I know Rod Serling may not have much time for many of the episodes, but he definitely needed more here, because there are so many problems with the wishes and their results in this episode.
Mistake Number One: The man granted four wishes, first wish, is to get his display's cracked glass fixed. Man, talk about a small change wish! But I suppose you could say he was just testing the waters and didn't really believe the genie, and therefore he picked the most annoying defect in the shop. Fair enough.
Mistake Number Two: Second wish is to ask for $1,000,000 right on the floor of the shop. Okay, the guy is excited, so this wish is badly considered, but not for the reason we end up getting. The reason it's badly considered, is because of the inevitable problem later, that people will come in trying to kiss backside trying to take it off the chump. But, also, when the neighborhood inevitably hears about it, do you think his place won't be a main target for burglars? To add to that, they speak of immediately going off on a trip.
And now for the stupidity of the consequence of mistake number two. The big fat lie that the IRS steps in and takes 94% of it. Never, never, in a million years does that make any sense, and Serling completely blew credibility in this episode with that. I guess it's supposed to be a joke, right? Well it makes a joke of the episode. They end up finding out they gave out $59,995 dollars to the beggars that wanted probably nothing to do with them before the windfall. So if this were for some looney reason possible at all, wouldn't it make sense to burn all the IRS money rather than give it all to such tyrants? The conclusion is obvious, the couple needs to go back out to all those beggars and at least try to get $20,000 of it back. Serling could have saved the episode by finding the TRUE IRS taxation rate for them, then have it's collection not necessary TILL TAX TIME, and have the couple give MUCH more away than they did, and still come out with the same effect, but he couldn't resist this tired old joke (and yes, it was VERY tired even way back in 1960)?
Mistake Number Three: It starts off with the stupidity of the prior wish, in that the IRS takes a laughable amount of money from them. So many have the impression that money itself is EVIL, so suddenly they think that wishing for money ALLOWING for IRS thievery would be the way to go (plus not be stupid enough to give it away to passerbys the minute you get it), but rabidly decline. Sheesh, back in those days, they might had been able to give out a decent sum to those same people, if only they invested in putting all of it into a bank, and yes, it would accrue interest for some time, and NOT have to be given straight away to the IRS. And at least that way they would be in control of the money, even if they lost 94% come tax time. Imagine the dividend payout on $1,000,000 at 5% annual interest.
Mistake Number Four: This mistake is too obvious, but it again shows the stupidity of the wisher. Come now, it's 1960, would you really want to be ruler of a country, and the other assurances, if it meant going back in time and being stuck there WITHOUT YOUR WIFE? I thought the wishes were supposed to include her in them. But in any event, it doesn't change the dilemma he put himself in, and therefore the wife would had changed into Eva Braun and gone back too, to get around the lameness of him going alone. Now while I'll admit going back in time permanently could find some advantage, it's a deliberate twist on the genie's part to put every single power seeker there, as he probably would, assuming, like the wisher here, you don't put lots of conditions on it. Well at least the wife thought that ruling a country isn't so hot if you can be ousted, etc.
Overall, I think the moral of the story is, to be careful what you wish for, you just might get it. Serling did a fairly poor job here as can be seen, but it was entertaining anyway. The immediate IRS taxation, and the amount of it, were just unforgivable though.
6 out of 9 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink