The High-Born Child and the Beggar (1913) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
a film version of a sentimental poem
kekseksa12 October 2016
This is in fact an example of a genre not uncommon in early film,a photoplay based on a sentimental narrative poem. D. W. Griffith was particularly fond of the genre (examples include Enoch Arden,Pippa Passes, The Unchanging Sea. Scandinavian film-makers also liked the genre and Victor Sjöström's (his 1917 Terje Vigen is based on a poem by Ibsen). The genre would persist even after the feature film became common in films such as The Old Swimmin' Hole (1921) and the superb Australian film, The Sentimental Bloke (1919), which is perhaps the finest example of the genre.

Unfortunately this is not clear from the EYE institute version, where the verse is replaced by lengthy prose intertitles but there is another version available on the internet (from the Huntley Archives). It is no better quality and, as with all the Huntley Archive films, there is no real attempt to identify the film (their films 17773 as "A High-born Child" 1910s) but it does include some of the verse and makes the nature of the film clear.

It is conceivable that the poem was specially written for the film (as in the 1919 Swedish comedy short Åh, i moron kväll) but it is much more probable that it is based on a well-known poem but I have not been able to identify the source.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wow is this Mawkish!
boblipton16 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
No need for the usual sort of round-up I do in my reviews. They make friends. They both die. It's the fate that all flesh is heir to.

Although I have a strong sentimental streak, when the the film-makers telegraph their intentions with as strong a fist as they do here, in the title, my attitude shifts from accepting the story as it is offered to a sneering "Make me cry! I double-dog dare you!" This one ran through all the notes in a most obvious fashion and came nowhere near communicating its message of the universality of the human condition.

In addition, the copy offered at the Eye Institute site on Youtube is not particularly good. The long titles -- always a sign that the film makers have no confidence in their ability to tell their story visually -- have degraded and infected the rest of the film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adelaide Lawrence is the life of this picture
deickemeyer28 December 2017
That graceful little actress, Adelaide Lawrence, is the life of this picture of sentiment and pathos. It illustrates a bit of verse which is not strong or very human; but is itself much better than this. If the story were told plainly, it would be ridiculous; but, like some rough urn, it holds an essence of pleasant odor and makes an acceptable offering. George Stewart plays the cripple boy. - The Moving Picture World, November 8, 1913
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed