"The Twilight Zone" Profile in Silver/Button, Button (TV Episode 1986) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Two for the price of one
sol12181 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
(Some Spoilers) Double feature "New Twilight Zone" episodes involving first, "Profile in SIlver", a time traveler from the year 2172 doing a historical study of the John F. Kennedy, played by Andy Robinson, administration. This time traveler just happens to be one of JFK's future descendants Harvard history Professor Joe Fitzgerald, Lane Smith. Smith carries on him, against time travel regulations, a 1964 Kennedy half dollar as a good luck charm.

Told by his one the spot controller, also from the year 2172, and fellow historic researcher Dr. Kate Wane, Barbara Baxley, not to mess with the past but only observe it Joe, on a spur of the moment, in fact goes out of his way to prevent JFK from getting assassinated. At first being hailed as a hero from JFK on down it soon becomes apparent that Joe in having saved JFK's life has torn a hole in the space time continuum! That hole will guarantee the destruction of not only mankind but life on earth as we know it in a nuclear exchange between the USA and USSR!

***SPOILERS*** It's then with Dr. Wange's, who knew all about this in advance, help Joe together with JFK pulls off the "Big Switch" by Joe replacing the president, as President Kenndey, on the motorcade in Dallas Texas on that faithful afternoon of November 22, 1963. As things turned out Joe gave up his life to save mankind and the president John F. Kennedy was transported to the year 2172, as Joe Fitzgerald, to see his vision of the future that he strove so hard to accomplish while he was alive in the 20th century become a reality!

(Some Spoilers) In the second "New Twilight Zone" feature, "Button Button", there's this couple the Lewis' Arthur & Norma, Brad Davis & Mare Winnigham, who get a visit, after receiving this strange button machine, from the "Buttom Man" himself a Mr. Steward, Basil Hoffman. Told by Mr. Steward that all they have to do is press the bottom machine, within 24 hours before he takes it back, and get rich by receiving a cool $200,000.00 in cold cash tax free! The only drawback to this transaction is that by pushing the button someone on earth that neither of the Lewis' know will die!

After debating the issue in having someone get killed by pressing the button and getting the 200 grand for doing it Norma decides against Arthur's advice to finally press the button and strike it rich! *** SPOILERS*** Well Norma and Arthur do get the 200 G's from Mr. Steward the next day and at the same time someone that neither the Lewis', or us in the audience, don't know ends up dying for it.

***MAJOR SPOILER***The kicker to this whole story is that the button machine will now be reactivated and given to another unsuspecting couple, who don't know either Norma and Arthur, with the very same instructions by "Button Man" Steward!
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Two Quite Decent Episodes
Hitchcoc23 April 2017
A time traveler goes back to 1963 to do some visual research on the Kennedy assassination in Dallas. He accidentally prevents Kennedy from being shot and ends up a hero. The problem is that the balance of time has been ripped and Kennedy's survival causes tremendous harm. The immutability of time makes any of these types of portrayals suspect, but this is done with great intelligence and care. Also, the acting is very good. In "Button, Button," Mare Winningham plays a beady eyed, cynical wife to a weak willed man. They tolerate each other and that's about it. One day, a tall, middle aged man brings in a "button unit." It is a single red button under a plastic dome. If the recipient pushes the button, some random person will die and the button pusher will receive 200,000 dollars. The two of them jockey around their disturbing world and try to decide what to do. It's a really cool problem to face.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't mess with history let it write it's own story, and beware because someone doesn't know you!
blanbrn18 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This TZ episode number 20 from season one featured two pretty decent segments that involve choices dealing with the future and the course of history. And as one can see it's really okay to let history and life live it's own self out.

First segment titled "Profile in Silver" involves the tale of a professor from Harvard who's from the future and he gets to travel to 1963 in Dallas to see the famous ride of President Kennedy, and he is able to prevent his assassination. Only this sets off a crazy and very bad chain of events it's a total rewrite of history. Only this professor of historical time travel knows how to write a historical and patriotic end.

Second segment is strange and uncommon "Button, Button" involves a strapped cash California couple(Brad Davis and Mare Winningham)who are struggling to make ends meet. Yet their luck is about to change for the better or will it come to doom them later? As when a strange mystery man in black shows up at their apartment door with a delivered strange box the deal is like a deal with the devil. If they push a certain button someone they don't know will die and they collect $200,000! Win win or will the luck turn about fair play or a doomed luck of the draw when the box is taken from them and given to someone they don't know! I guess death for everyone is only right! Overall good episode that deals with chance and history.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Profile in Silver
safenoe10 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I saw Profile in Silver ages ago, and it was quite intriguing about what would happen if JFK survived and time travelled into the future. Very sublime stuff.

I also wonder the same about Marilyn Monroe. Now that would be a fascinating combo - JFK and Marilyn together into the future.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
By far the most intriguing & compelling of this series, but-
zacdawac11 December 2021
Profile in Silver is a sharp, funny, socially significant, unique and creative episode. The characters are fully rounded, real, credible and you feel like you've known them for years. The dialogue is sharp and on point. It's at least as good as, if not better than anything from the original series. The But is for one minor plot point: Oswald didn't do it. I'm sure of that, Oliver Stone is certain and I'm sure Rod Serling was, as well.

I'm sure I saw Button Button when it first aired but I don't remember it. This review and rating are for Profile in Silver.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Twilight Zone - Profile in Silver
Scarecrow-8826 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
John Hancock's brilliant "Profile in Silver" takes on time travel and possibility of stopping the Kennedy assassination, particularly the time fabric repercussions that result from JFK's ancestor from 2072 (Lane Smith, great as usual) interfering with Oswalt's gunfire in Dallas, 1963. 2072 has time travel, and Lane Smith is allowed to return back to 1963 to see his ancestor, JFK, in Dallas on the day of his assassination. He's compelled to save JFK and, in doing so, causes a time fabric catastrophe he'll need to fix. Such damage control isn't all that this episode has going for it, as Andrew Robinson has one of the best roles of his career, getting a chance to portray JFK, relaying the shock and awe of not only meeting his ancestor but learning of time travel and his own execution. Louis Giambalvo is JFK's Secret Service, figuring out that Smith is not just some Harvard professor who happened to be in the right place to rescue the POTUS, discovering the "profile in silver" coin dropped on the floor accidentally of their plane. Look for Jerry Hardin (Deep Throat of The X Files) as Lyndon B Johnson (!), telling JFK about tornadoes rustling up in Austin. Barbara Baxley makes an appearance as an associate of Smith's from his time, discussing with him at the beginning about the limits on them when it comes to time travel. Although Smith's heroism at the end is admirable (a unique take on "trading places"), the recognition that it is a logical flaw that wouldn't help the fabric of time might skew some viewers' opinion of the story, but I just found satisfaction in the thought behind it. I accepted it for the heart behind what Smith does and how JFK was allowed a "reprieve" to be inspirational elsewhere. Perhaps this might not hold up to close scrutiny, but again the heart was in the right place. Maybe JFK wasn't as romantic a figure as Andrew Robinson paints him as, but at least the story recognizes that even if rescued from death he could have still been involved in worldwide calamity. His decision to return to Dallas to face his own death so that the time fabric would be salvaged certainly recognizes him as a man of integrity and peeks into a moment where crisis intervened upon what should have been cause for celebration. Cool gadgets such as a watch that communicates time fabric complications and theories and a camera that plays back recordings in time. 8/10

Mare Winningham is wholly unpleasant housewife who wears a constant scowl and never has a nice thing to say to her nervy, stuttering night shift hubby (Brad Davis). A box arrives one morning and it contains a device with a red button that is later explained by visiting Basil Hoffman to offer $200,000 is she pushes it. By pushing it, though, someone she doesn't know will die! The entire tale is about whether or not Winningham pushes the button, all the while, fussing with her husband or just snarling at him. Mare has never been as purely unlikable as she is in this episode of the Twilight Zone. Brad is a harmless pushover who tries to get along with Mare, but she is a miserable soul with no redeeming qualities. When Basil looks at her and tells her (once taking the device back) that someone she doesn't know would be getting it, the close-ups are amusing. Mare realizing someone else might decide on her fate for big bucks leaves us wondering if she would get her just desserts. If you really thing about it, there's just not much to this story! I don't think a soul watching wouldn't believe she wouldn't be willing to push the button and feel little pity for the poor victim that would be sacrificed because of her greed. 4/10
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Watch it to see Matheson's story done properly
Leofwine_draca15 May 2015
PROFILE IN SILVER is a story that mixes time travel and the JFK assassination, a bit like in the recent Stephen King novel, 11/22/63. A historian goes back in time to witness the assassination first hand, but he can't help getting involved, and then he has to live with the consequences of his action. There are plenty more twists in the tale alongside a fun acting performance from HELLRAISER's Andrew Robinson.

BUTTON, BUTTON is interesting because it's an adaptation of the same Richard Matheson short story that was used in the flop Hollywood film THE BOX, with Cameron Diaz. This one's a bit better because Matheson himself wrote the screenplay, and the idea behind the tale is very slight so it works much better in a half-hour episode than it did stretched out in an hour-and-a-half movie. A suburban couple are given a box with a button on it and a deadly deal: if they press the button they'll win a fortune, but somebody somewhere in the world will die. It's moral dilemma time again, with Brad Davis, and it's pretty decent.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Profile in Silver: A can-opener
bob the moo27 March 2012
An interesting episode this one – the second part (which I didn't watch) also exists as a recent film called The Box and, like Profile in Silver, has an interesting concept behind it. It was Profile that I came to watch though because I have an interest in the work of J Neil Schulman – an interest it is worth me declaring. I know him from a low-budget film of his that I thought was terrible and since then I have read one of his books and now also watched this Twilight Zone story which he wrote. Schulman for those that don't know has been a writer for decades and in certain circles is well respected for his sci-fi writing and his libertarian writings. Personally i don't see it myself but part of me checking him out is me looking for the things that others seem to see. Unfortunately I ended this episode still unable to see them but happy to say that he did a "solid" job here.

The plot is a time-travelling historian is sent back on a mission to study his specialist time in history (North America, early 1960's) but, on the day of the assassination, finds that he is unable to prevent himself shouting out an emotional warning and inadvertently saving the President. It is not long before the ramifications of this are all too clear to him. The set-up is a good one but unfortunately it is far too practically written and lacks anything in the way of bite and impact. I recently read Alongside Night and i found the same thing in the writing there – dialogue was often too practical and explanatory and it didn't flow with a natural air. This is how it felt here too – and it gets to that stage very quickly in the opening discussion between the professor and his time-colleague. The dialogue there just dumps everything onto the viewer and it is rather unsatisfactory and unnatural. The rest of the story plays out like this – with ideas just delivered but not refined in a way that makes them work well.

Functional. It is a word I thought before and it is a word that applied here – everything about this story was functional and it didn't engage me and it never let my mind run with it because it just seemed to be matter-of-fact with not much to offer beyond the initial idea. It is a shame because the idea deserves much more but it isn't given the words or the direction to do so in a script that is entirely functional and lacking in flow. Functional – it is a good when discussing a can opener, not so much when it comes to story-telling.
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed