around to watching this, and while I wasn't disappointed, I was left with one of those "What in the hell did I just sit through?" feelings. At first, when Misty Mundae rambles on to some baby crib about being trapped and alone, I thought she was just REALLY bad at acting her role, but then it's revealed that her character is just fruit-loopin' crazy. Darian Caine and Julian Wells play men (?!), although they have fairly large breasts and perfectly shaved "southern regions". Julian Wells even goes as far as to bang Misty from behind....interesting. The plot, like I said, is too choppy and confusing. But Tony Marsiglia is by far the best director Seduction Cinema has got working for them. His films are really twisted and very darkly erotic. The award for the best actress in this film is actually a tie between Andrea Davis (who is great at portraying b*tch characters) and Casey Jones (who physically fits the part of teenage goth-popper turned emotionally drained vampire to a tee). The sex scenes in the unrated version go on forever and a day, even more so than a lot of Seduction films. So if you're not used to the lesbian sex quota that must be met in every single one of their films, you're much better off with the R-rated version (not a drop of blood is cut out, its all sex). This is a welcome addition to my E.I./Alternative Cinema collection, and I am waiting patiently for Tony Marsiglia's new film, "Chantal", which looks to be pretty darn good as well.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A strange, but sexy and compelling soft-core lesbian vampire outing
Woodyanders16 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Forlorn young Mina (an endearingly loopy turn by the ever-adorable Misty Mundae) is stuck in an unhappy marriage with stolid and controlling pharmaceutical tycoon Jonathan Harker (a fine portrayal by the lovely Julian Wells). Mina encounters Dracula (exquisitely embodied by the gorgeous Darian Caine) when she longs most for a child and falls under Dracula's wickedly alluring spell. Writer/director Tony Marsiglia brings a peculiarly arresting dreamy'n'heady style to the offbeat premise and does an expert job of carefully crafting a deliriously erotic atmosphere. Of course, we also get oodles of tasty bare female skin and loads of smoking hot girl-on-girl action, with a steamy and tender poolside love scene between Mina and Dracula rating as the definite sensuous and arousing highlight. Moreover, Marsiglia's "try it, do it" experimental avant-garde approach gives this movie a truly inspired sense of all-out pervasive weirdness: Caine and Wells both play their characters as men (Wells even does a from behind sex scene with Mundae!), Mundae's wacky little bat bat monologue is simply jaw-dropping, and towards the end there's without a doubt one of the freakiest attempted rapes to ever grace celluloid. The cast of yummy babes keeps things sultry and watchable throughout: Besides the mighty troika of Mundae, Wells, and Caine (and how can one really go wrong with these three?), there's the foxy Shelly Jones as the lusty and willful Abigal Van Helsing, the delicious Andrea Davis as the predatory bloodsucker Sarah, and cute Casey Jones as enticing and vulnerable teenager Beth. Dang Lenawae's sumptuous cinematography gives the picture a stunningly opulent look. Don Mike's moody score alternates between wonky ambient noise and smooth jazz. An intriguing oddity.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You will not win my soul!
lastliberal18 March 2009
Since I didn't make it to SXSW, I missed the international debut of Lesbian Vampire Killers, so I have be satisfied with this film.

Little vampire and lots of lesbian action; some even say porn. There is even something for those who get off on schoolgirls with plaid skirts and white blouses.

Don't try to make any sense out of this film, especially Misty Mundae's "little bat-bat" soliloquy. Her sister Jonathan (Julian Wells) had just done a job on her. Of course, Dracula (Darian Caine) shows up at midnight to do a really good job on her.

All this film needed was a nun to make it fully exploitive.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed