"Midsomer Murders" A Worm in the Bud (TV Episode 2002) Poster

(TV Series)

(2002)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Another great murder mystery.
poolandrews19 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Midsomer Murders: A Worm in the Bud is set in the small village of Midsomer Worthy where several local farmers & residents are at war over the proposed selling of Setwale Woods near Abbey farm owned by James Harrington (Adam Kotz) who wants to sell the land to a property developer to fell & build houses on. Things take a very serious turn when the body of local farmers wife Susan Bartlett is found in the woods & a police investigation headed up by DCI Tom Barnaby (John Nettles) & Sgt. Troy (Daniel Casey) is started, was it murder or suicide? They learn of various affairs, money problems, jealously, dark family secrets, lies, sinister obsession's, ancient poisons & Jack Russell dogs all of which may or may not have a bearing on the case. Then James Harrington himself turns up murdered & the case gets even more complicated...

Episode 2 from season 5 this Midsomer Murders mystery was directed by David Tucker & is another very strong murder mystery during a golden period for this often great series. The opening twenty or thirty minutes of A Worm in the Bud are excellent with a very well crafted & written mystery that is developed up to a point that the episode then begins to drag a little & I have to say the middle third of A Worm in the Bud feels rather empty by comparison to it's excellent start & subsequent excellent finish. There's a body found quickly, there's all the ground work for the mystery & potential motives & suspects as well as sowing in plenty of red herrings & clues & I just felt this episode shot it's load a bit too soon & leaves itself with nowhere to go although that's a small quibble & maybe I'm just being a bit picky. The motives of the killer are a little flimsy but I did really like the ending to this one which is something a bit different to the usual explanations given by Barnaby although there's never any reason given as to why they only made Susan unconscious & went back later (several hours later in fact) & killed her which I did wonder about. So while there's a lull during the middle as two little kids play detective for a while this is a good solid episode that I enjoyed, the actual murders are a bit dull & neither are shown on screen (the bodies are merely found) but this is a still as well put together & intriguing as a lot of the early episodes from the early seasons.

I must admit I was very disappointed by the murders in this one, neither are shown on screen & are two of the dullest in the entire series although death by drowning in farm animal sh*t is quite an amusing concept. The photography is still very nice though as are the usual locations in & around Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire. The acting is good from a decent cast with British actress Wendy Craig probably the most recognisable face amongst them.

A Worm in the Bud is another highly recommended Midsomer Murders episode with an intriguing, absorbing, well thought out & satisfying plot that I am sure detective show fans everywhere will enjoy.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Love the children
labenji-121631 October 2021
Generally I don't like small children in my Mystery, they tend to be written as too bratty, or they simply can't act, but little Clarista and Charlie are fantastic in this episode --- Overall good episode.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Opposition to a housing estate results in murder.
Sleepin_Dragon8 March 2020
Two kids find a body, but the little girl is no stranger to making up stories to share her younger brother.

There is a sure quality to the earlier episodes of Midsomer Murders, the acting, production values and combination of Barnaby and Troy can make even a decent story into something very good.

A worm in the Bud falls into that category, it isn't exactly a remarkable story, but it's a very good watch. The crime solving kids are good fun, and their scene with Joyce is sweet, at least someone appreciates her cooking.

Wendy Craig and Ian Hogg are both particularly good, I was always surprised that neither reappeared on the show.

It's a good, solid episode. 8/10.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
big problems in Midsomer Worthy
blanche-226 February 2014
The people of Midsomer Worthy are attempting to keep James Harrington from razing Setwale Woods and turning it into housing. This apparently means that the farm owned by Simon Bartlett will be lost. He teams up with an attorney, Bernadette Sullivan, to stop Harrington. In fact, they team up in more ways than one.

When two children report a body in Setwale Woods, no one believes them until their father sees it, now in a different place. The body is that of Simon's wife, Catherine, an unhappy woman who left a suicide note. It's later determined to be murder. Then there's another murder. So who's doing the killing, and why? In this episode, Barnaby gets some crucial help from the brother and sister, whose parents are tearing their hair out with worry. There is a big hole in this script, which is that no one ever says why the Bartlett farm will be lost if the housing development goes up. Harrington could not have forced Bartlett to sell his farm, yet there seems to be a great deal of angst about holding onto it.

Still, it's a good episode with a good ending. The best scene is the children boarding a bus for Causton and going to see Barnaby at home. He isn't there, but Joyce is, and the little boy isn't interested in the mystery -- he just wants food.

Entertaining.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Season 5 continues to go strong
TheLittleSongbird11 January 2017
The first three seasons of 'Midsomer Murders' were more consistent, with all the episodes ranging from decent to classic.

Season 4 became less consistent, with "The Electric Vendetta" being the show's first bad episode and "Who Killed Cock Robin?" only being a marginal improvement, while the rest were very good. Season 5 got off to a promising start with "Market for Murder", and that high standard is continued with "A Worm in the Bud".

"A Worm in the Bud" lulls in pacing in the middle with the-kids-playing-detectives not adding to the story as much as it could have done. Agreed also that the murders are on the bland side this time, in a show where they can be brutal and sometimes elaborate, and also on that it was an annoyance about not being given an explanation for why Susan wasn't killed straight after being made unconscious (if indicated in the episode, it was very vague to me).

However, as always, the production values are top notch, with to die for scenery, the idyllic look of it contrasting very well with the story's grimness, and quaint and atmospheric photography. The music fits perfectly, and the theme tune one of the most memorable and instantly recognisable of the genre.

Meanwhile, the script is smart, thought-provoking and suitably grim, the humour also being a breath of fresh air. Nothing felt inconsequential, everything had a point and it was intriguing and maintained attention throughout. The story is absorbing and rich in atmosphere, with some neat twists and turns, a very memorably tense climax and the murderer's identity being one that one doesn't see coming. The characters are suitably colourful and eccentric, though also not what they seem.

Acting is very good, superb in the case of John Nettles, and his chemistry with Daniel Casey (a great contrast as ever as Troy, and the two work brilliantly together), Jane Wymark (love their loving chemistry) and Barry Jackson always convincing and more. Gillian Barge and Wendy Craig give great support.

Overall, another strong episode if not quite on classic level. 8/10 Bethany Cox
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another Nasty Landowner
Hitchcoc27 February 2016
If the criminals were able to watch previous episodes, they would know that it is best that a cruel, insensitive landowner is going to pay the price. In this one, he is going to use the woods that everyone sees as partly theirs and put up properties on it to strike it rich. There are polite, but under the skin vicious, characters interacting. The women in particular are the worst. At first, a young barrister is fighting the good fight over the property, but we later find that she has feet of clay. There is the old hired man who reds the Bible, quotes verses, and keeps pictures from his youth on a bulletin board. The bodies pile up. There are also two children who consider themselves investigators. They find the first body, but because the young girl has such an imagination, she is not believed. I would consider it an adequate representation of the series.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pretty good overall..
harrykivi24 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
"Midsomer Murders" has been one of my most beloved shows for many years now, but I haven't had the time to review episodes when the show was at its best. But now I do. I am going to start with the 5.season, which is a consistently good series with "A worm in the bud" being a pretty good episode overall.

Let's start with positives first:

. The production values are wonderful as always with nice direction by David Tucker and amazing music by Jim Parker in the background.

. Most of the script is well written as "A worm in the bud" has a lot of colorful characters, compelling subplots and very tense solution that I didn't see coming.

. The acting is also very strong. Gillian Barge, Wendy Craig do particularly well with their roles. Of course, I love John Nettles as Tom Barnaby, who brought so much warmness to his character. Let alone Barry Jackson or Daniel Casey who are just as good.

. There is also some lovely humor there and then, which is always charming :)

But....

. In the latter middle the pacing of this episode does suffer from a children detective subplot which doesn't bring much as it could had. Also agree that most of "A worm in the bud"s clues are fired of bit too quickly from the writer, which left me wondering: where else is to go?

. There are some untied endings at the end. For example, why was the first victim in the bushes six hours before she is found in the pond? That is never answered, though the murder mystery is built on this fact...

Overall, very good, but not great episode.

8/10 HK
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The ending!! Such a great episode, classic
barbrickey176 August 2020
I really have high expectations for the early episodes of Midsomer Murders, I always want them to be just excellent and to always have me intrigued and guessing what's going to happen next. I quite enjoyed this episode, it is worth a watch mainly because it's got great characters, and a really good storyline and plot to keep you interested and guessing who the killer is. Without spoilers, it certainly steers you in the wrong direction like most episodes with making you think it's one person, when it's actually another. I have never been so surprised with a twist before in my life, the ending was just incredible!! besides a couple of dull bits, you have to keep watching, and you'll be blown away by the ending, at least I was. A classic episode of Midsomer! Not the best episode I have watched, but I still love it. Wendy Craig in particular is just amazing, she makes for the perfect innocent old lady character, and the rest of the cast is fantastic as well, they always find such good actors. I certainly recommend watching, you will not be disappointed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It always bothers me
ojay221 April 2013
It always bothers me that there seems to be no explanation as to how the sale of Setwale Wood by Harrington will affect the operation of Bartlett's dairy farm. Only conjecture would be that it would compromise some water rights, or the whole area would fall under new zoning regulations. Otherwise, it would seem to be solely for sentimental reasons. As for the first murder not being seen, well we do see a dark figure at night dragging the body from the position originally seen by the children in the wood, when the victim was unconscious, and then dumped into the lake. Depending on one's TV screen settings the face may be distinguishable, however, in the second incident we see the murderer's clothed and shod lower limbs while setting up the body for transport to the lake.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed