Overall arguments: 1)Lacked facts and didn't consider uncontrolled/unseen variables 2)Was very one-sided 3)To much gore 4)Tried to hard to scare us
I watched this film with an open mind. I didn't want to judge it because it's purely a pro-life film. I wanted to judge it as I would any film. N' sadly it even failed at that.... The story is suppose to be based of a woman's testimony of the horrors she went through during an abortion. But it didn't strike terror into me. It just made me question the whole ordeal and the woman herself. There are so many scientific flaws to this film that made me wonder if her side was over exaggerated.
My theory is that she had a bad reaction to the chemicals injected into her childs heart(I say this because the mothers blood is shared with the child through the umbilical cord). Causing her to bleed which ultimately cause her testosterone levels rise from the shock of the chemicals. This rise testosterone caused her to panic and bleed faster. I'm guessing they locked her in there afraid she'd attack them(because testosterone ups a persons rage and strength). They probably rejected help from the police because they were ganna call a ambulance from a nearby hospital. The child being alive could be a result from a underestimation of the childs size or the stress causing her to give birth prematurely.
My overall views on this film are that I was quite disappointed. This film tries to persuade you through gore and a point of view that could have easily been disturbed through a varied amount of variables(Wow! That was a tongue twister!). I recommend that no one watch this film unless your terribly sadistic. It falls away from the point its trying to make, like its trying to hard to scare you into being pro-life. It's just to obvious, I can't give my respect to this film.
I watched this film with an open mind. I didn't want to judge it because it's purely a pro-life film. I wanted to judge it as I would any film. N' sadly it even failed at that.... The story is suppose to be based of a woman's testimony of the horrors she went through during an abortion. But it didn't strike terror into me. It just made me question the whole ordeal and the woman herself. There are so many scientific flaws to this film that made me wonder if her side was over exaggerated.
My theory is that she had a bad reaction to the chemicals injected into her childs heart(I say this because the mothers blood is shared with the child through the umbilical cord). Causing her to bleed which ultimately cause her testosterone levels rise from the shock of the chemicals. This rise testosterone caused her to panic and bleed faster. I'm guessing they locked her in there afraid she'd attack them(because testosterone ups a persons rage and strength). They probably rejected help from the police because they were ganna call a ambulance from a nearby hospital. The child being alive could be a result from a underestimation of the childs size or the stress causing her to give birth prematurely.
My overall views on this film are that I was quite disappointed. This film tries to persuade you through gore and a point of view that could have easily been disturbed through a varied amount of variables(Wow! That was a tongue twister!). I recommend that no one watch this film unless your terribly sadistic. It falls away from the point its trying to make, like its trying to hard to scare you into being pro-life. It's just to obvious, I can't give my respect to this film.
