Bones (TV Series 2005–2017) Poster

(2005–2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
325 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Decent Show That Ran Its Course.
henryshear26 August 2018
I started watching Bones when it had just finished its 9th season, so I had a lot of catching up to do. I had just finished watching Freaks and Geeks and I had really liked John Francis Daley, so he was the reason I decided to watch the show. He does not appear as Lance Sweets until Season 3, but he is amazing as always. I started to watch the show because of him, but I fell in love with other characters in the process. I loved how Booth, the FBI agent, made fun of all the anthropologists and how Brennan would always tell her colleagues not to presume or hypothesize anything and just go based off the evidence. Each of the characters have their own quirks that typical people would most certainly not have. That is something I absolutely loved about the show. I love how characters change over time too. Emily Deschanel who plays Brennan goes from being a cold, rational anthropologist to being warm, sometimes kind and sympathetic friend to others. Bones has about 8-9 amazing seasons, but after that it tails off. I watched halfway through season 10 before I decided to stop. The show was not bad by all means, but I was just bored with it by that point.

On a happier note, I loved the show!!! The writing is very witty and smart, it uses modern day real world events in the murder cases and talks about taboo topics in our society. I recommend this show for anyone that likes crime procedural tv shows, I loved it for a very long time and it was with a very sad heart that I decided to stop. This show is highly recommended!
20 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Classic "comfort TV"
DerrNovot10 July 2022
"Bones" is exactly the kind of show that you binge when you're home sick or the weather is bad outside, or maybe when you're cleaning the house. It's familiar, not too challenging mentally or emotionally, and the leads are really great together. They're the kind of people you don't mind having in your house, lol.

Are the cases mindblowing? No, but that's not what I want from network TV or procedurals. I want things I can watch and enjoy without hurting my head and that I can at least figure out every now and then before the show tells me. On this front, "Bones" is really top notch.
28 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I really enjoyed the first three and a half seasons before things went downhill.
malenapontrich23 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoyed the first three and a half seasons before things went downhill. After the episode containing Max's trial (season 3 episode 13), things weren't as good. Brennan's actions and the outcome of the trial completely ruined the show for me and while I did continue to watch it my view was changed for the remainder of the show. I also absolutely did not agree with Angela's actions in that same episode. Pretty much my entire opinion of the show was wrecked in one single episode. Needless to say I was not happy but continued to view the series. There were also some inconsistencies. The man in the beginning who was an archaeologist (I can't remember his name) was said to be on a trip away but never returned after Cam was hired. Also Booth told stories involving himself and multiple girls under bleachers in high school but in an episode involving a star basketball player says the last time he was under bleachers was in the eighth grade. Despite these, I did like the premise of the series and found it mostly enjoyable.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good blend of character relationship, plot, and occasional humor in horrific situations
blondesis2u20 September 2005
David Boreanaz and Emily Deschanel start well with better than two-dimensional characters in a fresh look at a CSI type show. Based on the real-life work of forensic anthropologist and novelist Kathy Reichs, it's fun, kicky, and only occasionally too gruesome to look at. Not quite like one of Ms. Reichs' novels, it is still a pleasure for a fan (me!) to watch. Boreanaz' past work on Buffy and Angel stands in good stead here as he delivers lines that stand up to a strong female role without diminishing it. Also like Buffy, humor lends grace to embarrassing social situations that highlight common human vulnerabilities. Surrounding the 2 major players are other characters who add to the thrust of a character driven show. The writers do good work giving each character unique attributes that have nothing to do with hair color or body measurements. The entire cast does a good job presenting real, quirky individuals who don't have to rely on looks to sell the worth of their character to the viewers. That alone is something new for any CSI show. Still some rough edges in writing and delivery (Tempe's "I wish this was the worst I have seen" was painful for all the wrong reasons),"Bones" has great potential.
170 out of 221 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
you fall in love with the characters
jidosha29 October 2013
If you're looking for a fun filled crime solving show, then this is the show to watch. This is not your average crime investigation show. Bones lets you inside to what happens during forensics and criminal investigation, but also introduces you to the lives of the crew behind it.

The characters all have different personalities. They all struggle to work in the same space to solve crimes and still be able to make it fun to watch. The chemistry between these characters open up you interest and you enjoy following them. Despite the seriousness that goes about their work, it still delivers you a laugh at every corner. Gives credit to good writing, acting and directing. Of course at times it also touches your sentiment by adding some intense drama between the crime story lines and also drama within the characters themselves.

Majority of the characters are intelligent scientists so it is common to hear science terms and jargon that may confuse the average viewer at times. They do however tend to give effort in to explaining them enjoyably through witty writing and character delivery.

I've been a fan of the show since its conception and I have to say it's been a fun journey. It's one of my favorite shows and I am happy where it has gone. I have to admit it has its weak moments. Some crimes grow nonchalant and predictable. The character developments also grow to a dead end at times. I am also bittersweet about how they write off characters and bring new ones in to keep the show interesting and set a different vibe. For a show running this long it's understandable they could tend to decline in writing.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
TV Entertainment of the Highest Kind
bsmillios1 June 2006
Here is a show that is refreshingly real, from characters to plots, while intellectually stimulating, and willing to tickle our funny bone.

Dr. Temperance 'Bones' Brennan (Emily Deschanel) is a smart, focused, professional woman whose sensitivities are not so far from the surface that she is hard, or hardened by avoiding them, nor so close to the surface that she is weak, or weakened by them. She is serious, candid and forthright. Her ability to "handle" herself stems from confidence and experience, not tragedy or pathology as is so often the case in TV-land female characters.

Special Agent Seeley Booth (David Boreanaz) could be a hardened, tough guy, stereotypical character. He is not. While we are reminded regularly of his past as a military sniper, the sensitivity he brings to his duties as an FBI agent redeem his past actions, as is his hope. Make no mistake, he is a fierce patriot and proud FBI man, yet his character's motives and motivation are clear and noble. They are never fanatically righteous or overbearingly macho.

These two characters are wonderfully balanced with each other: their approach to life, to their work, to the pursuit of this week's mystery. Their relationship rings true. Through agreements, disagreements and the sense of humor it takes to weather both, Deschanel and Boreanaz always deliver the wry portrayal these two staunchly serious, but genuinely human characters deserve. Each character's work is expertly accomplished and equally important to the solutions they unravel together. As audience, we enjoy their working together. Temperance Brennan and Seeley Booth are a great team - as are Emily Deschanel and David Boreanaz.

With these two very real 21st Century individuals, and stories that skillfully incorporate forensic anthropology, both as it is used in the discipline of anthropology to understand the most ancient of artifacts, and as it is used in the most modern criminal labs, the foundation is strong for TV entertainment of the highest kind. But, it isn't only the charisma of the two main characters or their portrayers that keeps the show real, believable, compelling. Dr. Brennan's support team at the lab are a fine crew (Michaela Conlin as Angela Montenegro - forensic artist and friend to Dr. Brennan, Eric Millegan as Zack Addy - genius, geeky, naively lovable forensic anthropologist in-training, T.J. Thyne as Dr. Jack Hodgins - soil, bug and all-things-creepy expert, and Jonathan Adams as Dr. Daniel Goodman - administrator/anthropologist and the lab crew's boss). Each has an expertise that is technically viable and each is well portrayed by the actors cast. It all adds up to a TV show you can't wait to see again next week!
145 out of 210 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
So good that you are going to feel it in the bones
danielagerch16 August 2006
I love this show. I have to say, the pilot is not that good but keep on watching the episodes and I can assure you, you are gonna love it.

The character are really amazing and you can see them dealing with real life and their own "world of bones" at the same time. Zach is one of those character I don't really have much to say. Angie is really nice and at the same time I can't stand how she always seems to connect with the cases they are working on. To emotional. Hodgins has his own view of life and really wants to stay away from his family, so he spends most of the time at work... just like all the characters. Booth and Bones have an amazing chemistry together and exact opposites, but at the same time they are the same. Both of them, you can say, uses their work as a way to "fix" their personals issues.

About the cases, it's amazing how they always seem to solve them in the most amazing and clever ways, LOVE IT.

You have to see it.
125 out of 187 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This show is brilliant
angelscots19829 May 2006
I am a massive fan of David Boreanaz so obviously i started watching this show for him alone, but to my delight this is turning out to be one of the most well-rounded show there has been on television in years. Despite what people might have thought of David Boreanaz's acting abilities, by starring in Bones he has proved that he is a well rounded actor whom can take any role and make it his own. The rest of the cast has been perfectly selected to bounce of David and make the show the best there can be. Also i am impressed with how Emily has turned out as an actor, in the first few episodes i thought she was a bit of a hollow actress, kind of carboardy, but i have since been proved very wrong and feel bad for terrible of how quick i judged her. I can only hope than this show continues to be made for a least another couple of years so we fans can find out as much as there is to know about our beloved characters. P.S To Fox Please please do not be as cruel as the bigwigs at the WB and cancel this show at the prime of it's run as it would be a dying shame and also doing this would grossly reduce your viewers. Thanks Danielle
85 out of 128 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Silly but entertaining...
s32761692 December 2014
I like Bones in spite of the silly and often inaccurate pretensions this criminal investigation drama is built upon.

Bones is a low EQ high IQ forensic anthropologist who solves murder mysteries using the assumed power of science. The reality of forensics however is nowhere near as analytic as this show would have you believe. Its an imprecise art more than a science and as such its prone to error.

The other limitation, with Bones, is it is inclined to be a bit corny and clinched, at times. This is exacerbated by the shows tendency to make rather shallow, moral judgments, that, like the shows forensics, simply don't stand up too well to scrutiny.

Casting these shortcomings aside what makes Bones work for me is the interplay between the main characters. The cast of actors work well together and compliment one another.The relationships that develop between them also give this show a sense of family that is familiar and at times charming. Bones lack of emotional intelligence leads to some genuinely funny moments too.

The episodic stories are innovative with enough interesting plot twists and turns to keep the viewers attention. Definitely worth a hour or so of your time (just not over dinner as some of the forensic scenes can be a bit graphic).
23 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
AMAZING
emilybowdidge17 January 2018
Amazing Television. Some people have said Emily Dechanel's Acting is Wooden and bad. Temperance Brennan is supposed to be wooden and as sweets states,she over rationalises things,meaning she doesn't understand 'life' like Booth/everyone else does. So she is supposed to be wooden and as seasons progess,she gets better as Booth teaches her.And I think Emily Has done this very Well. David Boreanaz's Acting is changed drastically from Angel,its much better! I love this show and the psychological aspect of relationships,especially between booth and Brennan. 4:47
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Major problem in later seasons
damc-0804911 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Main problem in the later seasons is the inconsistencies in the writing of Brennan. The story they are supposedly "telling" on screen doesn't match the character they are showing on screen. They have regressed this poor character to the point that she's almost become a caricature of her former self. Her speech pattern has become so terse and stiff that's it's hard not to see the character as one dimensional even though the script is telling us she has evolved and faced many changes over the years. It's inexplicable how stiff the mannerisms have become and how mechanical and one note the dialogue has become for her. It doesn't make sense for Brennan to be so stiff with people she has worked with for YEARS. She has gone through many tragedies and triumphs with Angela, Hodgins, Cam, Wendell etc. I can understand her being stern with a "new" intern but why would she be so detached and stilted around people she supposedly loves and has worked with for YEARS. She seemed to have MORE of a comfort level with them years ago than she does now! I miss the brilliant Brennan of earlier seasons who was arrogant and socially inept yes, but also SPUNKY and full of life. She had a zest for life and had a zest for Booth. Now she has no zest and has been reduced to mostly nothing but repetitive scenes of mechanical dialogue with interns and sprouting off meaningless scientific facts in a detached monotone voice. They throw in a few "mommy" scenes here and there and I guess that makes them think that they are making her seem to have more depth. Um...No. Just No. She still has chemistry with Booth (thankfully) but they get little screen time together and virtually no intimate scenes (another problem that's also very unfortunate). I don't understand the writer's difficultly in writing for her especially when they have done such a WONDERFUL job writing for Cam and Angela over the years. Both woman have evolved beautifully but yet still kept the core of their characters intact. They are not written as over exaggerated caricatures! Wish the writers would start showing the same respect for Brennan.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Bones"
dee.reid25 October 2009
"Bones" is a great show, one with fine acting and interesting oddball characters. It's one of those detective-forensic shows that are all the rage nowadays, but you know what, it's all good fun. Based on the real-life experiences of a real forensic expert Kathy Reichs, Dr. Temperance "Bones" Brennan (Emily Deschanel) is the star of the show, the preeminent medical expert at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, D.C. A bit socially unskilled but every bit dedicated to her work, she and her team of equally socially unskilled oddball co-workers work together to solve murders where many times all they have are "bones" to go on. On the justice side of it, is Special Agent Seeley Booth (David Boreanaz, of "Angel") of the F.B.I., who often teams up with Brennan to go after the bad guys. This is a fun show, one of those shows that you can watch over and over again and not have to really think about it too much. It's just pure entertainment; what more could you want?
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Started off decent, went down hill in a hurry
ashleynallen-430137 September 2017
Where to begin...

When I first started watching this, back in 2010 I believe, it was a decent show. Nothing amazing, nothing to get all hyped up and excited over, but a solidly decent show.

Which, hey... with TV shows being what they have been for the past fifteen years? That's respectable.

The biggest flaws the early seasons had was the technology; everything could be figured out, with amazing, Star Trek-esque technology. Every crime could be solved this way, no matter what.

But the characters were lovable; they were funny, and yeah, maybe a bit cliché, but they had some great points to them, with just enough seriousness and angst thrown in to keep you hooked.

And obviously, Brennan+Booth was a huge thing; everybody was waiting, waiting, waiting for them to get together. To reveal that they truly loved each other, and were meant to be together forever and ever.

Then the producers did it. Brennan and Booth became Brennan/Booth. And the show went downhill fast after that. Everything changed, from the characters themselves, to the settings, to the feel of the show in general. I stopped watching a few months after that, as it literally lost all interest to me. Not that I hated it... I just couldn't care enough to watch it anymore.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Overstayed
mcgrew18 June 2019
When this show started, it was a cut above other procedurals, in large part because it was different procedures. The characters were interesting, the puzzles fun. But they ran into the same problem all episodics have - they run short of puzzles. So they move on to soap opera. Everybody gets kidnapped at least once, for no reason a character becomes traitorous, stunt-casting, and of course romance. And if you like a soap opera with worms (literally), you'll keep watching.

But the thing that brought us in receded into the background, and fairly quickly. Are they in love? Will minor characters get married? Hey, isn't that a guy from that band? Who cares? I didn't.
35 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is a GREAT show!
perkapita19 February 2006
The dialogue is sharp, the acting is spot on; the characters are fun and well defined and each episode is worth watching. I mean nobody cheats! Emily Deshawhatever doesn't make her character more "appealing" (more "cute")- thus, making her more appealing!; her being so out of touch with the modern world is so well acted it's believable; and her best friend is hot because she's a perfect foil being so IN the modern world. I'm conflating all of these ideas because i want to cram in every reason why this is one of the 5 best shows on T.V. It is funny and smart and charming and if it is cancelled for some dumb ass executive reason I swear to God I will boycott...uh...whatever network it's on. Fox? Crap. Cause it's got one of the other 5: The Shield. But I will. This is a great show.
147 out of 217 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great show and great chemistry!
ShelbyTMItchell30 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This show is really good and that it is really going to grown Dr Temperance Brennan played wonderfully by Emily Deschenal is great as the doctor scientist who tries to study bones in order to find out how the person got murdered. David Boranaz, after years of playing the straight man in Angel, gets to play the comic relief in Agent Steely Booth who makes Brennan the rear of his jokes. But the two find each other annoying as well as attractive to each other. As he must tag along as a liaison to her and she to him. Wonderful witty acting as well as great writing makes the show a must see! It can hold its own from Prison Break!
18 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent cast - good stories - until series 7.....
harveyvilla16 January 2019
......which frankly started to put me in mind of a Mothercare advert. Too much goop about babies... Not at all what I was expecting having read most of Kathy Reichs' work, but enjoyable and well served by an excellent supporting cast, notably TJ Thyne and Michaela Conlin. Even the terminally irritating characters of Sweets and Daisy became less annoying with time. It's unusual to see a programme in which there are no main characters you can't connect with. In this case they are all easy to like sympathetic characters....even the interns. Good job fellas.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I love it
braga-marco6 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I love this TV series: it mixes drama, comedy, mystery, love story. I have seen a lot of time lot of episodes but they have never bored me even if i know all the scenes. The description of their method in order to find the killer and the precision of the scientific words are very interesting. I must be very careful in order to understand them.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Funny, witty. And at times gruesome
good_bi_cpl26 June 2022
This show is so good we watch every year when other shows are on hiatus.

It has it all funny, chilling and excitement. I think our favourite episodes are goremigon and Polant episodes. The safest episodes was when sweets dies. He was a great addition too the show.

Fab showq.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
So much wasted potential....hoping for a turnaround
rosepetals-207778 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I'll always have a soft spot for this one. I'll always think of it as the show that had the most potential out of all of the shows I've ever watched. But that potential was never reached, in fact that writers didn't even seem interested in reaching it, throwing away golden story opportunities time and time again. Years of buildup in the Booth/Brennan story was rewarded with no pay off when the writers wrote the culmination of their six year story off screen and didn't let the viewers see a single scene of their coming to terms with their feelings. My enthusiasm dampened immensely after that and although I loved seeing Booth/Brennan as an expectant couple after the time jump I never quite got over the disappointment of not getting to see something so huge and integral to their story. Quite a letdown and the series went from must see TV for me to being relegated to DVR viewing. Still loved the Booth/Brennan dynamic though but subsequent seasons proved to be a mix of highs and lows. They did have an awesome wedding episode and many episodes did still contain the trademark humor I adore. I also liked the intensity of the Pelant arc and love how they excel at special episodes like the "old fashioned catch a thief movie" and the recent documentary episode. But there were also many fails...a constant influx of rotating interns, many of whom never resonated with me the way earlier more fleshed out characters like Zach or Sweets did. Just rotating interns in every episode taking up space, talking incessantly and leaving less time to develop interesting plots/crimes of the week and less time for exploration of the Booth/Brennan dynamic. The show's downfall was definitely the emphasis on revolving interns over more substantial types of mysteries/plots and personal stories for the team. I've missed seeing Booth/Brennan solve crimes together...they were the heart of the show and a fantastic duo. I am hoping since the writers know season 12 is their last they will do away with the rotating intern theme and just let Booth/Brennan solve some crimes together and have some fun. I always liked the episodes where they went undercover and also the episodes that had a lot of suspense.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Top show
Starbuck8233 May 2009
First of all, give this show a few episodes. You need to get to know its characters, because they make the show.

I reckon Bones does the whole forensics better than CSI. I think its mainly because the characters work well together, where as CSI, the characters are a bit sterile and don't steer away from their given stereo type. Plus, CSI always seemed to have these random minute forensic details that can only be found by the lead man, and lo and behold, he solves the crime. In Bones, the forensic and the investigation parts are put together really well, and you feel like that everyone had a hand in actually solving the case.

The whole Booth/Bones relationship is done very well. When you put a male/female partnership, the dynamics can be tricky. I think they have got it right, with slow building their relationship through out the seasons. I'm glad they have been given the seasons to expand the relationships not only between Bones/Booth, but all the characters. The show also does good job of providing subtle humour without slapping you in the face with the obvious. Hard to do, but it is well done.

All in all, this is a top show. Give it a go!
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Chemistry and Science
silversurf427 August 2006
Sick of sitcoms I went looking for intelligent television and found it in Bones. Yeah, some of the science is unrealistic and happens at light speed comparative to real life forensic analysis, but it's science -- and it's sexy. The characters are quirky and not canned, they compliment each other well and there's plenty of friction. I'll keep watching cause it's interesting and not badly written. Booth and Brennan keep us watching to see what she'll let him get away with because we all know she like him more than she lets on.

I wish actual crime labs, forensics and morgues had these beautiful labs and stunning people that show up in television, then this dumb cop would be surrounded by hot people in amazing clothes, but until then there's television :)
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved it
jhnsmm26 June 2018
Amazing show! Still watch over on Netflix! Wish it was still on. The characters are amazing!! Hope they come back to do a TV movie a couple years down the road!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fascinating title character and great early seasons, but weakening as the character conforms
kira02bit12 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"Bones" is the nickname given to Dr. Temperance Brennan, a forensic anthropologist with the fictitious Jeffersonian Institute, and inspired by real-life writer Kathy Reichs. Brennan is a best selling author, a tough scrapper, a dedicated scientist who does not compromise in the search for truth, an unapologetic atheist, and an apparent sufferer of Asberger's syndrome in that she cannot stop her sharp tongue from saying exactly what she thinks. Each week she is given a set of bones of a murder victim to analyze and with her FBI partner (and later lover/husband) Booth, figures out the cause of death and ultimately the culprit. She is aided in her endeavors by a gang of lab rats including the free-wheeling artist Angela, Angela's conspiracy theory boyfriend/husband Jack, their boss Cam and a rotating door of supporting interns, lawyers and psychologists.

Bones started off nearly ten years ago and has been a steady performer for Fox ever since. While much credit must go to some of the fascinating crime story lines and the associated science, a lion's share should go to the refreshing lead character and Emily Deschanel, the actress who plays her with such straight-forward no-bull delivery. David Boreanaz is a likable counterpoint as her more conventional FBI partner. And regulars Michaela Conlin, Tamara Taylor and T.J. Thyne deserve much credit for creating a spirit of camaraderie among the supporting players.

This is not to say that all of the show is great. In the early days, the weak link in the cast was an intern named Zach, played by Eric Millegan. Millegan did his best, but Zach was obviously supposed to be a junior Bones and his flat line readings became annoying. Even worse, the socially awkward Zach become an example of a character that could only exist in the mind of writer and it was impossible to see him functioning in real society. Mercifully, it seemed even the shows insiders realized this and rather surprisingly wrote Zach out. The far more appealing psychologist Dr. Sweets (played by John Francis Daley) was added, and a rotating roster of interns were brought in to pick up the slack. Also added on a semi-regular basis is the acerbic attorney (the priceless Patricia Belcher). The rotating interns are more hits than misses - Michael Grant Terry's likable Wendell, Carla Gallo's adorably nutty Daisy, Ryan Cartwright's babbling Brit. I have not warmed though to either Brian Klugman's obnoxious know-it-all or Luke Kleintank's simpering aw-shucks rube.

However, in recent seasons the show seems to have lost its footing on several fronts. It has not ever done sentimentality well, and episodes that require an overdose of sentiment are usually badly written misfires. A 9/11 commemorative episode from last year with the male interns giving badly written, flatly delivered endless pageants to the camera was near unendurable. I am all for a 9/11 commemorative, but did it need to be this bad? I have no problem with the creators getting Brennan and Booth together, but did they really need to be this conventional? Another episode ham-handedly included an unrelated subplot about Booth helping children with a disease, which included the cast apparently reading brochures directly to the camera in an attempt to "inform" us. And any episode where the show tries to integrate schmaltzy supernatural elements is a disaster.

Additionally, I have never seen a serious show work so hard to undermine its leading character. It started a few years ago with an episode where Booth is trapped on a ship with a "ghost". The episode barely saved face by the later revelation that Booth had a head injury. A later episode had the team commissioned to investigate what turned out to be the JFK assassination. When Brennan positively proves that it could not have gone down like the government said, she fudges her findings because it may upset Booth. No real scientist would do such a thing - and they would be fired not congratulated by their boss for this move. It had Brennan seem like a hypocritical sell-out and Booth seem like a weak man-child who cannot cope when something challenges his outlook. Subsequent bad episodes have featured a ghost haunting the lab, Cyndi Lauper as a "genuine" psychic (Lauper is actually pretty good but could they not find a better role?), and Brennan having a conversation with her dead mother. Is this a show about science set in a lab or is it Miss Cleo's hotline (or a church)? Even worse, nearly every other episode features Brennan having to subvert her views in order to prop up Booth and make him feel better...huh?! Whereas Brennan used to stand her ground on religious issues, she now blinks and submits lest Booth have a boo-boo. I am waiting for that "very special" episode where Brennan finds Jesus. The writers truly seem to be robbing her of the spirit, tenacity and off-beat views that made her interesting in some misguided attempts to have her conform to the norm - which is exactly what she should not be doing.

This can still be a wonderful show when it sticks to form, but less effort to undermine its lead would be a welcome step in the right direction.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
At least 5 seasons too long
dinalt1016 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The show was never 100% original, in that odd partners and detective shows are a penny on television.

But it was generally enjoyable, although to be honest the episodes are very similar to one another - can't escape that, in that it's identify cause of death and catch the bad guy/gal every week.

But it should have ended when Bones and Booth became a couple. And given the stretched out will they/won't they story, that was more or less rushed through in a few minutes.

Once together, it became more about babies and family discussions. Not exactly a crime series, and it felt out of place and frankly boring.

The visit to the UK killed it for me more than anything. Stereotyped to high hell, and there's no way you'd get a vintage mini car from a hire firm either (other than those renting classic cars). Cringeworthy television at its worst.

If it had stuck to 5 seasons, I'd have rated it higher. However, Season 6 onward killed it for me.

A shame that shows like this carry on (and on and on and on), yet other shows get cancelled halfway through their first run.
38 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed