"Doctor Who" Love & Monsters (TV Episode 2006) Poster

(TV Series)

(2006)

User Reviews

Review this title
85 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
I don't get the hate for this episode
pjgs20028 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Sure, Love and Monsters isn't a 9 or 10/10, but it's definitely not a 1/10. I enjoyed the POV style found footage, and lots the camera work was great in this episode. The Abzorbaloff was a really bad villain though, but that doesn't undermine the rest of the episode and it's creativity. The characters were all likable, and I particularly liked how it didn't play out like every other episode and instead focused on what impact the Doctor has on the people who he surrounds himself with. I liked the use of Mr. Blue Sky by ELO, and I thought the ending was nice (apart from the weird Ursula-slab) and lots of the dialogue was great. Most people just rate this episode a 1/10 because of the bad villain, but they don't give it any credit for it's experimental nature and different style.

Love and Monsters isn't a classic episode, but it's not near as bad as everyone says it is. It's a weird episode, but it's also enjoyable and lots of fun to watch. 7.5/10
47 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Starts out as decent addition, slowly declines.
banaenaes23 May 2022
I actually really enjoyed the first 3/4 of this episode. That was, until the monster is revealed and the rest of the episode becomes disturbingly bad.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's not that bad!!!!
robert-22319 June 2006
I'm not normally one to post reviews, but I couldn't let the one negative post sit here as testimony to this episode. Yes, it wasn't perfect. The broad comedy and grotesque nature of the central villain would obviously not be to everyone's tastes. But Marc Warren turned in an excellent performance, as did Camille Coduri. The group of people who set up the "club" were portrayed as decent sorts who didn't deserve what became of them, and there were moments of charm and sensitivity. The use of E.L.O. in the soundtrack is also a plus point! Overall, the episode was an interesting experiment. If I met Russell T Davies I'd happily discuss it with him (without resorting to the violence another on this thread seems to expound) and of course thank him for making Doctor Who popular with a mainstream audience again.
52 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Divisive Gem
lynchnut-229 June 2006
Clearly, based on the comments left here, "Love & Monsters" is a love it or hate it affair. And probably all you need to know going into it is that after 45 minutes you'll likely fall into one camp or the other. I can certainly see why it would rub someone the wrong way, and yet I feel for the DW fan who doesn't embrace this episode for the wonderful stretching of the show's format that it is.

The episode, written by show runner Russell T Davies, is a great example of why he's in charge of the new series: He's an idea man, and unafraid to try new things, rather than simply fall back on the tried and true. Maybe some of his more radical ideas don't work for everyone? Even with the most mainstream episodes, Davies & Co. don't please everyone, all the time. After watching "Love & Monsters", my 13-year old son was so into it he immediately said, "I didn't even notice the Doctor and Rose were hardly in it."

In Season One Davies took some baby steps (the highly underrated "Boom Town" springs to mind); in Season Two he's confident and willing to go even further. "Love & Monsters" is a bright, shiny example of DW for the new millennium. While many have concentrated on its humorous aspects, few mention the episode's melancholy, which for me, was the core sell.

And on top of everything else, it's got ELO tunes. This fan was in heaven.
64 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun frolics...but where's The Doctor?
The_Sandheaver13 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This was one excellent episode told in an intriguing style. In this episode, it is oddly centred on a character called Elton Pope (played to perfection by Marc Warren), who is obsessed with trying to find The Doctor ever since an encounter with him when he was a child. He tells us all his story with the use of his camcorder, mostly with very comical results. He then tells the story of how he meets Ursula, someone who is also trying to find The Doctor, and how they meet other people who want to join them in their search. Together they form a group that is dedicated to finding The Doctor. Elton then tells of his adventures with them and how wonderful things were.

However, when the group are unofficially taken over by the mysterious Victor Kennedy, things take a sinister turn when he takes a very serious approach to finding The Doctor. When Victor provides Elton with a lead on someone who can lead him to The Doctor, he believes he is pursuing a course that will lead him directly to The Doctor. However, things begin to get very strange when his fellow friends start to go missing one by one. To complicate things, Elton begins to develop feelings for Ursula, the one who helped him start the group in the first place. Despite all this, Elton is determined to find out as much about The Doctor with the use of the one lead he has...Jackie Tyler.

This was told in an ingeniously comical manner, and the clever thing is that it manages to be a good story even though The Doctor is hardly in it. It is also rather spooky how the whole thing comes together and we find out just how Elton's past is linked to The Doctor. Marc Warren plays the role of Elton to absolute perfection, and it would be great if he had a few more episodes. This is definitely one of the best episodes of the series.
24 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Original, funny and moving, it's why I love it!
Sleepin_Dragon15 August 2015
I can understand why there is a loathing for the Series' Marmite episode, but I fall into the 'love it' camp. It dares to be different, it is often branded with 'Fear her' as terrible and lazy. Fear her's script was a lazy one, this one isn't, it's different, full of life and full of laughs. The script is a goody, and it falls together nicely.

It's funny throughout, funny and terror work really well together. The funny bits are nuts, from the Jamie/Troughton-esque runs of Rose and the Doctor at the start to the utter brilliance of Camille Coduri, her seducing Elton is class, so funny. Bella Emberg's cameo appearance had me screaming laughing, what a gem!!

There are also some beautifully touching moments, The Doctor's visit of junior Elton and the sadness of his mum's death, the members of LINDA talking. The climax is wonderfully touching, and I applaud Marc Warren's performance.

I bet Peter Kay had the time of his life playing Victor and the Abzorbaloff, he's a great character and the effects are super.

I love the links back to Aliens of London and Rose episodes, so cool to see that done. (Especially with my friend Eve's face behind Marc Warren.) Victor comes from Clom, Clom is one of the planets that disappear when the Daleks take planets out of time and Space for Series 4's finale, and we also get the first mention of Harold Saxon for Series 3's arc.

It is just a joy, I love it 10/10
38 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Haaaaa! Haa! Ha! Ha! Ha! Haaah!
GraemeGoodaker20 June 2006
Oh come on! I've been watching Doctor Who since I was five years old (30 years ago) and I've never seen an episode quite as funny as this one (not even the one with Bertie Basset in it). Don't take it so seriously, it was a totally played for laughs, self-mocking episode. Chasing the monster backwards and forwards across the screen at the start of the episode was straight out of Scooby Doo or classic Laurel & Hardy. Peter Kays human costume was a parody of the eccentric costumes earlier incarnations of the Doctor had worn (Ecclestone and Tennant look just too plain by comparison), and his Abzorbaloff costume harked back to the days when Doctor Who monsters were obviously just men in rubber suits (although I admit the kid who designed it couldn't have realised that, but then he did want it to be the size of a bus). Peter Kay didn't even bother trying to disguise his voice and if anything sounded even more northern as the monster. The soundtrack was great (I love ELO) and the blow job joke at the end had me in stitches. All in all the funniest Doctor Who episode ever, and a fantastic bit of light relief for between "The Satan Pit" and the next few episodes.
42 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A daring experiment with unsatisfactory results
markjoe3325 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The hypothesis of the experiment is "can a story be told in Doctor Who in which the idea of The Doctor drives the plot but the character himself hardly appears" - there's nothing wrong with the hypothesis but the results of the experiment prove deeply inconclusive because the method was awry.

It's hard to say who this story is aimed at. At it's best Doctor Who aims itself at all audiences simultaneously - fans and casual viewers, adults and children, sci-fi geeks and goth horror aficionados, and with the new series those who like their drama a little more emotional and sensitive are also catered to.

When it works each audience is catered for simultaneously. Here however each of the target audiences is served in small doses and alienated for the most part. Served up for the kids we have slapstick humour and fart gags which are sure to set the adult audiences teeth on edge. For the adults we get sexual innuendo and romantic comedy that pays some homage to the Confessions series.

Served up for the fans we have a story about Doctor Who fans! They're not really Doctor Who fans, they're a bunch of conspiracy theorists united in their belief and interest in the existence of The Doctor. Scenes of stroking police boxes and in-jokes about the history of fandom (is Victor Kennedy a satire on Ian Levine?). We have refer-backs to various stories from 2005, all told from the perspective of a passer-by - all self-referential and quite dull for the uninitiated. Served up for the casual viewer we have a certain camp self-depreciation, reminiscent of the old series during the mid-eighties in which the production team seem to be giving us a wink to say "don't worry, we don't take this stuff seriously either" - one surefire way to offend fans who for the most part think that maybe they should.

Goth horror fans may be disappointed to find that despite having a promising monster concept of a beast who absorbs his victims and wears their faces beneath his gelatinous skin the horror of this is downplayed, firstly by making the character a light-hearted comic one, and by having the obviously cheap rubber suit that comprises the monster costume exposed in broad daylight, leaving no room to suspend disbelief.

Despite some pretence at romantic comedy the episode also displays gross insensitivity at times, particularly in the closing moments. Having given a tragic but noble death for the heroine this is subsequently ruined by the plot development that the Doctor restores her to life as a disembodied face contained within a paving slab; a disturbing image of what one can only imagine to be a miserable existence. To make the development more disturbing the "boyfriend" of this object (and since she is an object with no means of self determination, should we say "owner" rather than "boyfriend"?) assures the audience that they have a love life of sorts, while balancing the paving slab on his lap. An innuendo that may thankfully go unnoticed by younger viewers, but is inescapable to the adult viewers, the more sensitive of which may well find the implication repugnant. While Doctor Who has it's roots in the horror tradition it is usually the role of the Doctor to fight against horror and for human dignity, and yet here he seems to be doing the exact opposite.

For all it's negatives the episode does have some genuinely funny moments, and some genuinely tender ones. It's flaws however are too large to overlook, and it's a shame because the fundamental idea for the story is quite workable and had it worked would have made this a unique sort of Doctor Who episode.

Marc Warren turns in an excellent performance as the central character Elton Pope, and the semi-regular character of Jackie Tyler is given more depth than usual and played sympathetically by Camile Coduri. Peter Kay on the other hand is typecast and given little chance to stretch his acting muscles as his character is written around him and based strongly on his existing comedy personae.
21 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than others suggest! Warning: Spoilers
This story is a perfectly cromulent episode. I cannot understand why it scored so poorly, the story is told in a unique way, the plot is good and it has a bizarre but decent ending with one rather....interesting joke too. It's not the best episode of Dr Who, not by a long shot, but it's worth more than a 6.something!
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quirky sci-fi rom com (w/ cameos by Rose and the Doctor)
dkiliane17 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I honestly don't understand how much hate this episode got. It's not amazing by any means but it's still entertaining enough. The episode follows a quirky group called LINDA lead by a sweet but odd guy named Elton trying to investigate the Doctor.

The first act is basically a cute rom com story between Elton and Ursula. The second act is still comedic enough with Elton's investigations leading him to Jackie Tyler. The third act (basically the uprising against the bad guy) does fall a little flat, descending a bit far into the absurd but also has its poignant moments as well.

Yeah the ending joke is a little off-color and quite frankly Ursula probably either should have remained dead or the whole gang should have been brought completely back. Ursula's partial return to existence as basically a tile was not the uplifting humorous choice the writers were going for. But overall I thought the episode was entertaining enough, as well as quirky and charming. 7.5/10
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
What is this mess?
It took days for me to finish this episode, because every time I thought about getting back to it, I lost all motivation. It's even worse than Aliens of London/World War 3 and that says something.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Overhated and Underrated
dillondjenkins5 February 2023
When people think of series 2, they often cite Love and Monsters as the worst episode of the series. This episode got a ton of backlash on release and went down like a lead balloon. However this has always been one of the episodes I come back to revisit in series 2.

Yes,if taken seriously this episode does not work and has many flaws. But its one of my personal favorite episodes of the new series of Doctor Who. I love seeing the doctor from a third party perspective from somebody who doesn't know the bigger picture. This episode, and the famous blink episode in series 3, have always stood out to me because of that, and I wish we would get more episodes in this way from a character who isn't linked with the doctor or a companion. Marc Warren did a great job with the character of Elton and is very likeable in this story.

I was only five years old when this story aired and I remember being very scared of the abzorbaolf. To me, being absorbed by a hideous green alien and still being alive is a fate worse then death and much scarier then simply being killed by a dalek or a sontaran. While it may seem silly now it was much scarier as child.

This episode has some great comedy in it too. I think it fits well where it is in the season as we just had the devil in the last two parter and have much more serious episodes to follow with fear her and the army of ghosts/doomsday. So having an episode more focused on comedy is a nice change of pace.

If you haven't watched this in a while, I urge you to give it a rewatch and go in with the mindset that this inst't supposed to be taken too seriously. Its honestly one of the most entertaining episodes.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Remarkable
Skint11118 June 2006
Series two of the new Doctor Who could well be one of the very best television series ever to appear on British television. I really mean that; I'm not just some raving fan. Love And Monsters was to DW what Revolution #9 is to the Beatles and will draw polarised reactions. Me, I applaud its originality, its zest, its supreme cleverness, and the fact that it was fresh, funny, satirical and wise. Peter Kay, truly proving that 'all planets have a north' was fantastic, as were the rest of the cast. But we've come to expect that from this series now, standards have been set so high. I suggest anyone who disliked this episode should expand the boundaries of their mind - there is really is an incredible world out there, just as the script said.
18 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The "Spock's Brain" of Doctor Who
galaxyjane20 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
A great concept, which could have led to a wonderfully funny/poignant episode is completely wasted on 45 minutes of rubbish.

As a long-time fan of the "Classic" program, I have mostly enjoyed the new series, accepting the darker tone of the Doctor's character as a result of some truly horrible off-screen experiences. However nothing makes a fan feel cheated like having your main character act as outrageously out of character as the Doctor does at the end of this episode, resurrecting the heroically self-sacrificing Ursula to a horrific half-life as a face on paving slab. The Doctor I have come to know would have respected her for her sacrifice without torturing her afterward with existence as a piece of rock (one who gets to give head to her boyfriend with no prospect of satisfaction in return as well, geez don't even get me started on the implications of THAT one).

There are some good early moments, particularly as they explore LINDA's development from basement conspiracy nuts to basement pop band, but the whole story starts falling apart as soon as Victor Kennedy appears. From that point on the comedy becomes forced and usually rude, while the tragedy is not given the full exploration that it needs to make a real impact after the sheer goofiness that has come before.

I didn't mind the decision to do a comic episode, or to tell it from an outside perspective,it could have been brilliant, but to make something like this work you need a happy ending or a truly tragic one, not the sort of half-baked semi-comic deus ex machina we get here. It was such an unlikely way for the Doctor to behave that I have been forced to spend the last 24 hours trying to wash this story out of my mind permanently. Not only do I have no intention of watching it again, I have already written it out of my personal canon.

I admire Russell T. Davies for how hard he has worked to make this new incarnation of Dr. Who happen, but his writing continues to leave a great deal to be desired. I think it is no coincidence that the best episodes (The Empty Child, School reunion) have been written by others.

Just as a side note, this is also the first episode of Dr. Who that has truly frightened my son, he didn't like the Absorbaloff monster one bit.
27 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting take on the outsider story
douglasp9 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This episode seemed to draw a lot from Clockwork Orange only instead of forcing the viewer to identify with a disgusting psychotic like Alex we get a sweet lost soul like Elton who loves ELO and is otherwise existing on the fringe of society.

This episode starts with a visual sight gag taken straight from Scooby Doo but of course, we take this with a grain of salt since it's Elton doing the telling and he's stumbled onto a scene that defies description so like the rest of us, he uses pop culture references to describe his reality.

Elton joins a Doctor Who fan club that sort of just turns into a club of people sharing their interests, baking, ELO, novel writing, etc. Then the serpent enters the Garden by way of Victor Kennedy, an elitist Comic Book Guy-type character who sucks all the fun out of the hobby group by taking the hobby seriously.

Soon after, club members go missing but the group does feel it's on the verge of finding the actual Doctor so they allow their seduction by this mysterious Victor Kennedy to continue. The closer they get, the more members go missing and we see the folly of trying to meet the Doctor. Of trying to make a beloved fictional character real instead of just enjoying our lives and our proper mates and jamming to ELO or whatever. Falling in love.

And that brings me to the only weak spot of the episode. When love is lost, one must let it go. It seems that the, of all people, would know this and wouldn't go and give an imitation life to Ursala. But oh well, it's only a story, and a very engaging one for the most part.
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Offbeat, but worth the watching
abs_is_back8 July 2009
Since the basis for this episode was a Blue Peter contest, it was going to be campy. So RTD just went for the romp... why not? When viewing the DVD of series 2, this is one of the episodes I usually skip - it doesn't have a great effect on the overall story arc, and the monster reminds me way too much of Austin Powers' "Fat Bastard." That said, this episode is worth watching, and even worth re-watching from time to time. Elton is a regular joe caught up in the fringes of the Doctor's world, and Mark Warren did a great job (not to mention that his butt-shot was the best one of the show hands down). Shirley Henderson is a treat, and the rest of the LINDA members are impossible to dislike.

But the best reason to watch this episode is Jackie Tyler. We get the Doctor's POV and the companion's POV, but what happens to the people who are left behind when the TARDIS whooshes on to its next adventure? Jackie doesn't have an extraordinarily eventful life, no serious significant other, no career - so what does she get up to while Rose is away? What does she feel about her daughter's way of life? How does the secret she's holding onto affect her, especially after Mickey is gone and there is no one she can talk to about it? One of the best lines of the episode is Jackie's statement that she will defend Rose AND the Doctor to the end of her life. She doesn't understand it all and she doesn't like it all but her loyalty is steadfast. And beneath all the dinginess, the flightiness, the flirtiness, is a core of steel - we see where Rose got her grit from. By the time Army of Ghosts and Doomsday come round, we're not surprised that Jackie is a full participant, ready to stand up to Torchwood, to anyone to protect those she loves. Brava, Jackie Tyler. Brava Camille Coduri.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Look deeper into the meaning of the episode, and it makes it incredible
jackkemp-306128 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Here I am, Mr unpopular opinion giving this widely hated episode a solid 9/10. An episode, which on the surface, appears like sloppy storytelling, with an exceptionally cringey villain. What I see is totally different. I see the whole episode based on obsession, mistrust and deluded characters. Elton is with a group of doctor seeking fanatics who are blatantly a shot at real life super whovians. Like the real life whovians, they are obsessed with he doctor, not going a second without thinking of him. Ever so slowly they bond, and the bond is expressed in the correct way for the pace of the episode. Overall they are portrayed as boring, sad, delusional no-lifes, and I like that part of the episode. We are then introduced to Mr Kennedy, and this is where the theme of mistrust enters the episode in spectacular fashion, as he instantly takes authority, reinstating order into their true destiny; to find the doctor, which is clearly forgotten. He appears a lot more knowledgeable, but as well as that, very suspicious, but these no lifes cannot see that. What really makes this episode entertaining is Eltons clear social awkwardness, as he tries to bond with jackie, all just lucky for him really. The sense of an elimination process comes into play as Elton and his comrades disappear one by one, which greatly blends with the non suspicions of the super whovians. The major downfall to this however is that someone thought it'd be a good idea to have them all ignore the really loud screams, unrealistic. We soon come to the final standoff, and we finally see Mr Kennedy as, the abzorboloff. A truly unique monster, absorbing bodies for heck knows the reason. Russel T Davies uses his maximum ability to use a child's creation to appeal to everyone, and it has a made the love-hate relationship of the episode. I saw the abzorboloff as a dangerous monster, and certainly not laughable, just disgusting, ugly, unique. The end of the abzorboloff's life comes when the doctor finally turns up. This was somewhat of a disappointment, but it all makes sense. Yes, the characters forgot that it was the doctor and worked together to finally do something useful, and it all payed off. Rose, certainly annoyed withe elton after a misunderstanding from both jackie and Elton, makes her very few lines powerful, and left s thinking that he'd be left to die. Overall the episode for me was an incredible experiment, which worked off well.
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Underappreciated Gem.
W011y4m531 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
So upon an initially reluctant rewatch of "Love & Monsters" for the first time in years, I can't believe I'm genuinely saying this... But I actually loved it which was extremely unexpected.

Yes, it's camp. It's crazy. It's bold. It's ridiculous. It's experimental. It's silly. It's outrageous. It's so atrociously bad, it's fantastic. I sat there laughing all the way through & beamed from start to finish.

Having subjected myself to 2 whole arduous seasons of Doctor Who written by Chris Chibnall - a writer who's abysmal but takes himself & his work seriously, I'm now thankful for anything which even remotely resembles a story that could be adapted in to an enjoyable script. This is what he's done to me - I'm now openly admiring what used to be THE most hated installment in the show's history.

Here, Russell T Davies has enormous fun with this episode & it shows in every scene as he injects life & a perceptible energy in to each one, refusing to take the vast majority of the narrative seriously, satirising multiple genres & the absurdity of the concept itself - & the tone (although very inconsistent) is a breath of fresh air after such a heavy two-parter which preceded it.

Not to mention, this outing also provides the rare opportunity for the audience to witness the life of Jackie Tyler as she tentatively awaits her daughter's eventual return home from between trips & Russell (not one to usually waste potential) capitalises on this immediately. The impact of Mickey's departure is finally explored & we get some really great moments of character progression for Rose's mother - who often finds herself sidelined in most of S2. Hence, Camille Coduri knocks it out of the park with her performance, definitely has time to shine & delivers one of the most heartbreaking little scenes between herself & Elton when she acknowledges the emotional difficulties of being left behind by everyone else - without her husband, her daughter, the Doctor or Smith who she could usually rely on for support. It's an uncommon insight I appreciated - seeing a more vulnerable, exposed side to her character - viewing the hardened exterior we've associated with her just crumble under the weight of the burden.

Of course, the episode's far from perfect & undoubtedly not a masterpiece, but it's a fun interlude (acting as a palette cleanser) which gives the audience a much needed smile before the events that are due to unfold.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Turn to Stone...
Xstal4 December 2021
Through all I sit here and I wait, this filler episode will just not abate. The poorest show of season 2 (so far), the search by Elton for Doctor Who. But the Lord of Time is barely in it, the writer's fail their scope and remit (they get away with it in Blink though, Season 3). I fear the next (instalment) will not atone (it doesn't, it's gets worse) and Ursula-like, I turn to stone.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
most original POV of nearly any Who episode
peteyarbrough9 December 2006
I lived in england at the cool age of 13 and watched jonathon pertwee cavort with characters who looked like they were glitterock backup singers with mild disbelief...

...But as a young adult in the early 80s I fell in love with the weird insouciance of the Tom Baker era, followed by a mild rooting interest in Peter Davison, further declining until Ecclestone and Tennant revived the franchise for the new millennium...

Back in the 80s the local PBS station KTEH helped fill me in on the doings of the good doctors that preceded Baker and I grew to appreciate Pertwee, and his nemesis The Master... good times...There were also some very well constructed plots/story arcs (the planet pirates, for example) which would take many episodes to resolve But enough of my fanboy credentials

This is an art film episode of Dr Who as told from the the view of the red shirted star trek crewman who will probably perish on the plant's surface.

It is a unique take on the normally unseen collateral damage these great events and adventures have upon the incidental characters. This teleplay looks at the effect on those who are merely aware and interested in the Doctor. It's probably the very first PoMo dr treatment apart from Comic Relief, etc.

This is Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with a handycam and it has that same unsettling realism that the more recent Dr Who episodes have had, and such as were found in some of the 'Historical' Pertwee and Baker episodes that were set in Medieval and Cavalier times in which some technologically advanced being attempted to subvert the flow of history for their advantage.

If this is from the guy with his hands on the franchise then I cheer for the revival of one of the most thoughtful TV scifi series of all time.
39 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lets just call this a different approach to Doctor Who.
lukepic12317 July 2006
Doctor Who episodes always follow from the Doctor or Roses' point of view. This made a different change, but i seem to find that children didn't like it so much. They want to see more Doctor not a different person.

Adults will find this episode a different and nice change to the usual episode. But still nothing like a normal Doctor Who episode. Russal Davis had a good crack at writing this one, he took a chance a writing something slightly different for the series as a kind of test, somehow i don't think there will be any more of these kind of episodes.

6/10
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
An Embarrassment to the Series
Snoopy52516 March 2010
My brain has just melted and started oozing out of my ears. This episode was pointless, had bad writing, dull acting, and really, the only enjoyable part was listening to a bit of ELO. The humor that Russell T. Davies was apparently so desperately trying for can be found on any sitcom- the more cliché the better. I'm sure Mr. Davies wanted to shake things up, but I suggest the next time he has that urge, he makes sure that he's actually creative, and doesn't steal the oldest, stalest, most overused ideas.

If this was your exposure to Doctor Who, don't give up. It's a brilliant series. This is just one of those episodes that's best swept under the carpet and forgotten about.
28 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Magic Continues
Theo Robertson6 May 2008
Oh dear . It doesn't look good does it ? RTD writes an entire episode around a competition winner from BLUE PETER . Add to this some stunt casting in the form of Peter Kay and the dreaded " C " word ( Comedy ) and you've got something that will lead to a fatwa for the DOCTOR WHO production team . I must admit that if the ideas involved seemed risqué then the reality succeeded beyond all imagination . This is black romantic post modernist comedy at its very best

There is a section of DOCTOR WHO fandom that will despise this episode . They're usually composed of humourless , self righteous , self centered people who thankfully don't make up the majority of DOCTOR WHO fans anymore than they make up the wider human species . It's their loss that they didn't enjoy this episode which breaks every rule of the show's format . The Doctor and his companion feature very little and the story is told via video cam and flashback and the production team deserve great congratulations for doing something a very bit different . The guest cast are all excellent and I certainly look forward to seeing more of Marc Warren as Elton Pope . But only if the follow up story is as radical , witty and oh so enjoyable as this one . The magic of the show continued for this fan
47 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Love & Hate
A_Kind_Of_CineMagic2 December 2018
This is not a good episode by Doctor Who's high standards. It is not a terrible episode by the standards of rubbish that make up the vast majority of TV shows, though, which is something I feel fans should remember when judging episodes of this great show. There are very few episodes I rate even as low as 4/10 let alone any less. The worst episodes of this show are still better than a lot of other things on TV!

So while this is one of the less brilliant episodes, there are a number of worse episodes of 21st Century Doctor Who in my opinion and there are still some positives here. There is some reasonable humour and it is a plot that has a bit of an interesting aspect: People who have become followers of the reputation and actions of the Doctor forming a society to track him down and support him then being hijacked by an alien in disguise who absorbs members of the group one by one.

It is quite a silly premise in terms of the alien but it is interesting to think about people becoming followers of the Doctor after seeing things he does. Some members of the group are well acted while others are a bit overacted. Peter Kay is a very funny guy and is funny and also quite creepy as Victor before going too over the top when he reveals himself as the Absorbaloff. The silly name of the alien as well as its design and premise come from a child who won a competition. That is forgivable to an extent but sadly it was not really lifted above that childish level.

The extremely limited appearance of David Tennant in the episode is a real minus. It is interesting to see his fan group but it misses his quality and feels like a comedy spin-off.

Taken as a bit of fun with a few interesting and creepy moments it is not awful at all but it is a bit of a disappointment compared to great Doctor Who standards of stuff like the 2-part story that came right before this.

My Rating: 6/10.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Oh dear...
johngraham6430 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Oh dear oh dear...

OK so this is how NOT to do an episode where the doctor doesn't actually appear very much.

I'm told you either love it or hate it - guess which category I fall into? The monster appearing in this episode was designed by a schoolboy in a Blue Peter competition on BBC1. Fair enough. And the idea of him absorbing fully grown people into himself could have been quite scary.

But it wasn't. Peter Kay gives a comedy performance as the monster. And the script is fairly childish. More CBBC than BBC1.

I understand why the doctor is out of the episode so much. But if you want to see exactly how it should be done, skip straight ahead to 'Blink' in series 3!
17 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed