"Poirot" Cat Among the Pigeons (TV Episode 2008) Poster

(TV Series)

(2008)

User Reviews

Review this title
27 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Very well done....
musicmike7021 December 2008
I don't think I've seen ANY of the Poirot series with David Suchet that I haven't thoroughly enjoyed, although some of them early on that were only an hour long left something to be desired in regards to production values and truncated stories. They were still fun to watch and Suchet's portrayal of Poirot is one of my favorites of all time.

I liked this one a lot...mostly faithful to the book which I have to admit I haven't read in years. The photography and set design were outstanding and it was great to see Harriet Walter again, and especially Susan Wooldridge, a favorite of mine since "Jewel in the Crown." I do admit that I miss Capt. Hasting, Miss Lemon and inspector Japp.

I sincerely hope that the rumors I hear of this series ending have no basis in truth.
41 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Surprisingly well done adaptation of one of Christie's middling books
granola35723 January 2010
I was fully expecting Cat Among the Pigeons to be dreadful, given that the source material is not one of Christie's stronger novels. Imagine my surprise when I watched this stylish, fun adaptation, done with tongue firmly in cheek. For some reason, the campy parts of the book actually translated well to screen (even the "orientalist" flashbacks to the Middle East), and the novel's plot was already so far-fetched that for once the screenwriters didn't change very much (the deletion of one minor character changes very little). Harriet Walter is a delight to watch, as always, and the rest of the casting was also spot on. The ending, which sees Poirot trying to find a way to thank one of the students for her assistance, was actually rather touching, and was a distinct improvement on the novel's.

Without a doubt, this is one of the best of the recent Poirot adaptations, and featuring more humor and wit than many of the others, which have become quite a lot darker than was the original television series.
36 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Delightful
fredfeenstra1 December 2018
Good cast, good performances, a somewhat ridiculous plot, but entertaining. Nice performance by the two young girls and Suchet is his old self. I am watching this on rerun and consider it a nice change from the dark and violent series that are commonplace nowadays.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Poirot goes from strength to strength
docmav25 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Despite the disappointment that this series is only three episodes (for some reason Appointment With Death - due to be in this set - isn't likely to reach the screen yet) I can only praise the high production values of this ongoing series and the standards of the cast and crew continue to reach the best possible level. David Suchet has oft been quoted as hoping to film all the Poirot stories and this brings him ever closer to his aim.

Where the earliest entries were shot more wide angle and with much more humour, these later entries are darker and more tightly framed. I have to admit I sometimes find the close- ups a bit too close but I am getting used to them now.

A coup in India and a girls school in Britain form the intro to the story and the action all takes place (near enough) in the school itself. Poirot is just visiting but becomes embroiled in a dangerous situation as one of the teachers is murdered and it becomes clear that someone is searching the school for something they are sure must be there! Kidnapping and more murder occurs as Poirot finds himself trying to uncover the identity of the murderer and save the reputation of the school.

Suchet is a tour de force as Poirot despite the newer films seeing him without Hastings and Miss Lemon. Praise, too, for all the young school girls who played their parts so well. The cast of lady teachers and the Inspector and groundsman all gave solid performances and it was quite hard to figure out whodunnit, even though I only read the book earlier this year. Mrs McGinty's Dead was so good and this, for me and my wife, was even better. Now we look forward to Third Girl and the return of Ariadne Oliver. Hopefully Appointment With Death won't be too far behind these three magnificent period mystery dramas.
27 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Atmospheric, well-made mystery
gridoon202426 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Hercule Poirot is asked by Miss Bulstrode, an old friend of his, to stay for a while at the prestigious girls' boarding school which she runs and determine which member of the staff is more suitable to become her successor when she retires. But when teachers at the school start getting murdered and a young exiled Middle Eastern princess who's also a student there gets kidnapped, Miss Bulstrode asks Poirot to work along with the English inspector assigned to the case to save the residents and the reputation of the school.

"Cat Among The Pigeons" demands your full attention or you will be lost quickly, at least on the first viewing. The (many) characters are introduced right away in overlapping style, and the setting is unusual for a Poirot mystery (the only slightly similar one that comes to my mind right now is "Hickory Dickory Dock"). The plot hangs together very well, though it seems that Poirot identifies "The Angel" more through intuition than detection, and I didn't really like the gimmick of the witness who would be able to clear almost everything up but cannot be located until the last minute. The direction, settings, music, etc. are all properly atmospheric and pull you in. The cast is very good, and the actress who plays the killer (I'm not spoiling much here, all the suspects are women) gives a terrific performance especially AFTER she has been revealed, making her character the coldest, hottest femme fatale in the series since Jane Wilkinson of "Lord Edgeware Dies". A solid *** out of 4.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
As Poirot would say, "Merveilleux!!!"
tml_pohlak_1325 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I've been very pessimistic about "Cat Among the Pigeons", episode 2 in the newest Poirot series. Having just watched it I must admit, my pessimism was proved completely wrong!

When the writer in an interview said he'd treated the story with care adapting it, I scoffed. I criticized this statement, and came up with prophecies that CATP would be another "Cards on the Table". Now that I've seen the movie, I must admit I was completely wrong. The screenwriter has, indeed, taken great care in adapting the story for TV.

MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD!!!!

I was disappointed at the deletion of Miss Vansittart. Her murder is still in the adaptation, only Eileen Rich is used instead. It makes sense, actually, to have changed this, because 3 rivals for one position as headmistress may have been to much to capture in 90 minutes.

I was also pleased that Katie Leung's character, Hsui Tai Wan, is extremely minor, and almost of no importance to the plot.

Another thing I really liked was the ending. Miss Chadwick jumping into the way of the revolver to protect Miss Bulstrode was one of my favourite bits in the entire novel, and this scene was filmed very well.

END OF MAJOR SPOILERS!!!

All in all, I am very pleased at the second installment of the 11th season of "Poirot". "Cat Among the Pigeons", one of my favourite books by Agatha Christie, has not been destroyed like I'd foreseen!
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very well done adaptation
TheLittleSongbird19 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
As a lover of Agatha Christie:Poirot and of the book, I watched Cat Among the Pigeons and was really impressed. Yes things are changed such as the deletion of Miss Vansittart and the means of Miss Springer being murdered is changed(killed by a javelin instead of a gun), but it is a very well done adaptation that sticks to the book's spirit, and while there are some really sinister atmospheric moments I liked the lightness of the adaptation as well. As I have said, I love the book, it is beautifully done and suspenseful, though I will say like my cover of Murder in Mesopotamia I was once afraid to look at the cover because it has a very evil cat on it as though it had just eaten a pigeon. Back on target, Cat Among the Pigeons looks stunning, with beautiful scenery, photography and a wonderful building for the school. The music is also really nice, and the script has a lot of nice touches. And I loved the acting, David Suchet is outstanding of course and so is Harriet Walter as the formidable Miss Bulstrode and Natasha Little as Ann Shapland. The part when Miss Chadwick saves Miss Bulstrode and gets herself shot was really tense and the scene at her deathbed was really poignant. Even the schoolgirls were terrific, in fact I don't think there was a bad performance whatsoever, and even if there were some liberties taken the plot is at least coherent. Overall, a solid adaptation of a great book. 8/10 Bethany Cox
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
S11E2: Cat Among the Pigeons: Enjoyable mystery with plenty of color and activity (MILD SUGGESTIVE SPOILER)
bob the moo19 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Hercule Poirot is visiting the exclusive school of Meadowbank as a favor to his friend and headmistresses, Miss Bulstrode – he is due to retire and she has enlisted his help to pick a replacement by observing the characters of her staff. This is rather sidelined when one of the staff, known for enjoying the secrets of others, turns up dead. Poirot remains to assist with the investigation, but what does it all have to do with foreign princesses and rebellions in lands far away?

A most enjoyable episode this one as it mixes the usual Poirot conventions of the contained group of suspects and also adds a splash of color and intrigue with so many related aspects. It helps that it is set in a girl's school so we get an element of mischief as the girls enjoy the murder and danger, but this color is also helped by how graphic the first murder is, not to mention the guns- blazing opening sequence. This sense of liveliness and flair drew me into the mystery very well. Even before it really got going, I liked the way Poirot was brought into it, and his assessing of the characters made for a good way into the investigation before it really had to begin. There is a lot going on, not all of which leads to the solution, but all of which is interesting and engaging. I was not overly keen on the final solution resting so heavily on one source of information (who was conveniently unavailable until the very end), but still it worked because it had a lot of base clues and information which provided enough to get teeth into.

The design and presentation of the film was very impressive; great use is made of the school as a location, and there was a real atmosphere to the place which was helped by the nature of the murders. As with the best Poirots, in among the mystery there are touches of humor and in this case I liked that they did not all come from aspects of the Poirot caricature but rather from some of the staff and the girls. Suchet plays his role well of course, but the supporting cast were consistently strong, with nobody really overplaying or hogging the scene; Walter, Raison, Berrington, Abbington, and others were strong. The child roles are interesting, firstly because they are all played by women in their 20's (which is normal I guess) but they do all add value in one way or another, and Edmett, Woodcock, and Karan were all good in their roles.

Overall an enjoyable film with a good mystery with plenty of color and activity, good performances across the board, and the usual high production values given greater atmosphere and presence by the direction and use of location.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting story takes place in a British girl's school in the late '30s...
Doylenf21 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Agatha Christie was awfully good at cluttering up her stories with lots of characters, some of whom aren't who they're supposed to be and this one is no exception. As usual, there's the princess who isn't a princess, a woman who isn't dead as supposed by a key witness, and various other red herrings that somehow never fail to fool Hercule Poirot (DAVID SUCHET). I read the novel so long ago that I don't know how faithful this adaptation is.

The teaching staff is under the supervision of the very able Miss Bulstrode (HARRIET WALTER), the most imposing member of the female cast whom I selected as the least likely among the suspects. Of course, my assumption was wrong and I failed to catch any of the main clues as to the murderer's identity.

ADAM CROASDELL does a nice job as the young gardener who isn't who he's supposed to be--and so it goes.

Tidy Agatha Christie mystery, but I missed the exclusion of Miss Lemmon and other usual Poirot associates.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A happy version of one of my favourite Christies!
Iain-21519 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
'Cat Among The Pigeons' is one of my favourite Christie novels. I'm not sure exactly why as I admit that Poirot does little actual detection and the murderer is revealed more through luck than anything else. The characterisation is very strong however and I love the girls' school setting juxtaposed against the Middle Eastern subplot. I was a bit apprehensive then about this TV adaptation - would they destroy one of my favourites? Well, no they didn't. They made one or two minor changes (particularly around the second murder) but these worked and overall I was very pleased. As always, these Poirot films are set in the late thirties; the book was written in the late fifties but the girls' school setting is timeless and so the change in period made no difference at all. Poirot's early insertion into the story (to try and help Miss Bulstrode decide on her successor) did not entirely convince me but fans would not have been happy if Suchet had not made his first appearance till halfway through (as happens in the book). Those (like me) who were concerned that Katie Leung's character might steal the glory away from schoolgirls Julia and Jennifer had no cause to worry and the J's retained their important place in the story.

Miss Bulstrode is a formidable character to portray but I think Harriet Walter pulled her off convincingly. Susan Wooldridge was just excellent as Miss Chadwick and Elizabeth Berrington was just right as the nasty Miss Springer but, for me, the real star performance came from Natasha Little as Ann Shapland - I couldn't imagine the role better played. All the schoolgirls were terrific and (unlike 'Mrs McGinty') there was a real feeling of lightness to the piece. Highly recommended.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Comes off well despite tinkering
notmicro8 January 2010
Screen adaptations of Christie's books usually play fast and loose with the original story and plot, with varying degrees of success. I always marvel at the audacity and hubris of producers and adapters confident that THEY know how to tell a story better than Christie herself, what a laugh - where is THEIR record of sales topped only by the Bible? In recent years they've been going kind of wild with very ambitious, high-gloss productions of Poirot, the results of which have been uneven to say the least, from "Five Little Pigs" (sublime) to "Sad Cypress" (hmmm) to "Taken at the Flood" (a vile wretched grade-Z trainwreck, and criminal waste of talented actors).

This one manages to come off fairly well, although there is considerable tinkering with the original story. The camera-work makes heavy use of diffusion filters throughout, giving the effect of the entire story taking place in a kind of a dreamy beige fairy-tale haze.

The lead Harriet Walter is an actress whom I respect, and who in the past I have repeatedly tried and failed to warm up to. Here she is less guarded and unusually accessible, and does an excellent job, in spite of the bizarre "period" hair and makeup inflicted on her.

My French isn't very good, but it seemed to me that the script had Poirot (and Mlle Blanche) using expressions that would never come out of the mouth of a native speaker. Also I had the English subtitles on while I watched the DVD, and there were some hilarious mistakes in the French, for example "pas du tout" showed up as "pas do tout", "oui, bien sûr" as "oui, bien, sure", and "Je vous en prie" showed up as - I swear! - "je vous emprie"!! I was in stitches and wondering what next, were they going to render "oui" as "wee" or something? Maybe it was done by computer voice-recognition software? Good lord, hire somebody who has a clue, or have someone competent copy-edit it.
18 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It beats the book. I really liked this one.
Sleepin_Dragon24 November 2015
Cat among the Pigeons is not one of my favourite novels, it's one of the very few I find hard to get through, it's a little bit on the flat side. The changes they make to the TV adaptation benefit the story.

It's slightly lighter in tone then some of the other episodes, despite having some grizzly murders, there are some moments of humour.

The quality of direction and the brilliance of the cast make a pretty average book into a thoroughly enjoyable drama. Harriet Walter is tremendously good as Miss Bulstrode. My favourite performance comes from Elizabeth Berrington, she is superb, so often cast as lovable, funny, sympathetic, it's great to see her cast against type, and be smarmy and devious, she's wonderful, and that fantastic hair style. Amanda Abbington is almost unrecognisable as Miss Blake, but she's great too.

Very enjoyable, 8/10
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Incomprehensible short version for American viewers
deansscreen4 April 2021
I listened to the great Hugh Fraser read the novel and had to wrack my brain to keep up with the story. The TV show is even worse in this regard. It barges past the viewer (past me anyway) with breakneck speed. I note, however, on IMDb that ten whole minutes were subtracted from the original British version for the easily-distracted American audience, which is used to ADHD-inducing commercial interruptions that shorten TV shows of all sorts. In other words, the producers (or editors) of the British version realized that millions of Americans wouldn't sit still to absorb the full show in its original length. I suppose that the shortening of the show accounts for some of my confusion and for my feeling that important points in the plot ended up on the cutting-room floor.

Other than the incomprehensible plot, the show is magnificent, drenched in period atmosphere and in fabulous acting from everyone in the show.

Back to my complaint: I imagine that if the crew had done Hamlet, the show would have stopped at "To be. That is the." How tragic that intelligent American viewers able to sit still for a longish television show have been cheated by whoever cut a large hole in this otherwise wonderful production.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Clueless.
richardmolenschot29 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This episode is saved by the fine acting, distinctive characters, beautiful shots and good film music. But the mystery has one big flaw: the viewers (and Poirot for that matter) do not get ANY clues to solve the mystery. Yes there are plenty of red herrings. Yes we know there is a spy who has been killing and we must discover his or her identity. But no clue leads us to that identity. Poirot just reveals the identity in his wrap up at the end. No clue leading up to it. No hint. Not a mistake the killer made. Not a clue.

To me, that is just bad storytelling. I haven't read the book, so it might be flawed in the story there too. But it sure is a big disappointment at the end.
5 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Really good
blanche-231 August 2014
"Cat Among the Pigeons" is one of the best of this series. It's faithful to the book, which has a strong story, and is filled with great production values and atmosphere, and the acting -- absolutely wonderful.

Poirot is asked by a friend, Miss Bulstrode, to present a sports prize at her girls' school, Meadowbank. Then she asks him to stay on, as she wants to retire and choose a successor and would like his opinion. The obvious one for the job, Miss Chadwick (Susan Wooldridge) is a little too conservative for Miss Bulstrode.

Things turn chaotic. The country of Ramat, overrun by anti-monarchy revolutionaries, has caused the only surviving heir to the throne, Princess Shaista, to get out. She is sent to Meadowbank and believes people are trying to kill her. Miss Springer, the gym teacher, is a sadistic piece of work who enjoys finding out peoples' secrets. She is later found stabbed with a javelin.

Each of the rest of the staff seems to be hiding something. There is another murder of another teacher, an attack on a teacher, and the princess is kidnapped.

Tennis rackets, rubies, revolution, fakes, and undercover work all figure in as Poirot attempts to find the culprit - the cat among the pigeons.

Terrific, with Suchet the perfect Poirot as ever, and with brilliant performances by Walter and Wooldridge, both very accomplished actresses. Endeavor fans may recognize Anton Lesser as the investigator helped by Poirot.

Well worth viewing.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best Poirot mysteries
grantss23 May 2016
Hercule Poirot is asked by Miss Bulstrode, an old friend and the headmistress of Meadowbank school (a prestigious school for girls), to award the first prize after their annual sports event. After the ceremony Miss Bulstrode asks Poirot to stick around at the school, as she is thinking of retiring and wants Poirot to observe the staff. Among the pupils are the princess, and heir, of a middle eastern kingdom and a girl whose uncle was murdered in the recent coup in the princess' country. Then the gym teacher, a loathsome, meddling, bullying, universally-hated person, is found murdered in the gym, killed by a javelin. In addition, the tennis racket of the girl with the murdered uncle is missing.

One of the best Poirot mysteries. Not overly complex and quite plausible. Solvable by the audience, but not easily and only through elimination. A good balance of difficulty and solvability. Some good twists, revelations and red herrings too. Great setting and ambiance - you can taste the English private school air.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Death of a games mistress in a sports pavilion. Sounds like a highly athletic crime."
bensonmum231 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Poirot pays a visit to school for girls and is asked by the Headmistress, Miss Bulstrode (Harriet Walter), to use his powers of observation to help her select a replacement once she retires. Poirot's powers of observation, however, are soon required for something more sinister when one of the teachers is murdered – a javelin through the heart. Before Poirot can unmask the killer, a second teacher is murdered, another is hit over the head, and one of the students is kidnapped. Poirot must find The Cat Among the Pigeons.

I certainly don't remember every detail, but I do remember enjoying the book, Cat Among the Pigeons. And I'm happy to say that I also enjoyed this production. While a few details have been changed from Christie's original work, from what I remember, it stays fairly true to the source material. All the most significant plot points are here and only minor additions or changes have been made – most necessary for a 90 minute runtime. Similar to what I wrote about Elephants Can Remember, Cat Among the Pigeons has a lot of moving parts – a staff full of suspects, several girls who play the part of witness, a coup in the Middle East, missing rubies, two murders, a knock on the head, and a kidnapped princess. There's certainly a lot going on and director James Kent and screenwriter Mark Gatiss do an admiral job of keeping it all coherent. They also add quite a bit of atmosphere – that kind of sinister atmosphere that I usually associate with a good Giallo. The acting is, as I've come to expect in the Poirot series, first rate. Suchet is very good here. Harriet Walter, Susan Wooldridge, and Lois Edmett (in her only screen credit) stood out to me in the supporting cast. The only negative I can add is in the solution to the mystery. Poirot seems to guess at many of the answers in his denouement without much actual evidence to go on. Still, it's a very well done, entertaining episode.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Early Screenplay from Mark Gatiss
henry-plantagenet-047 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I am a huge fan of BBC's "Sherlock" though I had my gripes about the last two seasons, and I wanted to check out early work from Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat. This, I think, might be the former's first screenplay in the mystery genre. I have to say it's sensational. I was already suitably impressed with "Halloween Party", but this one is even better. Both episodes tighten their story line even though they have a large number of characters. The proceedings move quickly and with purpose. We don't have the odd 30 minutes of exposition as we did in "Sad Cypress". Right from the start, there is immersion in the going's on, well before the first murder. Here the plot is suspenseful. This is not a given for an Agatha Christie adaptation. They are almost always interesting, but they rarely leave you on the edge of your seat. Here, I legitimately feared for the character's lives. Subsequent turns of events were nigh impossible to predict, because the murderer's identity was so well shrouded that it was not possible ascertain who the next victim would be. Throw in the misdirection with the attack on Miss Rich (Claire Skinner) and there is no way you will be able to predict the solution except through process of elimination, which you can't do until the circumstances of the attack on Rich had been clarified. The cast as usual is great. David Suchet is always great as Poirot and had wonderful dynamics with both Miss Bulstrode (Harriet Walter) and the Inspector (Anton Lesser), both fantastic characterizations. The two school girls (Lois Edmett and Jo Woodcock) whose tennis rackets become crucial evidence added welcome humor to the story, but I was also very worried that one of them might get killed. The murder sequences, all of which take place at night, are filmed almost like a horror film. (Gatiss gets even better at this in Halloween Party.) The cinematography is worthy of special note, with its choice of grayish haze, which suits the hazy nature of what is going on. Poirot seems to feel fairly comfortable in the circumstances, but nobody else is. And neither is the viewer. Finally, there is simply the taught energy, on which I already commented that holds together this episode, in a way that others from the series do not. That and many great scenes I will not spoil here but leave for the viewers to discover.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A lovely rendering of a rambuctuous plot
nikimoore-171689 June 2019
The Bulldog Drummond-type plot of Cat Among the Pigeons requires some considerable suspension of disbelief, but this film is so beautifully shot, so sumptuously acted, so gorgeously sly, that it is just one hugely enjoyable romp. Of course the murder victims are awful people that the world can do without; of course the good guys are all noble and articulate and upper-class, and the whole is set in a fabulously soft-focus England replete with a jolly-hockey-sticks girls school, proper school marms, impoeccable manners, afternoon tea from delicate china, exotic jewels, foreign princesses, handsome spies, very civilised shoot-outs, a suitably grumpy police inspector, a wonderfully dramatic expose and the incomparable Poirot. It all hangs together in a most satisfactory way, with one huge glaring plot point.... Everyone at the school has a dark secret. And so the entire film comprises the police, several members of the British Secret Service, and Poirot himself trying to work them out. Yet the gym teacher manages to dig up everyone's secrets entirely on her own! How come she managed it so easily, while the others needed files, reports, background investigation, interviews, the finest minds in English espionage, and considerable help from Poirot to reach the same conclusion?
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nice adaption
canfordcliffs201026 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
OK so I have to start with how much I love the novel of this particular Poirot. It's brilliant, think famous five with murders. Now the TV episode, it was good but missed what I loved from the book. The book takes great pains to describe Miss Bullstrode's crisis, she has lost her passion, her school's heyday long gone. The school and its runnings are set up so perfectly that when everything kicks off the reader feels it is an intrusion into THEIR world. Miss Bullstrode has a lot less action in the episode. Now I know that the story had only 90 mins but the whole charm of Agatha Christie is that she creates these little worlds which the reader feels like they live in.

All in all, nice adaption, David Suchet is exceptional as always but not half as enjoyable as the book.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cat Among the Pigeons
Prismark1019 April 2019
Cat Among the Pigeons is a lively episode of Poirot. Director James Kent keeps it busy and almost anyone could be a suspect.

Poirot is requested not to attend a murder investigation but a prize giving at a private girls school, Meadowbank. The headmistress, Miss Bulstrode then asks Poirot to stay on to size up any likely successors for her job as she intends to retire.

It is not long before Poirot is investigating a murder when Miss Springer the sports teacher is found dead, killed by a javelin.

Then one of the pupils, Princess Shaista from Ramat, a country in the brink of revolution is missing, believed to be abducted. There is also a quest for some lost rubies.

Poirot believes there is a clue regarding an angel. Something a mother of one of the pupils spotted. Miss Springer might had been killed as she enjoyed finding secrets about people and using what she found for mischief.

This one has a starry cast, some surprises but is also rather contrived. At one point, one of the suspects complains to Poirot about his melodramatic theatrics.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Jewels, kidnapping, murder and revolution make another fine Poirot mystery
SimonJack7 July 2022
Hercule Poirot attends a special program to present the Pembleton Lacrosse Shield to the Meadowbank girls school in Broadhinny. The school co-founder and head mistress, Miss Bulstrode, is an acquaintance and old friend. She is considering retiring soon, and she asks Poirot to stay on a few days to observe some of the faculty to recommend her replacement.

In short order, two murders happen, and Poirot is at work solving a mystery that's tied to foreign espionage, a foreign revolution and smuggling priceless jewels out of that country, and a kidnapped princess. As always, Agatha Christie's story is highly entertaining, and David Suchet is superb as Hercule Poirot. All of the cast are very good.

This is one of barely a handful of the many Christie stories put on film in which I could guess the culprit by halfway through the film. It does give a more obvious inkling of whom it may be than most of her story films, I think. Of course, I wasn't sure until the end, but my guess was spot on this time, where most of the time I'm off or can't decide between a number of suspects.

While none of the early characters of Poirot's circle are in this film, Detective Inspector Kelsey welcomes Poirot's help in solving the crimes, and defers to his leading questions. And, as with all of the Poirot mysteries, as written for the screen (if not by Dame Agatha herself), this one has some clever lines and a little humor. Here are some favorite lines.

Hercule Poirot, "I comprehend. The challenge - it has gone."

Poirot, "There does not need to be present a crime for the investigator to thrive."

Miss Bulstrode, " Monsieur Poirot has an international reputation." Detective Inspector Kelsey, "Oh? So does Mussolini."

Poirot, "But nothing, rien, is more dangerous than to try the blackmail on a person who has killed at least once."
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
When Student Bodies Suffer Over a Princely Sum of Rubies
WeatherViolet1 August 2010
When terrorists raid a school in Switzerland, Prince Ali of Romart (Raji James) and British Security Agent Bob Rawlinson (Adam De Ville) defend the Romart crown jewels, precious rubies, which are smuggled into the United Kingdom.

Princess Shaista (Amara Karan), cousin of Prince Ali, and next in line to the Throne of Romart, arrives in England to attend "Meadowbank Independent School for Girls," as does Jennifer Sutcliffe (Jo Woodcock), a niece of Bob Rawlinson, who remember his involvement with someone named Angelica.

Mr. Forbes (Don Gallagher) and Mrs. Forbes (Georgie Glen) arrive at Meadowbank to enroll their daughter, Patricia Forbes (Georgia Cornick), a weight-challenged youngster, whom its Physical Education instructor mercilessly bullies.

Mrs. Upjohn (Pippa Haywood) also arrives to deliver her daughter, Julia Upjohn (Lois Edmett), who befriends Jennifer Sutcliffe, they exchanging tennis racquets on the court, and small-talk in their quarters, along with foreign student Hsui Tai (Katie Leung).

Miss Bulstrode (Harriet Walter) operates Meadowbank as its co-founder and Head Mistress. Miss Chadwick (Susan Wooldridge), its other co-founder, presumes to Miss Bulstrode that she stands next in line to operate the school should Miss Bulstrode proceed with her plans to retire.

Also on staff at Meadowbank are Ann Shapland (Natasha Little), its Secretary/Receptionist, who has her own office and sitting room; Miss Blake (Amanda Abbington), its free-thinking Art instructor; Miss Johnson (Carol MacReady), its housekeeper; Miss Eileen Rich (Claire Skinner), its Poetry instructor, who delivers the story's title, "Cat Among the Pigeons"; Mlle. Louise Blanche (Miranda Raison), its French instructor; and Miss Grace Springer (Elizabeth Berrington) its Physical Education instructor, who complains chronically.

On the first day of the new term, Miss Bulstrode invites one Hercule Poirot (David Suchet) to address the gathering at the Auditorium, and to present the Meadowbank Champions an award for "the Pemberton School Lacrosse Shield." She also requests his staying on a few days, in order to advise her selection of a successor from among Meadowbank's staff.

At the accompanying reception, Lady Veronica (Jane How) crashes the event in a display of eccentricity; and, as Miss Chadwick ushers her through the door, Mrs. Upjohn tells Miss Bulstrode that she is stunned to recognize from across the room "The Angel," whom she has presumed deceased.

Poirot begins his sleuthing early on, as he scrutinizes the Misses Chadwick, Shapland, Blake, Johnson, Rich, Blanche and Springer, and also the school's gardener and grounds-keeper, one Adam Goodman (Adam Croasdell), who becomes sweet on Ann Shapland. And he scrutinizes all the more once bodies begin to turn up around the campus.

One night at 12:50 AM, Miss Johnson (Carol MacReady) and Miss Chadwick (Susan Wooldridge) investigate a light in the pavilion and discover a body skewered with a javelin.

Inspector Kelsey (Anton Lesser) arrives by day to investigate the murder, as do Mr. and Mrs. Forbes, to withdraw Patricia.

The next evening, Jennifer and Julia discover the Romant rubies hidden within the handle of a tennis racquet, the means of smuggling them into the country after the revolution.

But when Ann and Adam hear Miss Chadwick's scream, they discover another body inside the pavilion, the victim of a striking with sandbag. While the second victim survives, Meadowbank continues to be over-ridden with the scandal of murder.

Plus there's an apparent kidnapping, which leads Poirot and Inspector Kelsey to "The Glass Slipper" nightclub, and a third body discovered in the boat-house by morning, another victim of a sandbag bludgeoning and also a drowning.

Hercule Poirot gathers a roomful of suspects into the Meadowbank chambers and begins to explain his suspicions, when the perpetrator of the two successful murders draws a pistol, to claim a third victim, after Mrs. Upton returns to identify "The Angel."

Miss Bulstrode, therefore, has her choices for a potential successor narrowing as the list of candidates dwindles, so will her selection process become easier or all the more difficult to bear?

The cast is rounded out by Jemma Carlisle as School Girl, Olivia Jewson as School Girl, Laura Tarrant as Jane, Fudge Hammali as Adam Trimble, and Aaron King as Teacher.
7 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The screenwriter really goofed this one.
jmhart-130 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
When I saw that Cat Among the Pidgeons was being made into a movie, I was anxious to see it but was I ever disappointed. I gave it a 3 because the adaptation was really off base from the book. I have seen all of the Poirot movies up to this one and the quality and quantity of them has diminished over the years. The first seventeen were in the 100 to 105 minute range and included some great ones: Sad Cypress, Death on the Nile, etc. and were very close to the books. The next four were in the 92-95 minute range and included some really bad adaptations: Cards on the Table and Mystery of the Blue Train. After the Funeral was good but not up to previous Poirot standards. Cat was only 84 minutes and the adaptation left me stunned from the start. These are a few of my comments: What shootout in the Palace? What voodoo doll? What indiscretion with the young boy? What javelin (it was a gun)? There were three murders - not two. Miss Chadwick didn't hit Miss Rich - she murdered Miss Vansittart. Poirot didn't show up in the book until the last one-third of it. Where were Mr Robinson and Alice Calder? Did the screenwriter read the book or just skim through it? I would suggest that you read Cat Among the Pidgeons if you haven't. To me, it rates up there with some of Miss Christie's best books: Murder on the Orient Express, The Body in the Library and Appointment with Death.

If David Suchet decides to do Murder on the Orient Express, I would suggest that he read the book and watch the Albert Finnery version for inspiration.
9 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some Pigeons!
rmax30482313 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Poirot is visiting an elite girls' boarding school, where he overhears a good deal of gossip. One of the teachers, the gym teacher Miss Springer (Elizabeth Berrington) is a sadistic pill, making fat girls suffer, insulting everyone. Someone fashions a sort of Raggedy Anne doll, pastes a cut-out of Miss Springer's face on it, and pierces the doll with sharp objects. Miss Springer is subsequently murdered by being skewered with a lance.

Many people will dismiss this as a coincidence, but there may be mysterious forces at work in the universe of which we know little. There was a similar type of teacher, a professor, when I was in graduate school. He was to attend a friend's comprehensive oral exams and she was terrified of him. I told her, "No problem." Then we made a doll out of masking tape, long and thin, and I drew a remarkably accurate caricature of his face on the thing. We stuck several pins into it. He was stricken with a severe case of, I think, pink eye or restless legs syndrome and missed the exam. Let us not make unwarranted assumptions about how the world works.

As usual, the whole damned school seems to be filled with suspects, and Miss Springer, being hated by everyone, could have been done in by any of them. One or two of the girls, by the way, are pretty cute, including the spoiled Arabian Princess played by the sensuous Amara Karan. If I were teaching there, I expect I'd last about two weeks before being confined to Wormwood Scrubs or hanged at Newgate or something. The actress was twenty-four at the time but doesn't look it.

If you didn't know it was a story by Agatha Christie, you wouldn't know it from the opening scenes, which are more like those in "To Have And Have Not." Running feet, bursts of gunfire, and several deaths in the palace. That's the palace of the spoiled Arabian Princess, who is next in line to the throne of Ramat.

It ends in the traditional way. Poirot assembles the suspects and explains to them the meaning of all the clues he has been holding back, and he ends with something along the lines of, "And so it was YOU who murdered Miss O Mimosa San with the poisoned fugu fish and stole the Necklace of the Forbidden Dragon!"
4 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed