"Perry Mason" The Case of the Garrulous Go-Between (TV Episode 1964) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Good Episode
kfo949421 October 2011
This episode has all the things that make 'Perry Mason' still interesting today as it was in the early 60's. Good storyline, good acting and characters that are believable today as they were so many years ago.

Also in this episode we get to see Sue Randall (who played Beaver Cleaver's elementary school teacher) with those big beautiful eyes and girl-next-door presents. She plays Amy Scott that is going to a fortune-teller, named Madame Zillia (Lori March), and trying to find information about her life. But little does Madame Zillia know- she is being recorded during all the sessions with Amy.

We also see that Amy has hired Paul Drake to find out the whereabouts of a man named Tommy Stiller (John Napiers). At the beginning we are not sure why she wants to find him but by the end of the show it becomes clear.

Anyway a neighbor ends up dead and Amy becomes the suspect. And with Paul's ties she is defended by Perry.

I was captivated by the acting in the episode. Lori March, that played Madame Zillia, did a good job of becoming the fortune-teller and making the viewer accept her in the part. She is mysterious and rigid when she has to be- but also produces a soft side that has the watcher connecting with her feeling.

Sue Randall, with a face that stops traffic, is beautiful and outgoing in this episode. And from her looks, the viewer knows that she could have never done something as wrong as what has been accused in Hamilton Burger's complainant. (Sad that Ms Randall died of lung cancer at the age of 49)

This is a good watch because there is something for everyone in this episode. - Note, this is the third episode in a row that Della is not seen. She still must be visiting her aunt.
33 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Well paced with memorable roles
l_mammel28 March 2011
I thought this was very well paced in the way the usual complications were introduced and resolved. The beautiful young innocent accused is seeing a fortune teller, but it is telegraphed early on that she has designs. What are they? Then the involvements of the several players, including the victim, are also revealed, step by step. Finally the big picture takes shape at the usual "preliminary hearing", and we are put on tenterhooks with the subpoena of the very attractive surprise witness. I have to say I was quite taken with Madame Zillia, and her part gave her full play. Also, one of the best red herrings ever, if that's not too much of a spoiler. I was surprised to see that Lori March, as Madame Zillia, has a very thin filmography, although this is the last of her five Perry Masons, which is certainly enough to make her familiar to a devotee. Finally I must mention that Paul Drake had a lot of interesting involvement in the case, particularly in one unusual scene, and then a memorable closing vignette with Perry. I have to say I felt quite engaged for the entire hour.
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fortune Teller Drops Crystal Ball
DKosty12325 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Madame Zilla is a fortune teller who tries to see the future. In this case, her crystal ball gets no place. The plot is quite the reason to see this one, one of the better scripts despite the future not being seen.

Surprisingly without Della this one gets carried pretty well. The acting and story carry the day quite well. There is a scene with the crystal ball appearing and disappearing without any obvious explanation. That's okay, because we have a lot of the go-between's which keep the puzzle open up until the end.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sweet Susie
darbski16 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Okay, everyone else has pretty much covered the main stuff. I agree absolutely with kfo9494 about Sue Randall (It's easy to see WHY Beaver had a crush on her; if you didn't you weren't normal). One of the first questions I had was: IF Madame Zillia was such a celebrity bigshot, then WHY is she living in an apartment? Perry explains this later. Amy/Arnell has a housekeeper in an apartment? And yet has a problem raising money to pay Madame Zillia? That don't wash, do it? So the cops did a bang-up useless job of investigating old man Stiller's alleged suicide. With all the other investigating going on, didn't Tommy even think about questioning it? This was his FATHER, for Pete's sake (no reference to the deceased bird, Petey, though). One thing that I know everyone else has noticed is that the client, or future client of Perry is somehow ALWAYS rushed along; never quite able to get centered on the reality of the moment. This is a perquisite of any con game; to keep the subject just a little off balance, so to speak. The monkey wrench, in this case is the housekeeper. One other point is Merry Anders' wardrobe. Was I wrong, or was that white sable she displayed in court? On a secretary's salary? Now, what about Mr. Brylcreem/Herb Tarlek ; check out his sportcoat and oil job? He set a lot of the proceedings in motion by framing Joyce (Anders) in the divorce actions of Stillers' wife, didn't he? I'm not quite sure, but it seems that it is Slander to falsely accuse someone verbally, and if one signs their name to a document accusing someone of something known to be untrue, it is Libel. Both apply here to good old Sportcoat (Howard Kern); there has got to be grounds for criminal as well as civil prosecution of this charge. Since he admitted it in open court, he also should be charged with committing a felonious act; as part of a felonious proceeding. Maybe he should be at least investigated for participation in the murder of old man Stiller. Without his first intention, to knowingly deceive for purposes of profit (Fraud), the old guy's reputation would have been intact. An accessory, if you will. What was the involvement of the Architectural firm that profited from the contract to build the expensive apartment buildings? A tangled web, at best. Finally, Tommy (the drunken brother) and beautiful Joyce show up in a sweet new Buick? convertible to whisk Arnell away to the airport. Of course, they are now married, and living the married dream. Uh Huh. Good acting all around, quick moving story, beautiful girls, no Della (unfortunately), Paul gets a good last line - Perry with wings? I give it a 10.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Case of the Melancholy Medium
coolplanter2 March 2021
Sue Randall portrays the "Garrulous Go-Between" out to find the truth about her father's suicide--which drives the plot--and finds herself the defendant in the the murder of someone she believes to the "sweetest, kindest, gentlemen." This is well-written episode were there doesn't appear to be any of shortness of time for all the motives to fall into place--where the surprise isn't a surprise at all, but the process of elimination of characters--and there's the appropriate amount of characters in this episode. Lori March--who looks much better as a witness than in psychic weeds--and that is a good thing for the viewers. Much of the episode is attempted to be filmed outside, with ample sounds of birds mixed in--as opposed to its sullen inside opening scenes.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Miss Landers Wants To Teach A Lesson
bhoover24710 March 2022
The main attraction for this episode is the beautiful, girl next door looks of Sue Randall who was Beaver's big crush. Even normally cool and aloof Paul seems smitten. This was a good episode, easy to follow and an instance that Perry's client wasn't a complete nut case.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Are We Bored Yet
Hitchcoc11 February 2022
Where's Della? The same people have been together for so long, it might have been a good idea to infuse a little newness into the mix. These plots are so much the same. Once again, big business is involved. A young woman works to trick a clairvoyant for whom she blames her father's death and specifically suicide. Lots in the works. Once again, a fireplace poker is used.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bunco game goes wrong
bkoganbing10 February 2020
The Perry Mason client for this episode is Sue Randall who is trying to nail fortune teller Lori March for bunco as her father put his trust in her and lost control of his company, the one that Randall and her brother Tommy Stiller would have inherited.

Only it's Jacques Aubuchon who winds up murdered. Randall was renting a room from him. As it turns out March and Aubuchon have history.

In the end you feel sorry for the perpetrator, hopefully Raymond Burr will take her as a client. Good investigative work from William Hopper helps a great deal here.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
When I told him I was going to expose what he's done he twisted my arm!
kapelusznik1828 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
***MAJOR SPOILERS*** Even though he's never seen in the Perry Mason, Raymond Burr, episode or even noted it the cast credits, since he's dead before it even started, it's Edward Stiller who the main character in it. It's Stiller's daughter Arnel using the name of Amy Scott, Sue Randall, who's trying to get to the bottom of who was responsible for his death ruled as a suicide. Using private dick Paul Drake, William Hopper, to find out what kind of relationship Edward had with fortune teller Madame Zillia, Lorie March, backfires on her when the Madame's partner, who secretly feeds her information on her clients, the chubby and stuffing his mouth with food Victor Bundy, Jacques Aubuchon, was found dead at his pad not from choking on a Sheppard pie that he cooked himself up for dinner but up with with his skull bashed in with a fireplace poker! And as expected, in her being targeted by the script writers to be the killer, Amy being at the scene of the crime with her fingerprints on the poker is arrested for Bundy's murder!

On trial for her life with, who else, Perry Mason defending her it becomes apparent that fat boy Bundy's murder was connected with the so-called suicide of the late Edward Stiller Amy or Arnel's father! But what did Bundy's partner in crime, in fleecing her clients of their hard earned cash, Madame Zillia have do do with it. That turns out to be the real reason in all this confusion that in the end had Stiller's plans for building a multi million dollar luxury housing project ending up in the hands of his fired assistant the greasy looking Howard Kerns, Anthony Eisley.

***SPOILERS*** With Kerns and his sexy private secretary, or the other woman as she's known in the Perry Mason episode, Joyce Carlton, Merry Anders, now replacing Arnel/Amy Scott/Stiller as the #1 suspect in Bundy's murder the real reason as well as suspect/murder suddenly comes to the surface. It turns out that Bundy's murder was an act of revenge by the person who was the late Edward Stiller's lover. But not premeditated, thus preventing a trip to the San Quentin gas chamber, but in self defense when the fat guy was about to do that person in for exposing him! P.S check out Madame Zillia's housekeeper Dora, also a suspect in Bundy's murder, played by Lillian Buyeff who was Moses' mother in the movie "The Ten Commandants".
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed