If you watch this just for entertainment, you can ignore this review.
But this episode is easy to break down.
Oh no! The one "researcher's" camera got destroyed. In the woods, where many known animals live. A raccoon could have gotten interested and tore it apart to see if there was food inside.
Then there was the other two researchers, looking into a "strange" arrangement of sticks- into a kind of lean to. Why would a wild animal need to do that? The "lean to" didn't even offer full coverage, as the sticks were spaced apart. It looked more like something kids would have built playing in the woods. (i grew up playing in the woods) but in a scene at night, as the researchers waited to try to see something, as one heard something coming closer to him, oh no! Suddenly his camera died. But he continued saying something was getting closer, and then apparently Bigfoot has the ability to control the temperature, as the man said it suddenly got very cold. But as this mysterious thing closed in on the man, his female partner using a tool to detect body heat, saw nothing.
Then there is the man who has been living in the area of Kentucky all his life. His dad had been chased by something years before, so he believes it was Bigfoot. No other reason to believe it, other than his dad, in a state of panic claimed it was bigfoot. Couldn't have been a bear? You know, an animal we know exists. Also, the native Kentuckian with an injured leg so he couldn't help with the search, happened to be a religious person, meaning he takes things on faith, he doesn't require actual evidence. (that is what faith means- believing without evidence) he also believes that Bigfoot are the giants that the biblical angels created with their human lovers. It fits that he believes this, because there is as much actual hard evidence for both, none.
And oh yeah, his rock with a hand print on it and the one guy saying "if this fossil is proven to be a hand print, that proves it all. " what does it prove? Itonly proves that something with a hand put it on that soil and the soil fossilized.
Eyewitness accounts are just about the worst form of evidence available. That is why scientists do research and dont just go by "so and so saw this".
Same with the one guy whose tent was destroyed. Absolutely no reason to believe in crypto beasts. Any animal could have done it. He states whatever did it didn't take his food. So what? Why wouldn't Bigfoot take the food?
Finally, the man with teh bloodhound. "she will start out slow and once she catches the scent." then the dog takes right off, and he says oh she really got the scent. Whent he bloodhound leads them to a place, she stops. Her owner says "she's scared, when she's scared, she wont go in after the scent" then not a minute later he says, "i never seen her afraid of anything." then how do you know how she acts when she's afraid?
So they send the dog on its way, and the two climb the hill. Very poor footing for our intrepid researches, but we are supposed to believe a large bigfoot would routinely climb it.
Then they find a cave, with a small opening, and we are supposed to believe the large animal is supposed to climb down into this cave. The men themselves can barely get into the cave opening.
In the next episode the one man says "if bigfoot exists, it is subeterranean, it lives in caves. " why does he say that? He has absolutely no evidence to prove that. He just spoke out of his butt because he found a cave.
But this episode is easy to break down.
Oh no! The one "researcher's" camera got destroyed. In the woods, where many known animals live. A raccoon could have gotten interested and tore it apart to see if there was food inside.
Then there was the other two researchers, looking into a "strange" arrangement of sticks- into a kind of lean to. Why would a wild animal need to do that? The "lean to" didn't even offer full coverage, as the sticks were spaced apart. It looked more like something kids would have built playing in the woods. (i grew up playing in the woods) but in a scene at night, as the researchers waited to try to see something, as one heard something coming closer to him, oh no! Suddenly his camera died. But he continued saying something was getting closer, and then apparently Bigfoot has the ability to control the temperature, as the man said it suddenly got very cold. But as this mysterious thing closed in on the man, his female partner using a tool to detect body heat, saw nothing.
Then there is the man who has been living in the area of Kentucky all his life. His dad had been chased by something years before, so he believes it was Bigfoot. No other reason to believe it, other than his dad, in a state of panic claimed it was bigfoot. Couldn't have been a bear? You know, an animal we know exists. Also, the native Kentuckian with an injured leg so he couldn't help with the search, happened to be a religious person, meaning he takes things on faith, he doesn't require actual evidence. (that is what faith means- believing without evidence) he also believes that Bigfoot are the giants that the biblical angels created with their human lovers. It fits that he believes this, because there is as much actual hard evidence for both, none.
And oh yeah, his rock with a hand print on it and the one guy saying "if this fossil is proven to be a hand print, that proves it all. " what does it prove? Itonly proves that something with a hand put it on that soil and the soil fossilized.
Eyewitness accounts are just about the worst form of evidence available. That is why scientists do research and dont just go by "so and so saw this".
Same with the one guy whose tent was destroyed. Absolutely no reason to believe in crypto beasts. Any animal could have done it. He states whatever did it didn't take his food. So what? Why wouldn't Bigfoot take the food?
Finally, the man with teh bloodhound. "she will start out slow and once she catches the scent." then the dog takes right off, and he says oh she really got the scent. Whent he bloodhound leads them to a place, she stops. Her owner says "she's scared, when she's scared, she wont go in after the scent" then not a minute later he says, "i never seen her afraid of anything." then how do you know how she acts when she's afraid?
So they send the dog on its way, and the two climb the hill. Very poor footing for our intrepid researches, but we are supposed to believe a large bigfoot would routinely climb it.
Then they find a cave, with a small opening, and we are supposed to believe the large animal is supposed to climb down into this cave. The men themselves can barely get into the cave opening.
In the next episode the one man says "if bigfoot exists, it is subeterranean, it lives in caves. " why does he say that? He has absolutely no evidence to prove that. He just spoke out of his butt because he found a cave.