"The West Wing" Two Weeks Out (TV Episode 2006) Poster

(TV Series)

(2006)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Tour de force for Alan Alda
js_watkins7 September 2021
The West Wing only really became alive for me with the Vinick - Santos Presidential race.

Whilst The West Wing was a seminal TV series in so many different ways such as camera technique and a sense of real time political action, it often seemed mired in maudling sentimentality.

This led to storylines which meant you had to suspend disbelief - such as rushing a Middle East peace deal before one of the commercial breaks and the endless self introspection which led viewers to wonder if anyone had the time to run a country!

This, though, was far from the case with the Vinick - Santos storyline. Instead you had a sense of a battle of ideas and how the candidates' rival agendas for the country impacted on their personal lives.

This was definitely on display in this incredibly inpressive episode. Senator Arnold Vinick, played by the inestimable Alan Alda, starts the episode on the back foot. An accident at a nuclear power plant has had negative political repercussions for him just two weeks from election day.

At the same time, he is physically feeling the pressure where with constant hand shaking, he has fractured a bone in his hand but has to hide this from the media so that he is not typecast as too old for high office as compared to his much younger and physically fitter opponent, Matt Santos (as played by Jimmy Smit).

Amidst all of this, some secrets about Santos' past are unexpectedly found by Vinick's campaign advisor, Bruno (played with real sensitivity by Ron Silver).

Should Vinick use this new found information to win the election or should a higher sense of ethics prevail? When is it right to release confidential information? Is this about gaining a political advantage or letting voters know the truth?

This is the morality tale that Alan Alda's character wrestles with and this really is an acting tour de force as the character figures out what to do.

Whilst Jimny Smits is good in this episode and in this role, I felt he could have shown more emotion as to his conflicted state of mind in the final scene (without giving anything away!).

Overall this is a very good episode which also contains an intriguing sub plot within the Santos campaign.

Ultimately, after watching this episode, you will ask yourself what would you do if you were Vinick.

By the show leading the viewers to question themselves, this, therefore, is the ultimate accolade for this episode.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Good Episode Ruined by a Cheap Stunt
Sonatine973 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This could have been a good episode, especially if you're a fan of Vinick and want to seem some balance in the writing during the campaign (which would seem to be leaning in favour of Santos)

It was quite a joy to see Vinick brush aside all the conflicting advice from the licks of Bruno, Braun & Bob Mayer over the handling of the nuclear leak in is home state of California.

Rather than listening to them he decides to take his own advice, fly out to the nuclear reactor site, and have a detailed Q&A with the media. He knows what he is doing because he will talk and talk and talk until they're out of questions, thus putting the incident and his involvement with pushing through the red tape behind the construction of the site 25 years ago well and truly behind him.

But rather than leave on a high note, a subplot is thrown in involving Santos' brief case, which just happens to be in the same room as Vinick's senior staff, and discovered by Bruno of all people. And despite Vinick's moral stance against wanting to know its contents, you just know what will happen.

Therefore, the ending left a sour taste in the mouth, because I really didn't think the writing would have to resort to a form of intimidation and blackmail - that's the stuff of lame soap operas, and not quality political dramas!
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed