"Law & Order" Pledge (TV Episode 2009) Poster

(TV Series)

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
An Episode of Classic Wisdom
razberrydonut10 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A married couple's nanny and son are murdered by deep seated rage of a man with a brown briefcase and a grey fedora noted by a passerby. As the police force of New York City try to unravel a motive for this brutal murder takes Detectives Bernard and Lupo and A.D.As Cutter and Rubirosa down a dark and depressing path of sororities, popularity, and ultimately, a broken heart under the oppressing structure of social status.

This is an episode built on a classic word of wisdom: treat people the way oneself wants to be treated. Although the episode's plot spans over thirty years into the married couple's past, as well as for Ned Lasky's family, this episode works to focus on showing the burdens of prejudice structured by class hierarchy, and that people from various levels in social class still have feelings.

I recommend watching this episode to see a sociology through a theatrical view of one of the most hypnotizing dramas of law enforcement and the justice system.
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pushing his buttons
bkoganbing8 April 2015
The murder of a 12 year old boy and a housekeeper of a pair scientists is the case that Jeremy Sisto and Anthony Anderson catch in his Law And Order episode. The murderer in this case does return almost to the scene of the crime to gloat over his handiwork. He also snipped a lock of the victim's hair and sends it to the mother of the victim in a condolence card.

The sick puppy that did this is played by Martin Malloy who really dominates the episode. Convicting him will be a problem because the person who really gives them the evidence they needed is Malloy's daughter Brooke Bloom. She does it because L&O's mythical Hudson University offers a $100,000.00 reward. That certainly taints her testimony though without the reward Bloom has ample motive to rat her father out. He's that lovable a guy.

It all goes back to college days where the mother of the victim kicked him out of their snobbish sorority party. As one who was never part of the crowd that blue collar kid Malloy aspired to he's almost a sympathetic figure. I say almost because we never forget that he killed a child to hurt her. People get rejected, but we don't get so twisted as to do what this guy did. And there's hints out there Malloy might have done more. This guy could have been the protagonist for some slasher flick.

If he didn't have a client who couldn't control himself, Malloy's attorney Jefferson Mays might have gotten a dismissal. But Linus Roache really comes up with a legal strategy that presses Malloy's buttons in open court. The expression Mays's face in the end is priceless.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Deadly pledge
TheLittleSongbird20 November 2022
"Pledge" left a generally positive impression on me on first watch, while not blowing me away. Benefitting primarily from the main guest turn and the opening, but hurt a little by that there is too much familiar ground and not enough surprises which made the story feel too predictable and ordinary and a miscast. My general opinion of Season 19 was generally positive while not being blown away which is not too bad a position to be in, beginning exceptionally strongly.

On recent re-watch, my feelings are pretty much the same, well almost. There is a lot to like about "Pledge", with the standout things on first watch being the main reasons to view it (as well as 'Law and Order' completest sake). At the same time, it did feel like something was missing and that more could have been done with the premise perhaps. It is a good episode, albeit not a great one (and Season 19 did show greatness a lot) that is neither one of the best or worst.

Am going to start with the good. The photography and such as usual are fully professional, the slickness still remaining. The music is used sparingly and is haunting and non-overwrought when it is used, and it's mainly used when a crucial revelation or plot development is revealed. The direction has some nice tension while keeping things steady, without going too far the other way. The script is thought-provoking and doesn't ramble.

The story on the whole intrigues a lot and does pose some interesting questions, had no issue understanding what was going on while not finding it too easy to figure out. The opening is unusually graphic and creepy. The regulars are excellent and so is an unnerving Matt Malloy as a juicy character (that actually could have afforded to be even more developed).

However, it doesn't have enough surprises and could have done with more tension as well as attacked its subject with more edge and grit perhaps.

It also suffers from an overwrought turn from a too young Erin Dilly. Did feel that the motive was far too extreme.

Concluding, good but not great. 7/10.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Unbelievable plot and good actors cast in the wrong roles
grumblesmcgee5 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
L&O had a proud history of casting solid character actors (often relative unknowns with theater backgrounds), but really went overboard this time.

The episode revolves around the brutal murder of a young boy and the taunting of his family. Well, we're introduced by the neurotic suspect (played by Matt Malloy), and eventually learn that he was spurned "30 years ago" by sorority girls, and has held a grudge ever since. Malloy's eccentric, even obsessed, performance works to an extent. But we're led to believe his grudge was so extreme that, even though he had a loving wife and daughter, he would butcher an innocent child. It's a reach.

The premise is interesting, and we certainly get a good taste of how the a tiny portion of female college students were women looking for "men (they) could marry," but there are two huge problems. For starters, the mother of the victim is played by Erin Dilly. She plays the part as well as she can--accomplished and smart, with an air of elitism--but is totally miscast when we realize the she supposedly trampled on the pride of Malloy's character THIRTY YEARS EARLIER in college. And his character is said to be "two years older" than hers! So Dilly, 36 at the time of filming, was supposedly at least a junior in college thirty years before the events of the episode.

I get that some people play older or younger. Malloy looks a bit older than his age. Maybe Dilly does, too. But casting an attractive 36- year-old as a character in their 50s?! I'm sure they could've found a more appropriate actress for the part. Or maybe they just thought some eye candy would distract us from the math.

This is one episode that needed a rewrite and some more thoughtful casting.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Pledge did not ring true
jessicka-200-64265 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
As part of an otherwise strong season that saw Law and Order re-emerge from the disastrous Fred Thompson years, this episode was weird. We open with a graphic crime scene that wouldn't be out of place on CSI or Criminal Minds. We then are told the victims parents were scientists, a topic that the series has visited often.

The show can't seem to decide its stance on actual killer. Is he a figure if immense rage beneath the mediocrity of middle class American life? Is he a victim at the hands of the cotillion class system? A victim, and yet he's clearly internalized these values by rejecting his own daughter whom he deemed not good enough. The problem for me is that these questions are not very interesting. They don't really make sense when given the graphic nature of the crime. Maybe I'm not tuned into the politics of sorority life, but no one was particularly sympathetic. Perhaps the show needed a good interrogation scene to prove how unhinged Lasky actually was.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
obsessive compulsive disorder
jn-0294016 August 2022
A twisted obsessed man named ned lasky played by Matt malloy who murders a child and his babysitter just because he was obsessed with the kappa sorority girl called Susan at his college.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An example of how the show's lazy writing doomed it
imdb-2382129 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
There is some acting talent on the show that unfortunately was left holding the same "mind game" scripts which this crew manufactured at will. Rather than the clever, well crafted stories which mostly adhered to legal rules in the courtroom, this one involves a yet another tale that relies upon trickery to get a defendant to lose his composure completely and admit his crime - the same unrealistic nonsense that has fueled the likes of the poor L&O knockoffs for years. Perhaps that works for junk TV but that's not why people watched the original, which was even watchable by lawyers. Not this stuff.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not good
WilliamJE14 June 2021
Poorly written, poorly cast (a 30ish actress playing a character who has to be in her mid 50's) make this one of L&O's worst episodes.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A strange and ugly one
schappe121 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
A housekeeper and a child is murdered and it traces back to a slight at a sorority party a generation before?

The trial seemed to put the sorority on trial as much as the defendant.

And then Cutter wins it using a trick that would have made Perry Mason blush.

At least like Perry, they did it all in a preliminary hearing. The Mason show rarely went to a jury trial so they didn't have to pay extras to sit in a jury box.

Frankly, I spent the evening watching Law and Order re-runs on TNT and those shows were a lot better than this one.
10 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed