"Doctor Who" The Girl Who Waited (TV Episode 2011) Poster

(TV Series)

(2011)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Timewrecks run in the family
owlaurence19 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It's amazing how much waiting Amy and Rory seem to do over those seasons. And how time always gets out of whack when they're around.

This episode starts out as very plot-heavy. Amy's ordeal is a lot like a futuristic action movie, while Rory and the Doctor have to solve yet another time puzzle and rescue her from a separate time stream... except that they're already 36 years late. While I appreciate the idea that this idyllic leisure center has become a complete hell, this episode seems quite unmemorable at first. Quite obviously, saving Amy only requires a time reboot --she's got a subscription to them anyway.

The twist comes when Older Amy refuses to be "saved", i.e. erased. And I love her for that. On any other show, the characters would kindly accept to be removed from existence on the grounds that they don't like their lives anyway. Not Amy Pond: her life so far has been hell, but boy, will she fight for it. I guess it's in her genes.("Not these times. Not one line", anyone?) I think that Older Amy is a great character; hardened and bitter as she is, her true nature still shines through -chiefly, her love for Rory, which always shows in the oddest ways. So the decision to save her is understandable --but quite wrong in a show that has repeatedly stressed the dangers of time paradoxes. Despite the lessons of Father's Day (S1), I bought it because the Doctor is always so protective of Amy, and because honestly he has not been quite himself recently. Still I totally expected Older Amy to suffer some tragic but very convenient accident which would get the scriptwriter out of a serious bind.

Then came the REAL shocker, the moment that makes this episode just brilliant. The moment when *The Doctor abandons Amy to die*. Wow. It clearly is the right thing to do, but what an inhuman decision to make --and to live with. That's the Doctor for you. Yet asking Rory to accept this decision is even worse because the poor bloke is no Timelord; he does not HAVE to do the right thing. Worse, he has just spent the whole episode reminding Amy of who she really was (and now that's Rory for you: it has always been his role). So that final scene with Older Amy just blew me away. It was beautiful, beautifully shot, and it seemed just right. You may find it overly dramatic. I find that I really need a tissue right now.

Oh, and one last thing that irks me every time: What kind of person, when presented with two buttons, bends over to press the RED one when there's a nice, safe green button at hand level??! (Answer: "someone bloody-minded, contradictory and completely unpredictable?")
28 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Apalapucia Roulette...
Xstal24 December 2021
Amelia Pond chooses red over green. The effect is quite impacting, the affect leaves her unseen. In a world all on her own, like a self-imposed boycott. Except for the attentions of the unkind, kind Handbots.

Many years in just a day leaves her lost and a recluse. Thirty Six to be precise, the Doctor's fault, there's no excuse. But to relapse older Amy into what she used to be, raises issues for the lady and the world that she now sees.

Soon enough we have the parable of AP old and AP young. A paradox the TARDIS isn't keen the Doctor sprung. Suffice to say there's lots of chat with Rory and his wives. But only one can end the play, and go on to survive.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The word "brilliant" may be an understatement
gridoon202423 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"The Girl Who Waited" is not just a fantastic 45 minutes of television, it may be one of the best things I've seen on any screen for a very long time. It's visually impressive, intellectually stimulating, and emotionally devastating. It surprised me, it made me laugh out loud a couple of times, and by the end I had real tears flowing down my face. What makes this story unique is how it examines the whole "alter the timeline - change the future" concept that is so common in science fiction from a perspective that is usually ignored; that of those who will be erased, those who will never exist, if the timeline is changed. Usually we get only one side of the coin; this time, we get both. And, although her two male co-stars are very good, it's Karen Gillian who really owns this episode with an astonishing, award-worthy performance. Don't miss it. ***1/2 out of 4.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Two Amy's for the price of one.
Sleepin_Dragon6 September 2015
The Doctor takes Amy and Rory Appalapachia for a well earned rest. A short holiday becomes an eternity for Amy, who has to wait, and wait.

As of 2020, this is still one of the best.

Best bit has to be the scenes with the two Amy's, and I disagree with the comments about Karen not giving enough emotion in her performance, rubbish, she's really good, and as those that have read my reviews will realise i'm not Amy's greatest fan. The look on older Amy's face when Rory rescues her younger self is devastating.

Without a doubt this is one of my all time favourite new who episodes, it is truly original. I really liked the creation of the handbots, they're very different. The gardens of Appalapachia are so beautiful, they truly look incredible, almost fairy tale esque. The prosthetics used on Amy are brilliant, she really does look older, a bit of grey hair would have been good. The best performance from Karen Gillan for a good while, again I find it mainly because she's better written for. The story is a hugely interesting one, how would she feel about being left behind, how Rory would feel about meeting an older Amy, and the decision the Doctor had to make when two Amy's existed. This is brilliant.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant
josephthedoctorcaleb15 August 2015
Series six of Doctor Who is perhaps one of my favourites and after the whole River Song business halfway through and the disappointment of 'Night Terrors', this simple stand alone episode of Doctor Who is definitely worth watching. It really shows how much Amy and Rory care about each other and the lengths that they are prepared to go to in order to save each other. The Doctor although absent from most of the physical stuff is certainly well used and it's also good to see how he watches on and is emotional to see how he has to lie and make bad choices that will allow good things to happen. For me, this is the most emotional episode of Series six and will always be one of the best episode in its history.

Though I am still wondering how Amy mastered Gallifreyan technology and made her own sonic probe.
21 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Love of All Seasons
hellraiser718 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This is my favorite episode not just of the season but the entire show (for now anyway) if you can believe that. It's one of the most emotionally touching and heart wrenching episodes I've ever seen. What makes this episode all the more interesting is the fact that the Doctor is second string and it's really Amy and Rory's story.

The planet they visit is unsettling, it's obviously been inspired by the film "THX-1138" as most of the place is all white and you even have mannequin enforcer droids.

We see a dilemma where Amy is older than Rory, it sort of reminds me of the Deep Space Nine episode "The Visitor" as Benjamin Sisko was seeing his son Jake grow older but Ben remained the same age. It was sad to see what has became of Amy over the years, despite still looking good physically you can see from her eyes how the years have made her a shell of a woman.

But what I love was how Rory had an unwavering love for her all the same, despite what has happened he still loves her and will do anything to save her. And we see that the time he's spending with her she is starting to be herself once more.

One really great and touching moment was when both the old Amy and the young Amy were talking with each other and the young version tells a little story on the reason she fell in love with Rory, which I thought was beautiful because I feel that what love really is. This of course leads them to say something at the same time which to me showed how long Amy's love for Rory truly lived.

It then comes down to one of the most heartbreaking climaxes as Rory is stuck with a terrible dilemma where he has to chose to save one of the versions of Amy, both can't exist on the same time together. Despite what the Doctor says, Rory is about to open the door to the Tardis for the old version of Amy, but then stops as the old version tells him no. She then gives a monologue which I'll admit really put tears in my eyes as we see the old version make a sacrifice for the one she loves,so that both Rory and the young version can have the years she lost. The final minutes with the old version of Amy just made me break down and cry.

No matter the seasons, love is timeless.

Rating: 4 stars
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The reason this doesn't deserve a 10/10
warlordartos3 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I truly believe this is one of the most emotional Doctor Who episodes but that doesn't make up for certain things, such as Amy Complaining about waiting 36 years when Rory waited 2000 years without a complaint. Also I think they pushed a paradox too far this time. Luckily the acting, music and overall storyline was top notch.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
brilliant
diroffers22 September 2011
"The Girl Who waited" is one of my favorite episodes involving the eleventh doctor. The writing in this one is a perfect example of why so many people love this show. This was a rather self-contained episode that is very Amy-centric. It does not really appear to contribute to the ongoing story line, but it doesn't need to as it is quite brilliant and provides some insight into one of the main characters.

Karen Gillan made an excellent and compelling performance, and it was a joy to see a different side to her character.

This is one of the few episodes I actually went back and watched a second time. Some parts were a bit slow on the second go around, but the end more than makes up for it.
33 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I cry every time
doctorwhofan9622 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
At first i'll admit from all my hype for 'Night Terrors' because of the dolls, i thought 'The Girl Who Waited wasn't going to be very good. However I was completely wring, this was way better than 'Night Terrors' which had a unfortunately disappointing ending. Karen Gillan did it for me, her acting was spectacular. Her portrayal of older Amy was excellent, i loved the difference in the characters despite them being the same person. I'm glad Matt Smith wasn't centre stage because it gave Arthur Darvill a chance to shine, and god did he shine. He grabbed this opportunity to show his acting talents firmly and proved he was worth being in the show (which i'm happy about as for a while he seemed like a spare part). The story line was great and i even got all the 'timey wimey' business. The highlight though was the tear-jerking, extremely poignant ending. The scene where old Amy and Rory were pressed against either side of the TARDIS door was fantastically written and directed. I re-watch it over and over and i still shed tears. I will say what made this episode stand out even more is that it showed the Doctor's 'darker side' as i'll call it, as he left old Amy behind. It made me for the first time actually realise how cruel he could be and honestly made me briefly hate him. Overall brilliant. 10/10 for Tom MacRae
23 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Where good and bad acting makes the difference
laura-bonaventura123 April 2014
I really loved the script, and it might be the first time in season 6, but Karen Gillan didn't keep the episode at the emotional level where it belongs. Talking about new doctor who, I'm a big fan of Donna Noble / Catherine Tate, I was surprised by Billie Piper and in the end I really enjoyed Martha Jones / Freema Agyeman. Karen Gillan is a beautiful woman, with the kind of beauty that makes you like her and think she's a funny mate: she's some material to work with, but she doesn't. As simple as it is. She didn't had many good scripts, this was one of that and she missed it, especially on the second part. Too bad.

I must say something about how the season is going on, because there's something Moffat (whom I adored as many of us with "Blink" and "The girl in the fireplace") needs to understand, or to remember. Science fiction is not science. In science fiction you can travel through the time line, in the real world probably not, for a long long time. And this is perfectly fine, but when you write science fiction you need to state some rules (your own rules of course) and respect them no matter what. Asimov stated the robot laws and there isn't a single robot in Asimov's literary universe who isn't bound to those rules. The Doctor of Moffat's era makes people see and speak with the older or younger versions of themselves, not mentioning the awful season 5 finale, where the Doctor goes back and forth and speaks to himself. When this kind of thing happens more than once I call it rubbish.
11 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is a kindness
Tweekums22 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
When The Doctor, Amy and Rory visit the second most popular destination in the universe it is no surprise that things go wrong; that than finding themselves on a beautiful planet they end up in a strange facility. Amy is soon separated from the other two and we learn that she is in a quarantine facility for people who have a plague that will kill them in one day; Rory and The Doctor are luckier as they have ended up in the visiting section where time travels at a different rate to where Amy is. It turns out that the plague only effects people with two hearts so Amy is safe… so long as she doesn't get any treatment, as it would be deadly to her! In an attempt to rescue Amy, The Doctor takes the Tardis into her time-stream but when Rory goes looking for her he finds that they have arrived a little late; Amy is nearly forty years older! Now they must figure out how to get back and rescue the younger Amy and if they can what will become of the older one?

I rather enjoyed this episode even though it didn't include any traditionally monstrous creatures; the faceless robots that did everything 'for kindness' were creepy enough without actually being scary. This may be the episode with the smallest cast as it only really includes Amy, Rory and The Doctor; Karen Gillan did a fine job playing Amy at two different ages; it was fun watching her take out robots with a katana! Arthur Darvill was also good, when he first appeared as Rory I was hoping he'd be a one-episode character but now I'm convinced that he makes an excellent addition to the team. The story itself was pretty good and the ending was quite a tearjerker.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Two Planks Of Wood Equals Twice As Many Splinters
Theo Robertson10 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
As soon as the opening credits started I thought this was going to be the most enjoyable episode of the Matt Smith era . The Doctor , Amy and Rory find themselves stuck in a white room and Amy gets separated only to find herself in mortal peril . This opening mirror episode one of the 1975 classic Ark In Space , one of the most effective stories in the history of the classic series and which shows that you don't need a big budget to create a memorable piece of television drama Did I say Amy is in " mortal peril " ? Perhaps I should have said " immortal peril " because a week after seeing a traditional monsters are gonna get you type story we're back in the timey wimey tale that seems to crop up in every story produced by Steven Moffat that's not written by Mark Gattis

This isn't enough to condemn the episode but I'm afraid that Moffat deserves much condemnation for doing something last year and that is casting Karen Gillan as the female lead . Ms Gillan is certainly beautiful but so is a tree in a field and a tree is far less wooden . The script calls for Amy to emote the whole gamut of every conceivable feeling - joy , grief , despair , loss and hope . I'm afraid the only thing we saw from Karen in this episode was splinters . And having two Amys running around had the Doctor warn Rory at the climax " Rory we can't have two Amys in the Tardis . If they rub together they'll start a fire didn't you learn anything in the boy scouts ? " . This is a great pity because the script itself must have looked fantastic on the printed page

Not to be too negative Arthur Darvill gives perhaps his best performance as Rory simply down to the fact that a writer has utilized him in a character driven story rather than have him as a plot device as in " oh no they killed Rory again this week " . But even this illustrates how poor his co-stars can be sometimes . Did anyone else notice that Smith's dialogue seemed to be painfully reminiscent of the tenth Doctor ? That said at least the Doctor was sidelined for much of the episode and we didn't get River Song either which is a big plus

Sorry if I've seemed painfully negative but being a fan of the classic series I tend to use the 1972 adventure Day Of The Daleks as the yardstick for any DOCTOR WHO story featuring a time paradox . It's released on DVD this week and is worth every single penny for the extras alone . The only episode of NuWho that comes close to it is Father's Day for very different reasons. That story showed Eccleston and Piper at their very best and how lop-sided the dynamic between the current cast of characters are
35 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Saving Time in a bottle
boblipton10 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The essence of a great Doctor Who episode is to handle those issues symbolically which we cannot bear to look at in the cold, hard light of reality. Those issues can be reduced to simple question, analyzable in a fashion that the messy, muddled world will not permit us to see clearly. When we read Tolkien's LORD OF THE RINGS, we get to make the choices of how to deal with palpable, malign evil. We don't have the luxury of looking away and mumbling about secondary issues. We look at Sauron -- or at least the Eye of Sauron -- and know he is evil. What do we do about it? We don't get caught up in issues of cause and effect, sidelining the discussion by arguing about what made him evil, or what it will do to us. Sauron is evil. We fight him with any weapon we can find and sort out the damage later.

In this episode, we think about love, sacrifice and suicide. Amy Pond gets separated from the Doctor and Rory, stuck in a timestream in which time proceeds at a vastly greater rate. By the time the Doctor and Rory can rescue her, three and a a half decades have passed. With her help they can go back and save her from those years of loneliness and terror, but she will have to give up those years, that life. Her life. Should she commit suicide for someone who is now a stranger?

I'd like to draw attention to a part of television story-telling that is usually ignored: the lighting technicians. It's a subset of camera-work that most people don't notice, but I've been thinking about it for some time in the context of DOCTOR WHO, wondering if the lighting inside the TARDIS reflects the way the Doctor's eyes work. In this episode, they've reduced a lot of the lighting to a flat, white background and green plants that are so dark they are almost black, with the characters providing colorful splashes. That almost monochromatic background emphasizes the simplicity of the choice: yes or no, the younger Amy or the older one. The colors of the players shows their complexity. In the real world, choices are never that simple.

Karen Gilian gives a technically brilliant performance. She stands and moves very differently as the elder Amy, she pitches her voice differently, she plays a different character. It's a fine piece of acting, but it draws attention to itself and self-destructs on that account. Arthur Darvill, as Rory, though, does his usual fine job as the man who has to make a decision that no man should have to.... and almost refuses to make it. And Matt Smith is.... well, you believe he's an alien who can make these godlike decisions when he has to.... and he doesn't want to make them either.

Because I think DOCTOR WHO is at its best when it takes the symbolic component of science fiction seriously -- in between the goofy jokes, of course -- we have been having a great season. There have been a couple of duds, of course, but this episode, like the last one, is sf near its best.
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
More like the girl who turned into a cranky old woman
dkiliane25 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
When I first watched this episode I hated it. Absolutely hated it. But after rewatching it a couple times I began to see its strengths.

First off, the acting is impeccable. Amy is the main showcase for this episode, as she is trapped in an alternate timeline that of course moves faster than Rory and the Doctor's. Her acting chops are well shown here and the prosthetics to show her age are decently believable.

But here is where from my complaints stem. Amy is furious at both the Doctor and Rory (but mostly the Doctor) for leaving her behind even though they clearly did all they could to get to her as soon as possible. Unfortunately, due to timey wimey nonsense it takes 36 years. And the reason they can't try again in my opinion is dumb.

That aside, Amy's cynicism seems rather undeserved, especially when it's possible to completely undo it. Not to mention Rory waited 2000 YEARS for her. Technically he was plastic and didn't age but 2000 YEARS. And she's gonna quibble over 36! Just saying. Also, the whole "I die" explanation doesn't ring true to me either. She's given a do-over, to have never experienced that isolation. I fail to see the downside.

Even so, it is cool to see her wield a katana and her own sonic screwdriver, though how she is all of a sudden a genius is not explained and is just there for convenience sake. And Karen Gillan does a good job selling both the action and the emotion of both versions of Amy. And it's nice to see her NOT a damsel in distress.

However, it is Arthur Darvill's portrayal of Rory who steals the show (again). His love for Amy, his persistence, and his genuinely deserved heartbreak and anger at the Doctor eventually giving way to quiet strength as "his Amy" wakes up at the end of the episode. This is what gives the episode its strength. Without his tremendous performance and his character being so well written to provide the performance the episode really would have been just Amy as a cranky old woman. 8/10
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A diamond in the rough that is series 6.
kingkass11 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This series is bad. However this episode is one I will never forget. Amy and Rory are two character I don't care about and if I think about their entire journey with the doctor I think it's a mess. They lose a child but it seems they don't really care, and it never even seemed they wanted a child in the first place. Ugh. But getting back to this episode. As a standalone it works tremendously. I actually cared about Amy and Rory (who I always preferred out of the two), more than I ever have before. Actually maybe it's the only time. I'd say as companions go "future Amy" is far more interesting than normal Amy. This episode is awesome.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A decent episode with one annoyance
getitdrunk20 July 2022
"Gillan also wore a padding which affected her movement and she spent hours in makeup" yet no-one considered she might have different hair? Hacked off for practicality which would have been in keeping with the character? Gone grey? No exactly the same hair, it's silly distraction in what was otherwise a pretty decent episode.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
As Time Goes By
A_Kind_Of_CineMagic3 February 2019
I find a lot of positives with this very solid quality episode: It is quite ambitious in showing some depth and thoughtful themes about Amy and Rory and their relationship as well as Amy's relationship with the Doctor. It mostly manages to achieve a good level of interest with dramatic and traumatic events for Amy. There is some decent humour on a few occasions too as well as a cute robot 'Rory'. It is also not getting involved in the convoluted Melody/River story arc and is instead basically a self contained story which is a positive for me.

I don't think it is a really top level episode but it is a good episode.

One negative for my taste is that the situation they find themselves in feels a bit unconvincing to me: The Doctor takes them to a leisure resort only to blunder into a quarantine situation and lets them get separated in a way I found a bit jarringly careless.

This leisure resort the Doctor rates so highly is a rubbish organisation. No warnings are given to prevent people getting trapped in quarantine. People in quarantine are left to wander around back rooms which look like empty factory units. Dangerous robots maraud about with no way of people controlling them. The setting looks a little unimpressive and unconvincing as well.

This isn't a major criticism though, it is just a minor grumble.

The impact of Amy's possible death is dramatic and is a positive for sure (albeit lessened a bit for me by constant fake deaths throughout series 5 and 6 which left me feeling cynical about her apparent mortal danger).

Writer Tom MacRae has done a good job overall on making an engaging and involving episode. The main positives are that the storyline is interesting, the dialogue is decent, the acting is very strong, there is a thoughtful study of how it feels for Amy to be left alone and separated for 36 years as well as to finally have to choose between changing the course of her life or endangering everyone by risking a paradox.

My Rating: 8/10.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Girl Who Waited Warning: Spoilers
Now this is one very good episode. Classic Doctor Who with moral questions, paradoxes and the like. This was the best episode out of the past previous slightly below average episodes. Very refreshing indeed.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Two Ponder, Doctor and Nurses
GameAndWatch14 December 2013
Finally some off earth sci-fi!

Lots of ideas to cram into such a small time slot. Nice to see the micro-cast, and immediacy of story.

I found I didn't really enjoy this episode in the moment. I know though that it will be memorable. It lingers like good sci-fi should. There's a lot of concepts to explore here - perhaps too many.

I remarked recently that I've never been that big a fan of the companions (thinking there's plenty of room for improvement, even hoping for a female Doctor, and a great wise male companion, or an alien!). I also stated that I liked Pond and Oswald.

Re-watching the 6th series of nuWho, and especially this episode I discovered that I didn't actually have that much love for Amy. I may even prefer Rory, even over Amy's pout.

It reminded me of a Star Trek TNG story: 'Second Chances'. In which Riker ends up with a body double after a transporter anomaly. The second Riker is stranded, and when he is reacquainted with the crew, he's still holding a torch for Troi, but the original Riker has moved on. Which is a bit of an emotional roller-coaster for all involved. Riker is jealous of his dopple-ganger that re-kindles his love with Troi.

It does make you wonder how much you'd change under different circumstances, and perhaps if we try an project our futures we might position ourselves better.

Many time-streams/parallel universes make for endless possibilities, and I'm surprised we haven't seen a little more in the same ilk with Who.

This episode is probably more clever than I give it credit, in that I personally was a little repulsed by the older Amy, who happened to eek out her existence in her lonely surrounds, through no particular fault of her own. Bar her pressing a big red button (red buttons are a no no!).

Will you still love me when you're old? Yes, but I'd rather we grow old together. At its heart this is a love story (even if Rory and Amy are a little unconvincing). The Doctor undeniably made the right call here.

Samurai Amy and her sonic screwdriver were unnecessary additions. More like this please.
5 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Do gingers never go grey?
acharrell16 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Amy ages 36 years and looks like she's in her 30's. No 56? Year old looks that good. Bad makup. Also, Amy built a Sonic screwdriver? What?
2 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed