User Reviews

CONRAD BOYS is not a bad movie: the story though frequently used by others holds its own, the style of direction keeps the pace moving, the message of the movie is worth stating. The problem is one of a single person assuming the role of writer, director, film editor AND principal actor. Justin Lo does well in all categories except the last one. As pleasant as he is to look at his ability to create a believable character on film is seriously lacking.

Charlie (Lo) is a 19-year old taking care of his little brother Ben (Boo Boo Stewart) after the sudden death of their mother. Charlie is a history buff headed for Columbia for college until his mother's death halts that direction. He becomes a recluse despite his friend Tori (Nancy Hancock) attempts to get him out of his café job and into a social life. But at last Charlie reluctantly attends a party and eventually encounters a very handsome, intelligent drifter Jordan (Nick Bartzen) who touches Charlie's buried attraction and the two become friends and more. Jordan has demons, some of which become painfully apparent form his life of crime's encounters from the past. Another stumbling block for Charlie's adjustment appears in the form of his long departed recovering alcoholic father Doug (Barry Shay) who has cleaned up his act and wants to be a part of Ben's and Charlie's lives. The myriad clashes to Charlie's fragile ego serve only to bring out his protective forces in caring for Ben and eventually his nascent longing for Jordan and his responsibility for Ben are settled in surprising ways.

The cast Lo has selected is fine - especially the promising young Nick Bartzen and the solid Barry Shay. If only Lo had had the foresight to cast Charlie with an equally fine actor the film would have played more strongly. But as a first film by a young talent there is reason to view this venture. Justin Lo gives evidence of being a solid talent who just needs some focus.

i totally agree with the reviewer's comments and the point was made regarding jason lo trying to wear too many hats in the making of this film. he did a decent job as director, writer, editor, etc... but his acting skills are absolutely not where they need to be. His film could have been much more powerful had he casted an actor other than himself in the lead. really a glaring mistake that almost ruins the film and thus relegates it to more of a straight-to-video offering. not deserving of the big silver screen. a shame really. i do hope in future efforts he hears this criticism and learns to cast a film properly. i believe he has some talent.

This little movie is not guaranteed to raise your blood pressure much. But the more you watch it and get to know it the more endearing it becomes for its treatment of family issues and coming of age themes in which being gay is calmly taken and accepted as a given but--and this is a good thing--is not the main point and is simply accepted by the protagonist. He has a lot of things to deal with, but who he is happily isn't one of them.

Highly recommended to watch the DVD with Justin Lo's commentary. He gives a good picture of how a no-budget production can be made in a professional manner and why the result looks and sounds pretty darn good. Sure, this is not a very intense or charismatic main character, but I don't agree with some who've said that Justin Lo--who with remarkable self-possession and apparent calm produced, wrote, edited, directed, and starred--should have picked somebody other than himself to play Charlie. Okay, Lo isn't a great actor, like River Phoenix, who maybe (but this is highly theoretical) could have made this character heartrending and unforgettable (I guess I'm thinking a little of Running on Empty), but he's still well cast as Charlie, in whom he seems to have written a good deal of himself, and thus thoroughly believable. At the same time the commentary makes it clear that Justin is not Charlie: the movie is not autobiographical, even though both Lo and his protagonist are half Chinese and half European and gay. In real life Lo was not 19--but he looks young enough for the part. His looks kept reminding me of Joseph Gordon-Leavitt--which is an irrelevant association but a positive one, since Gordon-Leavitt is such a fine actor.

Now, somebody asks why Jordan, the dashing stranger who comes into his life, would even be attracted to Charlie? Well, that's obvious: because Charlie's cute (and obviously gay, in a good way) and sweet--an innocent angel who's all the things Jordan, who's been around the block too many times, is not--and more sensible too--somebody to show the world to, a virgin bride if you will, who will provide the stability in the relationship that he lacks: that's why Jordan's wanting to take Charlie on the road with him makes sense.

It is true that this qualifies to be a Movie of the Week, and not much more. As sincere and true as it is, it's not very ambitious. That's the paradox. Lo deals with some pretty heavy subject matter, loss of parents, alcoholism and recovery, a diminishing future for the main character, (apparently or for all we know) first sexual experience, a stranger who brings danger and illegality into one's life, but the writing, though sincere and authentic, isn't lively enough--compare S.E. Hinton, for instance--to make the milieu come to life. (It's also a limiting factor that Charlie, the main character, is very shy and uptight and has almost zero social life). Compare the world of Hinton's The Outsiders as realized on-screen by Coppola.

But that's not what Lo is trying to do--nor something he could have done: he didn't have access to a dozen Brat Pack dreamboats. The heart and soul of the picture is the exciting stranger, Jordan (quite well brought to life by Nick Bartzen). To continue the S.E. Hinton comparison, it's more a Rumble Fish kind of situation. Charlie winds up stuck with raising his younger brother Ben (the soulful and adorable Boo Boo Stewart) alone for a while. His father Doug (Barry Shay) was an alcoholic and split. Their mother dies suddenly. Charlies defers his acceptance at Columbia and stays in town working in a restaurant. Soon, Doug reappears, two years sober, with a decent job and place to live, wanting to help out. Geeky Charlie has to deal with a lot of disreputability, and also with Ben's gradual estrangement, nightmares, and acting out at school. Then along comes Jordan, and disreputability starts to take on a strong appeal. Lo's screenplay sets up a world in which there are strong moral imperatives in the protagonist's mind, but in the end nothing is as clearcut as he thought. It's simple but it's never schematic; it works.

In the commentary Lo shows how he used his family and friends, all of whom, plus the crew, he fully acknowledges, showing himself to be very much a team player at ease with his role. He uses the same park space four times for different scenes, and even successfully transforms his sister's childhood bedroom into a vice principal's office. Lo worked with available locales and people, other than the lead actors (who are all fine). Charlie's best friend Tori is even played by Lo's actual best friend Nancy Hancock. Lo comments repeatedly on the fact that he had a good cinematographer, and indeed the lighting is excellent throughout, so, as he says, this looks like a movie that cost much more to make.

That ought to be encouraging to anyone who wants to make a first film and doesn't have extensive means. In his commentary Lo says Brokeback Mountain is one of the best films of the past ten years, and declares that Paul Thomas Anderson is a genius. Can't quarrel with that! Think globally, act locally: that was the right way to work. Good luck with future film-making, Justin.

This film is about a 19 years old man having to take care of his young brother after the death of his mother. He could not enjoy any social life until he meets a hot guy called Jordan.

I am very impressed by this movie. First of all, the relatively big budget surprised me. It was shot on proper film, and not on hand-held cameras. The sets are nice and well touched up. The lighting is excellent, and the cinematography is pleasant. Every scene is bright and sunny, with great colour contrast. The quality of the production is much better than most of the gay films I have seen. I wonder how the first time filmmaker financed all this, and managed to make such a good production.

Charlie's is character that is written well, I totally sympathised with him. However, I agree that the acting by Justin Lo is a little Wooden. By contrast, Jordan is a lively character with ultra good looks. Nick Bartzen's acting is good, I hope he will become big one day. I also liked the subplot of Mr Conrad coming back. Justin Lo must have faced a lot of personal demons when he made this film. I salute him for that.

I think this film is an excellent attempt, especially for a first time film maker. I enjoyed the film a lot.

The boys are cute, so I guess that's one reason I want to like this film, but I just can't. The acting is less than spirited and at times I didn't want to even watch the entire film. The writing is sub par but had great plot line potential, I believe. So much more emotion and connection to the characters is possible, but it just wasn't there. I felt disconnected from the entire cast and I felt no sense of love between the brothers or the two "lovers." In fact, all the relationships in the entire movie seemed fake and inconsequential. I will always support the LGBT community, writers and actors and if Justin Lo comes out with something else, I'll be sure to try again. But as far as this title goes, save your time and money. Sorry Justin and Boo Boo.

I thought this was a delightful movie, very professionally filmed and with some excellent acting. Good photography and sound (I'm amazed at how many gay themed films have low or bad sound - it can ruin a movie.) I really came to care about these lead characters very much. They seemed absolutely real.

If I have to find fault at all, I thought that the film was a bit slow at times and could stand to be tightened up a bit in editing, perhaps by about 15 minutes. The two young lead characters are the stars of the film and the story line involving the father is less interesting and that's where I find myself wanting to fast forward. But, that's quibbling. This film is an amazing accomplishment. It is quite rare to find a gay-themed film of such quality and honesty. I'm always thrilled to come across something of quality after encountering so much junk wrapped in a pretty cover photograph. This film was very touching.

Poorly acted, directed and written, "The Conrad Boys" is barely watchable. The main problem is Justin Lo, who assumes the role of writer, director, film editor and principal actor. Lo does not handle any one of his jobs well; his ability to create a believable character on film is seriously lacking. Watching Lo is akin to watching a beginning actor with no idea of what he is doing or saying. The script is quite clichéd and lacks any real imagination. The two stars I awarded this are solely for Nick Bartzen who is quite good as the young drifter, Jordan Rivers.

This film is to be avoided.

I just watched this film, although the film is somewhat predictable, it was I thought well thought out and well done, It told the story it needed to tell, the acting was good the cinematography was also OK, regardless of the quality of this film I believe.

The story line came though and made it to the suffice, even though it's a fairy tale of sorts, I remember living the tale myself in my own personal life, although my story line would have been slightly different in reality but basically the same in some regards, I think most young gay males have experienced this feeling in one fashion or another, in the end where they split up and go their separate ways was sad, but I think that's true to life as well, at least is was for me.

If I had to rate this film and give a score of 1 to 10, I would give it an 8, but then again I am a sucker for romance and true love which I think this film had, believable acting, could it have been done better sure but I think he did a great job over all, well done

The Conrad Boys can be either a small or a big disappointment. It simply depends on whether the previous film of that kind that one has watched was just as cliché or perhaps (probably) better.

There are two main areas making the film weak. The first would be the fact that there is already a much better movie with a similar plot, namely 'Shelter'. What might stand for a defending factor for 'The Conrad Boys' is the fact that it was released in one year earlier which might have helped the makers of 'Shelter'. However, Justin Lo could do much better, at least making the film more believable for the audience to attach with. The other major problem of the movie is its cliché aspect, which unfortunately touches a number of the film's areas. The first would be the dialogues, which might sound original only for people who begin their adventure with cinema. What makes the dialogues even worse are the cliché characters played by second-class actors, with little BooBoo Stewart (playing the protagonist's little brother) at the top of the list. One cannot stop wondering whether he got the part only due to some family relations with the person responsible for the movie casting.

Summing up, but for the very nice face of Nick Bartzen (playing the protagonist's 'boyfriend') and his acting, 'The Conrad Boys' is an evening waste of time and it can hardly remain in the viewers' warm memories or heart.

A delightful coming of age LGBT film by Justin Lo. It's about Charlie Conrad a 19-year-old who takes care of his bright 9-year-old brother Ben Conrad after their mother's death. Everything changes after he meets Jordan Rivers they begin a personal close relationship. Just when their relationship starts to build up. However, when Charlie's father Doug Conrad shows up he wants to take care of Ben and everything heats up.

The Conrad Boys a magnificent well written movie. Good acting by Justin Lo, Booboo Stewart, Nick Bartzen, and the entire cast.

I've seen many gay films and TV shows, but The Conrad Boys is by far the best I've seen the characters, the story, the picture, and all brought the film to a delightful point of view. Justin Lo is amazing writer and he did a excellent job on this one. A cute yet lovely film. The Conrad Boys is 100% good from my point of view.

This was very touching.

Imagine trying to juggle one ball. Even if you can't juggle, you can speculate that it's probably not that hard to do. Now add another ball. It's probably still pretty easy, right? Now, imagine someone that has never picked up a ball trying to juggle 5 balls at once. That's what Justin Lo attempted to do with "The Conrad Boys." The five balls I was referring to are writing, acting, directing, editing and producing. Even though it's a small low budget production, I can't help but feel that Justin Lo wrote himself into the lead role just so he could make out with whoever was going to fill the role as the attractive drifter. The story was so dull and the acting so dry and 1 dimensional that I couldn't watch this movie all the way through without taking breaks. Justin Lo, who was 23 at the time, and played a 19 year old in the movie wrote a script with dialog that read like a high school play. So try to imagine a few much older middle aged characters trying to deliver lines that sound like they were written by a 14 year old.

The directing and camera work was bland and the only thing that kept this movie from being a complete flop was the involvement of Nick Bartzen who filled the role of that attractive drifter. Nick was the real star of this movie. He was able to emulate real emotions not only by his realistic delivery of dialogue, but also by utilizing his body language and facial expressions. So while I didn't really care about this story, his acting in it makes me interested to see what other projects he'll be seen in.

The Conrad Boys was a nice try for first timer Justin Lo with good intentions, but I can't really imagine what kind of group this movie was even targeted to appeal to.

I give indie films a lot of slack in ratings. Especially LGBTQ film. It's hard to make these films. Hard to raise the money, of course. Hard to find distribution. Hard to get the tech support. But these artists carry on. And thank God they do.

This is a quirky little movie. It's a good premise but it drags. It's wordy and sometimes preachy. Sometimes it's vague. Probably could have cut at least 20 minutes out and been fine. But I admire Justin Lo. He wrote it, directed it and edited it. And then played a leading role. He reached out to friends and family to volunteer and lend a hand. And you know something? He's good. He's a better director and editor than actor but just knowing what he no doubt had to go through to get this made is inspiring.

He has a good eye for talent. Nick Bartzen is perfect as the somewhat mysterious boyfriend. BooBoo Stewart (young and hair blonde)is now all grown up and a teen heart throb on The Twilight Saga.

In indie film land the most frustrating thing is to wonder what has happened to so many very talented people? Did the industry just chew em up and spit em back out? Did they give up? Did they find other interests? Where is Justin Lo? I hope he's not given up on writing and directing. This film was released in 2006 some 9 years ago. I can find nothing more from Justin and I would like to see more of his work. The same for Nick Bartzen. I thought he was great. But after 2 or 3 roles (ending around 2006) he just falls off the map. Too bad. I would have thought he had a nice future as an actor.

Still, I'm glad I stumbled across this little work that made an evening so much more pleasant. I just wish these talented people were making more.