"All in the Family" Archie and the Editorial (TV Episode 1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Archie Goes On TV
Jimmy_the_Gent418 June 2019
Archie sees a local TV station manager give an editorial on gun control and Archie goes on TV to rebut him.

A hilarious classic 3rd season opener. The first scenes are some funny arguments as Archie comes home after driving Munson's cab. Gloria announces that she is looking for a job and Archie calls Mike a "giggle-o". The station manager Mr Bennett then comes on TV saying we need stricter gun laws. He is played by Sorrell Booke, his first appearance on the show. He would later play Archie's boss Mr Sanders on several later episodes. Archie has more funny lines arguing with Mike and Gloria and the right to bear arms. His encounter with Mr Bennett is another highlight. The funniest scene is when we see Archie giving his ideas about guns on TV. He says he can stop all airplane hijackers by arming all the passengers! He says "Ya just pass out the pistols at the beginning of the trip and collect 'em all at the end! Case closed!"
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
wonderful episode - stacked deck
lrldoit16 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Here we have one of the best episodes of Norman Lear's best series. The centerpiece encapsulates Archie Bunker's view of gun control. Because Norman Lear has his own view, the episode skews the issue. Despite this, the episode is hysterically funny.

You get the usual contrast of traditional male/female roles versus the new wave that Archie hates. The interaction of the characters is priceless. Because of the quality of the writing, the series holds up today.

Eventually, Archie and Mike get to the Constitution. Archie says that what the Supreme Court says has nothing to do with the law. Considering that the Constitution says that no one could deprive anyone of life without due process; and the court finding the death penalty unconstitutional in 1972 (before partially reversing), Archie has a point. Mike's comment about the militia clause would suggest that the founders intended to say that a militia has the right to guns. That is laughable on its face, and ignores the ninth amendment.

Archie's editorial is an utterly ridiculous statement with some truth in it. Studies have shown the effects of gun control. Criminals don't follow the law. Gun free zones are more dangerous because law abiding people are disarmed. While there could be a real debate, Lear's purpose is to push an agenda.

The end shows a man congratulating Archie for being against gun control. He robs Archie. Actually, criminals are in favor of gun control because it is far less risky for them. What if Archie had had a gun on him? Despite the tilting of the issue (Lear would do the same thing in the series, 704 Hauser St., with regard to Anita Hill having no reason to lie during the Clarence Thomas hearings), this is one of the best episodes of a great series. I wonder if it prompted anyone to read the Federalist Papers.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hilarious Archie's viewpoint
vitoscotti6 November 2021
Mostly the episode is a setup for Archie to spew his goofy take on life. Misquoting the bible, or the constitution he always has things jumbled up. He makes life a struggle being so pigheaded with his biases. He never backs down. It would be a just a average show without Archie.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why Archie Bunker was 'created'
cynic2all2 August 2022
This is just another of Lear's use of Archie Bunker as his straw man, in order for Lear to push his own leftist views. "Arm all the passengers" ... if done, more than half would not even know how to check for ammo or know whether the safety is on or off. But it wasn't until after 09-11-2001 that airlines began using armed marshals, who know how to use their guns as well as what warranted situations they are thus justified. So there is a little something to the idea, but I don't think anyone was preposterous enough to really think passengers should be armed. The first problem would be many, likely most, of them would refuse to take a firearm, based on religion, personal belief, or knowing they were not capable of knowing when or how to use it. So Archie is that preposterous straw man so easy to knock down.

But for the Second Amendment, the Meathead was right at the time-- but Archie would be right today, and as of 2009, in the Hilliard v. Washington, D. C., case, in which the SP ruled that the amendment does promulgate the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed