Dead Write (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Boring pseudo-thriller
ivo-moelans10 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Jade Harper is a successful writer who suffers from a slight form of schizophrenia. One day she discovers her husband has an affair with her editor. She flees to Hopewell where she was born, under the pretext of writing a history of the village, only to receive a cold welcome from her father who blames her for her mother's death. As she begins her research she discovers dark secrets surrounding her mother's death... The acting in this movie is bad and the lighting is somber, but the script is the worst component of this boring pseudo-thriller. Never mind that it can't decide what to be: a straight thriller or a ghost story. In the end none of the supernatural elements are explained and the explanation that is given is far less satisfying than that of your average "Murder She Wrote"-episode (and that is saying a lot).

Although IMDb originally listed this movie as '2008' it was shown on one of the smaller Flemish stations on July 9th, 2007 under the alternative title "Dead Write".
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An OK mystery (SPOILERS)
chey60-635-6598559 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with the previous review.. not enough is explained.. there is a particular story line with a little boy and his old soul, I would have loved to see played out and explained but they never go there. He looks at the lead Jade as if he knows her. is smitten with her it seems , talks about having been "old" He even sings a song only people from the past would know and it's never explained. Also they never wrap up the husband storyline, which is odd because he checks on her during the movie . I am not sure why they included that if they weren't going to include him in the rest of the movie.. The father being so ugly to his daughter is odd, but then when they wrap up this "mystery" which honestly, they should have delved a little deeper into it I am thinking, the father and daughter reconcile way too quickly for him having been so abusive to her in the past and recently. I would give this 3 stars out of 6.. only because I love mysteries :) and at least it had a twist.. Rachel Hunter doesn't do a bad acting job.. she looks pretty worn and ragged throughout and very confused.. but the conclusion wraps up too neatly..

and actually it's like a bad lifetime movie:)but worth a watch.

3 stars
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An OK midday chick flick
ansell-7287917 December 2020
When I was a boy in, the late 1950s, it was a different world. Police carried whistles not guns; biscuits where purchased by the ounce or pound and: daytime television programming was exclusively women's territory. Melbourne had the Olympics in 1956 and this fast tracked TV for us. Even so by 1957 Queen for a Day and the midday movie ruled the airways. And the midday movies were of a type, a type very much like Dead Write. Of course Dead Write was produced in 2007, not 1957.

This raises the first issue with what is a generally an acceptable movie. It's dated to the point of being stale. It is a drama so there must be something to cause tension. No tension, no drama. It's the same rule for theatrics and cinematic drama. The drama in this movie is all found in relationships, friendships, family and romantic. The principle Jade, played by Rachel Hunter, is an author who after a falling out with her husband returns to rural U.S. to stay at her father's house. They don't get along. She also doesn't get along with her husband or his new 'interest', another author. Jade is like a weaver's bobbin winging and darting through the lives connected with her own.

The bobbin metaphor is extended when she decides to write a book about her hometown. She devotes each chapter to different a local character.

Things get very complicated very quickly. Oh, and there is a supernatural element; books open mysteriously, desks slide across rooms, fires spontaneously ignite, etc. Her grandmothers death / murder, or one of her numerous grandmothers, hey, where did that come from, drives most of the spooky stuff.

As Jade, the bobbin, darts through the tapestry she is constructing she is also gradually composing a picture of her self for the viewer. Beware though, there is a scene were Jade sits before a tombstone, despondently shaking her head whilst saying over and over, 'Nothing makes sense. Nothing.' There are several scenes were I found myself falling back on this bit of dialogue.

This must have been a nightmare for the scriptwriter, A. W. Gryphon, though a breeze for director Michael Connell. The plot is convoluted but working with the cast, which includes luminaries such as Rachel Hunter and Tippi Henderson being told to be dramatic but not melodramatic, must have been a breeze.

I don't want to cause offense but KGF Vissers, who wrote the plot summary for this movie either has no idea about New Zealand or didn't watch the movie. The references to Auckland and New Zealand have the smallest plot function but basically serve to explain Rachel Hunters Kiwi accent in the middle of a forest US of A accents. The film is squarely the product of good ol' Uncle Sam.

If you want a little taste of daytime TV as it was in the 1950s but with a new millennial twist Dead Write fits the bill perfectly. Don't confuse perfect with Dead Write. It's not perfect but is sort of OK.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed