4 reviews
The eclectic and quirky Vincent D'Onofrio has a real interesting duel of wits with Michael Gross playing a psychologist. Not only a psychologist but one who is on call as a prosecution witness when they're trying to dispute an insanity defense. In fact when we meet him first, Gross is testifying at one of Courtney B. Vance's trials.
Ever since he left Family Ties playing the former hippie now parent Steven Keaton, Gross has played mostly bad guys and well. I've seen him in so many sleazeball parts that I wonder how he was ever cast in Family Ties in the first place. But being a psychologist who knows how both crazy people think and about police methods, this guy will not be easy to take down.
The reason for the murder of a man at the Bar Mitzvah of his son is to impress the victim's sister-in-law whom Gross has absolutely flipped over. Stephanie Seymour is certainly one beautiful woman. Why a murder to impress her and why the brother-in-law is for your viewing pleasure.
The end is usually a battle of wits between Major Case and the perpetrator. This one is one of the best.
Ever since he left Family Ties playing the former hippie now parent Steven Keaton, Gross has played mostly bad guys and well. I've seen him in so many sleazeball parts that I wonder how he was ever cast in Family Ties in the first place. But being a psychologist who knows how both crazy people think and about police methods, this guy will not be easy to take down.
The reason for the murder of a man at the Bar Mitzvah of his son is to impress the victim's sister-in-law whom Gross has absolutely flipped over. Stephanie Seymour is certainly one beautiful woman. Why a murder to impress her and why the brother-in-law is for your viewing pleasure.
The end is usually a battle of wits between Major Case and the perpetrator. This one is one of the best.
- bkoganbing
- Dec 5, 2014
- Permalink
- Scarecrow-88
- Nov 11, 2010
- Permalink
The original 'Law and Order' will always to me be the best of the 'Law and Order' shows (other than the UK 'Law and Order', but that feels more like its own separate show or at least how it feels to me). Do feel though, since seeeing them regularly through late night re-runs though that both 'Special Victims Unit' and 'Criminal Intent' are worthy spin-offs, if more in the earlier seasons than the more frequently aired later ones for both shows.
Up to this point of Season 1, and 'Criminal Intent' even, there were a few particularly outstanding episodes (especially "The Faithful", "Jones" and "Poison") and even the weakest ("The Third Horseman") was still decent. So a very solid standard and it was great to see the show get off to such a promising start. Personally consider, out of the twelve episodes at this stage, "Crazy" among the better-faring episodes and has one of the best supporting/guest star turns.
Did think that the identity of the perpetrator was never really in doubt, it was a case of suspects being too few and being a little too obvious too early and considering how they are such a nasty piece of work the outcome is like a slap in the face.
Also felt that the motive was rather extreme and quite idiotic, when one wants to know why a crime is committed it is understandable if they want a motive that's easy to buy and undermines a character that makes such a big impression in the episode (would not have minded if it was cliched and would prefer it over "they killed for that" motives).
"Crazy" does show however that one of the beauties of 'Law and Order: Criminal Intent' is seeing the detectives' methods and how they work in getting a result. Even when the who is obvious, the motive is not as much, true for this episode and the show in general. Goren's are quite unorthodox and eccentric and that's what sets this interesting character apart. Also love Goren and Eames' chemistry together, and they contrast beautifully with he being the hard-boiled and somewhat neurotic one and she the softer-spoken, more by-the-book and sympathetic one.
It's another case too of tackling a heavy subject, child abuse in this case, and personally didn't consider it tastelessly done, there isn't really anything that came over as controversial. Subtle it isn't but 'Criminal Intent' is not always the most subtle of shows. The story is absorbing, especially in the latter stages. The writing is taut and has amusing moments in particularly the battle of wits chemistry of Goren and Webb.
Expectedly, "Crazy" is a slick looking episode with some understated grit too, and the music thankfully doesn't intrude or feel ham-handed. The direction has momentum, so it's not hard to digest what is going on yet it doesn't become dreary either. The detective methods and psychology are very intriguing, as is the character of Goren. A character brilliantly portrayed by Vincent D'Onofrio and there is a nice softer contrast in Kathryn Erbe. Stephanie Seymour does a lot with her role but it is the deliciously barnstorming performance of Michael Gross that makes the biggest impression without unbalancing things.
All in all, very good if not quite outstanding. 8/10
Up to this point of Season 1, and 'Criminal Intent' even, there were a few particularly outstanding episodes (especially "The Faithful", "Jones" and "Poison") and even the weakest ("The Third Horseman") was still decent. So a very solid standard and it was great to see the show get off to such a promising start. Personally consider, out of the twelve episodes at this stage, "Crazy" among the better-faring episodes and has one of the best supporting/guest star turns.
Did think that the identity of the perpetrator was never really in doubt, it was a case of suspects being too few and being a little too obvious too early and considering how they are such a nasty piece of work the outcome is like a slap in the face.
Also felt that the motive was rather extreme and quite idiotic, when one wants to know why a crime is committed it is understandable if they want a motive that's easy to buy and undermines a character that makes such a big impression in the episode (would not have minded if it was cliched and would prefer it over "they killed for that" motives).
"Crazy" does show however that one of the beauties of 'Law and Order: Criminal Intent' is seeing the detectives' methods and how they work in getting a result. Even when the who is obvious, the motive is not as much, true for this episode and the show in general. Goren's are quite unorthodox and eccentric and that's what sets this interesting character apart. Also love Goren and Eames' chemistry together, and they contrast beautifully with he being the hard-boiled and somewhat neurotic one and she the softer-spoken, more by-the-book and sympathetic one.
It's another case too of tackling a heavy subject, child abuse in this case, and personally didn't consider it tastelessly done, there isn't really anything that came over as controversial. Subtle it isn't but 'Criminal Intent' is not always the most subtle of shows. The story is absorbing, especially in the latter stages. The writing is taut and has amusing moments in particularly the battle of wits chemistry of Goren and Webb.
Expectedly, "Crazy" is a slick looking episode with some understated grit too, and the music thankfully doesn't intrude or feel ham-handed. The direction has momentum, so it's not hard to digest what is going on yet it doesn't become dreary either. The detective methods and psychology are very intriguing, as is the character of Goren. A character brilliantly portrayed by Vincent D'Onofrio and there is a nice softer contrast in Kathryn Erbe. Stephanie Seymour does a lot with her role but it is the deliciously barnstorming performance of Michael Gross that makes the biggest impression without unbalancing things.
All in all, very good if not quite outstanding. 8/10
- TheLittleSongbird
- Sep 25, 2019
- Permalink
I'm enjoying reruns of the first season of CRIMINAL INTENT, which has both D'Onofrio and long-haired Erbe in fine form. But this segment suffers from poor direction of the actors by good ole Steve Shill, the maestro who "graduated" to directing last year's candidate for trashiest movie honors, OBSESSED starring Beyoncé.
Here he's piloting an even more beautiful woman, my choice of greatest all-time from the Victoria's Secret catalog, Stephanie Seymour. Needless to say, he doesn't do her, or the viewer justice.
-SPOILERS AHEAD-
Not helping is a contrived, never convincing script, about a shrink (Michael Gross, who should be ashamed of this particular performance) who kills his would-be girl friend's brother-in-law to try and win her affections (!) He's crazy like a fox, so he follows his textbook of mentally-ill symptoms and convinces everyone of his erratic behavior before D'Onofrio & Erbe can track him down as the killer, all the better to plead insanity and get off with an ultra-mild punishment.
This nonsense is built around an even less digestible hook of suspected child abuse that sets the whole scheme in motion, involving Stephanie's niece being abused by her dad, the murder victim. That subplot is resolved in a tasteless manner, just to add sensationalism to an already idiotic plot line.
Shill handles this admittedly inferior material flatly, with Seymour sleepwalking through her role -a shame, since we have so few opportunities to see this beauty act -last time I can remember was in Ed Harris' POLLOCK. IMDb says these are her ONLY two acting roles, period, so Shill wasting her is unforgivable. He could have used a potted plant for the result shown here, and (revealing my particular bias), we don't even get to see her fabulous legs! Gross, as already mentioned, muffs his nutsy role -I didn't believe him for a minute in or out of character(s). D'Onofrio is allowed to ham it up shamelessly when interrogating Gross -again I fault the "director". Always reliable J.K. Simmons offered a few seconds of relief as a good-guy psychiatrist, but overall this episode lands with a deadly thud.
Here he's piloting an even more beautiful woman, my choice of greatest all-time from the Victoria's Secret catalog, Stephanie Seymour. Needless to say, he doesn't do her, or the viewer justice.
-SPOILERS AHEAD-
Not helping is a contrived, never convincing script, about a shrink (Michael Gross, who should be ashamed of this particular performance) who kills his would-be girl friend's brother-in-law to try and win her affections (!) He's crazy like a fox, so he follows his textbook of mentally-ill symptoms and convinces everyone of his erratic behavior before D'Onofrio & Erbe can track him down as the killer, all the better to plead insanity and get off with an ultra-mild punishment.
This nonsense is built around an even less digestible hook of suspected child abuse that sets the whole scheme in motion, involving Stephanie's niece being abused by her dad, the murder victim. That subplot is resolved in a tasteless manner, just to add sensationalism to an already idiotic plot line.
Shill handles this admittedly inferior material flatly, with Seymour sleepwalking through her role -a shame, since we have so few opportunities to see this beauty act -last time I can remember was in Ed Harris' POLLOCK. IMDb says these are her ONLY two acting roles, period, so Shill wasting her is unforgivable. He could have used a potted plant for the result shown here, and (revealing my particular bias), we don't even get to see her fabulous legs! Gross, as already mentioned, muffs his nutsy role -I didn't believe him for a minute in or out of character(s). D'Onofrio is allowed to ham it up shamelessly when interrogating Gross -again I fault the "director". Always reliable J.K. Simmons offered a few seconds of relief as a good-guy psychiatrist, but overall this episode lands with a deadly thud.