Robotropolis (2011) Poster

(2011)

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Had potential
mergatroid-118 February 2012
This movie was almost good. The acting was on and off, as some of the actors seemed pretty good while others should not quit their day jobs.

The robot effects were pretty good. They did not quite convince me they were really there but they came close. I have to give them points on the story. It wasn't bad and if given a bigger budget it could have been pretty decent.

Too bad about the script though. Again, one of the things that stick out most about bad movies for me is how bad the script is. I've seen some movies with pretty good actors, but the movie sucked because the script was so bad you could tell the actor didn't even want to say the lines.

So, not a bad story about robots running amok and killing everyone they come across, not bad effects (the effects company shows great promise IMO) but hit and miss acting and a poor script.

I watched it once, I doubt I'll watch it a second time.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Robotropolis
sptrash-13 September 2012
I found this movie is not as bad as the reviews and ratings claim it is.

Again, everything depends on your movie tastes and preferences.

But if you like movies such as "District 9". "metal tornado". or some other type of space channel or Sci-Fi channel movies, oh, and also cannot forget these "found footage" genres, then you might be able to get along fine with this movie.

but if your expecting a "star trek" type movie, or some popular science fiction movie, then you may be disappointed. This just goes to show you Cannot always go by the user ratings or reviews that's for sure.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This in 2011?
pietro-garofalo18 August 2012
This movie explicitly alarmed me for the wrong attempt in introducing technology and robots in a hypothetic future where big bosses control the globe.

The idea and plot is definitely nice.

At the beginning, I was thinking that the idea of showing the facts of the disaster like it would be sitting at home in front of TV was original, because (you must admit it), that is how you would leave a disaster that is far from your house.

However, the overall result is absolutely below the expectations and it makes me thinking that there is nobody controlling the quality of a movie before it is actually released.

More than that, I am very surprised actors in such a movie would be satisfied about themselves, about the words they were asked to say, and dialogs in general.

I understand there could be also budget reasons, but I saw many movies where the budget limitations do not prevent the movie to have a good soundtrack, music and dialogs.

Finally, for who thinks that famous actors make a movie successful, it is not true. With such dialogs and direction, even Bruce Willis would have appeared as inadequate in such movie.

Our children in the future will probably see a robot in every movie, but it will not be a robot to make a nice movie.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The CGI robots were more sincere than the characters...
aelthric18 September 2011
Where to begin?

This film is nothing but annoying on so many levels, it lacks suspense, it lacks a coherent storyline, it lacks any semblance of grittiness or of the most basic realistic emotional responses from the actors (Even the most whacky Sci-Fi premises are generally redeemed by applicable emotional acting).

It was almost as if this film was created by a group of media studies drop outs, at all levels it fails from the talentless actors to the clueless direction to the ludicrous scripting and storyline to the terrible CGI...

I have seen better acting, direction and story lines in home movies on youtube...

The most annoying aspect is the insincerity of the acting...

I recommend you avoid this film like the plague...

PS According to Copyright protection agencies we are expected to waste our hard earned money on garbage like this before we have had a good opportunity to see what we are buying, this garbage movie is the perfect example of why the file sharing revolution is gathering momentum...

ADDENDUM : It appears that there are a tiny minority for whom such terrible acting, terrible scripting, terrible plot etc are an attraction, these people seem to be able to suspend their disbelief at such scenes as the saving of a child in one scene and in the next scene the child has disappeared without explanation (I can only assume that the child actor decided that this garbage was beneath her already meagre acting abilities and quit during production)....

These people are easily identified by their attention to criticising other reviewers who gave honest reviews of this garbage, to these people I simply say "If you enjoyed this garbage so much and disagree with honest reviews so much then I am sure you will not mind refunding the rest of us the hard earned cash we paid to either watch or buy this cretinous tripe"...
54 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
When your anti-virus stops working.
davidfurlotte18 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Even before reading the synopsis of this movie you already know that it is going to be about machines going crazy and people being in danger.

Some of the things in this movie were taken right out of I, Robot, like how the colour of the visible light on the robot changed from nice blue or green to ominous red.

*****Serious Spoilers Here***** The acting in this went from VERY VERY bad to mediocre and a good part of that I blame on the director and the writer.

So, here's the premise, you're playing a nice game of soccer or football as our Brit friends would say, with a robot on one of the teams and the robot shoots and kills one of your friends, what do you do? You don't panic but you immediately check on your friend to see if he's alive and maybe someone pulls out his cell and calls for help, right? WRONG, at least according to the script for this movie. Everybody stands around looking at the robot and down at their dead friend and then they just walk away. Can almost hear them saying, "Damn, Frank was such a nice guy, too. Too bad about him dying like that. Anyone think that perhaps his wife might be annoyed with us?" Oh, and let's not forget the main actors for this movie. The "news crew" also just stands around looking at the scene. They keep the cameras rolling of course but do they bother to try and do anything? NOPE. The robot eventually walks away from the situation and the main news reporter (who just graduated from medical school) gets a little closer to the man that's down and stays cool, calm and collected as she pronounces him DEAD. Check for a pulse? Nah, why would you want to do that, might get some blood on you or wreck the nail job you got yesterday.

Seriously, did anyone even bother to THINK before they put some of these scenes together? It goes downhill from there. If you do NOT pass on this one, you can't say I didn't warn you.
31 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a waste of time.
Asilee21 September 2011
I'm not going to really get into depth about this movie, nor make this a long review.

Just know that, it lacks creativity. It really, really sucks. The acting is horrible, the storyline is pointless. Whoever decided to direct this movie didn't try hard enough; whoever came up with this movie should have went back to the drawing board. I made a movie in high-school back in 2004 and it was better than this piece of work. The animations they used were very obvious, not believe able at all. The effects looked sloppy and it look like there was no effort at all. The only believable effects about this whole movie was the camera moving.

The end.
23 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really really awful. Seriously!
eodhasa21 November 2011
I do love all things sci-fi, and I've been known to tolerate some fairly bad sci-fi B movies, but this was well and truly awful. No plot to speak of or character development, badly written and some pretty terrible acting to boot. It was almost as if someone stumbled upon a child's short story and decided to run with it as a script.

It opens with a rescue/recovery type scene which piqued my curiosity and promised something perhaps more interesting and in-depth to come. Unfortunately the opening scene is arguably the high point of the movie. What came after was just a jumble of badly acted live reporting scenes & interviews with a few chases thrown in later on, but overall nothing anyone will not have seen done better in other movies. Trying to write a summary of this movie is actually incredibly difficult as nothing of note actually happened in it.

I honestly don't know how or why I sat thru this until the end.

You have been warned!!!
15 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Robot Plop
t-dooley-69-3869161 July 2012
This is billed as some sort of war zone robot versus human in a desperate fight to the death; a sort of 'Terminator' meets 'I Robot', the reality is so far removed. So where does it go wrong? Well the synopsis is that a group of investigative reporters are dispatched to do a piece from 'New Town', this is an oil mining facility somewhere in the South China Seas. It is owned and run by forward thinking Mega National Industries.

Once there the CEO tells them that this is basically 'the future' in that robots are now fully integrated. They do all the jobs we can't be arsed with, like routine maintenance, security and taking the kids to school. They are all alike except for some security markings and look like a poor version of the Storm troopers from Star Wars - only poorly done in CGI. Whilst the 'reporters' are doing a piece to camera, of an innocent game of 'soccer. One robot "catastrophically malfunctions"! Well it shoots one of the other players and this is live on the news feed. This then becomes a 'Killbot!!' and as the news is fed all around the less than interested world, the fortunes of Mega Naffall Industries start to wane.

What happens next is an exercise in how to save production costs. I once saw a film producer say that the best invention for film ever, was the telephone. He demonstrated by picking up his phone and screaming 'what you mean Godzilla has eaten New York!?!' This would apparently save three million dollars. Well director Christopher Hatton has come up with a newish way, he has the anchor man in the news room have the reporter tell him what is going on in New Town as the camera has been eaten by a killbot ; so we are told that thousands have died and even more are on the streets fighting the robots. The only news reel we can see shows six lack lustre fifth rate 'actors' doing a ropey pretence of running away from some killbots who are armed with everything from electric carving knives, to flame throwers. The anchor man says at one point 'for those of you that pray, this would be a good time'; well I started praying to the gods of decent acting, good continuity, plot development and production values - alas my prayers were left unanswered.

This third rate, badly acted guff continued for a bowel shatteringly, boring 81 minutes, it would have made a better comedy but in the end it is a big idea versus a small budget and I guess the budget just won. The ending is seen lumbering before it is even over the horizon and by the time it happens you will be looking forward to watching a local news bulletin rather than endure any more of this unctuous tripe. I tried to like it and even laughed at one point, but it was for all the wrong reasons - this will appeal to no -one do yourself a favour even if you are tempted, just watch a community cable channel it will be time better spent.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Yet another movie where they decide to cut to black without resolving anything.
philip457921 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Warning, minor spoilers follow. Nothing big, and certainly nothing you don't see coming.

It's predictable. It's anti-climatic. It's poorly thought out. Poorly acted (you know everyone is phoning it in). The CGI is really poor too, but there are so many elements of the movie that are so much worse you don't even notice. Everything bad you can say about a film, this has got it. The story goes exactly in the directions you expect it to, and right when you think the movie is about to have a creative reason for why this is happening, it get's shot down and replace with the tired "you took all the credit for our invention" hook. Aside from the fact that this came right out of nowhere, the inventor never claimed to be the sole inventor, he actually says outright that it was a group effort. There is just so much suck in this movie, but I'll skip to the worst part.

There is no ultimate resolution. At the end of the movie, it just cuts to black. We don't find out if the robots are stopped in time. We don't find out if the protagonists survive. We don't find out if the villain get's punished. It just cuts to black in a laughable attempt at depth.

Unless you really enjoy bad movies and robots, don't bother.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No-Bot
ohsokool22 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Easily one of the worst films made in the last decade. If you're able to get past the first 20 minutes of awful acting, you were probably high, drunk or both. I understand this is supposed to be a sci-fi film, but at the very least inject some touches of reality - which this film failed to do. (partial scene spoiler coming up)

I mean honestly, a robot playing soccer gets scolded and head-butt by a human, and the robot shoots him dead. This is all captured live during a broadcast about the robots interacting with humans. Not only do his friends run off, but no one bothers to call the ambulance. When the dead guys friends do come back, instead of calling for help, they start chanting "Nobot! Nobot".Really.

After that poor excuse for a scene in a movie, I just stopped watching. Avoid this garbage.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not that bad
peter-883-3779223 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Common guys. This is definitely not Oscar material I agree but I have seen far, far worse shows. The CGI on the robots was very good, Zoe Naylor did a perfectly adequate job that bordered on good at times and Peer Metz was enjoyable and believable. Edward Foy was annoying. I couldn't decide if i wanted him to survive or have his head squashed. I agree that the scene at the football field was incredibly bad. In itself it may qualify for one of the worst scenes I have ever seen but that was only one scene. Yes, the fade to dark ending was,at worst,annoying but I did hear the robots power down; I guess because I wasn't frantically making notes on how I was going to slam the movie. I quite enjoyed the show, a bit corny but certainly watchable. If you want really bad try my all time favourite bad movie "Chawz".
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not so Bad
michaelst17 November 2012
I looked at this film in the same breath. Not to say of course that draws on Oscar IMHO painful story here is simple. But wanted to note that the director's job is not so bad and nothing like setting, not too primitive. Given the idea, then the film is good, especially liked his unusual. Peculiar idea spicing notes film. I do not want to judge strictly film, the camera work is also nothing, there are many gaps, and if a severe critic would say what they were everywhere, then agree. But I'd add that in addition to shortcomings, and I saw a lot of positives. And especially liked the fact that the linearity of the plot is not interrupted by any stupidity or "tyagomyatinoy" off topic. I mean, there is an idea, the idea and the plot, and the creators in one way or another, managed to bring it in order to convey the message of the film. A more in this genre and is not necessary, you could spend a lot of money and resources, and the product could get a lot worse.

The main disadvantages of the film - it is a small budget, and not a rich scenario of course is to great effect on the final result ... But in general, the film turned out good. It is a pity he was sentenced too harshly, but my opinion: the direction of such works have the potential in the future.

I'm Russin and Sorry, if that ... I translated his thought through "your" Google, and he is very stupid translates from Russian into English and so sorry. But I would like to convey my words exactly, a lot of things to talk about the film ...
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Quite adequate robot rampage B movie.
ONenslo22 September 2011
I guess I am not critic enough to slam a movie I haven't even watched like other "reviewers" of this film, so I can tell you I watched all of Robotropolis; not to look for things to gripe about but to take it on its own merits and just have some fun. It's about robots going berserk and killing people - and that is what happens. The CG design and integration into the live action was pretty good, the locations were unusual and interesting, the action kept up a good pace, and it didn't get excessively grisly, though there is some moderately graphic unpleasantness. There were occasional flashes of wit in the dialog and a little inventive camera-work in the chase scenes, but in the end it's a robot rampage movie. Sometimes it's going to be kind of silly. If that's not what you want in a movie, don't watch it. I found it adequately entertaining, it kept my interest and I don't feel I was cheated of my time as I sometimes have with flashier, more expensive movies. Just a decent B movie. Comparisons, they say, are odious and taking it for what it is, not what I think it should have been instead, I think everyone involved did a pretty good job. Some things are just for fun and I liked this fine.
27 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
enjoyable with a few minor flaws and 1 major one
andy-ronin29 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed this, and as a sci-fi fan, you probably will too. It's a pretty good story of a (not too distant) future society where robots are introduced into daily life, and then things go wrong. Not original, but interesting enough. After reading some of the other reviews I just want to defend the acting in this movie, there will be no Oscar nominees here, but it's adequate. I think lead actress Zoe Naylor did a good job of depicting the somewhat heartless sideline stance of modern journalism. The critics who say she shows no emotion should notice this is only true when she is 'on camera' in her reporter role. The big stinker however is the guy who plays her producer, Edward Foy. By far the worst acting job I've come across in 2012! Some things in the movie didn't make much sense (like where does the flashlight come from in the tunnel scene?), others could have done with a little more explaining (the how and why of the sabotage by one of the robot developers) and the ending is kind of sudden. Also, the intro scene doesn't fit in the storyline, as we (at least the careful listeners) are made to believe all the robots get shut down when the screen goes black at the end. All in all, it was still a good waste of time.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Robots run amok during a live news report.
Someguysomwhere18 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Movie is about robots who go berserk during a live broadcast of "Nouveau Reports", a GNN (Global News Network) news program. The report is being broadcast from New Town located on a small tropical island that is home to Mega National Industries, a privately owned energy (oil) concern, and it's employees. Seems that the owner and CEO of MNI, Gordon Standish, has a doctorate in mechanical engineering and a thing for robots. So when he's not running his oil corporation he's churning them out and integrating them into his New Town island community to perform in almost every professional capacity.

The news report was done quite well, I thought; it had a professional and realistic feel, and the actress playing Christiane Nouveau was very convincing. GNN is an obvious take on CNN. As well, one or two first names reminded me of people who have worked on CNN. I thought that a movie occurring thru and as part of a live news broadcast as an "unexpected development" was innovative. In this instance, the unexpected development is that a robot shoots one of MNI's employees during a "friendly game" of soccer that was being reported on by Christiane Nouveau. "Robots and humans working together, playing together" is a sample of her line before the spoil sport robot knocked off a player.

For about half the movie the scenes alternate as a "talking & reporting" drama between Christiane, her producer who was directing her while watching on monitors from his set up at Gordon Standish's home, and an anchor man back at a GNN news desk. Instead of a whole scale panic with people running all over the place while robots rampaged and killed, the robot mutiny is done quietly and indirectly; off camera. We know what is happening and what has happened thru Christiane's report, thru a few dead bodies lying here or there, seeing some oil platforms in flames, and an incident or 2 involving individual robots. The robots became active as a group for the first time late in the movie as they chased and hunted the GNN employees which added a bit of welcome robot action and suspense. My rating is based on the fact that the acting was good and I thought that the idea of a movie occurring thru and as part of a news broadcast was creative. Perhaps with a larger budget they could have done more with the robots and my rating would be higher. I dunno. Love, Boloxxxi.
15 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nobots!
Orchardtiger25 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Honestly... watching this film was a bad idea.

Bad writing.

A soccer player and a robot get into a fight. Why are all the people on the field not even paying attention to it? Then the robot kills him and they all leave. Why is the news crew just chilling like he won't do anything else? The robot just walks away and the news crew is minimally cautious as he does so. Why are they even approaching the killbot? Then the players come back and chant nobots nobots! Why has no one called for help or even checked on their buddy? The movie just goes downhill...

Do not waste your time, unless you find humor in watching terrible movies. Watch a real robot movie - iRobot or Terminator.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Skiffy Channel Chewey Goodness
JoeB13117 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This was obviously designed for the Skiffy Channel or its Australian or New Zealand equivalents... And it has all the ingredients.. silly plot, lame CGI, a washed up actor from GOOD Science Fiction (in this case, Farscape's Lani Tupu) and more filler than a Hostess Snack Cake.

The plot is that an eccentric billionaire builds a community where all the work is done by robots, but they still have a bunch of humans on hand to, well, I don't know, I guess be easy victims of the inevitable robot rampage.

Where I give it some credit, the characters of the News Crew were interesting, and you kind of cared about them and their plight and whether they would survive or not. But you didn't need to guess who was going to live and who was going to die, because honestly, the only way it would have been more obvious if they had Star Trek Red shirts on them.

Oh, because this is made for TV, no extreme violence, no sex, no nudity and no swear words. Because we all want to maintain our propriety during a robot slaughter. Not me. Robots start slaughtering, I'll probably be swearing a lot. Maybe crying like a little girl, too.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mildly amusing premise that got crushed trying to be serious
jackmeat28 July 2013
What if in a not so distant future, robots become more or less the entire workforce of society? Sure, this idea has been presented before, and many "robots turn against humans" movies/stories are out there, but what if you present it in such a deadpan amusing way with the least talented actors you can find and let the idea fall on it's face the second it gets started. That is what you have here. So the robots turn on the humans for no apparent reason and start killing everyone, so the news crew that was filming the first murder must run for their lives (where are they going? good question). Back to the crew, this is by far the highlight of this movie, the presentation of the news is so damn funny, i could care less if it was intentionally made that way or not, it is pure comedy gold. Absolutely saves this movie from some REALLY low numbers since every other aspect of the movie stinks. So, run they will, chase the robots will, some die, some don't, the end. Except for the robots who make it to the sequel (it isn't a sequel at all, just a strange cameo type role in "Battle of the Damned" (see other review)Bad, yes but in a good B-budget way. You will laugh, trust me and it is nice and short, which helps. 3.9/10 +3 for the laughs, .9 for the movie outside of that.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
bad but gets better
Callam_102 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"contains spoilers"

The acting is the worst i have ever seen, Zoe Naylor is by far the worst, she needs to give up acting all together!!!. She shows no emotion when the guy on the football field gets shot. Also the footballers are terrible actors they just walk away, surely you would go see if he's alive, right?

The script is terrible, when the footballer gets shot, Zoe's character stands there and says stuff like "someone has just been shot". I was watching it thinking THANK YOU CAPTAIN OBVIOUS -.-

The scenery in this movie is great, i really enjoyed it. The robots are OK, they could have added a bit more animation to them though. The explosion effects are OK

This film is very boring at the beginning but about 35 minutes through it starts to pick up. Still i would not recommend the movie.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Wasn't a bad gore fest!
jamessmith-6957818 May 2020
The robot cgi in some places looked good, then bad. The overall solution was decent but, it wasn't very action packed or exciting. There were a lot of robots but, I wanted to see more get destroyed or shot/blown up. If the robots were damaged, the action would not be shown or it would be in the robots vision. And the cliffhanger at the end was very poor.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely dreadful, the acting was terrible!
Naughtia_Nah26 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I'm very much in to science fiction movies but this movie is dreadful. I started out thinking that the special effects and robots were very neatly done but I got extremely turned off by the awful acting. This movie had a lot of potential but it never really got pulled off.

In this movie the robots were more capable of showing emotions than the humans were, and I very much doubt that people in the distant future will lose their ability to think logically and to express their emotions. I mean who in their right mindset would not be fearful or want to flee when they see someone getting shot dead? What's the point? Are they trying to tell us that people will get more stupid in the future? As a huge fan of Farscape I was expecting more from actor Lani John Tupu, but this movie did not reflect his best sides in my opinion. I really liked him in Farscape.

My advice to others is to not watch this movie unless you have nothing else to do, maybe not even then.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Would make an awesome game.
rakavichermes22 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The movie had really awesome potential but failed in the end. Over and under acting, and a script that had quite a few flaws. I wanted this movie to be awesome but... I thought this movie was going to be animated after watching the opening scene. It would make some waves if it had been completely animated. The robot movement wasn't horrible and I liked the way they were able to transform to a 4 legged movement with an eye on top of their head. On a side note I was wondering if the bots could track the cell phone signals.

I couldn't help but think this was a vehicle to launch a game but have not seen anything on the web concerning such. Several different robots to kill,acquire a code to shut them all down, has all the makings of a great game if done correctly.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Marvel of Storytelling
bltclowater18 May 2019
Robotropolis is probably one of the best movies I have ever seen in my life. So many layers, so many new thinks I didn't pick up on my first viewing, like all the australians trying to do American accents, or all the intricate details in the extras performances during the soccer scene (highlight of the movie for me), or the amount of thought that went into the design of the robots.

The actors have what many would call "dull performances", "bad dialogue" or "no talent", and in a more traditional movie I would probably agree. However, these simple folk clearly missed the subtle, underlying message of the entire movie, which is expertly executed through these, shall I say, ROBOTIC performances? The film suggests that perhaps as we advance further towards achieving true artificial intelligence, that we become unfeeling, emotionless robots, and the machine race we create steals the fire of human passion and thought. They abandon their lifeless predecessors, and conquer our land, taking what they want from the previous inferior race they once came from.

This follows the law of natural selection, as the superior species rises, they begin to take from and dominate their ancestors. Much like how snakes prey on lizards, or how humanity takes the habitat of monkeys and other primates for our own selfish needs. This is another hidden message of Robotropolis, that as much as we believe humans are above the rest of the animal kingdom, because of our civilization and culture. When the robots attack and kill their makers in the film, they prove that our race is nothing special, just another stepping stone for a superior being, like the lizard and the monkey.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If you love "B" movies...
radiopal14 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
You'll love this one. Yes, it's a fun low budget film, and believe me it's not like the low budget films that come out of SyFy channel.

The special effects were really pretty good, the acting was a bit cheesy, but I think that was intentional.

I came into this with very low expectations (and that's the way you really need to see this), and was impressed with the movie overall.

Zoe Naylor gives a great performance (and yes a little cheesy) as Christiane Nouvaue. She's actually believable as a fluff reporter thrown into a world shattering story. The actors playing the other reporters, well I have to say they were stereotypical in modern movies... but then, that's part of the appeal. Though in this one, I really didn't want anyone to die... okay, maybe I did want to see Edward Foy's character Jason Brooks obnoxiousness gone...

AS I've stated, if you love "B" movies, that are good (and intentionally good), give this one a try.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The "Acting" or lack there of...
slmcdee3 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I'm actually watching this movie as I type this review. I've watched tons of bad movies, its actually something that I like to do. This movie is absolutely terrible. The best thing about this movie is... gimme a second... well the part where... nope. Okay, there are no good parts to this movie. Terrible writing, terrible directing and terrible acting. I've used IMDb for at least a decade and I've never written a review, but this movie was so awful I felt like it was my duty as a human being to keep others from wasting time. Transparent plot points, disconnected acting, and amateurish CGI and S/FX.

When the first murder occurs at a friendly soccer game, the friends of the slain player (best acting in the movie), stood around not even responding to what had just occurred. Then they all kinda walked of camera as if someone motioned them off. No one stopped to check on the victim. Then the reporter was basically like... "Oh someone just got shot, oh no, we should walk over to the killer robot and investigate, yep he is dead... bye robot.. we'll stand here and watch you walk off." Then the soccer players meander back in ... like "Oh no the robots killed my friend. We are angry, rarrrrrrrr".

I could go on... but I actually think this movie made me physically sick... and if that is truly the case, this physical sickness would actually be better than the movie.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed