"The Civil War" Simply Murder (1863) (TV Episode 1990) Poster

(TV Mini Series)

(1990)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Fredericksburg, Grant, Proclamation, Stonewall & More
ccthemovieman-112 August 2007
The North puts on a valiant, courageous effort in storming Fredericksburg but loses over 10,000 men in what really amounted to a suicide mission. The South continues to win key battles mainly because the North has such inept generals, according to this Ken Burns TV documentary.

Finally, after numerous strategic mistakes by Northern military leaders, Lincoln turns to Ulysses S. Grant to lead the Union. Conditions continue to be brutal, not just for the undermanned but for the North. Food and supplies are scarce and costly. Men are going AWOL by the thousands The Emancipation Proclamation has made Lincoln very unpopular, both with the South and North.

Thousands of blacks are shipped off to Texas, so they don't wind up fighting against the South. (Reportedly, there are many northern sympathizers in the South and they fight for the Union.)

Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson dies midway through the year, a huge loss for the Confederates. Next to General Robert E. Lee, Jackson is the most beloved soldier the South had, I believe. (See the motion picture, "Gods and Generals," by the way, for a thorough look at Jackson.)
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Slug Fests.
rmax30482314 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
There's really not much to say about this superb documentary that doesn't already apply to the other episodes. "Simply Murder" takes us through the Union debacle at Fredericksberg, through the Union debacle at Chancellorsville, and ends with Grant's siege of Vicksberg and Lee deciding that it was time to invade the North and threaten Philadelphia and perhaps Washington. While Robert E. Lee was destroying Burnside's army before Fredericksberg, he's said to have remarked, "It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it." I'm not at all sure the sentiment has penetrated every soul in this or any other nation.

It's difficult to imagine how the Union Army could have produced such a string of incompetent leaders: Scott, Halleck, McDowell, McClellan, Pope, McClellan, Burnside, and Hooker. Some of them seemed to lose battles almost willfully. The Confederates by this time were having trouble with men and supplies. Inflation was rampant in the South, and Union gold dollars were becoming the coin of the realm. Women caused "the bread riot" in Richmond and only dispersed when threatened with bullets. But the Army of the United States was hardly better off. Supply houses bulged with food and equipment but little of it was reaching the men. Hooker straightened that problem out, if nothing else. But the Union troops were thoroughly discouraged by the series of defeats. Desertions on both sides became more common.

It's too bad that the engagements themselves are presented in such brief form. A lot of interesting and sometimes gripping detail is left out. Nothing about Burnside's unlucky "mud march." Nothing about the "Confederate Angel" who risked his life to give water to dying Yankees at Fredericksberg. Nothing about the wounded in the Wilderness lying helpless and watching a forest fire approaching them before they burned to death. A considerable time is spent on the death of Stonewall Jackson, killed by his own sentries. The house in which he died still stands preserved, a short distance from Interstate 95. A highway sign warns you in advance that you are approaching the "Stonewall Jackson Shrine."

But, if such detail had been described, I suppose we would have had to miss the quotidian rituals -- how to make coffee when there is none; how to make "sloosh"; the improvised truces among combatants on either side of a small creek; a recipe for home-made booze that includes fermented meat.

There are contemporary film clips of the swamps in the vicinity of Vicksberg that Grant's men had to march through for twenty miles or more. There is a glimpse of a snake in the muddy water, head up and alert, before it swims from the camera. It's not a water moccasin. It's a harmless water snake of the genus Natrix. I just threw that in for the hell of it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Living and Dying Through the War
Michael_Elliott5 November 2012
The Civil War: Simply Murder (1990)

**** (out of 4)

The fourth episode in Ken Burns' terrific documentary covers topics including Falmouth, VA winter camp, Ambrose Burnside, the Union's defeat at Fredericksburg, the meals eaten by both sides, Sons of Liberty, Stonewall Jackson's death and Grant's fight at Vicksburg. History or movie buffs are going to find great entertainment here as once again Burns does a terrific job at not just telling the stories but also really making one feel for both sides of the battle as it's clear both of them were suffering great loss through the first couple years of the war. Burns direction is, as usual, flawless as he perfectly mixes real life photos with some paintings and of course there's the narration, which is used to tell the stories of the war but also hear from soldiers through their writings. I think the best moments of this episode deal with the living conditions of the soldiers as they were all suffering from various diseases and it's rather shocking to learn that most of them died from illness rather than battle. There's also some great talk about the stuff both sides were eating and how they would go about making the food.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed