"Law & Order" Misconception (TV Episode 1991) Poster

(TV Series)

(1991)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Two coldblooded con artists
bkoganbing12 August 2017
After working late Molly Price is assaulted and loses her baby she was carrying as a result. Chris Noth and Paul Sorvino at first work on the theory that her philandering boss lawyer Nicholas Surovy was the one who impregnated her and then tried to kill the kid. Easy to buy because Surovy is not one of God's noblest creatures.

But later it was those loose details that Columbo always harps on that slowly tear apart their story. In fact the conduct of Price and her "former" boyfriend Reed Diamond now a cabdriver and formerly a lawyer disbarred in his native Wisconsin is called into question.

Both of them truly deserve each other, a pair of real snakes, two coldblooded con artists.

Can't say any more, you have to see this for yourselves.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Motherly Love.
rmax3048236 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Back in the early 50s, I think, some wag added up all the elements in the human body, gave each their market value, and it came out to about two dollars. A human body, even a baby's, is worth considerably more than that to some people.

A young woman is found beaten and kicked in an alley outside the law office where she works. She miscarries. Serreta and Logan look into the case and it appears that she had been seduced by her boss and, when he found she was pregnant, decided to abort the child himself.

The woman and her husband are stricken with grief, but not so much that they are prevented from bringing a suit for a couple of million bucks against the lawyer who presumably impregnated her during their three-month affair.

But it's not so simple. Real life is usually more complicated than that, and these additional complications are what add zest to what might otherwise be just another cops and criminals TV series.

It develops that the young couple have turned the wife into a baby factory. The child had already been promised to a couple wanting to adopt it, and it had been already paid for, with non-refundable funds in case of accidental miscarriage.

Moreover, medical forensics casts doubt on the lawyer's being responsible for the pregnancy. The child is probably that of the husband, not the wife's boss. So the lawyer was deliberately set up for the million-dollar lawsuit.

The plot sort of lifts up a rock and reveals a horde of disgusting things scurrying around under it. The lawyer has been banging his secretary. (It costs him his family.) The wife has been using her uterus as an ATM. Her husband has been in cahoots and bilked a childless couple out of considerable expense money.

Amy Price is the duplicitous mother and she's perfect for the role. Her performance is good -- she goes from mourning the lost child to a grim determination to keep as many shekels as possible. But, equally important, she LOOKS right. She's not overly attractive by Hollywood standards but she's by no means ugly either. What she does have is a formidable jaw that suggests fortitude and a pair of keen and piercing blue eyes that see right to the heart of the matter, which is where the big bucks lie.

It's not even touched upon, but a viewer may be excused for asking what would have happened to the child if, after these revelations, it had been born. This is the very definition of an "unwanted child." What a pro-choice argument it makes.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Tough misconception
TheLittleSongbird26 February 2020
It must have been a tall order and quite daunting for the show aiming to be as good as the consistently good to brilliant Season 1. But Season 2 of 'Law and Order' managed to be just as good. Starting off more than solidly, if understadably unsettled due to the number of changes it had to work with, and generally getting better even with the odd minor dip quality-wise. Even the weaker episodes of the season still managed to be well above average.

"Misconception" is certainly a well above average episode, or at least to me that is. It just falls shy of greatness or of being one of the season's best, and is a bit of a let down after two amazing and quite powerful previous episodes. It is still very good and again does hit hard, also think its tackling of a difficult subject that will resonate with quite a lot of people was brave and commendable. What was unsettled before started to show signs of settling four episodes in and that continues in "Misconception".

Again, it is a well acted episode. Paul Sorvino had a tough job replacing George Dzundza but has not been a bad replacement at all, far from it, and he and Chris Noth (not disappointing either) are gelling better with each episode. Michael Moriarty is still killing it as the most interesting of the regular characters Stone, such a juicy part and one that Moriarty acts the socks off of. Molly Price is the other acting standout, first affecting but then serpentine. The chemistry feels cohesive.

Production values are sharp and the grit and slickness hasn't gone, despite looking sharper. The music is a good fit tonally and in placement, while the direction is sympathetic which allows the story to breathe but alert enough to make it not drag. The script is tight and thoughtful, tactful in how it explores the episode's themes.

Something that was very striking about the story, which had an absorbing case and the second half even more compelling and with tension and poignancy, that it had a sensitive and relatable subject not easy to talk about and explore it without being heavy-handed or trivialising. The two main guest characters are very interesting characters and really give off the creepy vibe.

Though perhaps it could have explored it even further, there was room for more growth and even more of an emotional connection perhaps. Which would have made the point/argument it was trying to make clearer and stick more, again perhaps.

It is agreed that what happened to the child could have done with more explanation.

On the whole, very good. 8/10
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Controversial like SVU
safenoe24 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This could have easily been a story-ripped-from-the-headline for Law and Order: SVU. I don't know if it was designed for Misconception to immediately follow God Bless the Child, but maybe I don't know.

Anyway, this episode, Misconception gets a bit out of hand towards the end, and you kind of wonder about the contortions that occurred when the script was being written.

Anyway, for me I still like the early episodes, and especially enjoy seeing the helicopter shot of the cars over the bridge at night, although the drivers and passengers would have had no idea they were a part of Law and Order history.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed