This film to most people can be a bunch of colorful fluff with a few grains of thought. That is until the object or place strikes the head of the viewer. Then the film must be re-watched with the view that other observers see and feel what you just thought was fluff.
However, it could have been presented better. Is it just a place or an object that invokes a feeling or is there something real about the place itself?
Maybe it is because I live in America, However, I all of a sudden woke to the purpose of this film when they showed the Star-Spangled Banner over the Capital. However, in that segment, there was someone there to explain what we feel and why. Most of the rest of the film was background noise.
I cannot believe they missed Watts Towers. I grew up nearby.
To get an idea look for - "Watts Towers of Simon Rodia: Architecture" (1957) Simon Rodia's Nuestra Pueblo Los Angeles Watts District Landmark.
However, it could have been presented better. Is it just a place or an object that invokes a feeling or is there something real about the place itself?
Maybe it is because I live in America, However, I all of a sudden woke to the purpose of this film when they showed the Star-Spangled Banner over the Capital. However, in that segment, there was someone there to explain what we feel and why. Most of the rest of the film was background noise.
I cannot believe they missed Watts Towers. I grew up nearby.
To get an idea look for - "Watts Towers of Simon Rodia: Architecture" (1957) Simon Rodia's Nuestra Pueblo Los Angeles Watts District Landmark.