Boxing Day (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Hard going but worthwhile
keith-2839 May 2007
'Boxing Day' is not an easy film to watch. Shot in and around a suburban Adelaide house and garden, we watch Chris prepare lunch on Boxing Day for his teenage daughter, ex-wife and new partner. The home is sparsely furnished - Chris is recently out of prison. He is obviously nervous, meticulously preparing the lunch and tidying his home. But an ex-prison mate turns up, to Chris' horror - to the point where he tries to make his mate think he's out. Chris wants everything to be perfect for his daughter - this sudden visit is not part of the game plan. But he gets to talk to Chris and reveals a not particularly well-kept secret about the ex-wife's new partner. From there on in, everything spirals out of control.

As the daughter, ex-wife and her boyfriend arrive, we see, in painstaking detail, the painful journey of a father who must finally decide to expose the dark and disturbing secret that threatens to tear his family apart.

According to publicity this was shot in three takes with an element of improvisation to the script. It's a slow burner of a film - some people will hate it, for sure. But whilst it may be short on 'action' and 'entertainment', it's an amazing achievement for a film that I understand was shot on a shoestring budget of AUD$175,000.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Boxing Day achieves what a lot of Australian films try to do but fail
rettercritical1 March 2008
I saw this film recently at the Mercury Cinema in Adelaide, Australia. This is Kriv Stenders' second directional effort of a feature film. Boxing Day is a real time documentary style approach to telling a fictional story. The casting is a big part of what makes and breaks a film like this and the choice of actors shows some wisdom. The lead actor Richard Green was also a collaborator with Kriv in writing the story and it because of this that film has authenticity. There is a ring of truth in the performances, which I appreciated. This kind of Australian urban drama is done from time to time but not always as convincingly. Often Films similar to this make the mistake of casting people we know or big actors taking away from the realistic everyday style the picture is trying to accomplish.

The scenario is a small family gathering at Boxing Day. This day or the holiday season is often awkward for families who may only see each other around this time of the year. Chris (Played by Richard Green) is a reformed criminal and he is hosting the get together. The film is shot on location in Elizabeth in South Australia.

The shooting is rougher than most verite style films and the format is HD video not film (DVCPro HD). This look is the closest to documentary I have seen in a fictional feature since Lars Von Trier's "The Idiots" (1998) and does pull you into the film quite effectively. Stenders shot the film himself hand-held. The colours are quite blue or cold and there is no artificial lighting. This low budget situation has bean handled very well by the director and embraced totally to achieve an authentic experience. The acting is brilliant. All the performances feel like people I know. Casting not very well known actors was a great decision even if it was budgetary because they don't come with a persona from other films and this makes it feel like discovering new people.

The only things that I am critical about in this film are when it may be conventional in places. I think making a film like this is always a battle between pure reality and the conventions of cinema. Kriv Stenders balances quite well in this challenge to be both realistic and create an interesting story. Luckily the film is not very predictable in the journey it takes. I want to stress also Richard Green who is a knock out actor and collaborator because when I look at Kriv Stender's first much more expensive film, "The Illustrated Family Doctor" (2005) I feel he has achieved so much more with Boxing Day and with substantially less funding. I hope this is a direction that is further pursued and even further refined for the talented director and actor respectively. I would suggest even less story if anything and that was my main criticism of being conventional.

My understanding of Australian films is they rarely make any money. Apparently this did not clean up at the box office but it is films like this that need to be made. Boxing Day was funded by the Adelaide Film Festival and it is important that excellent films are still able to be made even if they are uncommercial. There are too many films made about affluent middle upper class situations that are not representative of society and on the other hand gritty urban dramas are often hopelessly directed and acted. I think that if film making itself is more representative there would be directors from diverse social backgrounds with interesting concepts and approaches. I think merit is always more important than getting a return on an investment when films are government funded much like public broadcasting should not be ratings driven.

Kriv Stenders has made one of the best Australian films in recent years and it will be interesting what film comes next. I have heard he is going to make a genre film and to be honest that disappoints me. Whatever he does it will no doubt be interesting as both of his feature films have been but Boxing Day stands out far more as an accomplishment. Highly recommended.

8 out of 10
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Watch this space.
willywilly17 September 2008
Stenders is a heroic filmmaker. He's doing R&D for the rest of us timid, eager to please, pussy type auteurs. Kriv is here not only to ask 'what if' but to do the work and find out. Necessity is the mother of invention and the necessities of his budgetary constraints mean we now know how a film that is (what looks like) one take, with largely improvising actors, can work. While good, this isn't the greatest film ever made, but Stenders is mining promising territory with his experiments and I'm waiting for him to strike gold with the right components applied to the right idea, and a bit of luck. I'd like to see him use his freedom to try bolder subject matter. The family secret in this film felt a little too familiar in today's media-sphere. Still, I can't think of another Australian filmmaker still working in Australia as worth keeping an eye on as Stenders, except maybe the guys who made Black Water.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Long-takes are the way to go
missingtth17 October 2007
This film blew me away. I didn't know anything about the film before entering the cinema (which is usu. better to start) and even though I wasn't on board in the first 10 minutes, I stuck with it and it proved to be one of the gems of the festival.

This film is potent. As Kriv the director noted, casting is 99% of a film, and he couldn't be more right. The characters ARE real. They don't seem to be acting. And Richard Green's performance must be seen and heard to be believed. I hope this talented man can stay out of detention (the story behind his casting is pretty nuts) and keep acting.

As for Kriv, this kid can carve out an incredibly tense film with relatively few elements (setting, performance, hand-held camera etc...)And then there's the story itself! Unbelievable.

Don't listen to what anyone says; this film should be seen by everyone, and should (will/must) be appreciated by most.

I only wish the film had been subtitled in English, because the accents are pretty thick and the vocal qualities can be rough around the edges making some passages difficult to understand.

First-rate film-making.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Could have been good but wasn't
shortbread22629 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film has a good story in it, with some decent acting. Although the narrative moved a bit conveniently at times, like the way Chris reacted to Owen telling him Dave was pedophile, I think this movie had potential and was heading in a good direction. I feel like all it really needed was to let go of the 'all in one shot' idea.

I'm all for long shots and the effect they have but I don't see the point in hanging onto them just for the sake of what is essentially a gimmick. I say gimmick because there are more than several bits where it detracts from the film. You notice moves that don't need to be there. When the camera walks up to a character to go from wide shot to close up, there is no narrative reason for the camera move to be there. It exists solely to preserve its one shot ideal. You notice when things are horribly overexposed or out of focus. The stark lighting scheme works but to see the exposure change mid shot and have parts of the screen burnt completely white is much too distracting. The story of the film becomes secondary to the one take idea.

A particular example when they are waiting for Brooke to come back from the shop. This scene could have been a powerful scene but was completely undermined by the overexposed exterior and out of focus element once Brooke arrive.

The camera moves play around uncertainly at times. No doubt it was a mammoth effort to orchestrate the filming but there is still too much technical stuff gone wrong for to me to have totally lost myself in the film.

I even felt the performances where affected because of the don't mess up a whole take mentality they would have had. They were on the whole very good but the situation of filming does not really allow for the actors to take risks.

It really is a pity to me because this could have been a simple realistic film about one family on one afternoon but that takes a backseat to an unnecessary technical idea
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed