"Law & Order" Remains of the Day (TV Episode 2007) Poster

(TV Series)

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
just or unjust for the have-nots?
jujuju12314 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I like this episodes which leave open-ended questions. Is there anyone interested in starting a conversation about why the doctor is found not guilty? Is it because the defense has made a successful strategic move in turning the trial into a war between the haves and have-nots and exposing the inadequacies of the system? I would also like to know how other people think of McCoy's final question about whether it means that the doctor is wrong? Is it safe to conclude that even McCoy himself has been somewhat shaken to believe the doctor might really have been acting out of altruistic motivations?
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
All that remains
TheLittleSongbird12 September 2022
Of all the topics covered in Season 17, that for "Remains of the Day" was one of the ones most difficult to get right. It had real potential to be a hard hitting and insightful episode. Or it could easily have been too strange and sleazy. This is not the first episode of the 'Law and Order' franchise (or last) to have a plot line that has something to do with illegal use of body parts, and have seen the subject executed both ways. Almost all the previous Season 17 episodes are very impressive and more.

A very high standard that "Remains of the Day" continues. It is not Season 17 or 'Law and Order' at their best, but it did execute its topic very well. Uncompromisingly yet tastefully. There is nothing sugar-coated about it, yet nothing is over the top or exploitative, all dangers with exploring the subject and its variants and not fallen into. A very good episode, though not a great one, that has a good first half and a mostly really great second half sans the ending.

"Remains of the Day" has very little wrong with it. Milena Govich still comes over as bland.

While some may not have issues with the type of ending that the episode has, for my tastes the ending was too on the abrupt side. Do agree too that the murder charge was a bit too much of an overreach.

Have very little else to fault though. It is well made, intimately photographed and slick with no signs of under-budget or anything. The music didn't sound melodramatic or too constant and the direction is accomodating while still having pulse. The acting is very good, the one exception being Govich. The legal portions are especially well acted, not a surprise as the legal portions were more interesting than the policing in a lot of the show's episodes. The first half was interesting and the ways at getting to the truth also intrigued.

This is a case of the second half being even better, with it being more complex and having more tension, without being convoluted. Quite a feat as this is a subject that is not always easy to make accessible or easy to get the head round. While the script has a lot of talk and a lot to digest, it is tight enough to not become rambling and always provokes a lot of thought without being overly serious that it becomes too dreary. The ethical issues and moral dilemmas are handled in a thoughtful and not heavy handed manner, the subject doesn't feel exploited and unlike latter seasons 'Special Victims Unit' and occasionally on 'Criminal Intent' it is not made too clear and shoved down the throat what the writers' stance is on the subject.

Concluding, very good. 8/10.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
He had a greater chance of getting struck by lightning or even dying in a plane crash, than developing ovarian cancer
Mrpalli7728 January 2018
A nineteen years old junkie guy died at the hospital in what seemed to be a pulmonary edema. Detectives thought at first the target was his mother. There was a will of 46 million dollars, a lot of people could be involved in the murder: Green and Cassady had to deal with people who talked only with the attorneys' help, the classic rich folks. Anyway, medical examiner figured out he died as consequences of a brain cancer that he contracted as a result of a leg surgery, that caused him ovarian cancer at first. The bones belonged to a dead girl who had that cancer whose body was cremated, that means that someone (the undertaker) must have sold stolen body parts before the cremation. Another guy who received bone tissues agreed to testify to help McCoy at trial, in order to convict the doctor (Ben Bass) who performed the surgeries.

I don't know exactly how healthcare works in United States; I don't have any knowledges about medicine as well. Anyway I'm not agree healthcare should be a private matter. The poor black guy couldn't afford that kind of surgery because he had no insurance....
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Overreach
bkoganbing4 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
ADA Jack McCoy took on one of the most popular defendants he ever prosecuted in this episode. Dr. Ben Bass is a popular doctor who does all kinds of transplant surgery. He's just not too careful in how he obtains body parts. This all starts when the son of an Anna Nicole Smith type celebrity dies of a very strange type of cancer. He had a bone cancer, but the cells found in tissue in the autopsy were the type associated with Ovarian cancer. That gets the investigation started. Mariel Hemingway does a fine job possibly channeling Anna Nicole herself in her performance. In an age where going through it legally for millions of potential transplant patients are on long waiting lists and while this episode aired millions have no insurance, this doctor certainly cut some dangerous corners. Bass was charged with murder and that was definitely an overreach. And the jury came back and said so.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed