"Hart to Hart" Murder Between Friends (TV Episode 1979) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A healthy way to exchange differences!
abcs9930 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Another episode that withholds the answer to the puzzle until near the end. Despite the "who" being obvious and some forays into other possibilities that seemed too obvious, the "how" is not. The storyline for this one is interesting and without a major flaw. Jonathan did get away with parking in a long "no parking" zone, however! The best and perhaps telling (for the series) parts of this episode was a scene about 2/3rds in when Jonathan and Jennifer have a lengthy exchange where they disagree but ultimately conclude back to normal tones. It was a delightful bit of acting and one wonders how many takes they did it in.

Meanwhile, the ending of this one is clever and brings a smile, the second episode in a row that had something like this and what makes for a more successful episode.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
How many red herrings does it take to screw in a light bulb?
HilaryElizabeth96 April 2015
I should have known from the opening scene that this one was going to be work to get through. The old Hollywood kind of over-the-top acting was painful out of these guest stars, and by the time the gun goes off I was glad to be rid of one of them. A Bonnie Bartlett so ageless it's unreal is the grieving wife, and now we're off on a classic whodunit. There are at least four people you are just sure did it at any given time, then there's a 5th, and all but one are red herrings with some kind of ax grind. Honestly, didn't enjoy the story on this one at all, but I was fascinated, anyway. For one thing, Stefanie Powers is completely believable in every single thing she does. Her expressions, the way she sits, and her reactions. She's got more presence in her silences than some actors do in their line deliveries. I also loved how believable Jonathan is when he gets heated with his friend. The weird stuff fascinated me, too. Jonathan's robe is really beautiful, but that H on the breast reminded me of Laverne and her L's. I also couldn't look away at how nipply it was out there in the very interesting exercise class. The instructor was so harsh, and they named her Inga. Really? OK. Usually I can relate to this show without being reminded that it's 36 years old, but in this episode Jonathan whistles at his friend's secretary. No way Jose' would that go over these days from anyone, let alone a Jonathan Hart. Once I picked my jaw up off the floor I watched the scene, and ya know what? Shannon Wilcox is fantastic. Really, really good. She went from very very busy actress to nothing since 2011, unfortunately. I'd say of all the characters, including Bonnie's, she was the only one I really actually found myself caring that much about. I guess my problem wasn't the story, it was, sadly, everything else. The scripted dialogue was eh, the acting was really eh, and the direction was just plain weird. Like let's talk about the hats in the scene of mourners heading for the funeral. I had a director who did mostly period stuff, and he made everyone wear hats all the time in every show. No one got away without a hat, and I kind of felt like he might be directing this episode, too. The collection of cars in that scene was the strangest anywhere, from jalopy's (thanks, Max) to the Rolls – then the scriptwriter goes and blames the ex- wives who got all the good cars in the divorces! What? Some great nuggets, though, like watching Lionel Stander drive the Rolls; I'll bet every opportunity he had to do so he just ate up. He also got a great line when he says someone was crying alligator tears. Jennifer corrects him with crocodile tears, and he says, "crock of somethin'." Zing! But again, a weirdly placed scene in the park, and why on earth did the costumer dress them like twinsies? Perhaps the strangest choice here was when one of the red herrings is killed, and the next day several people, including J&J just walk right into the crime scene, no telltale yellow tape, no CSI, no nothing. Even back in 1979, this is a plot hole that is gaping. It's in that scene, though, that J&J have themselves a spat, and what fun THAT was. The chemistry between them is off the charts in that scene, the love amidst annoyance is so clear, and the chastely sweet kiss Jennifer gives Jonathan at the end just made my heart expand. It's good stuff, Maynard. Back to weirdness, the end fight scene has Jennifer just watching while Jonathan allows himself to be relieved of his sleeve, followed by just silly, silly choreography. It was the kicker, however, that really had me scratching my head. It comes out of positively nowhere for no reason and, while adorable, it doesn't belong. If Harry Caesar as Lt. Doyle had stuck around for future episodes I'd've thought maybe the bowling scene was filmed as part of another episode and then moved to this one, but no, this is his one and only episode. Talk about random. People, it was a weird ep. It was just a really weird ep. Worth watching … but weird.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Murder between friends
coltras3510 June 2022
Two of the Harts' friends are suspects in the murder of a famous divorce attorney -- and they aren't answering Jennifer's and Jonathan's questions. But their bickering over who is innocent of the two - Jonathan thinks his friend is innocent whereas Jennifer says her friend is innocent - is amusing. This is sort of a classic whodunnit with enough red herrings and twists. Definitely one of the best in season 1.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed