unfortunately a good idea went completely down the drain. right from the beginning, the details unfolded in a very haphazard manner. The "actual footage" was replayed so many times and to be true didn't even seem relevant to the actual Maryland case. what bothered me the most was that they were many loop holes in the narrative. the owner of the building saying "welcome to hell", just exemplified a very poor script. It looked like people were told what they have to speak before. the only scene that intrigued me was the last scene, but again not executed well. they could have made a 45 minute documentary with the focus on their findings.
8 Reviews
Deeply Unsatisfying
maryschroer21 October 2010
I saw this movie earlier tonight (10/21/2010) at its world premiere in the Tivoli Theater in St. Louis, MO.
It was very disappointing.
Touted as a docudrama exploring the true history of the events that inspired William Blatty's 1971 book/1974 movie "The Exorcist", instead the audience was subjected to 90 minutes of the random meandering nonsense that happens when wannabe ghost hunters are given a camera and a budget.
Divining rods... ouija boards... evps... ambiguous shadowy figures... digitally blurred faces speaking in electronically disguised voices... embarrassingly lame re-creations... erratic timelines... tiring repetitions... irrelevant sidetracks... an aggressively bad soundtrack... sigh...
Viewers hoping for an illuminating exposé will have to settle for an incredibly frustrating lack of substance. This movie offered no coherent facts or details that would lead to a clearer understanding of what actually happened to this boy, who was involved, why, and what they actually did.
I left the movie confused and knowing scarcely more about this case than I did when I arrived.
It was very disappointing.
Touted as a docudrama exploring the true history of the events that inspired William Blatty's 1971 book/1974 movie "The Exorcist", instead the audience was subjected to 90 minutes of the random meandering nonsense that happens when wannabe ghost hunters are given a camera and a budget.
Divining rods... ouija boards... evps... ambiguous shadowy figures... digitally blurred faces speaking in electronically disguised voices... embarrassingly lame re-creations... erratic timelines... tiring repetitions... irrelevant sidetracks... an aggressively bad soundtrack... sigh...
Viewers hoping for an illuminating exposé will have to settle for an incredibly frustrating lack of substance. This movie offered no coherent facts or details that would lead to a clearer understanding of what actually happened to this boy, who was involved, why, and what they actually did.
I left the movie confused and knowing scarcely more about this case than I did when I arrived.
Interesting subject and terrifying
tmdarby16 September 2015
I'm giving this a 3 only because the subject and interviews were very interesting. The Booth brothers have absolutely no idea how to put together a documentary though. They jump all over the place, include things that are loosely related at best, like the AmittyVille case. Also they need to remember that people who watch documentaries normally know what they are looking at. You can't show a crime scene from the Defeo family murders and try to pass it off as a crime scene photo from another case.
I really wish they would have spent more time on what the diary said and less on their "did you hear that" ghost hunting crap. Not to mention this is about the Haunted Boy, yet they spend a good chunk of the "documentary" on clips of their investigations into other cases.
All in all, the subject is very interesting and I'm looking forward to seeing a decently done documentary on it.
I really wish they would have spent more time on what the diary said and less on their "did you hear that" ghost hunting crap. Not to mention this is about the Haunted Boy, yet they spend a good chunk of the "documentary" on clips of their investigations into other cases.
All in all, the subject is very interesting and I'm looking forward to seeing a decently done documentary on it.
How NOT to make a documentary
cannonfiremail18 January 2012
Stylistically, you can file this effort under "We have After Effects are we are NOT afraid to use it!" Yeah, there is a lot of eye candy. Lots of spooky sound effects and quick cuts and cool transitions. Lots of WHOOM and WHOOSH and FLASH.
But none of it makes any sense. The Booth brothers have ZERO notion as to how to assemble their materials into a comprehensible, linear narrative.
You'll see lots of talking heads, but the people interviewed are never allowed to say more than a line or two at a time -- because the film-makers presume that the audience has an attention span of three seconds. Consequently, we have no idea what the interview subjects are even talking about.
We never know what year is under discussion. We have no idea as to who the main players are or how the events relate to each other.
For example, the film-makers include many shots of modern-day people playing with ouija boards. But how does this relate to the events in Georgetown in the 1940s? We are frequently allowed to hear "real" exorcism sounds. The audience is led to believe that this audio comes from the Georgetown case. But it doesn't.
I've read a great deal about this real-life case, yet even I had little idea as to what was going on in this movie. This so-called "documentary" devolves into such incomprehensible gobbledegook that I had to stop watching after about half an hour.
Booth brothers, heed my advice: Take the After Effects OFF your system. Just get rid of it. Learn how to tell a story without it. Learn how to use straight cuts and classic dissolves. Learn how to assemble your work in chronological order.
Have some faith in your audience. Just because YOU apparently spend your entire lives hopped up on meth and caffeine doesn't mean that your viewers are as itchy and twitchy as you are.
Ultimately, the audience wants to become engrossed in a narrative. We want to be hooked. We don't want our eyeballs slammed continuously by "cool" images that don't have any relationship with each other.
Also: If you want to be taken seriously, either don't appear on camera or cultivate a different look. You guys look like a couple of pimps from El Paso.
But none of it makes any sense. The Booth brothers have ZERO notion as to how to assemble their materials into a comprehensible, linear narrative.
You'll see lots of talking heads, but the people interviewed are never allowed to say more than a line or two at a time -- because the film-makers presume that the audience has an attention span of three seconds. Consequently, we have no idea what the interview subjects are even talking about.
We never know what year is under discussion. We have no idea as to who the main players are or how the events relate to each other.
For example, the film-makers include many shots of modern-day people playing with ouija boards. But how does this relate to the events in Georgetown in the 1940s? We are frequently allowed to hear "real" exorcism sounds. The audience is led to believe that this audio comes from the Georgetown case. But it doesn't.
I've read a great deal about this real-life case, yet even I had little idea as to what was going on in this movie. This so-called "documentary" devolves into such incomprehensible gobbledegook that I had to stop watching after about half an hour.
Booth brothers, heed my advice: Take the After Effects OFF your system. Just get rid of it. Learn how to tell a story without it. Learn how to use straight cuts and classic dissolves. Learn how to assemble your work in chronological order.
Have some faith in your audience. Just because YOU apparently spend your entire lives hopped up on meth and caffeine doesn't mean that your viewers are as itchy and twitchy as you are.
Ultimately, the audience wants to become engrossed in a narrative. We want to be hooked. We don't want our eyeballs slammed continuously by "cool" images that don't have any relationship with each other.
Also: If you want to be taken seriously, either don't appear on camera or cultivate a different look. You guys look like a couple of pimps from El Paso.
I asked OVILUS about this "documentary" and it chillingly replied
Mister-Creeper25 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
"SUCKS," it spoke back to me in its hauntingly, monotone electronic voice. Then, from within my room, I heard laughter. It was my own. This "documentary" was hilarious! Grown men playing with their ghost hunting toys, while trying to act serious, is funny to me. Who do they really think they are kidding? What was the need for all those silly electronic devices to tell a story they never really told? Go, go gadget thermal image camera! It found a hot spot around the one guy's head because he's full of hot air.
Seriously, this was horrible. These guys don't know how to tell a story. They jumped from one place to another. From one person to another. Showed scenes and talked to people that had nothing at all to do with the original story. Constantly putting words on the screen. Showing type-written pages that we are to believe was a secret old diary. The same newspaper headlines over and over again. This was nothing but a bunch of people claiming to be "Paranormal Investigators" and "Ghost Hunters" walking around with their gadgets, filming hot, cold, black masses, orbs, and whatever else they could come up with to try and make us believe they were actually in direct contact with demons while filming this "documentary." This turned out to be more about themselves and Father Bowdern than it did about The Haunted Boy. All I got from this was that the boy was moved from his home to a hospital and then to an asylum. A couple of priests eventually exercised him somewhere. Oh, and his bed was really heavy and it levitated. I gave this a 2 out of 10 for the couple of things that actually had to do with the boy.
I just asked OVILUS another question. "What lies ahead for these brothers?" "Brothers." "Booth." "No." "Future." "In." "Film-making." "Losers." OVILUS has spoken...
Seriously, this was horrible. These guys don't know how to tell a story. They jumped from one place to another. From one person to another. Showed scenes and talked to people that had nothing at all to do with the original story. Constantly putting words on the screen. Showing type-written pages that we are to believe was a secret old diary. The same newspaper headlines over and over again. This was nothing but a bunch of people claiming to be "Paranormal Investigators" and "Ghost Hunters" walking around with their gadgets, filming hot, cold, black masses, orbs, and whatever else they could come up with to try and make us believe they were actually in direct contact with demons while filming this "documentary." This turned out to be more about themselves and Father Bowdern than it did about The Haunted Boy. All I got from this was that the boy was moved from his home to a hospital and then to an asylum. A couple of priests eventually exercised him somewhere. Oh, and his bed was really heavy and it levitated. I gave this a 2 out of 10 for the couple of things that actually had to do with the boy.
I just asked OVILUS another question. "What lies ahead for these brothers?" "Brothers." "Booth." "No." "Future." "In." "Film-making." "Losers." OVILUS has spoken...
So angry, need to write this or I will explode
pinkingyellow8 August 2014
Happy to find it on RED BOX, Hoped to watch a very scary movie.........was a documentary. OK Nothing against documentaries but anyway , What is this?!? E V E R Y T H I N G seems UNREAL..... is like knowing all the time that everything wasn't truth, even if maybe it was!! interviews, documents pictures, records, people..... ForGdSk. Needs more to be spooky/scary is not enough with just metallic sounds, screams, and dark backgrounds stages...... Could be scary if done 5 decades ago. And then, why on earth those "MATRIX film" letters??? Omg and that DVD menu?!? A disaster, needs to be exorcised. No, no, I ... need an exorcist right now because of how I feel watching this
Poor us, exorcisms lovers.. Disappointed 101%
Poor us, exorcisms lovers.. Disappointed 101%
Grab Your Crucifix Before Watching!
arnoldgop28 July 2011
This is a documentary that dives right into the most infamous demonic case of our generation .... the 1949 St. Louis Exorcism which was partially the basis (along with the 1928 Iowa Exorcism) for the movie "The Exorcist".
However, in this movie you learn more about the "truths" of the 1949 St. Louis case and of the real hero Father Bowdern (the assigned exorcist) in the epic battle of good vs. evil. This was a real case documented by the Catholic Church itself.
This documentary brilliantly and artistically brings many hidden truths concerning this case to life and it is done superbly in a way that the new generation can understand and relate to.
In this documentary you get to learn about the real character of the assigned exorcist, Father William Bowdern, from his niece. You also learn of never before locations involved in this infamous case and get to witness firsthand the paranormal exploration of such. You actually get to go inside the bedroom of the actual house where it all started and where the Devil slept in 1949. You even get to hear accounts from actual close family and friends of the boy who was possessed in 1949 and even get facts about the furniture from the hospital room where the demons were cast out, why is it still in cold storage today? This is a must see film for any fan of The Exorcist, paranormal enthusiast, horror buff, those local to the St. Louis area and everyone who wishes the historical aspects of not just this specific case, but possessions and exorcisms in general. The demonologist interviewed in this movie was Dr. William Bradshaw one of the last true degreed demonologist left in the world who received his Masters from Yale and Doctorate from St. Andrews University in Scotland. When you are done watching this movie you feel like you have gained a wealth of knowledge within several areas. It will leave you wanting to watch it again!
However, in this movie you learn more about the "truths" of the 1949 St. Louis case and of the real hero Father Bowdern (the assigned exorcist) in the epic battle of good vs. evil. This was a real case documented by the Catholic Church itself.
This documentary brilliantly and artistically brings many hidden truths concerning this case to life and it is done superbly in a way that the new generation can understand and relate to.
In this documentary you get to learn about the real character of the assigned exorcist, Father William Bowdern, from his niece. You also learn of never before locations involved in this infamous case and get to witness firsthand the paranormal exploration of such. You actually get to go inside the bedroom of the actual house where it all started and where the Devil slept in 1949. You even get to hear accounts from actual close family and friends of the boy who was possessed in 1949 and even get facts about the furniture from the hospital room where the demons were cast out, why is it still in cold storage today? This is a must see film for any fan of The Exorcist, paranormal enthusiast, horror buff, those local to the St. Louis area and everyone who wishes the historical aspects of not just this specific case, but possessions and exorcisms in general. The demonologist interviewed in this movie was Dr. William Bradshaw one of the last true degreed demonologist left in the world who received his Masters from Yale and Doctorate from St. Andrews University in Scotland. When you are done watching this movie you feel like you have gained a wealth of knowledge within several areas. It will leave you wanting to watch it again!
Much better than anticipated
fathersonholygore1 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I saw the lower rating on this one, and I've already seen one other project by the same directors which I did not particularly enjoy a whole lot, so I didn't expect much going in. However, I got a big surprise. This was a really good documentary. It isn't very stylish, there's nothing too exciting visually going on, and I'm not a fan of re-enactments or anything like that. What it does have here is a lot of neat information about the true case that influenced William Peter Blatty's The Exorcist. A lot of people go in assuming they're going to almost see a step-by-step of how the story influenced Blatty, but it's not about him, or the movie- it's about the true case behind it all.
I'm non-religious, completely. Yet there is something terribly creepy about the real case here. There is some terrifying stuff here when you sit and listen to it. They go into a lot of the backstory, including St. Vincent's hospital, et cetera, and you get a real sense of the history in all this. Things have been wrong a long time, it seems. I don't really believe in demons, ghosts, none of it- I'm sceptical (yes, I speak and write in true English, as I'm a Canadian), though I want to believe. I just need to see it to believe it. That being said, I didn't go into this documentary hoping to see evidence of ghosts or demons, I went into it wanting to know more about "The Haunted Boy", and where it all started.
I gave this 8 out of 10. There is no style to this, it's not exciting to look at, but there's more to it than the look, it's all about the real story that's being investigated. At a few points we get to hear some of the audio from the exorcism of "The Haunted Boy", performed by Father William Bowdern, who himself suffered greatly after the event as well, and what we are able to hear is horrifying. The screams and the sounds which, presumably, come out of the young boy are blood curdling, and absolutely amazing in a horrifying sense. I'm not saying he was "possessed", but something was clearly not right, and the audio really put this over the top for me.
A nice look at the real case. I could have done without the dramatizations and such, we've already seen William Friedkin's fantastic adaptation of Blatty's novel and countless other exorcism-based film. However, there was enough to really keep me interested, and I feel it's the best of the Booth Brothers I've seen yet, as opposed to the very lackluster Children of the Grave. I can't see how anybody could rate that awful 'documentary' any higher than this one. I recommend anyone interested in the real events behind Blatty's fictional novel check this out because despite what others say, there are some excellent things in here!
I'm non-religious, completely. Yet there is something terribly creepy about the real case here. There is some terrifying stuff here when you sit and listen to it. They go into a lot of the backstory, including St. Vincent's hospital, et cetera, and you get a real sense of the history in all this. Things have been wrong a long time, it seems. I don't really believe in demons, ghosts, none of it- I'm sceptical (yes, I speak and write in true English, as I'm a Canadian), though I want to believe. I just need to see it to believe it. That being said, I didn't go into this documentary hoping to see evidence of ghosts or demons, I went into it wanting to know more about "The Haunted Boy", and where it all started.
I gave this 8 out of 10. There is no style to this, it's not exciting to look at, but there's more to it than the look, it's all about the real story that's being investigated. At a few points we get to hear some of the audio from the exorcism of "The Haunted Boy", performed by Father William Bowdern, who himself suffered greatly after the event as well, and what we are able to hear is horrifying. The screams and the sounds which, presumably, come out of the young boy are blood curdling, and absolutely amazing in a horrifying sense. I'm not saying he was "possessed", but something was clearly not right, and the audio really put this over the top for me.
A nice look at the real case. I could have done without the dramatizations and such, we've already seen William Friedkin's fantastic adaptation of Blatty's novel and countless other exorcism-based film. However, there was enough to really keep me interested, and I feel it's the best of the Booth Brothers I've seen yet, as opposed to the very lackluster Children of the Grave. I can't see how anybody could rate that awful 'documentary' any higher than this one. I recommend anyone interested in the real events behind Blatty's fictional novel check this out because despite what others say, there are some excellent things in here!
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
