The Trial of Tony Blair (TV Movie 2007) Poster

(2007 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Amusing and cynical but not realistic
targetboy1 February 2007
This satire is very amusing and shows how fickle politics and politicians are, however the show most not be taken too seriously. If you keep in mind the insane nature of the story, you may very well enjoy it as much as i did. Robert Lindsay is brilliant as Blair, but then he is brilliant in almost all of his roles, he does however nail Blair when showing him as his grinning media self, the portrayals of Gordon Brown and of David Cameron are also very funny, though the physical likeness of both is questionable the voices and actions are perfect.

The humour is biting throughout but then again so is much of the political comedy in Britain. If you are prepared to take this show at face value i am sure you will thoroughly enjoy it. I cannot wait for the second installment.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Vindictive, yet marvellously filmed and acted.
ingrid-augustin31 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
London 2010. The war in Iraq is not over yet, Tony Blair has finally resigned, Gordon Brown is new Prime Minister. Mr. Blair, obsessed with his place in history, his legacy and his pompous memoirs, haunted by images of the carnage in Iraq and suffering from pangs of conscience, fails to realise that public (and published?) opinion perceives him as a war criminal and that he has become a liability to his successor – and to Hillary Clinton, US president. They abandon him to be put on trial at The Hague. Ignoring all warnings, failing to read the writing on the wall, he staggers into the trap, is arrested and extradited to the International Criminal Court.

This, in a nutshell, is the plot of the TV play "The Trial of Tony Blair", produced by Channel Four. It is beautifully filmed and edited, superbly acted and sometimes outrageously funny, and yet not quite satisfactory.

It is uneven piece and the first half of the film teeters between political satire, sitcom, malicious revenge fantasy and serious drama, never deciding what it really wants to be. The humour is heavy-handed, some of the jokes are unsubtle and the characters drawn with a rather thick brush. Mr. Blair's vanity and egomania almost hurt, Mr. Brown seems not too bright, and Cherie Blair's first scene shows her as venomous termagant. Ah, yes, David Cameron gets a not-too-subtle bashing too, of course, which brings the plot nowhere.

I was ready to dismiss the film as a vindictive fantasy, not above using clichés to drive home its point, when, suddenly, it became dark and serious. The second half had me on the edge of my seat. There are interesting character developments; Mr. Blair's self-assurance starts crumbling when he begins to suffer from nightmares and hallucinations about the carnage in Iraq; Cherie softens to a voice of reason and support. Tony Blair converts to Roman Catholicism as the idea of forgiveness of sins appeals to him, and if the writer, Mr. Alistair Beaton, wished to make him appear a mere hypocrite and the notion just ridiculous, he did not succeed. As the net tightens around him the former Prime Minister becomes truly oppressed by his guilt, and his vanity and megalomania are parts of a mask worn very thin.

We watch him slowly falling apart. He is arrested and some disturbing scenes follow. When he is swabbed for DNA, a policeman smiles and comments maliciously while inflicting unnecessary pain upon him. The mood becomes even more oppressive when he suffers a heart attack and has to wait for hours in a filthy NHS hospital. "I hung my head" sung by Johnny Cash accompanies this sequence and we are indeed under the impression that a death sentence has been passed. An attempt at Confession fails – he is still too proud for unconditional contrition – he is locked into a tiny, claustrophobic cell in a police van, so humbled that he now may in earnest embark on the spiritual journey that could save his soul.

All members of the cast are marvellous, but Robert Lindsay as Tony Blair is just brilliant. He has expressed anger and disappointment at Mr. Blair's policy, but his artistic integrity keeps him from letting his personal opinion mar his performance. He carries the play and lifts it to a higher level, that of cathartic drama. Mr. Lindsay's stunning dark eyes and eye-brows act like a magnifying glass, intensifying the emotions he conveys. He makes watching a formerly powerful man disintegrate before our very eyes compelling. Phoebe Nicholls sensitively plays his wife Cherie, and they share some of the most powerful scenes.

Several of them simply took my breath away. In a nightmare Mr. Blair carries a dead Iraqi boy in his arms; there is his despair while waiting for treatment in casualty and the loving looks he has for Cherie. The way Mr. Lindsay uses body language is striking. A very slender man, he looks not only vulnerable but positively fragile at the end. Watch out for how he steels himself to overcome his horror of the police van at the end and thereby regains the dignity he has lost before in moments of delusion.

So, in the end "The Trial of Tony Blair" impresses as a rather powerful drama, and yet I was not completely happy with it, for all the brilliant performances. The basic idea is mainly vindictive and in my opinion a crude way to express political discontent. The war in Iraq was wrong; nevertheless Tony Blair can't be compared to people like Milosevic or Charles Taylor. Overoptimistic and naïve with regard to its outcome (peace and democracy), what he had in mind was almost certainly not mass slaughter and religious wars.

Moreover, supranational institutions like the International Criminal Court do not automatically guarantee that problems will be solved and wrongs righted. Look at the European Community – it brought a loss of sovereignty and government by unaccountable bureaucrats, implementing policies a majority of citizens would never vote for. Who controls these institutions? Who questions their policies? If, as in this play, the decision whether to extradite a former British Prime Minister to The Hague depends on partisan politics and petty revenge (and this does not seem too improbable!), one can only doubt the legality and efficiency of this tribunal, and sincerely hope that no Western politician will ever stoop so low as Gordon Brown in this left-wing revenge fantasy.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Could Be A Prescient Film One Day
filmex200017 June 2007
TTOTB is a worthy satire, the type of which could never be found on American television.

Those that see Tony Blair to already be a tragic figure will probably find this film to be both darkly humorous and somewhat sad. It is not beyond the pale to believe that someday a variety of figures related to the Iraq war fiasco could someday wind up at the Hague facing a war tribunal.

The films treats both the Labour and Tory Party with equally contemptible amusement. Understandably, Tony receives the brunt of the beating. At one point a protester is seen holding a placard reading "Tony Blair = 800,000 Iraqi dead". That figure is easily reachable given the current scale of the carnage and the fact that this film takes place in 2010.

It is equally conceivable that as the killing fields of Iraq continue to gestate for a few more years, that whatever benefit of the doubt Bush and Blair are currently given for the rose-colored fantasy of bringing democracy to the Middle east, will have long since wilted. In that they took a regime that was contained, and had US air power flying over it continually for ten years enforcing a no-fly zone, only to topple a sovereign nation against the wishes of the United Nations, a logical case could certainly be made before a war tribunal.

Having unleashed the Furies resulting in hundreds of thousands of innocent deaths, not to mention turning multiple millions more into refugees...well, characters have stood before the Hague previously for a lot less.

The satire of the film derives mainly from the same faith-based morality that drove Blair to act so questionably to begin with. Here, with the walls closing in, abandoned by his former allies and facing a trial, he never can quite get a grasp on the situation he is in. Like Mr. Bush, whose faith-faith certitude never allows him to consider the folly of his ways, likewise, Mr. Blair is intellectually incapable of seeing how anyone could ignore the benevolence of his own heart, as he sent his country to war, squandering its blood, treasure and national reputation.

By the time in the film when new PM Gordon Brown comes to see him, and Blair feels sandbagged in believing that Brown too has abandoned him, Tony criticizes his belief that Brown is merely acting on orders of the White House (and current President Hillary), to which Brown responds, "I wonder who I learned that from."

A very black satirical comedy. Not any less timely than "Dr. Strangelove" which came out at a time when everyone felt the dire threat of nuclear annihilation from either the Soviets or the U.S.. Yet it is also a film that could possibly turn out to be much less satire that prescient drama depending on how events play out over the next half dozen years, the precise levels of the human carnage unleashed by Blair and Bush's geo-political experiment, as well as the international mood and tolerance come the next decade.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unintelligent and easy attack on Blair that may appeal to some liberals but even then isn't any good
bob the moo24 February 2007
It has been quite a few years since we first expected Blair to go but in 2009/10 he eventually makes the announcement to step aside for Gordon Brown (albeit after a war in Iran and another wave of suicide attacks on London). Deeply worried about his legacy, Blair and his people put a brave face on it and spin for all they are worth but whether it is the protesters, the political isolation or just his own conscience he cannot shake the feeling that the hundreds of thousands of deaths in and associated with Iraq will be all he ever is remembered for. When the UN launches a tribunal into Iraq, PM Brown refuses to veto it and the motion passes – leaving Blair facing prosecution for his decisions in Government.

After several other comedy dramas that gleefully attack the Labour government, this film suggested that it would be nothing more than a liberal fantasy that hits lots of easy targets and forces down Blair down that will always be fictional even if a lot of people seem to wish that it would come true. Sadly this is just what this lazy drama is – and I write this as someone who would gladly see the Blair/Bush actions thrown open to intense public scrutiny with a legal standing behind it. However that does not mean that I chuckled and rubbed my hands with glee as was clearly the hope of the makers of this; and the reason I didn't was down in a big way to the fact that the film never avoids an easy target and rarely backs it up with intelligent material. So we have him heading to trial (we don't see it because we all "know" the outcome), waiting for hours in casualty, having his DNA taken by compulsory order that he introduced and so on – it is so easy and relentless that it is like watching a puppy be kicked at times.

The cast all mug along to this easy beat. Lindsay gives a so-so impression but is an easy mess of nerves and guilt – would be nice to believe it is true but he doesn't ever convince. Nicholls is a shrieking caricature as Booth, while Mullan's Brown and Armstrong's Cameron are just more of the same on a smaller scale. The film does really belong to Lindsay but the material is what lets him down and leaves him doing what I feared he would.

A rather lazy drama then that is like hanging the man on a meat hook and just pummelling him relentlessly while he is defenceless. There is no intelligence or insight here just the hope that the sight of Blair getting "what's coming to him" is enough to draw a big crowd. It drew me this way but it severely disappointed me with all the things it failed to do.
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
predictable but fun and watchable.
surfscon21 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Not as profound as it should have been. Because - and here's the spoiler - there is no trial .The film chronicles all the events leading up to the trial. Not the trial itself. Despite that ultimate disappointment, Robert Lindsay and Phoebbe Nicholls give spirited performances (as Tony and Cherie).Though his targets aren't tough and in many ways taking a satiric view of the last days of Tony Blair's time in office is like shooting ducks in a barrel; Alistair Beaton's script does offer a few genuine laughs along the way. More laughs than insight. My favorite sequence was when Cherie goes for a walk around their new neighborhood.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Michael Sheen doesn't have the monopoly on Tony Blair
MOscarbradley22 January 2007
As if to prove that Michael Sheen doesn't have a monopoly over the role of Tony Blair, Robert Lindsay gives a magnificently comic performance in this very funny satire set three years in the future when Tony finally decides to stand down. Hilary Clinton is in the White House, George Bush is in rehab, ('he was found comatose on his ranch'. 'I'm surprised anyone noticed'), and the far from charismatic Gordon Brown scrapes through the General Election with a majority of two. It is then that Gordon bows to international pressure and allows Tony to be extradited to the Hague to stand trial for war crimes. Turning on the news immediately after watching this and hearing that one of the serving Prime Minister's closest advisors had been arrested in the 'cash for honours' inquiry only shows how prescient Simon Cellan-Jones' satire really is and how hard it may be to separate fact from fiction.

Alastair Beaton's script is a joy. It's clever, pertinent and side-splittingly funny but it is Lindsay's barn-storming, grand-standing performance as the deluded Blair that lifts this into a class of it's own. He is supported by a wonderfully straight-faced Phoebe Nicholls as Cherie, who chooses to distance herself from her liability of a husband and by Peter Mullan's blank and insipid Gordon Brown. Already a contender for best single programme of the year.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A wry, and perhaps prescient left-wing satire
dfle329 January 2009
This fantasy was conceived before British Prime Minister Tony Blair actually quit politics, so the scenario envisaged might already put some people off, due to the fiction involving Blair being in power for a few more years before quitting. In any case, it works quite well as a "What if...?" story, or alternative world story.

In this movie, Blair announces his retirement and looks to find a role for himself in business and society. He instead has to face charges that he is a war criminal. So, the trajectory of the plot is Blair starting out as Prime Minister, and then ends with him about to face trial on war crime charges. Thankfully, no outcome to the trial is envisaged...you can let your imagination run free!

Imbetween, we see Blair as a man haunted by the ghosts of his actions...literally. A plus for this story is how Blair is portrayed as a man who lives in his own world...he tries to shut out the reality of his situation the best he can. He and his wife, Cherie, have, amusingly, a foul mouth, which get quite a work out when reality and Blair's deluded fantasy refuse to mix.

There is some delicious irony in the plot concerning Tony's past and the situation he now finds himself in. The satire is quite pointed as well, at times. Some of the scenes are painfully embarrassing to watch, like Tony's successor Gordon Brown, on the campaign trail...and the same goes for his conservative opponent...they both really make you squirm uncomfortably.

There were some laugh out loud moments in this film, but it is mostly 'dry' humour. To its credit, it also has a very strong basis in plausibility. Just today, I think, I read in the news that there are moves afoot to release documents on Blair's cabinet discussions on whether the Iraq war was actually legal, or not.

The slant of this movie is very left-wing, so if you buy Blair's "third way" spiel and his motives for supporting the US in the Iraq war, you may take umbrage that Tony Blair is even considered to be a war criminal.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A fantasy of the worst kind
Prometheus-10124 April 2016
Some people really, really dislike Tony Blair. And they're very angry with him, too. That's the overriding impression I get from this film.

At times it plays like it's been written and produced by achingly left-wing sixth formers, and if you, like them, see Blair as a one dimensional villain, then this is probably just the kind of revenge fantasy you'll relish. For anyone who sees both the man and the whole Iraq episode as a tad more complex, then it'll more than likely have you snorting with derision.

I deliberately reserve my criticism for the writer and producers because I actually think the actors are pretty good. Robert Lindsay picks up some of the verbal and physical mannerisms of Blair quite well and hints at more psychological depth than many caricatures allow. And I thought Phoebe Nicholls was excellent as Cherie, but mostly because she's a fine actress no matter what she's in. The problem is the material they're both stuck with, which is more often than not very one-note, cringingly one-sided and sometimes downright ridiculous.

Are we really to believe that everyone, and I do mean everyone, around Blair is constantly needling him about Iraq, making snide comments about his 'legacy', and mocking him openly to his face - yet somehow he either doesn't notice or just doesn't care? His assistants have apparently chosen to stay with him in his post-PM career, yet they behave as though they hold him in utter contempt all the time. Cherie seems at once to be loyal and caring, yet moments later she is distancing herself, even insisting that her name is Cherie Booth. Their relationship seemed completely wrong - again not through any fault of the actors, but rather because the script forces them into being mere mouthpieces for the writer's own heavily biased perspective. We're meant to believe that a protester would be allowed to camp outside Blair's private home and shout insults at him 24/7, even though Blair has left public office by this point and would be entitled to all the protections of any other citizen; that the US would throw Blair under a bus because it was politically expedient to do so; that the UK government would do something frankly risible at the UN in order to pave the way for a prosecution of Blair. All these details are technicalities, you might say, to create the conditions for the drama. But they mount up to such an extent that it screams desperation on the part of the writer, as he scrambles to rearrange the real world furniture in just the right order to bring about the denouement he wants. And much of it is also internally inconsistent. I simply didn't believe these characters were anything more than the writer's own voice shouting at the unfairness of the world.

The very worst moment comes when Blair is at a police station and encounters what has to be the most irksome, self-righteous, self-satisfied character ever to appear on screen. Seriously, this police man is a study in smug, insisting to Blair that his comments are not political but just him being a human being. This moment alone is so absurd in its easy moral reductionism and high self-regard that it poisons the whole piece, leaving a bad taste in the mouth.

There are some chilling, well-filmed moments of Blair having nightmarish delusions about Iraq, but mostly the filmmakers are more interested in seeing Blair suffer and be humiliated than they are in exploring any real psychological truth.

I genuinely didn't like this film. I thought it was nasty and a waste of some talented actors. Whatever your views on Iraq and Tony Blair's decisions, a fantasy polemic like this does no good at all. All it does is serve up a fictionalised version of a real human being to be hated, mocked and punished. Great drama should be about much more than that.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great piece of Drama
jp-stir22 January 2007
The premise of the programme was that after eventually standing down as Prime Minister Tony Blair is called to the Hague to face war crime charges. Ithought this, although slightly far fetched was a great piece of Drama and shows why More4 is one of the best channels to come out of the usual dross of digital channels. Robert Lindsays portrayal of Tony Blair was magnificent and rather than doing an impression of Blair instead gave a great performance. Peter Mullan as Gordon Brown was inspired and it was well into the show before I even realised that it was him playing the part, and although only seen briefly Alistair Armstrong as The image conscious David Cameron was brilliant. The soundtrack also was well devised from Johnny Cash to The Killers. But perhaps the most impressive part of the drama is not the funny elements or to see Blair get his just desserts, rather the idea that the War on Terror has had a deep emotional impact on Blair causing him to have hallucinations and nightmares. All in all a great programme.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretentious Piece of Political Theater
auntshakespeare20 September 2017
The year 2010 has come and long gone without these events transpiring, and setting it up as a future that never was ensured the movie would quickly render itself outdated, which is only one of many reasons that it was doomed to fail from the outset. The whole conceit of the movie is on that list, as it's utterly ridiculous that these events would occur in reality, and it is so hamfisted that it doesn't even work as satire. I'll confess I'm from the other side of the pond than most viewers and reviewers of the piece, but I appreciate a lot of British television series and movies, with this obviously not counted among them. Putting the special relationship on trial in an intelligent way that explored all of the complexities therein could have been compelling, but the makers of the movie settled for a simplistic version of Bush as the greatest of evil and anyone standing with him the same. It borders on apology for terrorists, as if it was unholy war started by the US that prompted terrorist attacks rather than the reverse, and it paints the problem as Blair being in thrall to Bush, never confronting Britain's past in the region, which preceded US involvement by centuries. It's more straw man argument than movie, and the missed opportunities for something more are reason enough to make this a must-miss piece of political theater and propaganda.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
left-wing fantasy garbage
kaleto21 June 2007
This fantasy was utter garbage. I thought Michael Moore cornered the market on ridiculous anti-government movies, but this one was far worse than anything he ever did. No wonder critics of the British media complain it's driven by tabloid journalism. This movie is a left-wing loony's greatest fantasy come to life on the big screen. Anyone even slightly to the right of such rabid Bush-bashers should be appalled it ever got funding to be made. I'm sure it will do well in Syria, Iran, Pakistan, and North Korea, though. It's hard to believe that in these days of insane Muslims blowing up innocent commuters there is anyone in the U.K. who thinks Britain should surrender in the war on terrorism. I guess it's no longer the country I admired for standing alone against the Nazis nearly 70 years ago. All hail Neville Chamberlain and the pathetic policy of appeasement!
10 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed