Rogue (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
185 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A tense and well-made Aussie monster movie
LoneWolfAndCub25 November 2007
Greg McLean is looking to be someone to watch out for. After scaring audiences witless with his Aussie outback shocker "Wolf Creek" and hurting the Australian Tourism Board immensely his back at it again. However, this time he replaces a serial killer with a 7 metre saltwater crocodile who's hungry for humans and luckily a boat full of them arrives at his doorstep.

McLean doesn't waste time with a huge story, it is very basic and to the point. Pete McKell is an American travel writer who travels the world and writes about the places he visits. He is sent to the Northern Territory to go on a river cruise which is lead by Kate Ryan (Radha Mitchell). On board there are plenty of other tourists waiting to become bait.

The movie starts off with some beautiful scenes of Australian outback, they are absolutely stunning. When the action starts, though, it never lets up. For the rest of the movie I was on the edge of my seat, McLean really knows how to racket up the tension. It helps that the river is murky and we don't see too much of our monster until the end. And when we do see our crocodile friend it is amazing. Part CG and part animatronics, the crocodile looks very good and very menacing.

The acting is good all round, although the characters aren't hugely deep, the actors do a good job of making us love them or hate them. Particularly good is John Jarret (of Wolf Creek fame) and Radha Mitchell (Silent Hill).

For those that like blood and gore you won't be too disappointed, there is some and it's nice and bloody when it comes.

3½/5
62 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Croc rock
ctomvelu-118 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Nothing wrong with yet another killer crocodile movie. Especially one that keeps the beast hidden until the second half. A group of tourists on an Australian river is stranded on a tiny spit of sand after a croc attacks their boat. Trying to get from the spit of sand to the riverbank becomes the group's major challenge as the monster croc picks them off one by one, and their spit of sane begins to go underwater. Radha Mitchell is the tour boat captain and French-born actor Michael Vartan (who bears an uncanny resemblance to Luke Perry here) plays an American journalist. When we finally see the croc, it is huge and fearsome indeed. Vartan ends up in its lair and must face it down. Great CGI and physical special effects. Most of the movie was shot on sets and a back lot, but you'd never know it. A must-see for killer croc fans.
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining Adventure
claudio_carvalho26 March 2009
In the Northern Australia, a group of tourists goes on tour in the Ryan's Wildlife River Cruise to see crocodiles in the Australian Outback in the boat The Suzanne with the guide Kate Ryan (Radha Mitchell). When they are ready to return, one tourist sees a distress flare 3 km upstream the river and Kate heads the boat to an unexplored territory. They are attacked by a huge crocodile, the boat sinks and the hysterical group is trapped in a small muddy island stalked by the crocodile. However, the high tide forces the group to move, and the American journalist Pete McKell (Michael Vartan) has an idea to hold the killer croc while the group swims to the other side of the river.

"Rogue" is a light version of the tense, realistic and dramatic "Black Water", which is based on a true event. The beginning is well developed and tense, but in a certain moment the story becomes unrealistic and corny with a silly conclusion. Anyway, "Rogue" is an entertaining adventure, and the viewers that have not watched "Black Water" or appreciate a commercial happy ending, will certainly like this flick much more than I did. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Morte Súbita" ("Sudden Death")
28 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well crafted B movie
it_lives8 September 2007
I saw Rogue this morning at a preview screening in Melbourne, I've been looking forward to this film for some time. I don't want to say that it was a disappointment as it is a solid effort. There is nothing that stands out as something I think should have been done differently.

Some wandering British and American accents from the mostly Australian cast can be forgiven.

The obvious difference between the locations in the Northern Territory and those in Victoria caused a brief chuckle (mainly because director Greg McLean introduced the film and commented that he hoped the transition would be seamless), though this may go unnoticed by foreign (non-Australian) audiences.

Visual effects were highly competent, I doubt that the average cinema-goer will pick the matte paintings or have an issues with the CG croc.

The main issue I have is that the film lacks the suspense and excitement of a truly great monster/horror film. Due to the nature of the material this will have to be compared to Jaws and Rogue will inevitably suffer. A fairer comparison has to be Lake Placid, and in that scenario Rogue also comes off second best. Rogue lacks the suspense and the humour of the American monster Croc effort.

This follow up to Wolf Creek was written long before the surprise Aussie hit, Rogue has the hallmarks of a first feature script, hitting all of the genre conventions without ever attaining any moments of originality.

If you enjoy this kind of monster movie (and I do) you'll find it a decent way to spend a couple of hours, you won't be missing much if you see it on DVD. Apart from Radha Mitchell looking great in khaki shorts, and believably playing a 28 yr old, though she has to be at least 35.

Nice job over all, good job, not great but good.
77 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
CRIKEY!!! -- This Croc has bite!
willy200416 November 2007
Granted, it's not perfect, and the idea is not 100% original (from a cinematic point of view) but one thing I love about Greg McLean's films is that he takes what are essentially Australian icons and flips them totally askew. For instance in Wolf Creek the films brutal killer - Mick Taylor is basically Mick Dundee turned psycho. And in Rogue, he yet again takes a well known Australian reptile and sets it loose on some unsuspecting tourists.

There's no denying McLean can shoot a beautiful movie, and some of the wonderful scenes of the Australian top-end are simply stunning. The characters all portray strong performances, especially when the pressure sets in and they begin to crack. McLean also does a good job at drip feeding the dread and teasing the audience with nothing but growls, grunts and slippery tails. It's an age old formula where directors don't show the full extent of the threat till the end - well, thankfully we don't have to wait that long, as when the croc does reveal itself - we see that it is frickin'MASSIVE! And what's even more scary is that these thing's actually exist up there.

The croc itself is naturally CGI with some animatronics, and it's a relief to see that it looks "real". The movement and animation is authentic and the sound design is also effective in giving the audience that jolted feeling a 3 tonne croc would give.

It's a tense, taught and well directed film, and the only gripe I have about it is that it seems a little short - maybe that was put down the fact that I was so immersed into the film? But it did feel a little short. It also lacked the brutal punch Wolf Creek gave us back in 2005, but never the less, it's a cute little Aussie horror thriller where McLean pays sound homage to classics like Jaws and Aliens. And it's also good to see more "genre" films like this coming out of Australia, and it's also good to know people like the Weinsteins and Warner Brothers are backing horror films from Australia for international releases and distribution.

For anyone into their Reptillian chills and thrills - I highly recommend ROGUE.
41 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More dumb tourists for the taking.
BA_Harrison2 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I have a fondness for the killer croc horror sub-genre-from the slow-burn psychological terror and realism of low budget Aussie flick Black Water to the cheesy, B-movie goodness of far trashier fare like Crocodile 2: Death Roll-and was interested in finding out which approach director Greg McLean had opted for with his reptile-on the-rampage offering Rogue. Turns out he went for both.

The film starts in the same vein as Black Water, with river guide Kate Ryan (played by Radha Mitchell) and her boat-load of tourists attacked by a huge saltwater croc, leaving them stranded on an isolated mud-flat as the tide slowly comes in. There's not a lot of croc to be seen in this portion of the film, the tension derived from never knowing where the voracious creature is lurking and when it will attack next. It's slow going but brilliantly executed, and benefits from some lovely cinematography.

Eventually, desperation forces the people to try and find a way off their muddy prison, a decision that results in a couple of casualties, including Kate. After this, the film takes an about turn and becomes a far more commercial beast, with the hero of the piece, travel writer Pete McKell (Michael Vartan), discovering the crocodile's lair (with a little help from Kate's dog) where he miraculously finds Kate still alive. But guess who's on his way home...

This second half of the film is undeniably fun, packed full of thrills aided by very impressive special effects, but the shift in tone is way too abrupt and sits very uncomfortably with all that has gone before. Because of this, I can only declare the film a partial success.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rogue
mr_popcorn5 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"Welcome to the Terrortory"

An idyllic wildlife cruise disintegrates into terror when a party of tourists are stalked by a massive man-eating crocodile. Pete McKell, a cynical American travel writer, joins a disparate group of holiday-makers on a river cruise through the waters of Kakadu National Park. Initially Pete clashes with their tour captain, Kate, a feisty young woman who assumes he is just another 'city-slicker' in search of a quick thrill. After an uneventful day cruising the river, Kate is reluctantly persuaded to steer their boat into unexplored territory. They discover a secluded lake but terror strikes when their craft receives a powerful blow from beneath the murky depths and begins to sink. With little choice, she beaches the vessel on the closest dry land -a tiny mud island. With a rising tide and only half an hour of daylight left, fear grips the group as they realize they are trapped in the lair of a 'rogue' crocodile, governed only by its need to hunt and kill. Begrudgingly, Pete and Kate join forces to keep hysteria at bay and in the process start to see beyond their initial impressions. Their first attempt to escape fails, but then Pete has an idea - they must trap the crocodile to enable the group to flee to the other side of the island whilst Kate swims for help. Pete volunteers to stand guard, but without warning, the beast breaks free and targets Kate who fails to resurface. As darkness descends and the muddy waters rise, a terrifying struggle ensues with only one probable outcome death.

Rogue all in all, is a solid effort. Wolf Creek director Greg McLean manages to build up the tension only showing glimpses of the horrible monster that lies beneath the swamp for the first half of the movie. These little glimpses alone will definitely scare the bejesus out of you as it doesn't rely on "scare-you-with-a-black-cat" from somewhere like the current trend today in the horror genre. Like I said, he builds and builds the tension, slowly scaring you to death as it all leads up to one mind-blowing, heart pounding finale.

Another factor is the beast itself, the killer Saltwater crocodile. It came off as pretty convincing, the way they rendered the texture, the skin, the whole shebang. The movement of the killer croc was spot-on too. And unlike Lake Placid where the crocodile is as big as the HMS Titanic, this one stayed real giving the killer croc a believable size. All in all, if you crave for some spooky thrills and killer beasts, I suggest you go see this one you won't be disappointed.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The dingo didn't eat your baby, the Salty did!
ElijahCSkuggs28 August 2008
In the Northern Territory of Australia a River Boat Tour, led by Radha "I didn't know she was Aussie" Mitchell is struck by enormously and hungry bad luck, in the shape of a Killer Croc. The Croc wants them for food and with this ragtag group of geniuses, this Croc will get his wishes.

Rogue was an alright flick, it had okay acting, a cool atmosphere and a few deaths. The whole beginning was actually really well-done and really made me feel like these people better be careful. But that dropped when you got to know the characters, and the weak writing that plagued them.

It was pretty predictable, plagued with ridiculous decision-making, was a tad too dark, had weak writing, and the CGI was very noticeable. But hey, this is a horror flick, so you gotta go with the flow.

The whole idea behind this movie seriously felt like it was conceived by one idea. The last death of the movie. The Croc and the Chicago dude duel-off. Every other part of the flick was really nothing special at all. It's really just a very average flick.

Rogue isn't the best killer croc flick and not even the best the country has to offer (Dark Age), but it did offer jump scares (for those that like that crap), and some good ole fashion Salty Croc violence. Which is reason enough to check this flick out.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Nutshell Review: Rogue Crocodile
DICK STEEL13 April 2008
Not another crocodile movie again, you might groan. I did too, as I wonder just how many killer shark and killer crocodile/alligator movies need to be made, before they finally die off. Not too long ago we had Primeval, which was a crocodile movie set in the African continent which had attempted to weave local politics into it. Here, it's set in the Northern Territories of Australia, and with such killer-reptilian movies, the more exaggerated the size and aggression of the animal, the better. So we have a seven metre long crocodile for the characters to contend with.

It's a simple set up, in which Radha Mitchell plays Kate Ryan, a river tour guide who pilots her own boat to ferry tourists down a river to experience the wild life, as well as learning little details such as them not getting themselves attacked by any crocs because their tour boats are larger, or so they would like the tourists to believe. That said, our monster in question took about 30 minutes before deciding to increase the pace and tension of the movie, by knocking up against the boat of our merry bunch when they respond to a distant distress signal.

It takes a while to get things moving because writer-director Greg McIean (Wolf Creek) had dedicated the earlier portion of the movie to get the audience chummy with the characters, before they become fodder for our hungry crocodile. And surprisingly, I have to say that Rogue Crocodile did work, despite it being a crocodile movie done countless of times over, and whose plot development we can see coming from a mile away. What probably worked in its favour, is that there aren't any gung-ho heroes in the story - no cops or natural crocodile dundees, but everyday folk like you and I, and we naturally would root for them as they try to escape their predicament.

And it looks like a typical episode from the television series Lost too. You have a makeshift island where our temporal inhabitants seek refuge from, though the tide's coming through to flood it in time, and with water comes natural territory for the crocodile to wade through. Communication devices aren't working and they're cut off from the rest of the world. So they can only rely on their own ingenuity, plans crafted with time working against them, if only they can get past their occasional bickering on what to do.

There are enough tension filled moments to excite you as this crocodile chomps without remorse, and it doesn't shy away from showing some gory bits, though the number of set action pieces are limited, and involves a little too much thrashing about by the roguish reptile which turns out to be not too smart, relying on plain brawn. Suitable for those lazy Sunday afternoons.
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rogue of a croc
CUDIU6 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Seen at Sitges Film Festival. Before entering the theatre I thought this was going to be an obviously self-conscious splatter b-movie, as we see so many these days. The mother lode was started by "Scream" and has not stopped since then. All in all, however, Rogue comes out as a honestly, straightforwardly enjoyable pop-corn movie with some good moment to remember.

The film superstar is -not surprisingly- the crocodile. The croc is realistic, fun and quite scary. Thumbs up for the special FX guys who did a really good job (otherwise I suspect the movie would be unwatchable). The best scene with the croc is when, after showing itself in full glory, the beast goes under water in the little pool in the cave, and you know it is going to come out in 1 sec or so and you scream for the good guy to do something (which he eventually does). These scenes are a major innovation of the classic "Jaws" stuff we see during the rest of the movie. The most typical "Jaws" shot (swimmer seen from below, hypothetical beast's POV) is repeated several times. Once we even see the back scales of the croc looming over the water like a shark's fin. More Spielbergean inspiration from "Jurassic Park": crocs are explicitly referred to as modern dinosaurs; like JP this is a tale of tourists chased by a reptile during an excursion; croc thuds boat like T-Rex thuds jeep, etc.

Other influences I smelled: "Deliverance" (men in boat cross the wild and get their holiday messed up), Terrence Malick (the cricket close-up), "Alien" (croc's den) and John Carpenter (people on small island besieged by invisible forces).

Acting is surprisingly solid, above all from the supporting characters. Overall, telling who dies next is not 100% predictable, which I consider good value for a b-movie like this; for example, the bad guy turns out to be a hero but gets butchered anyway and the nice doggy dog is not luckier than that. Script is not so bold as to have hero and heroine slaughtered as well, although you may think they are doomed at one point. Score works well underlying scary moments and luxuriant landscapes.

The only thing I am a little upset about is why the hell the guys do not turn off their torches when swimming across the swamp. I am not into crocodiles that much, but I am pretty sure they are not blind
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not enough bite
slake0923 June 2008
This story of a monster crocodile eating tourists is solid enough to watch once, but not twice. The crocodile is seldom visible and there is very little gore. The tourists efforts to get away from him are somewhat laughable - they never seem to consider just walking away into the woods.

There isn't much comedic effect, the rogue is not played for laughs, nor is there any gratuitous nudity, much in the way of suspense, or gore. Just a horror movie that isn't horrible, sleazy or gory.

My 8-year-old son watched it with me and pointed out the plot holes. That should tell you everything you need to know about it before deciding whether to watch it or not.
15 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Finally A Top Notch Crocodile Film
davek221 June 2008
I thought this would be a real cheesy B movie but was in for a great surprise.

Starting with the cinematography and the initial town scenes I figured this may be half decent. Things picked up even more with the scenes on the boat introducing the characters. Small touches like the guy letting his loved ones ashes into the water and the photographer having a sly chow down on a hidden sandwich were really cool touches. Bigger budget films should take note! It got better from there, not showing too much of the croc and building suspense with good pacing and realistic reactions from the cast. The cinematography and editing on the river journey were great. After seeing this I almost want to go to the Northern Territories. Almost, but not after the Croc finally shows its face.

This is one primal beast. The film does a good job of keeping it under wraps for the early portion of the film but when it finally shows its face its a great moment. The visual fx are faultless and the croc acts in a very realistic manner.

In the second act the filmmakers do a great job at ratcheting up suspense, using a great set up involving the river. I wont spoil it here but its so simple but very effective.

I am a jaded monster film fan and this one had me wanting to see it for a second time straight away.

Crocs and Alligators seem to be the whipping boys of the film industry with so many comedy or low budget appearances. To finally to see one with real teeth and to give it a go with a good story and great fx is fantastic. I would recommend this to anyone after a monster night out.
103 out of 125 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'd wait for cable
dbborroughs2 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Boat load of people end up stranded on a tidal island in a river when a giant crocodile wrecks their boat and plans to make a meal of them. Beautifully filmed in Australia this would be a perfect film to lure tourists to go see the countries scenic beauty-except that the plot involves a hungry reptile. Actually the problem with the film is that it takes forever to get going with a good 45 minutes passing before the crocodile strands the boat. Up to that point its the typical cruise through the river canyons and getting to know the people. Its a nice idea if it hadn't been done to death. Points to the plot which doesn't take the typical path to the end with everyone being eaten in turn, there are more survivors then you might think, but at the same time, say it with me, we've seen some of it before. Worth a shot in on an undemanding night, but not something that needs to be actively sought out
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A croc movie that is a CROCK
skel7710 November 2007
Greg McLean's follow up to Wolf Creek about a killer croc may well come back to bite him...on the arse. Underwritten to the extreme, this movie harks back to 70's creature films but isn't anywhere near as fun. The cast have nothing to do, especially John Jarratt who seems to stand around in a bad moustache and fat suit. The acting is on par with bad Crocodile Dundee ultra-Australian stereotyping. We don't see enough gore which made me think there will be the obligatory "Unrated" DVD to suck more money out of us. Disappointing film that pays not to think about too much because logic was out having a smoke on the set of this one.
12 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boring stuff from the splat pack
Esken3 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I can't say much good about this film. The story is mediocre, the effects are dull, the acting pretty weak and the suspense put me to sleep. I'm not kidding! And it'so sad because i've been looking forward to this for about a year now! I really loved the directors first film "wolf creek" and thought this would have the same. I was very very wrong.

Don't bother watching this. It's just not good enough. Go rent "lake placid" instead.

Final words. Greg Mclean has been named as one of the members of the unofficial "the splat pack". This film has got absolutely nothing to do with that.
12 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Yes, another Croc Flik - But Not Bad For B-Budget
afiazuddin-004009 January 2023
This 2007 offering from Australia does not make any totally innovative take on the "animals gone wild" sub-genre of Horror films. But, the story is told logically, well paced, suspenseful, and 'borderline' well acted for a B-budget flik.

In the outback of Australia, a down-on-her luck swamp croc tour boat operator takes out a group of stereotypical idiot tourists. Within 20 minutes, I made my "who dies" predictions. I was mostly right. In any event, the tour boat operator sees a distress flare and goes to investigate . . . Much to the upset of her passengers. They reach the source of the distress signal - clearly too late - and then things go south for them as well. All due to one really, really, really big MF croc. And the rest, of course, is survival focused. It is by no stretch brilliant, but kinda' good ! If you are a fan of this sub-genre, its worth a look.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not-bad creature feature
Travoose11 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Greg McLean's follow-up to "Wolf Creek" is nowhere near as gory or brutal as his first film. Instead, it's more of a nod to the classic creature features of the '50s and '70s. The plot can be summed up pretty easily: giant croc menaces boatload tourists in the Northern Territory. That's pretty much it. But it's an enjoyable ride nonetheless. It ticks all the boxes and doesn't really offer any surprises, but it has some good, suspenseful set-pieces. I just have a few problems with it.

* It falls prey to the "import-a-second-rate-American-actor" syndrome that used to plague Aussie films back in the '70s and '80s. Michael Vartan is competent, but he's really just this movie's version of Gregory Harrison from "Razorback." He's good-looking in a male catalogue-model sort of way, but doesn't really set the screen on fire. He's really just there so American audiences have someone they can identify with. When two lowlifes threaten the tourist boat, it's the two American characters that stand up to them. None of the Aussie males on the boat show any cojones, which is disappointing. * The tiny town at the beginning of the film is depicted as a sleazy, seedy, tumbledown dump full of unfriendly locals. Well, I'm sorry, but this is a city slicker's view of the outback. In actual fact, the outback is full of friendly, hospitable, colourful characters who take pride in their meagre towns. Greg McLean obviously hasn't spent much time in rural areas. He's basing his view of country people purely on stereotypes. * McLean shoots mostly in closeups and in the 1.85:1 frame. He has wasted his opportunity to really showcase the Australian landscape. Some wider shots and a 2.35:1 frame would've been much better. I know Sergio Leone shot a lot of closeups, but at least he mixed them up with wider shots. "Rogue" just feels claustrophobic and soundstage-bound a lot of the time. * The first major croc attack that kicks off Act 2 and sinks the tourist boat just lacks impact. It should be far more shocking, but it's just a bit limp. The first tourist death is also portrayed very blandly. It's virtually a non-event, and there doesn't even seem to be much of a horrified reaction to it from the other characters, they're almost just like, "Meh." * The dialogue just doesn't seem all that clever or sharp. I know this is basically a B-movie, but I found myself yearning for the wit that infused the John Sayles-written creature features "Alligator" and "Piranha." Even "Jurassic Park III" had a better script, I found. But in "Rogue", the characters basically just yell at each other and do extremely stupid things that put themselves in jeopardy, which gets annoying after a while. * Barry Otto proves that he is completely useless at playing an ordinary, ocker Aussie. He has a cameo at the start of the film as a publican and his attempt at a true-blue Aussie accent is woeful, even though, ironically, he IS Australian. He sounds like a plummy-voiced, chardonnay-drinking theatre luvvie and overplays his short role, utterly failing to convince anyone that he's a rough-and-tumble outback bartender.

On the plus side:

* The croc is extremely well-done. I couldn't tell which shots were CGI and which shots were animatronic. Kudos to the FX crew. * Radha Mitchell is as dependable as ever. * The cinematography is nice, despite its occasional aforementioned claustrophobia. * Steve Curry has some humorous moments. * The music is nice - very sweeping and grand in parts. * Sam Worthington puts in a good performance. It's easy to see why Jim Cameron hand-picked him for "Avatar." He's got that movie-star quality. * The final set-piece in the croc's lair is very hair-raising and well-done, bringing to mind St George's battle with the dragon.

Overall, a solid B-movie monster mash, a film worthy of being called "Australia's answer to Jaws." McLean will probably be criticized for following up "Wolf Creek" with a film like this, just as Peter Jackson was when he made "King Kong" after LOTR, but remember: McLean wrote the script for "Rogue" years before "Wolf Creek." It almost got off the ground but slid back into development heck, which must've been very frustrating for him, so you can't really blame him for wanting to finally get the movie made and out of his system. I strongly disliked "Wolf Creek", but I liked this one, and it'll be interested to see how he matures as a filmmaker.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Getting up n' close with a crocodile.
lost-in-limbo17 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
American journalist/city boy Pete arrives in the Northern Territory, but soon as he gets there, his luggage is lost at the airport, poor mobile coverage and a stinking hot day wearing nothing but business clothing. He joins a boat tour group led by a gritty Australian gal Kate, and along for the ride are some local visitors and overseas' sight-seers. The day has come to an end, but a flare in the distance captures their attention. Being oblige to check it out, they come across a cap-sized boat. Then suddenly their boat is mysteriously rammed, and they crash into an island, which eventually in hours will be under water. But in the water, happens to be a crocodile that's stalking its prey.

Tourism to Australia's outback won't be receiving any favours after Greg McLean's 2005 grim serial killer film "Wolf Creek" and now he chalks up a gripping monster sized croc feature "Rogue (2007)". If any of these films are anything to go by, I seriously lay in wait for next wondrous, realistic thrill ride. Actually I came out of the cinema, and I just didn't know what to think of "Rogue". It ain't spectacular and noway does it match the impact of his predecessor, but this one the make-up is different and for most part it does push all the right buttons and is impeccably crafted. Both movies basically share the same imprint of a forlorn location, and predatory instincts. Director/writer McLean's latest chapter more so plays on the escalating fear, and drumming up excitement and adrenaline in a fun manner compared with his debut feature that heavily relied on the nasty and unpleasant images, and the lingering dread that awaited the characters. Just like "Wolf Creek", the opening set-up of the characters in "Rogue" is casually paced, as we soak up the awe-inspiring backdrop caught beautifully by Will Gibson's well-etched scenic cinematography. The passengers on board are typical stereotypes, which are roughly drawn up despite spending plenty of time with them at the get-go.

I was thinking since there was a lot of details brought up, but not entirely explored enough to flesh them out. There was going to be numerous body count to the fodder to rid us of that problem, as the cast would be picked off one by one in what would turn out to be a basic, but surely pulsating monster feature. But I was wrong on that aspect too! McLean could have let it go overboard and just give in to providing us a repetitive body count, but instead he steers clear away by drawing upon well-organised biting suspense, humidly remote locations and a spectacular looking CGI crossed animatronics crocodile. These days I find the majority of special effects to overkill on CGI, but the FX team here do an excellent job creating an authentic looking beast. McLean also likes to keep it mainly in the shadows, with only showing glimpses of it until the film's closing. Even the way it goes about things and takes out its victims, is true to its sources. Just look at the deadly tumble roll. Blood and carnage sees very little daylight, as the deaths (some off-screen but definitely felt) happen to be very sudden, lethal and over in a matter of seconds. You have no time to blink! This makes it more believable, and suit's the striking reality of these predators. However there is one circumstance that bugged me, and destroyed what lasting impression the film could've finished off with. For me to talk about it would be too much of a big spoiler, but I think you'll know when it happens.

Characters are conventionally thin (though it seems like it was on purpose, as we're left to wonder), and the loose script is rather secondary lacking a polished touch and the finale lacks an almighty sting. You might have one of your eye-brows raised, but making up for its faults is McLean's economical direction, and the technical side of the production. McLean knows how to alienate you in the unsparing environment, and unbearable situation with his vivid directorial eye and always tightly composed touch. Visually there are some great brushes. He leisurely lets it tick along, but when it gets into it. The showcase begins, as the feverishly fast-paced suspense is emotionally jarring without using any sort of jump-scare tactics. The staging of the edge-of-seat climax is completely first-rate. Not only do the characters have the croc to worry about, but also they're ravaged by ecological barriers, their own fears and finally each others. The laid-back premise might be a cut-out, but he throws up one or two surprises and demonstrates a clever, thrifty outlook from a screenplay of genre clichés. The sprawling music score is well-rounded, and harrowing with scope. Even the sound FX emerges with great intensity, and a swiftly clean ambiance that only enhances the atmosphere. Editing is sharp, art direction is expertly handled and the kinetic camera shots during the action sequences never become too disorienting. Some inventive camera-work can be found too.

Performances won't set the world alight, but they shape up even though there's very little to work with. Michael Vartan is agreeable in the rugged central role of Pete. Across from him is a down-to-earth, and superbly gusty turn by Radha Mitchell as tour guide Kate. Australian locals fill the support cast. A sullen looking John Jarrett is fine, Stephen Curry twitchy photographer slightly amuses and Sam Worthington's mildly intense, blunt character gains your interest to be only swept under the rug. The rest of the support are decent, but on an emotional level very little do you care about this lot.

This tour is nothing out of the ordinary, but still manages to be an eventful and effectively bravura ride when let loose. There's a lot of promise here, and it would make great a double feature with another (but hard to find) killer crocodile film starring John Jarratt; "Dark Age (1987)".
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another good Aussie horror flick
rumbleinthejungle16 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched this last night on DVD and I was pleasantly surprised by how taut and tense the film was. The atmosphere created by the location of the film play a major role in the creepiness factor here - rock faces look twisted and contorted, the murky green of the water becomes steadily more and more foreboding and the general sense of isolation is excellently conveyed by the sweeping vistas of the lovely aerial shots. I think that some audiences might not like the fact that much of the background of the characters is only hinted at and not spelled out. If you are observant you will pick several things up about the various people on the tour boat but, having said that, some things are left completely unexplained. I think that this works to the films advantage, though. A lean running time is a key factor in making a film like this work and 'Rogue' ticks this box by clocking in at just over 90 mins. The music of the film merits special mention, too. Often a film like this suffers from having no distinguishable score to carry it but 'Rogue' has some quite lovely pieces accompanying many scenes. If anything, I found the final act of the film (in the Croc's lair) the least satisfying part of the film. This third act feels like an incongruous mainstream gesture in an otherwise smart horror flick. I also detected perhaps a wee nod to Lee Tamahori's extremely under-rated man vs. nature flick 'The Edge' here. Overall, the tension of this film is great and the performances of the actors are uniformly solid. A good horror flick.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Overrated .. Flop
naqvifaheem20 June 2008
Since last year after reading all positive reviews and much Hype of this project, I was desperate to watch the movie but was not available because of flop Aussie production in Pakistan.. Luckily I got a chance to travel to Australia and last night I bought the DVD and MANNN I am disappointed.. The movie is too slow to start with, waste of time in name of character development and amazingly low body count.. plus no memorable kill (most are offscreen, even 1 on screen which is again not worthy)...

Fun part is that many extra were actually alive while main actors were targeted by smart creature...

In the end director of shocker Wolfcreek somehow wanted to make a character driven, medium scare and happy "Commercial" movie to recover 25Million investment but Failed badly because of exact intention...

with such a great landscape, good cast and nice croc... there was a true potential of good movie here which was missed...

I don't know why there is buzz around for this movie.. for me I wasted my money and time in DVD better just ignore it and watch something else..

BTW there is no comparison of JAWS with this movie... Even Black Water (From Australia too)is better movie than Rogue....
12 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gets the creature feature mix just about right.
oneguyrambling3 November 2010
In choosing a follow up to his critically acclaimed (for some reason, it was only OK) debut Wolf Creek, Greg McLean chose an old favourite, the big scary animal movie.

This time it is crocodiles, or crocodile to be specific.

The story starts and ends in Australia's Northern Territory, where an American joins a tourist cruise along a river.

The American turns out to be a travel writer, though that is just a reason to get an American in the cast and on the boat. As with every disaster or monster movie there are a host of miscellaneous extras of various backgrounds and circumstances, around 12 in all… initially (wink!) and of course when the sh*t hits the fan various among them clash and react differently.

But I'm getting ahead of the plot… a little.

The cruise is "manned" by the daughter of the never-seen owner, named Kate, and her faithful dog Kevin is along for the ride. We spend 10 or so minutes meeting the cast and hearing tidbits about their background and why they are on the boat. I call this time "meet the soon deceased", and use it to pick 1) who will be the first to croak and 2) who will live. I'm almost always wrong about 1) but can usually get 2) right, and I did here.

Along the cruise two boneheads show up to stir Kate and a minor standoff ensues, where a couple of passengers muster the courage to tell the clowns to "bugger off mate", (hey this is set in Australia after all, strewth!).

Boneheads leave. Kate turns the boat to head back to dock, only a passenger spies a flare in the distance, followed by others. Obeying the law of the sea (probably) Kate decides to do the right thing and check it out even though it causes a delay to all.

They arrive at the source of the flare to find only an upturned dinghy and BANG, something runs into the boat, causing it to slowly sink. While they have time Kate steers the boat to a tiny mid-river sandbank and they rapidly disembark.

Now the fun starts.

The boneheads once again reappear, to pad out the onshore numbers and create a bit more tension, and ol' croccy starts munching. It soon becomes evident that they are all intruding on the crocodile's home turf, and he is none too pleased with their presence.

Like hippos, where you aren't supposed to get between a hippo and the water, the live bait that is the survivors need to get ashore to calm the croc down, only like Frogger doing that involves crossing a dangerous area, namely swimming past his choppers.

So they try a few plans, needless to say they use three because the first couple don't work, and each failed plan brings about a more croc-snacks. There are promises made and broken, allegiances made and conflicts created and settled in between fatalities, and as a special treat I got to hear someone call a guy "numbnuts" for perhaps the first time in cinema history.

McLean sensibly avoids certain standards, not everyone who gets chomped deserves it and those that deserve it (at least in your mind) don't always get what's coming to them. Some things work that shouldn't and where human interaction is concerned things don't ever go exactly to plan.

I was happy enough with the pace, the frequency of kills and thankfully the heavy handed Steve Irwin style Ozzy slang was kept to a minimum, the finale was OK and happily when they ran out of things to do and people to kill… Then the film stopped - no Lord of the Rings 37 pointless endings here, movie part ends, the credits roll.

Final Rating – 7 / 10. Less tongue in cheek than Lake Placid, but less serious than Wolf Creek, Rogue gets the lazy video night mix about right.

If you liked this (or even if you didn't) check out oneguyrambling.com
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mediorce gator flick with overtones of Gilligan's Island
em890720022 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
A bunch of strangers get on a boat and go for a sightseeing tour just like in the TV show Gilligan's Island; things take a turn for the worse, they get stranded and have to do their best to survive.

But, this isn't a comedy, just a PREDICTABLE gator flick. It starts out slow and drags on from their.

On the plus side there are some nice landscape scenes as the tour goes up-river at the beginning (but, a nice postcard has the same effect).

And, the fake crocodile is believable which is a plus as a lot of gator flicks can't even get that right.

There are a couple major problems.

1). The second half of the film is way too dark. Yes, it's shot at night, but numerous other films competently manage this challenge. Here, one can hardly see anything for far too long and so one ends up losing interest in the story. This is video not radio so one wants to be able to see the action.

2). Too many background characters on the boat. These characters don't add anything to the story and their not developed enough so no one cares about them. Maybe they were included to keep people guessing who will be eaten next, but it's easily predictable who will get it and when.
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the best crocodile horror film.
Fella_shibby26 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The film starts n ends with the camera zooming in on a newspaper article regarding giant crocodiles. The initial scene of the newspaper cutting is very disturbing n scary regarding a 12 year old devoured wholly by a giant crocodile.

The film is about a group of tourists in Australia who fall prey to a giant, man-eating crocodile after they venture far off into the creature's territory. They take shelter on a mud island which is slowly submerging cos the river being a tidal one. The film has beautiful cinematography of the Northern territory of Australia. This is a must watch for horror fans. This is one of the best horror film about a giant crocodile.

Character of Mitchell surving n the lead actor landing coincidentally at the exact place where Mitchell is lying is way too over the top. We have a Jason Clarke lookalike, an overweight one with a funky tshirt. I recognized Robert Taylor (Storm Warning). Didn't recognize Sam Worthington that time. We also have John Jarratt (Wolf Creek) in a not so memorable role. Director McLean created some solid tension with enuff kills. I first saw this in 2008 on a dvd which I own. Revisited it recently.
31 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent aquatic horror
mrnunleygo8 May 2017
A boatload of tourists gets trapped on a tiny island and hunted by a huge crocodile. I watched this not knowing what to expect but having a general liking for B movies, especially what I call "aquatic horror." Compared to others in that genre I thought Rogue was very well written, well acted, and quite suspenseful. I saw a review that criticized it for lacking a sense of humor, which is a fair criticism, and it's true some scary movies just don't work without the humor. But this one was straight-up suspense, more realistic than over-the-top: it invoked no radiation accidents to create the horror nor presented any seriously improbable approaches to attempt to escape it. It was closer to a drama about how people might act in a desperate situation. I also liked that it had a large enough cast of quickly-delineated characters to play the "who will survive game?" without any certainty you'd get it right. Along with plenty of scary moments. Recommended.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's getting old.
Jacques982 September 2008
First and foremost, do not be deceived by the cover in thinking this will be a gory film. There is more blood on the cover than the movie itself. I do not know why this was released by Dimension Extreme, because it could have easily gotten a PG-13 rating if they took out a few f-words. On the violence scale, this is maybe a 2/10. Do not expect a gory movie. At all.

With that said, the lack of gore worked for it rather than against it. By far the main focus here is the tension, and the "this could happen to you" feeling. This made the first 3/4 insanely solid and well-done, even a little scary.

But the last 1/4 was a complete disaster, similar to Alien vs. Predator in style and layout. The movie did a total 180 from neat realistic horror to cheesy, laughable b-monster movie. It was too over-the-top and cliché for the type of story it started as. That really screwed up the entire thing.

The other main problem I had was the lack of ANYTHING even remotely similar to originality. It used the exact same formula as every other giant crock movie. Why couldn't a director as talented as Greg McLean think of something at least slightly original? Surely he could think of something that could happen in real life that would be this terrifying, but not so unoriginal.

I just wish he would have at least tried.

The movie was good, but nothing to phone home about. It's just as unoriginal as it looks, and it has NO gore to boot it. It creates tension some, but kills it with the lame ending.

Take it or leave it. I expected more from Greg McLean. Wolf Creek is far superior, though it lacks a lot of the same things this movie lacked. Namely anything even remotely original.

1/10
11 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed