Undercurrent: The Disappearance of Kim Wall (TV Mini Series 2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
only 12 reviews and 512 ratings, a small sample.
jmccrmck-651729 April 2022
I watched ' The Investigation ' and I was enthralled but most would find that offering way too slow moving. So I was intrigued by this documentary with the same subject matter and I was not disappointed. An exploration of a seemingly random killing or actually bad luck; wrong place wrong time. Intelligent coverage of what was a such a sensational murder and criminal trial. Interesting, informative, sensitive rendering of a a tragic loss of a young curious female journalist trying to get a story. This documentary is everything that 'sensational media' discounts because they want the sensation and not necessarily the complete story. I have not watched much in this genre since I watched 'City Confidential' which I avidly watched a long time ago. This documentary is sensitive intelligent and extremely well executed.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good-Too Much Contextualizing
jhph1217 March 2022
Is worth seeing. Good documentary, but kind of weirdly felt like there could have been more and less. The more would have been as some others noted (spouse, boyfriend, escape, etc.). For me, the less would be the interviews where different individuals contextualize the murder into other issue areas. Not sure those were very inciteful and detracted a bit from the telling of a very real human tragedy.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fascinating Documentary About a Briliant yet Obscure Scientist and A Danish Journalist who Undertakes Her Last Story
RedKidBytes2 October 2022
Kim Wall (Journalist) and her Partner Ole Stobbe threw a formal farewell party to friends and family for their decision to move to Beijing on August 16th. Peter Madison is an outlandishly mouthy hyperactive scientist who seems to support an apathetic mental torpor. Nevertheless, he convinces Kim Wall to pay a visit to his hand-made miniature submarine named UC3 Nautilus. 2 people, Kim and Peter leave the docks for a test drive on August 11th, (5 days before Kim and her partner Ole's move to Beijing) with the sub at around 7:00 PM (local time). Only one person, Peter Madison, returns.

The bizarre story follows his arraignment and imprisonment. Then a stupendous escape ensues in the MacGyver style from the prison. Finally, his twisted personality turns the court system into a media circus. Albeit none of his efforts enable him to attain his freedom.

At last, in 2020, Peter Madison admitted to killing Kim Wall. The Netflix documentary undertakes this raw and crazy story in style. It is Choreographed elegantly and coherently, a well-told dramatic chronicle.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Half told, but terrifying.story
aarpcats11 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A freelance journalist decides to follow a story about a man who built his own submarine by going on an underwater ride with him. Because she is used to reporting in war torn countries, she considers the interview to be a kind of novelty piece about how and why a quirky scientists would build a submarine. She thinks it will be fun.

Unfortunately, she wrong. Her interview subject returns to port without her or the submarine. He can't quite say what happened, but soon bits and pieces of the journalist begin to wash up on the shores around the launch site. When the bits wash up, they have clearly been removed from her body with an axe.

It's hard to imagine the terror Kim must have felt when she found herself alone on the sea bottom in a fancy tin can with a man wielding an axe. It's equally hard to fathom how devastating it was for the police who found the body parts to realize that the expertise of the axe marks meant Kim was not the first victim.

Now only part of the story is told. The rest will be told when the cops find the bits of the other bodies.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A beautiful tribute to a talented women taken too soon
kristenmerek14 March 2022
It's really gross and sad to see reviews of this documentary that say it would have been better and could have been covered in less time if there was less focus on Kim's life, who she was as a person, and the people who loved her. Not only is that disgusting, but it also willfully ignores the point of telling these stories and, in fact, the entire point of this documentary (a point which was clearly expressed several times throughout). The point of true crime stories shouldn't be solely focusing on the killer and the crime. These stories shouldn't make the killers a household name while only focusing on the victim for as long as it takes to describe the worst day of their life. These stories need to show the other side of things- the void left in people's lives and in the world now that this person has been taken out of it. We know too many "famous" killers' names and yet next to nothing about their victims. This documentary does an amazing job of balancing the story and the trial with the human impact of Kim's death. It's just really pitiful that folks don't seem to have enough attention span for both.
30 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Are we becoming immune to cruelty?
mariposasopiram6 April 2022
I dont really understand the reviews saying that this was extremely slow and boring? I never heard about this crime before and for me it was not boring at all. It kept adding more and more gruesome disturbing details of what happened to this poor woman. The story's timeline was a bit annoying to follow in some places, but other then that it was a very interesting crime story, one of the most horrific I saw. I feel so sorry for the family and friends of the victim and of course they have the rigth to talk about the victim as much they want, if you are not interested don't watch. As for the killer there is not much to it, it is a psychological condition he has and he fulfilled his dream.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Very slow paced
romedini20 March 2022
Could have been done with one episode. Way to many unnecessary cut aways. Felt like it was in slow motion. Could have been much less boring. Not much else to add but 150 character requirement.
15 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mindblowing
southaussie6225 April 2022
Exceptionally well made documentary on the disappearance and murder of an innocent journalist.

What starts out as a harmless interview and tour of a home made submarine with its owner, the story turns into one of mystery when only 1 person returns from what was supposed to be a short 2 hour tour out to sea.

The story of what happens is well told with the story flipping back and forth between interviews with different people so it keeps you guessing as to what actually happened. When the details finally came out I just sat there with my jaw on the floor asking why??

The details of what happened is nothing short of disturbing. The reason 'why' is as dark as it is evil.

I found this short 2-part documentary one of the best movies I've ever seen. It kept me guessing then knocked me out when it revealed the details of what occurred. The plot would make excellent material for a fictional, thriller movie - only this is true.

Highly recommend.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Incredibly eye opening
florenciaamz22 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is an extremely well done documentary. It's perplexing why it's severely underrated. Perhaps from people who expect to see an action crime show, in which case, it would be best to watch a TV series with a made-up narrative to attract the public, not a documentary.

The reason why it's so good, is it introduces perfectly both the victim and the attacker in the perspective of those around them before the incident, and develops it into the situation that became Kim Wall's death. It is eye opening, as it digs much deeper into the attacker and uncovers the disturbing nature of what a person can be underneath, unbeknownst to others, especially those closest to them.

It also sheds light on the dangers we can all face which are not immediately apparent, and the drive of human behaviour. This as well as the representation and relevance of who Kim wall was, for those learning about this occurrence, to be able to fully grasp that she was a beautiful human being, with a good soul, who unwarrantedly suffered the most unimaginable pain and suffering at the hands of another person. And to help people grasp the severity of the crime, and its impacts on the world, rather than it being looked at as a piece of entertainment.

Perhaps people are so insensitive now a days, since interacting with each other through a screen 95% of the time, inevitably prevents us from connecting and perceiving each other as human beings.

In my opinion, the director of this piece is absolutely brilliant, and did a fantastic job.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Needed a lot of cutting
bc_global1812 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Presented in two hour long parts, this dud would have been much better served as a one hour, Investigation Discovery type show. There were sooo many interviews that seemed unnecessary. Tragic story but like many others have stated in their reviews, the bottom line is it became boring early on and never recovered. I kept waiting for something significant to happen which would warrant a 2 hour HBO Documentary and thought that it occurred when the guy escaped from prison, but that too was uneventful and the director didn't even follow up with what the outcome of that was? Odd show - so many better ones on ID.
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant
raulfromsouth17 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Amazing documentary, in a context of an extreme violent world that we live in, not only manage to explain the atrocious crime comited by an individual who doesn´t deserve to be called a person, but the most important of all, change the focus to what is really important in this story: Kim, an amazing reporter who´s light will shine on this world forever.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well done
TopazMermaid31 July 2023
This could have probably been told a bit quicker, maybe in one part rather than two. However, overall, I appreciated the way this story was told. I watched this, as well as another documentary on the same disappearance, and this one does a far better job of speaking for the victim (Amy Wall) and giving voice to the tragedy. Many of her friends are involved with the production as well.

It was a case I hadn't heard about before and so I was fascinated (and horrified) to learn about everything that happened.

This is a very easy to follow film and I definitely thought it was worth watching this.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
1 episode too long
NewNostalgicReview10 March 2022
This could've been captivating had it not been watered down with a slow pace and filler to stretch this into 2 episodes. Otherwise we'll done and worth watching.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Too Long / Dramatized
daebat26 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
At what point are we going to accept that not every person in this world is a princess or prince? No, you're not special. Was Kim special to someone? Sure. That doesn't mean we need to turn this documentary into some celebration of her. She happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. I also found it really weird when a gal stated that this represents some sort of oppression of women and that women have to walk around in fear. Men are the worst right? Yes, one man represents us all and 50% of the population of the world are responsible for the fraction of the population who have this happen to them. I'm sick of this narrative and I'll give 1 star to anything that perpetuates the continued hate toward men.

On that note, the documentary drags on with meaningless scenes that have nothing to do with the story. The entire thing could have been summarized in thirty minutes but instead it's scene after scene of the sea and that submarine.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Slow and so boring.
ebergswe11 May 2022
Theres so many words spoken in this content milking documentary, yet so few facts or words of interest. A 20 minute story told in 2 hours.

There is a painful trend with this type of docu series, a backside of streaming plattforms i guess.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Tragic story told in the most boring way possible
ogptrash25 March 2022
For a true crime story involving a journalist, you'd think this documentary would involve the relevant facts and not too much fluff. Instead it is the most boring true crime story I think I've ever watched. This had all the potential to be riveting given the circumstances of the case but instead here I am watching someone who barely knew the victim once tell a reaaaaalllly long story about going to a restaurant in a bad part of town 10 years ago that has absolutely no relevance to anything whatsoever. Don't waste your time. This is the worst of HBO.

I am so annoyed at this doc that I created an imdb account and posted my only review just to vent!
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Underwhelming
vkdnbbfz11 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This seemed to be a compelling story, but was not told very well. They glossed over the prison break. They never mentioned Madsens wife. They mention Kim's boyfriend, but give very little details or have any film of him. Overall they could have simply gave more details and back story and less of her friends monotonously speaking about Kim.
10 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
PAINFUL
kroberts-1211 March 2022
This was the slowest documentary I have ever seen. It could have been good but it was drug out far too long. It was so painful to watch I ended up turning it off and have no clue what happened.
11 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very underwhelming
jbellesi10 March 2022
This doc was boring. It would have been a great 30 minute doc, but it was dragged out alot. There was too much unecessary focus on Kim's background. That focus should have been more on the crime and psychology of Peter. Would not recomend.
12 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
There's no reason for this to be 2 hours long.
HeroOfTomorrow2 August 2022
While the subject matter is fascinating and the focus on Kim Wall as opposed to the murderer admirable, this documentary was stretched to bizarre lengths... and I can't fathom why. This would've worked much better as an 80-minute doc, and literally no content would have to be cut; only the endless slo-mo transitions would have to be trimmed.

The length really hurts the storytelling, as I felt myself lulled into boredom on multiple occasions. The content should drive the length; not the editor's love for overlong transitions.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Could have been one ep.
benjaminbrodrick28 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Starts off great. Well shot, good directing, lighting, footage and good pace. But towards the middle you feel they are grasping at straws to lengthen it. Friends talking about background that adds no value to the doco. One area that killed it for me was the obviously very privileged Indian girl the victim studied with. She goes on the usual feminists tangent. How all women need to be in fear and that men are at fault. Painting all men for the 1% of 1% of the worst in society. When a man is also being interviewed by a lady behind camera she issues the work "misogyny". I have seen this before in a promising documentary (a healthy scoop of man hating) and it just ruins it. Other then the feminist smell in some of the documentary what would have made this a 8 would have been if they discovered more crimes.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
My god...
shanayneigh24 September 2022
I came close to turning this off after five minutes or so, because there were an abundance of journalists delivering a very self serving view of the profession, furiously patting themselves on their backs. I skipped forward to the actual events which took of perhaps 30-40 minutes of the first hour-long episode.

The second episode was basically the same people acting as armchair psychologists doing their worst to diagnose Peter Madsen. But the suffering didn't stop there. The last half hour or so were the usual feminist conspiracy theories one have come to expect from Erin Lee Carr, complete with faceless anonymous witnesses crying as if on cue.

Kim Wall deserved better than to have her memory besmirched by an opportunist hack like Carr.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Part 1: 3 stars; Part 2: 7 stars
paul-allaer26 March 2022
"Undercurrent: The Disappearance of Kim Wall" (2022 release; 2 parts totaling 126 min.) is a documentary about the brutal murder of Swedish journalist Kim Wall. As Part 1 "The Crime" opens, it is "August 10, 2017" as Kim Wall boards the submarine which Danish eccentric inventor Peter Madsen has built himself. She is doing a piece on him for Wired magazine. The submarine does not return to shore, and before too long, the Danish authorities start looking for it... At this point we are 10 min into Part 1.

Couple of comments: this is the latest documentary from Erin Lee Carr, a widely respected and award-winning documentarian ("I Love You, Now Die"; "At the Heart Of Gold: Inside the USA Gymnastics Scandal"). Here she looks back at the savage (and worse) murder of Kim Wall by Peter Madsen. This 2 part documentary is like Dr. Jeckyll & Mr. Hyde. Part 1 feels hurried and aloof, certainly as compared to last year's excellent Danish 6 part mini-series "The Investigation", which truly conveys the efforts by the Danish authorities to tie Madsen to the murder. Then, just as surprising, Part 2 "The Punishment" is an excellent assessment what drove Madsen to do what he did (something that is barely addressed in "The Investigation"). Frankly, I was ready to bail on "Undercurrent" after the disappointing Part 1. Glad I decided to ride it our. Boottom line: if, like me, you have seen "The Investigation", you will not miss out on much if you skip Part 1 of "Undercurrent" and instead you go straight to Part 2.

"Undercurrent: The Disappearance of Kim Wall" recently premiered on HBO and is now available on HBO On Demand and HBO Max, where I caught it. If you are interested in true crime documentaries, I'd readily suggest you check this out, and draw your own conclusion, although for those of you who have seen "The Investigation", I'd go straight to Part 2.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed