"Gunsmoke" Jailbait Janet (TV Episode 1960) Poster

(TV Series)

(1960)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Weather
darbski10 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Well, this episode points out the fact that a lot of Justice was doled out by lawmen on the scene. Like Matt said "The law's young out here" (or new out here, something like that). So, what the heck.He's probably had a bellyfull of petty suits tellin' him what to do while not paying him anything for two months. I agree with another reviewer that 50Gs is way too much to be calling it even, More than that, it's too much to ship in greenbacks. Most of these transfers would have been done in bonds of some type or gold coins.

Now, we don't know about Matt and Chester leaving Dan Everly out for crow bait, either; they might have just gone to get a horse to drag his body over to the pre-dug hole. It's interesting that they used the name "Everly". At that time, Don and Phil Everly were very popular with teenagers for some really good music they made and recorded. I can remember it well, as they were from right down the road from here, in Shenandoah, Iowa. I guarantee ALL the teenagers at the time were happy about the outcome, and Matt was even more popular after letting the two teens go.

Something I didn't like was the fact that, body or no body, they shoulda been wearin' slickers. It was de rigueur for riding anywhere on the plains; because they were out a lot, they would have known about the weather, too, so the rain that blew up right then was just a little pre-storm sprinkle. We get them like that in the mid-west. Janet was way too old to be "Jailbait".
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Jailbait or Crowbait?
Johnny_West9 April 2020
Jailbait Janet was played by Nan Peterson, who was 23 at the time this episode was released, and she had some woman miles on her. Janet did not look like a girl in her early teens. This was Nan Peterson's first and only appearance on Gunsmoke.

Janet's young brother was played by Steven Terrell, who was 31 at the time, and this was his only appearance on Gunsmoke. John Larch played the father of the gang, and he was 47 years old, and this was his fifth appearance on Gunsmoke.

Larch is not very convincing as a father, nor as the victim that he wants to be. According to Larch, a railroad spark started a fire on his crops and destroyed everything he owned. That is impossible, unless he had his crops planted right up to the tracks. Usually the land around the tracks is owned by the railroads. They are not going to lay down rail lines through crops.

The rest of the story is just as bad. Larch takes his teenage kids on a train to rob it. Why would he take the girl? It would have made more sense if she was outside holding the horses or maybe just at home reading her Bible. Larch shoots the baggage car agent, and takes off with $50,000.00. That $50,000 in 1870 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $987,320.61 in 2020, yet it had no guards.

Larch and his kids spend the rest of the episode crying "poor me" because the railroad owed them a million dollars. Into the mix is Bartlett Robinson as the evil railroad detective, making nasty insinuations about Dillon keeping the $50K and having a sexual relationship with "Jailbait Janet." This was the last of Robinson's seven appearances on Gunsmoke. He definitely stinks up Dodge with his slanders against Marshal Dillon.

One interesting note is that whenever people bad-mouth Dillon in front of Miss Kitty, she acts like she could care less. Later on, towards the end of the series, she became more defensive about Matt and his reputation.

The end of the story is as convoluted as the rest of it. Kitty begs Dillon to let Jailbait Janet stay with her. Janet takes advantage of Kitty's trust, and breaks her family out of jail. They go off to pick up the railroad money. When Dillon catches up, Larch gets what he deserves. Then Dillon cuts the kids a break.

Was it because he really wanted them to get a fresh start, or because he wanted to score some points with Miss Kitty? Either way, this is another example of Dillon selectively enforcing the law. Sometimes he arrests people who were defending themselves after being victimized, and yet Dillon has no sympathy for them. Other times he selectively enforces the law to fit his sympathy for someone. Either way, it seems like Justice is subjective.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uneven
dougdoepke28 November 2012
A train baggage car is held up by four masked men one of whom ends up shooting the clerk. Matt and Chester track them, encountering a hospitable man and his son and daughter on the prairie. Still, Matt's suspicious and jails them except for the girl, Janet, who's turned over to Kitty. But the girl breaks her dad and brother out, and now Matt has to track them again.

This is an uneven episode, more contrived than usual, with Robinson going over the top as the demanding railroad agent. But the narrative again brings up the plight of homesteading on the prairie, which makes the little family more sympathetic than simply a bunch of robbers. But, it also calls into question Matt's judgment at story's end by making us wonder if justice has truly been served by his decision. Nonetheless, I see that as a series strength since life itself doesn't always wrap things up neatly. Then too, by bending to sentiment Dillon is humanized in an unusual way for the unbending lawmen heroes of this TV-cowboy period.

(In passing-- I'm curious why the final sequence was done on an exterior set. Of course, that was needed to stage the big storm effects. But why, I wonder, did the producers think a violent storm was needed when the dramatics themselves seem sufficient. Just curious.)
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fifty thousand dollars??!!
george-84123 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Weak episode. The writer's effort to evoke sympathy for the widower and his two kids just doesn't work, especially after he shoots and kills the railroad official in the course of stealing the $50,000.

And that's part of the problem! The rancher may have a legitimate gripe about the railroad's accidental "spark" burning down his farm. But farms in those days sold for hundreds of dollars, not fifty thousand! $50,000 in Gunsmoke days has to be like at least a million dollars today. It's farcical that the railroad would have $50,000 in an open safe "guarded" by an elderly clerk who wasn't even wearing a gun. The story ends after Matt shoots the widower dead, recovers the $50,000 and takes $1000 of it to give the two kids a stake for a new life in Wyoming, reasoning that the railroad was offering a $1000 reward for the recovery of the money so his actions amount to the same thing. He does concede that he's "bending the law a bit", but rationalizes that "the law is young in these parts" and bending the law is part of his job! Not sure about that---Matt bends it an awful lot here. Both "kids" were probably old enough to be hanged for murder. Dad claims their guns weren't even loaded but we all know as accomplices they'd be just as guilty as the guy who pulled the trigger. Personally, I don't think the kids should have been "granted" $1000 by Dillon and I do think they should have served some time in juvenile detention so they'd learn that you don't pursue a grievance by stealing far more money that you lost from your opponent!
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The ending is highly questionable in this show
kfo94942 September 2013
We can only guess that the writers wanted to show a soft side of Marshal Matt Dillon but it appears that they went well over the line as they used some questionable tactics, or even unlawful tactics, to fulfill the point they were trying to create. The story seemed to push the limits of what Marshal Dillon has been preaching to people when concerning respecting the law.

The story begins as three people rob the train that is heading toward Dodge. They get the money that train was carrying but end up shooting and killing a train clerk before getting away. Matt and Chester trail the bandits and find a father, Dan Everly, and his two teenage children, Jerry and Janet. They confess to the robbery but will not reveal the location of the money.

When they get to Dodge, a train employee by the name of Krocker is telling everyone that the reason the money is not returned is because the Marshal is going to run away with the young girl, Janet, and take the money with him. And it even looks worse when the family breaks out of jail and is on the loose. Matt will again have to track the family in order to bring back the money and hopefully justice.

They story, even with some flaws, is going fairly well at this point. However it is about to take a turn that would not follow the usual logic set forth by Marshal Dillon. Matt tends to violate the same law that he uses to arrest and prosecute others on the Kansas prairie. He threw out the law that he preaches to others and took it upon himself to rewrite the law on his own terms. Just did not set right and decreased the value of the show. The ending ruined the watching experience for this episode.
11 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
****spoiler alert!******
phillyflash-1886726 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
****spoiler alert!******

Strange for the Marshall & Chester to be leaving a body for the buzzards, even in a rainstorm...

The kids seem equally unconcerned about their father's disposition. They're more interested in taking the money and running!

At least the Marshall admitted to bending the law in handing them $1,000 in reward money out of the loot they stole.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just Plain Awful
StrictlyConfidential1 December 2020
In this episode of TV's "Gunsmoke" there's definitely one law for the men and then there's another, quite different law for the women. And, I don't go for this kind of thing, at all.

And when it came to Marshal Dillon s-t-r-e-t-c-h-i-n-g the law, I thought that he was an even bigger dingleberry than the criminals were.

I'm not kidding here. This was really one terrible episode.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed