An attorney may have been killed for trying to further bilk people who have lost their life savings in an S&L scandal.An attorney may have been killed for trying to further bilk people who have lost their life savings in an S&L scandal.An attorney may have been killed for trying to further bilk people who have lost their life savings in an S&L scandal.
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaFinal performance of veteran character actor Dub Taylor. He has over 260 acting credits listed in IMDb for both TV and movie roles. A very familiar face from Western TV and movie roles. He was a member of the 1937 Alabama football team that played in the Rose Bowl.
- Quotes
Willard Tappan: You know, they're talking about privatizing the park. A subway token to enter or $30 a year. Trump thinks he can run it at a profit.
Jack McCoy: That's fascinating. We're here to...
Willard Tappan: You're here because you have a problem. I'm talking to you because I have a problem.
Jack McCoy: We'll prove that you hid that money, Mr. Tappan. That'll prolong your study of institutional dining.
Willard Tappan: Yes, that's my problem. Meanwhile, Mr. Curren, your murderer, will go free.
Jack McCoy: If you hadn't stolen his money, that murder would never have taken place.
Willard Tappan: I concede your point. If things were different, they wouldn't be the same. Look, I know that you've been asking about a conversation I may have had with Mr. Curren, a conversation I may not be able to recall.
Jack McCoy: I saw your testimony to the House Banking Committee. You couldn't seem to recall the answers to more than 200 questions.
Willard Tappan: My memory is dreadful. Especially when I'm anxious about the future.
Jack McCoy: What do you want?
Willard Tappan: No prosecution on fraud.
Jack McCoy: We'll take your money.
Willard Tappan: You'll take it anyway.
There is a plot hole, which I won't give away in detail. Suffice it to say that the legal mechanism by which Jack McCoy resolves the case is hugely implausible. The extent to which this bothers you will probably determine your reaction to the episode as a whole. For myself, I'm happy to enjoy this as a work of human drama rather than legal realism.
- L_O_Addict
- Dec 5, 2020
- Permalink