"Wagon Train" The Hollister John Garrison Story (TV Episode 1963) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A different emphasis
bkoganbing13 February 2018
Some real talent behind the camera went into this Wagon Train episode, Gene L. Coon who wrote for Star Trek did the script and future Oscar winning director Sydney Pollack was at the helm of this Wagon Train story. Another one of those Wagon Train episodes I remember well from my youth.

The Civil War is about to begin all over again with unreconstructed rebel Gary Cockrell and his wife Evan Evans traveling with another southern gentleman on the Train. Charles Drake is hiding a dark secret from the rest on the Wagon Train, he was from Virginia but he did not fight for the South or North. In their eyes it was worse. Drake went north and edited an abolitionist newspaper. Which makes him the lowest kind of human being around because Cockrell lost his family and his plantation burned down during an abolitionist inspired slave revolt.

If this were made today Drake would be a hero. In this story his views are tempered by the fact of the terrible carnage of the years 1861-1865 which he feels he had a part in starting. Drake just carries a burden of sadness in his performance for all to see.

Peter Whitney is also on the Chris Hale Wagon Train, he plays a surviving member of a divided family. Whitney fought for the Union and his two brothers died for the Confederacy. He's not happy with either Cockrell or Drake.

It wouldn't be the same episode today, but it's still a well acted one.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Stop rewriting history
buccaneer-5192910 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Granted this show is 60+ years old, however even in the 1950's and 60's Hollywood should have had a better understanding of history. First off John Quincy Adams, James Butler Hickok better known as (Wild Bill Hickok), Abraham Lincoln all abolitionists. Even Benjamin Franklin (even though he owned slaves) was a abolitionist. They weren't hated by both sides just by the south. If it wasn't for the abolitionists slavery probably would have continued on for any number of years, granted racial discrimination and hatred still continues to this day. However if not for the abolitionists it could be much worse, and the character of Drake saying "my father set his slaves free in his will" is meaningless because before they even had a chance to make it to the east they would have been recaptured, and re-inslaved not to mention if not for the 13th amendment the next of kin would have just purchased new slaves. Slaves finally standing up to their "masters" I don't care how nice the people were they still owned people. They endorsed chaining, beating, branding of human beings. The fact that the slaves finally fought back killing never answers anything but the quote un-quote hero of this story got what was coming to his family. The point is the hero of this story should have never been the drunk who fought for the south. He was fighting for slavery plain and simple. He should of been hung after shooting a innocent bystander!!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed