Destination Truth (TV Series 2007–2012) Poster

(2007–2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Total great entertainment
jakeev673 April 2008
Cryptozoology might be considered a crackpot science, but no show makes it so entertaining like Destination Truth.

Headed by photographer Josh Gates and his young and hip production crew, they get the travel the world in search of the unknown creepy crawlies and creatures nearly every country seems to have in its culture.

The show has been around for about a season and half and we still don't know if lake monsters or Bigfoot actually exist.

So if you want exact science stay away from this show but watch it if you just want a have a good ol entertaining time.
29 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The most fun you'll have watching some guys run around in the woods
Tanuccoon30 January 2008
Destination Truth follows the exploits of self-styled adventurer and cryptozoologist Josh Gates. Every episode Gates and his drinking buddies search for two new cryptids (or, when convenient, any other odd stuff in the vicinity).

If you overlook the fact that Gates lacks any real credentials (although he regularly consults with experts), the show is a great watch. It's a light-hearted alternative to series like Ghost Hunters and MonsterQuest.

Although Destination Truth's methods are suspect (as they only spend a few days in most locations), they're by no means worse than other sensationalist documentaries and the casting more than makes up for any shortcomings: Gates is both abrasive and witty as he playfully (and rightfully) ridicules first-hand eye-witness testimony; his outright skepticism is a breath of air; and his sarcasm, well, a bit over the time (he's about as subtle as a hammer... or Michael Moore).

All in all, Destination Truth is a surprisingly good watch for a Scifi channel documentary.
25 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Entertaining Show If Nothing Else
job132016 February 2008
All right, so they really don't find anything, but maybe that isn't the point. Something that is missing from investigation shows is a little bit of humor and Destination Truth has plenty of that. I find this show absolutely hysterical and would watch episodes for that reason alone. However, DT does introduce many lesser known myths about animals around the world. Maybe, just maybe, this is the true purpose of the show, to reveal stories and legends of other cultures. Maybe in Season 2 they'll find some exciting evidence, maybe they'll continue to come up empty, but I will learn something about a foreign culture and laugh a little in the process. My suggestion is take the show for what it is and enjoy it for what it offers, an entertaining hour of television.
23 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Full of adventure and fun
krisj133718 March 2013
I absolutely love this show and am baffled about all the people bashing it. Josh Gates is one hell of a host and keeps things interesting and fun. I have no idea why some people get the impression that he is making fun of the locals in the exotic destinations he investigates. Josh is a goofy guy and finds humor in every situation and I don't think that's such a bad quality and who ever thinks so must lead a boring life. People also seem to complain about them not finding any evidence which I find hilarious. Do you really expect them to find evidence of a werewolf? Obviously there is no such thing as werewolves and if they found "evidence" to support that, I'd stop watching. Destination Truth is about introducing us couch potatoes to other cultures and their superstitions and beliefs and going out there to A. If it is a plausible creature, look for possible evidence of it's existence. and/or B. Look for what people could be mistaking as a unknown creature. Most of the time they find evidence to support the latter. I have also read comments criticizing the on camera "freak outs," I'm sorry but if you are in the middle of the jungle at night; you better be afraid of EVERYTHING. No one on this show claims to be a scientist and actual scientific research can take years if not ones lifetime. So, if you like travel mixed with humor and learning about other cultures' superstitions and "monster" sightings with a healthy does of skepticism then this show is for you. If you take life way too seriously, hate fun, and like to spend time ripping a TELEVISION SHOW apart... look elsewhere.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love it
mtrapp-382-71708228 May 2012
I loved this show from the get go. It just gets better each season. I wait impatiently for the next season every year. Josh is by far the best reason to watch. He's funny, adventurous and down right entertaining. His current crew is relatively new, so there's some "getting to know them time" that's necessary but typically, the crew seems to work well together. The show's not about absolutely finding what they're looking for (although they have found some interesting evidence that gained world-wide attention of the scientific community), but it's about the journey, visiting new places via the TV and interacting with new and different cultures. It's about the adventurous spirit for those who don't have it or the finances to travel the world looking for themselves. By far this is the best SyFy show and the best cable reality show! Those that don't like it probably have a poor sense of humor, adventure and lack the inquisitive nature of the human spirit.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Uuggghh. An insult to the intelligence that likes Expedition Unknown.
stacm-white_0617 February 2018
What a polar opposite to Expedition Unknown, which I truly like. EU is based in facts, archaeology, history, evidence. Destination "Truth" is based in....nothing but entertainment factor for ghosty ghoulie fans. Can't hardly stand watching this idiocy, except that once in a while they actually throw in some true culture and history that keeps my attention and makes me think that if I endure the crap, I might learn something worth my time. Big foot, large crocodiles, bats, animal noises, lights, urban and backwoods legends, over stating weather and normal natural obstacles.....all WAY over dramatisized deliberately, for nothing more than suspense to keep really bored people really duped. It's like one show is scientifically based and then....well hell, just in case we don't do well with intelligent, historical science (EU) let's do stupid, drunk hillbilly, sensationalistic bullcrap just in case. That way we get good ratings for EU from one demographic and some good, drug induced thumbs up from....another demographic. Seriously....if you're fascinated by paranormal (and plenty of intelligent, scientific ppl are) there are many other venues which are actually better suited to whet your appetite....that don't presume you're a total idiot. Flipside....Gates is ingeniously two faced in these shows. He is knowledgeable, level headed, factually in-tuned and a good teacher in Expedition Unknown. It is much less theater and more genuine conveying of real info. Yet he is a silly peddler of tricks and drama in Destination "Truth" and betrays that he really sucks at acting. Expedition Unknown raises my eyebrow. Destination Crap makes my eyes roll.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's a Dramady
cactuscwby16 October 2009
It looks like a couple of folks don't get it. It's a drama and a comedy.

We laugh our butts off every time we watch it. Actually about half the time. The first half of each "investigation" is funny. This includes getting there, which is always a disaster. The investigation kind of slows the laughs down some as it is awful "Blair witchcraft". It's OK though as they have two investigations per show.

I wish they would just change it to more of a travel show so we would have the laughs the entire show. It would be great if they could have some guests on the show like Geraldo Rivera as he has to be the model for Josh Gates character.
17 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Puzzled
sailingargo17 March 2018
Call me crazy, but wouldn't it make sense, when chasing spirits in Peru for instance, to communicate with a suspected entity in Spanish or Quechua instead of English? Inquiring minds...
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Show!
owen_shock5 January 2011
Every week when I'm flipping through the channels I see the same old cryptozoologic show, where the hosts and hostesses don't seem to care about what they are researching, and hardly even try for evidence. This is not the case with Destination Truth. Destination Truth is a great show, following cryptozoologists across the world as they look for evidence of many undetermined species, in other words, cryptids. Every week I bear witness to some bone chilling evidence, (although mostly there isn't quite enough to prove the existence of the cryptid) and the hardy, trying work of the hosts and hostesses. Destination Truth is a terrific show, and I would recommend it to any fans of the genre. I feel like I really do know Josh Gates, and that I'm tagging along with him during his globe trekking adventures to search for cryptids worldwide.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
By far, the best investigation show on scifi
syke-419 July 2007
First of all, Josh Gates is a very entertaining guy, something which has been missing from prior 'investigation' shows which scifi has aired. Amanda Tapping in Proof Positive, while a good host, was just far too serious and made the show very dry. Boston Rob in that show from last year, which I can't even recall, was obviously bored with it and falsely skeptical. It was all a show and not an overly entertaining one. Josh Gates ... he's awesome. He takes something that really does not warrant the level of serious treatment which makes people interested in cryptozoology and such things appear as weirdos and brings it down to earth. A show of this type is good for interesting people in the field of Cryptozoology. As a 30 year old who IS interested in such things, it's nice to find an entertaining, fun to watch, semi-investigative series. And it's also fun to be afraid that some of their less than smart ideas might end up with either the host or the producer seriously injured.
13 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Fozzie Bear turns Monster Hunter
ZoZo1327 September 2010
Josh Gates is silly and lots of fun with his equally goofy crew as they go around the world searching for monsters and ghosts.

Josh, a big man with a voice like Fozzie Bear of the Muppets, is a real ham. I think the show is fun as long as I don't attempt to take it seriously and therein lies one of the problems. The title implies that there's a "TRUTH" slant to this show. Of course there's no serious or even scientific stuff going on. Yep, they have cameras which they usually have on themselves. They have gizmo's that beep and buzz.....so do I.

The funniest part of this show is when the guys get scared and scream worse than the women. Can you imagine being in an abandoned outdoor place of worship in Taiwan and NOT seeing something moving?? Geez guys, they do have monkeys and other animals roaming around. It ain't ghosts! Oh well, that show was hilarious as was the one when the guys were in the water and saw something "Big" moving.

I Put aside any thought of it being serious and I think it's a fun show with exotic destinations. Otherwise, I'll just get aggravated.
27 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Informative and Fun!
scottgilesmusic-12 May 2014
A romping travelogue full of fun facts, comedic turns and the occasional monster! And who doesn't love monsters?!

The fist two or three episodes are a little rough, with the intrepid host coming off a little more mean- spirited than he ever does again but after these initial tender attempts the show takes off just fine, finding its unique voice.

If anything, Destination Truth is a kind of hip Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom.

So do they ever find anything? Well, that would be telling. Lets just say that some things remain undiscovered simply because nobody seriously looked for them.

And you should look for this show. You'll enjoy it. And mysteriously, for all its cleverness and adventure, it is somehow very comforting.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Fake
mitchryder195324 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I watch these show to see what's the deal. Then you surf and find out all the things the show tells you. Then you surf to see if the "crew" has any credibility. Most are just actors Erin Ryder is and actress that all. I'm guessing you have to have some pretty female so males watch. Just like all the other reviewers say they never find anything. If the ever would find something it would be in the news not on a TV show that was filmed months ago.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Utter garbage
count-slackula13 August 2011
Over-hyper rubbish made for the ignorant and superstitious.

The presenter is a supercilious, self-important publicist who cares not a whit for the truth or even a destination unless he can get some gullible production company to subsidise his trip there. The editing is woeful and 30 years out of date and the use of cuts to bring an impression of drama is pathetic.

These clowns have not, and will not, ever find anything interesting because if they ever did we'd have heard about it from proper researchers, not bloviating cretins like this crowd. The blatant product placement is yet another reason to find this insult to the viewing public reprehensible television at its worst.

This is one of the worst things my TV has ever spewed at me.
11 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This show is Great! Makes me want to travel!
kwilcox-777538 June 2017
Our family loves this show! It's the only travel / mystery show that makes you want to get up off the couch and go Explore. Josh Gayes is the Funniest Guy on the television! I Hope Travel channel keeps broadcasting this series. I give this show an 11 and wish they come to our state so we could find bigfoot!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of my favorite shows
lynnnymeyer26 July 2022
Fun show and love watching!

In the haunted Banche Episode, the mist in the window at the top must be Ghost of Mounted knight in Armor. It is a very interesting photograph,
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun, smart, silly and informative
shancody989 May 2021
Very good show. Josh and the team are entertaining. My biggest complaint is that the episodes are broken into two investigations. I think it should have focused on just one topic per episode. They are too quick there in and out. But still it is very fun. They make things interesting and fun. It has lots of "dad jokes" and silly but still teaches you things and informs. Cast mates like Ryder, Jael, Ali and so on are good as second leaders. Josh is the entertainment and heart of the show. The series gets better. I do not like the intro voices and Josh seems rushed on some of the episodes to get out what the page says quickly. Feels a little forced. He gets better on Expedition Unknown but I miss the team feel of this series.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
amateurish yes but rewarding
fisk142 March 2008
It's entertaining on some levels but what it sparks in me the most is that I learn about local myths around the world and I begin to read up on them. If you watch the show, use it as a starting point to read and learn about local legends and myths that you never knew was out there (if you're into this stuff and care to look it up for yourself). It's amazing how myths spring up all over the world and have similarities no matter the people, culture, location, or even the number of skeptics; it's all connected in some way and I find that very interesting seeing how so many people notice differences in all races and cultures but ignore the similarities in our origins. I never expect these guys to find anything but I like the show. peace
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
really really awful
dogglebe2 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Having watched the first two episodes of this show (a la Netflix), I get the impression that this is more of a failed parody of a paranormal hunters' show, than an actual paranormal hunters' show.

Each episode has the DT team searching for two creatures. After two episodes, the team fails to provide any real proof that their creatures exist. In searching for a dinosaur, the only proof we have are tree branches being moved. In a haunted cemetery, we have a scraping noise on one of the microphones.

In the end, all we have are Josh Gates' lame comments. Everything else might add up to footage, for other similar shows, that would've ended up on the cutting room floor.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Josh Gates Should Never Have Agreed To This Show!
carlmuecke2 July 2019
I've watched a number of these and the hour long searches always contain a lot of trekking through jungles and oceans in both day and night conditions and aside from a lot of hyperbole, nothing is ever found...if you're looking for revelations of new creatures you will be very disappointed!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Problematic at best
firepants493435 May 2010
My biggest problem with this is the high and mighty attitude that the host has. "I here for the truth!" he announces with each episode. The problem is the truth better come out in the one night they spend researching a case. I can see coming into an area and doing the research with a healthy dose of skepticism, but they basically clown around, making more fun of the locals than anything, then spending only 8 hours or so doing any actual research. They NEVER find anything, but they certainly do a lot of running around chasing the illusive whatever they are hunting that week. Then as soon as day breaks, no matter how close they were to getting some real answers, they pack up and head out. It takes them longer to get there than to investigate. Plus my biggest issue with this show and with Ghosthunters is all of the stuff that they both claim to see and hear, but by the time the cameraman points in the right direction its gone. The cameras worn by the team are a great idea, but I didn't tune in to see your damn faces! TURN THE DAMN CAMERAS AROUND! Let us see what you see, when you see it! I know what you look like, and I prefer not to see you up close!
21 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Worthless and Non-Scientific - Just a Means of Inflating Josh Gates' Ego and Giving Him Free Vacations
WiscGuy29 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Let me first explain that I find cryptozoology fascinating, notwithstanding that most of the more famous specimens are either hoaxes (e.g. Loch Ness Monster - The "Surgeon's Photo" has been clearly proved to be a hoax) or are very unlikely to be real (e.g. Bigfoot/Sasquatch - unless they hibernate, they would be very trackable in winter in the snow in their so-called environments and we certainly would have captured one or found a corpse by now). However, the world is indeed a large place with large tracts of wilderness that can hide significant sized animals for extended periods of time, such as the coelacanth and the Okapi (which was just photographed in the wild for the first time this year). So, while I have a healthy dose of skepticism, I also do not reject all claims of unknown creatures as nonsense.

Destination: Truth ("DT"), which is known as Monster Hunter outside of the U.S., is definitely the sort of show I might find interesting if it was at all well-done. Unfortunately, DT is about as far from well-done as is possible – in fact, about the only thing they could do to make this show worse is hire the ridiculously melodramatic old actor who narrated the second season of the similar Animal Planet show, Animal X.

Where to begin? Let's start with Josh Gates, the star of the show and so-called leader of the merry gang of cryptozoologists. Gates might be the most obnoxious person on television these days. It is rare to find a person whose ego is so unjustifiably bloated, even more so than his gut hanging over his safari belt. Gates leads his team of "investigators" on trips to various parts of the world where, if the local people are unsophisticated, Gates takes great pleasure in mocking them, sarcastically quizzing them on little bits of 21st century Americana, getting satisfaction from the blank or puzzled looks with which they respond. Another favorite subject of Gates' scorn is the rudimentary transportation they take, which seems to break down in almost every episode. As soon as they get to the region where they think their cryptid is to be found, Gates has them set up their "base camp" with their tents and equipment. Usually, the only reason that such a camp is set up is so that Gates can have someone with a walkie-talkie perch there and respond to his "Josh to BASE, Josh to BASE" calls on his walkie-talkie, arrogantly pretending he is some sort of macho military figure or great explorer rather than the unqualified, pompous, lard-*ss he actually is.

What kind of cryptids do they investigate? They have gone to very remote areas of Africa and South-East Asia to investigate sea monsters, giant owls, dinosaurs, etc…, as well as the yeti in the Himalayas, suicide-inspiring ghosts in Japan and elves in Iceland. So far, they have discovered exactly zero concrete proof of anything. They have some extremely inconclusive videos and tape recordings of movements and noises in the dark, and some unknown footprint casts but nothing more. There is a very good reason why they do not uncover any real evidence: they spend a lot less time investigating these mystery creatures than it takes for them to travel to these far-off locales. Generally, they spend the end of an afternoon and part of a night traipsing around in the forest and then call it quits. Often, the reason given for why they have abandoned the search after only a few hours is because their batteries have run down on their equipment. Apparently, no one on the show, Gates included, is smart enough to think to bring extra batteries or maybe lug a gas generator with them in their jeeps that can recharge their batteries.

Most episodes seem to be modeled after The Blair Witch Project – a bunch of people wonder around in the woods with infrared cameras becoming terrified at the slightest little noise. A viewer is more likely to get motion sickness from all of the shaky camera work than to become either scared or convinced there is a genuine point to anything that they do. Most episodes feature someone named Erin Ryder, whom Gates refers to just as "Ryder" on their team of investigators. Ryder appears to have been involved with a bunch of third-rate reality TV shows (including one with the Pussycat Dolls), has no scientific credentials and seems to have only two qualifications for the job: she looks pretty good in tight camp shorts and she screams as well as any girlie-girl in a B-movie horror flick any time a large bug, small bat or large gust of wind passes nearby.

So, if you love The Blair Witch project and want to see people pretending to be in that movie screaming "What the f^&%^#^ was that???" at every tiny little noise they hear at night, Destination: Truth is the show for you. If you like a show that actually has some connection with the truth and a real attempt at an objective, scientific-based documentary, then you will find that Josh Gates' show is a complete waste of time.
24 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Destination: Pointless Waste of Time....
billack-9179416 October 2018
Really? I have watched episodes of this show on and off over the years and I can't believe that it's still on. I guess if you like overstated and obvious well know historical facts and completely over dramatized non events, this is the show for you.

They make a huge deal over nothing and then when the expected nothing happens.... well, maybe next time. Puke.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
poor knockoff in an already-hackneyed field
bdwilneralex18 August 2014
I find Destination Truth to be profoundly disappointing. My first complaint is that they must be addressing an audience of ignorami, as the lion's share of the "little-known mysteries" that they examine are quite well known among fans of cryptozoology or paranormal (e.g., haunting) phenomena. I find the main guy, Josh, to be overwhelmingly arrogant and pseudo-knowledgeable: I'm not sure whether it's his mispronunciation of words that's more annoying to me than his corrupted citations of almost-facts. The specialty of the show is what I term the "red herring cliffhanger": we are introduced to a "Holy cow!" situation that introduces--guess what--a COMMERCIAL and is immediately followed by a letdown. The attempts at detecting evidence of, say, ghostly phenomena are about as childish as, "Whoa, did you see that?" "O.K., guys, I'm getting creeped out," "Oh, it just got colder in here," and that old standard, "Did someone or something just touch me?" The simulated, nonsensical terror--ALWAYS dispelled and resulting in a zero-lessons-learned mission--reminds one (and this is FAR from a compliment) of "The Blair Witch Project" with a touch of bachelor's-degree-level biology or ecology.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Host discover 'truth' by mocking other cultures
Anon51318 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I created an account just to review this show. I haven't been able to get past episode six of the first season. The host is the most pretentious presenter. He mocks every culture his visits, views everyone he meets in these countries as unintelligent simply because they don't share the same economic or educational background as he, and has no regard for the culture or customs of the people.

In season 1 episode 6 (as far as I could push myself to watch) 'El Lobizon and El Pombero' they are investigating sightings of Werewolves. According to Argentinian legend, any seventh son born in a family of all boys is a werewolf and the only way to protect these boys is to name him a special name and have him baptized by the president. Well, they find one family who didn't do either of those things to their son, so they decide to stake him out for a night.

That'd be fine... if he were an adult. But this is a 10-year-old boy. A boy who is already ostracized from the village they live in, so a bunch of rude American's drawing attention to him surely won't help his cause. This disregard for a local superstition that has the potential to ruin this little boy's life is disgusting. Then to top it off, in the middle of the night they sit the boy on a wooden chair, point a camera at him, and leave him there for hours to 'make sure he doesn't turn into a werewolf'. It's barbaric.

This show is not funny. The host is rude, idiotic, and makes up for it by mocking everyone else so he looks superior. I won't even go into their 'investigative' techniques, as others have already done so. Needless to say, those are lacking as well.

Horrible show. If you want to see the consequences of imperialism in action -- Western ideals mocking the traditions of Hispanic, Asian, or African cultures -- then this is the show for you. But don't expect to uncover any truth.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed