After meeting a stranger, Jess learns the father she never knew may have been a treasure hunter.After meeting a stranger, Jess learns the father she never knew may have been a treasure hunter.After meeting a stranger, Jess learns the father she never knew may have been a treasure hunter.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaHarvey Keitel reprises his role as Peter Sadusky from the original films.
- GoofsWhen the lady takes the folder she starts to open it but in the next scene she is now holding two index cards.
- ConnectionsReferences The Matrix (1999)
Featured review
Would be better without the lectures
The original movies played fast and loose with history, but its focus was on fun entertainment. This show is promising, but as per usual, the entertainment industry and its virtue signaling militants cannot help lecturing us about the evils of the Anglo patriarchy and its perpetual sins against pretty much the rest of the world. Way to suck the fun out of a potentially highly entertaining series.
Heaven forfend that we are not beaten over the head about DACA, the rudeness of requiring citizenship for certain public servants and the use of the idiotic Latinx - which the majority of actual Latinos find insulting and nobody uses except pandering academics and deliberately ignorant activists preaching tolerance and showing none.
It also ignores significant portions of history in favor of a preferred and inaccurate narrative. Not to mention an almost total ignorance of Masonic rules and rituals. For instance, non- lodge membees ar never allowed into masonic temples without being escorted by a ranking member of that lodge. And few Masons would be photographed performing any rituals- at least not knowingly.
The typical post millennial attitude towards viewing the context of history is revealed several times, most particularly in the outrage that the two young women express when they learn that Abigail Adams failed to persuade her husband to allow women to vote in 1776. Guess what, nitwits- there was a huge fight about slavery also.
Apparently, and evidently- by the way that young people have been conditioned to believe, compromise is a dirty word. This distortion of education results in a failure to see that there would have been no United States if everybody with progressive views at the time had remained as intransigent to compromise as today's progressives. But, considering how anti-anglo the narrative is, they would have been totally okay with that. Yes, it would have been far better for everyone if the Spanish Conquistadors had prevailed over the New World instead of those English tyrants inspired by the Enlightenment. The Spanish were so much more progressive. Zero religious tolerance- the Spanish Inquisition was still a thing in colonial times- even more hostile towards rights of women or indigenous peoples. Or better yet, let the charming Aztecs prevail and expand their society - well known for its gentle, tolerant and peaceful attitude. What's so bad about human sacrifice and slavery as long as no outsiders pollute the pristine paradise?
The intellectual bankruptcy of the entertainment industry is grotesque and insulting.
Heaven forfend that we are not beaten over the head about DACA, the rudeness of requiring citizenship for certain public servants and the use of the idiotic Latinx - which the majority of actual Latinos find insulting and nobody uses except pandering academics and deliberately ignorant activists preaching tolerance and showing none.
It also ignores significant portions of history in favor of a preferred and inaccurate narrative. Not to mention an almost total ignorance of Masonic rules and rituals. For instance, non- lodge membees ar never allowed into masonic temples without being escorted by a ranking member of that lodge. And few Masons would be photographed performing any rituals- at least not knowingly.
The typical post millennial attitude towards viewing the context of history is revealed several times, most particularly in the outrage that the two young women express when they learn that Abigail Adams failed to persuade her husband to allow women to vote in 1776. Guess what, nitwits- there was a huge fight about slavery also.
Apparently, and evidently- by the way that young people have been conditioned to believe, compromise is a dirty word. This distortion of education results in a failure to see that there would have been no United States if everybody with progressive views at the time had remained as intransigent to compromise as today's progressives. But, considering how anti-anglo the narrative is, they would have been totally okay with that. Yes, it would have been far better for everyone if the Spanish Conquistadors had prevailed over the New World instead of those English tyrants inspired by the Enlightenment. The Spanish were so much more progressive. Zero religious tolerance- the Spanish Inquisition was still a thing in colonial times- even more hostile towards rights of women or indigenous peoples. Or better yet, let the charming Aztecs prevail and expand their society - well known for its gentle, tolerant and peaceful attitude. What's so bad about human sacrifice and slavery as long as no outsiders pollute the pristine paradise?
The intellectual bankruptcy of the entertainment industry is grotesque and insulting.
Details
- Runtime50 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content