"Air Crash Investigation" Falling from the Sky (TV Episode 2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
No smoking.
rmax3048233 August 2016
You have to love Australian lingo. It's sui generis. There's a flight from Maylasia to Perth and the program briefly introduces us to a few passengers. One is a father with two active sons, and he asks them, "Aw roit, sittle din, kids." This episode spends more time with the passengers than is usual but that doesn't detract from its effectiveness.

The airplane is at 37,000 feet in clear weather when it begins to glow all over with an eerie blue light. It looks like St. Elmo's fire except that there are no storms to provide highly charged electrical particles.

All four of the jet's engine begin to leave streams of flame behind them. The passenger cabin becomes filled with a sulfurous smoke, but a diligent search reveals no fire on board. Then all four engines quit, one after the other. At a lower altitude the crew manage to get them started again but as they approach the nearest airport they discover that the windows are translucent, the airport's landing assistance devices are inoperative, and they must land the airplane blind.

The episode almost belongs on "The Twilight Zone." I won't describe the explanation.

The musical score is sometimes distracting, drums pounding and so forth. It's really not necessary because the suspense carries the narrative quite well by itself.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bad TV description.
tsn-4873013 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I'd really like to say it's not the fault of the show itself, but if not them then who? Like many programs the description of the episode that (apparently) the producers put out for the various cable or TV services (which happens a whole lot with movies also) is extremely inaccurate.

The description of this episode every single time it's shown, no matter the cable or satellite service (so it must be being compiled by a service of some kind?) says that this plane crashes into the Indian Ocean when in fact it does not. So why does it say so? Obviously they've been written by people who never actually watched the program, so why in the hell are they being paid to write wrong synopsis'?

This happens a LOT! Like in film "Roadhouse" where every time the Patrick Swayze character is described as a "Phd" bouncer, when the character is never even hinted at having a Phd. Also in "McClintock" with John Wayne. In every single synopsis in every description of the film in every publication he's described as having everyone after his ranch, including the government, Indians and even "his own sons". When the government, nor the Natives are after his land in any manner and he only has a single daughter. No sons.

It makes one wonder what country the writing of the descriptions of these shows are farmed out to? Either hire people to write them who've actually watched the program and don't have their head up their backside or just leave it blank and not look like an idiot.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed