The Oscars (2023) Poster

(I) (2023 TV Special)

User Reviews

Review this title
18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The best ceremony in a while
bpercival-1621213 March 2023
The winners weren't just exciting. Everything Everywhere All at Once earned the sweep! Brendan Fraser earned this comeback award.

But this was also a solid ceremony. The jokes weren't terrible and most of them actually landed with me.

I just want less comedy and banter between presenters to give more time for speeches. It's so frustrating. We don't need every presenter to have banter with another person.

RRR winning song was one of the best wins of the night.

Only wins I was disappointed with were All Quiet winning production design and score. Even those I know who weren't fans of Babylon thought those elements were deserving.

But this was actually a very good ceremony.

Overall, I'm very satisfied with this years Oscar's.
26 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No slaps this year, we won an Oscar! Jamie Lee and Everything and Everywhere wins Oscars, and The Whale sinks an upset on Elvis.
blanbrn14 March 2023
Haven't missed an "Oscars" telecast in many years and I must say the "95th" Academy Awards went off without a slap and Jimmy Kimmel was very funny and super as the host! True to form the show ran over and a little long the music with Lady Gaga and the moving memorial tribute by Lenny Kravitz was moving and touching. Plus the funny "Cocaine Bear" skit had you asking yourself did director and actress Elizabeth Banks trip over the bear!? Finally after many years of work Jamie Lee Curtis(my favorite scream queen 1978's "Halloween") won an Oscar a surprise for best supporting actress, yet she deserved one finally as she was respected by her peers and she gave an emotional and moving speech even thanking late acting parents legends Janet Leigh and Tony Curtis! Jamie you all won together! And then Ke Huy Quan and Michelle Yeoh win respectively for best supporting actor and best actress as both finally got their due proving that comebacks are possible and that they were not past their primes. And you guessed it "Everything, Everywhere, all at Once" wins best picture as the imaginative, transformation, dimensional, film mixed with comedy and action wrapped all in love and in the moment was to much for the academy to ignore(7 total wins for the film). In a surprise somewhat upset win it in a comeback for Brendan Fraser as he upset Austin Butler for best actor as voters went with an overweight shut in man struggling with connection over legendary Elvis, I myself liked Austin and the "Elvis" performance better, yet Fraser had a character that showed courage, and will power so it's okay that Brendan won best actor. Overall good well done show as the third time was a charm for Jimmy and it was nice to see Hollywood honor the winners who all had come backs.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Oscars
Prismark1013 March 2023
The producers were hoping The Oscars 2023 would prove to be knockout for the viewers instead of the presenters like last year.

Presenter Jimmy Kimmel took his cue from Billy Crystal, inserting himself into footage of the Best Picture nominees.

Unfortunately his jokes lacked Crystal's sure touch. I thought maybe Steven Spielberg was going to slap him for poking fun of his parent's marriage.

It took a while for the ceremony to get going. Only one award was handed in the first half hour.

The two best supporting acting awards indicated that this would be the night for Everything Everywhere All at Once.

Ke Huy Quan no longer a Trivial Pursuit question. Whatever happened to the kid from Indiana Jones and Temple of Doom?

Jamie Lee Curtis showing she was always an acting talent to reckon with. Charismatic but the Hollywood bigwigs took a while to notice her outside of genre movies.

Brendan Fraser who seemed to have disappeared for a few years and them emerged on television got the Best Actor award. He was championed by Ian McKellen 25 years ago. He said once Brendan gets older, the looks go, the Hollywood executives will notice just what a good actor he is. The Mummy films might have been silly but Fraser always had the effortless star quality.

Michelle Yeoh took a leap from the martial arts genre. The first Star Trek captain to be an Oscar winner.

The songs were boring It was a good job Naatu Naatu had the infectious dance moves.

Overall rather safe and predictable. Apart from an impromptu Happy Birthday sang out at the auditorium.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
3.5 Stars out of 5 Stars
ajneeago9615 March 2023
Sticking to the tradition of watching the oscars the day after it airs, this installment was actually quite good. Most (if not, all) of these films that either got nominated or won were most deserving, as the films I did see out of the bunch were exceptional films. Most of the speeches were great (most notably everyone that won for best picture winner Everything Everywhere All At Once) and I found the musical performances more entertaining than past Oscar ceremonies. My only gripe is that when the winners would be on their way upstage, the announcer who's giving information about the said winners was just way too quiet, and was barraged with background music, so I wasn't ever able to hear what she was saying. Jimmy Kimmel nailed it as the presenter though, making a few Will Smith jokes that seriously made me laugh out loud, and we got an appearance from cocaine bear, so honestly, win. This oscars was a win IMO, and am excited to watch these movies that were either nominated or won.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Redemption and Reflection
williamjseversons13 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Redemption. The key underlying theme of this show. From seasoned veterans such as Colin Ferrell receiving his first nomination to Jamie Lee Curtis's victory. Actors and crew receiving accolades encompass many forms of the Film Industry. Despite disagreeing with particular wins (Women Talking over Top Gun: Maverick for Best Adapted Screenplay) and the choice of Jimmy Kimmel as the talk show host, the speeches were eloquent and reserved, the editing smooth, and a killer production design present throughout.

Additionally, the Academy rightfully addressed animation with a hard backpedal from their prior award show statement (with a welcome comedic touch from The Rock). Also, this show found creative methods around obstacles (such as honoring Tony Scott during "Hold My Hand"). Ultimately, I cried when Ke Huy Quan won Supporting Actor. It was both earned and respectful after twenty years of absence-similarly, Brendan Fraser's tearful and honest reflection after a demanding career. I was on the edge of my seat, awaiting his victory.

In terms of music, performances, such as M. M. Keeravani & Chandrabose's "Naatu Naatu," were masterfully matched with accompanying backgrounds and precise choreography. Conversely, Ryan Lott, David Byrne, & Mitski's "This Is A Life" were flat and off-pitch despite a creative costume design and well-staged setup, understandable due to the unnecessary pressure of performing alongside four other performers. Sofia Carson and Diane Warren's "Applause" is worthy of its title. Rihanna's "Lift Me Up," due to the solid vocals and elaborate breath control, maintained a necessary presence available solely to stage performers and, as a result, is worthy of applause. Finally, Lady Gaga killed it with a bare-bones setup, crisp diction, and raw vocals when performing "Take My Breath Away," unexpected to anyone. (Except for her fanbase). In addition, issues such as the disrespectful dance sequence were replaced by a well-performed and masterful Lenny Kravitz performance for the In Memoriam.

For pacing, the show unsurprisingly dragged during the halfway point with unnecessary comedy bits (Kimmel asking celebrities nothing questions) and unfairly cutting off VFX artists before they could thank their families. Additionally, the advertising for various additional ceremonies needed to improve due to halting prominent editing and core acting categories. Also, despite being sarcastic, dancing "Naatu Naatu" to shoo the actors would have been more respectful than abruptly cutting the mic after an inconsistently timed twenty to forty-five seconds. Meanwhile, in terms of positive Academy Performance, the endpoint of the Oscars without an accident was brilliantly timed-a far turn from the cringe-worthy opening. Overall, this was a few nominations short of greatness. But, if nothing else, like many of the winners, the Academy finds redemption on the stage.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
No one could object to any aspect , , ,
pixrox113 March 2023
. . . of this year's Academy Awards program. There were songs. There were dances. Celebrity cameos. Jokes galore. Some of the Favorites won. Some of the Dark Horses triumphed. Half of the ten Best Picture nominees reaped a total of zero shiny statuettes between them. The remaining quintet garnered 14 top prizes, with one lucky Mega Ball winner grabbing 7 of them, and another streaming service entry notching a quartet of trophies. Who cares if a few--or even most--of the glitterati in attendance wouldn't be caught dead in an actual movie theater, despite their frequent hypocritical tributes to flicks which had drawn in the Paying Public to see "movies like they were meant to be seen." Most of we normal, regular people also would prefer to stream the latest films--or view them on free "screen-er" discs--in the comfort of our own homes, if this were an affordable option available to us. To argue otherwise would smack of "sour grapes."
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Many people have been wondering why Paul Dan O. . .
tadpole-596-91825611 February 2024
. . . is only a presenter, and NOT a nominee, after his star turn as "Keith Gill" in DUMB MONEY. I think this awards "snub" can be attributed to P. D.'s lack of conditioning, and by inference, lukewarm commitment to this role. In Real Life, Keith ran a 4:03 mile. Having personally witnessed workouts by a 3:57 four-lap dude, as well as another racer who clocked a 1:50 half in high school, I was NOT impressed or convinced by DUMB MONEY's frequent--failed--attempts to portray Keith doing interval training on his local track. My 3:57 one-time teammate would push himself through three laps under three minutes during workouts. Then, after a 60-second break, he would see how much faster than one minute he could run a fourth lap. Mr. 1:50 would run sets of a dozen training quarters, during which a younger teammate would race him all-out the final 220. None of this comes through during DUMB MONEY's scenes at the track. This is where Paul falls far short of RAGING BULL.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Refreshing!
reefaddict-8652411 March 2024
Loved the show. I've been watching for over 55 years. Having previous award winners presenting the awards was genius... especially when I remember when they got them. The timing was flawless and the Jimmy was awesome and the humor was tasteful and respectful. Keep up this standard and it will go a long way to restoring what the Oscars used to be! Even though it started an hour earlier... it didn't feel like it was longer. The pace was comfortable and wasn't ever boring. It was nice to see everyone in such a great mood. The entertainment was well thought out and meaningful. It was also nice to include recognizing the orchestra!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wasted time
sammckee-1799825 August 2023
You wasted so much time on Jimmy Kimmel being painfully unfunny. He has the LEAST amount of charisma as any Oscar host ever. His jokes are nothing but references to Oscar movies with no substance or comedic timing. Why the hell has he been invited back so many times. The show worked SO well without a host at all. Every time Jimmy Kimmel goes on stage, the pacing of the show grinds to a screeching halt.

You wasted so much time with a bunch of stupid skits that nobody wanted. "Wow look it's Jimmy Kimmel in a popular movie. How original. It's not like I've seen that exact same joke in every mediocre Oscar year".

You wasted SO MUCH TIME on random montages. This one is really bizarre. Because the films included in the montages are from completely different years, completely different genres, and most of them are Disney owned properties. This adds nothing to the Oscars, it's clearly just completely unnecessary padding.

You wasted all of this time, and you STILL cut off half of the acceptance speeches.

And on top of all that, you made a joke about cutting off the visual effects artists. Even though they fix Hollywood's broken movies, get paid pennies, and often go out of business for doing so.

The Oscars is a joke and nobody cares. Just shorten the damn thing. Give out every award. Cut out the hosts. Make the Oscars a celebration of art, rather than a 3 hour long Hollywood circle jerk.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
drag harms no one
lee_eisenberg14 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I should start by noting that of all the nominees in all categories for this year, I've only seen "The Banshees of Inisherin", "Causeway", "Everything Everywhere All at Once", "The Fabelmans", "Glass Onion: A Knives Out Story", "Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio" and "Le pupille".

It was inevitable that this Oscars ceremony was going to reference last year's infamous slap. I also liked Jimmy Kimmel's dig at Scientology, and Elizabeth Banks's skit with the Cocaine Bear. One thing that I found weird was Morgan Freeman's shaved head; he looks better with hair.

Since I've only been watching the Oscars since 1995, I can't say which ceremony was considered the best ever, but I liked this one. Obviously it was impressive to see two winners of East Asian descent - one of whom was a refugee - but Daniel Scheinert made an important point (in an obvious swipe at anti-LGBT legislation) by noting that drag harms no one. Another good thing was that the anti-war "All Quiet on the Western Front" took home more awards than the militaristic "Top Gun: Maverick" (which I have no desire to ever see).

All in all, I liked it. To be certain, Malala Yousafzai responded perfectly to Kimmel's silly question.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I spent most of the telecast watching "The Longest Day" onTCM
Carycomic13 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
And I can't honestly say I missed much worthwhile with regard to the 95th Academy Awards. Don't get me wrong! I'm glad there was a greater number of Asian-American recipients. But, I still found it disappointing that "Wakanda Forever" only took one out of its five nominations. It almost makes me wonder if the Academy was getting some payback for the threatened African-American boycott back in 2016.

My predictions for Best Director, Actress, Actor and Picture also proved wrong. As I thought sure "The Fabelmans" would take three out of those four!

And, with regard to Best Animated Feature, I had not even heard of "Guillermo Del Toro's Pinocchio" until literally that moment.

I think, next year, I'll just wait for the next day's morning paper and read about the results.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Oscar's are Back!
skyfall-3340213 March 2023
This was a really good one! Besides Babylon being snubbed for Best Score, I was happy with all the winners! The show was great and ran smoothly, the In Memoriam was well made this year, and the winners all gave great speeches! The only complaints I had was I would've liked a few more skits like a long time ago Oscars, as well as a few more unrelated clips about film in general. I would've also used some different clips for some of the actors just to show scenes that showcased some of the really good acting from the actors. Overall a good show! Can't wait to start making my 2024 Oscar predictions!
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wonderful event but they shouldn't rush things up.
Perspicuity130 March 2023
What a wonderful show it was this year with some genuinely deserving winners and an absolutely fantastic host. The one thing that kept bothering me however was the rush with which things were happening. I get that it's a long show but the Oscars take place only once in a year and it holds a special place in every cinema lover's heart. For all the importance associated with the Oscars, I feel rushing through with the awards night is not the right way to go. In comedy, it's a basic rule not to say anything when the audience is applauding at your jokes; the fact that an experienced host and comedian like Jimmy Kimmel had to break that rule and say his lines even as the audience clapped, gives an idea about the kind of pressure he must have been under to move forward the show at a rapid pace.

I know some winners have had the habit of just going on and on with their speech, so I tend to agree that there should be a time limit allotted to each winner to deliver their speech, but cutting them off, especially the first time winners, comes across as a little rude. The Oscars should go a little easy on first time winners and when there is more than one person receiving the award. I felt really bad for Guneet Monga, who was ready with her speech but wasn't allowed to say anything. She won an Oscar for Best Documentary Short Film for The Elephant Whisperers (2022), and it was the first time an Indian had won this award, so it just felt a little unfair. Also, the next award which was given for Best Animated Short Film had two winners as well, but interestingly both of them were allowed to speak for close to two minutes, which felt rather odd. Why wasn't the Oscar management team consistent with the time allotted for the winner's speech? The award for the Best Make-up went to The Whale (2022) and even in this category more than one person was getting the trophy, but only one person was allowed to speak as the music started playing right after 36 seconds, cutting Judy Chin off; meanwhile both winners of Best Production Design were allowed to deliver their speech. This inconsistency was wrong and unfair in my honest opinion.

I was really happy with the decision of making Jimmy Kimmel the host of this year's Oscars, as he is truly an exceptional comedian and host. By the end of his initial monologue, he had delivered way more punches than what we experienced last year, only this time it left everyone in splits. I was looking forward to some more comedy from Jimmy Kimmel but unfortunately he was on stage for a very little time after his initial monologue; I guess they reduced the comedy on purpose this year to avoid a situation like the one we had last year. The segment where Jimmy Kimmel was throwing stupid questions towards the guests should have been longer as it was so much fun, but it just came to an end abruptly. I feel there are many things in an award show that can be cut short, but comedy is not one of them, because it keeps everyone in high spirits and excited.

The performance on the song 'Naatu Naatu' from RRR (Rise Roar Revolt) (2022) was truly one of the highlights of the show. The introduction by Deepika Padukone, the highly energetic dance and finally the Oscar for Best Original Song made this year's Oscars truly memorable for every Indian. Of course I can't say anything about every song that came out last year, but among the nominees, 'Naatu Naatu' was easily the most enjoyable number.

I was very happy to see Michelle Yeoh getting an Oscar; she is such an amazing talent and after so many years in the movie industry, her magic moment finally arrived at this year's Oscars. In my honest opinion, Michelle also gave the best speech of this year's Oscars; I feel it's so much better to say something that comes straight from your heart instead of thanking hundreds of people, because quite frankly that just comes across as a formality and not something that you really want to say.

This year's Oscars did not have a number of top actors and actresses like Tom Hanks, Meryl Streep, Kate Winslet, Tom Cruise, Emma Stone, Jennifer Lawrence, Matt Damon, Leonardo DiCaprio, Joaquin Phoenix, Russel Crowe, Woody Harrelson and Lupita Nyong'o among others; I almost thought there is some kind of boycott happening his year! It would be really sad if just the nominees attend the event. It's understandable if people skip other award functions, but considering the importance associated with the Oscars, I was really hoping to see a lot more stars in the auditorium.

There is a visible effort being made by the Oscars to focus on representation and inclusivity, but in my honest opinion that should not be a criteria for selecting the winners. The award for the best film should go to the best film, that's it, there should be no additional eligibility criteria for it to fulfill. No one should be overlooked just because of who they are, but the quality of their work should be the only reason for them to win an award.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bologna
yohnny18 March 2023
Nobody in their right mind is going to pay their hard earned cash to see everything. It appears to have been the year of the stir fry wok of fame.

The adjective that I would use regarding the telecast is forgettable.

It was a gigantic waste of time. Top Gun was obviously the best movie.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences derailed many years ago and has never recovered.

As an American, I love Hollywood. There was a report of light snow at the famous Hollywood sign recently. Me and a pal snooped around it in the 1970s. I took some pictures. Those letters are pretty damned large when seen up close in person. It was originally a real estate advertisement and has since become an iconic symbol of the entertainment industry.

More than likely, I will view the Oscars on TV every year no matter how crappy it is. It is a tradition like the Super Bowl.

"Talk amongst yourselves." ~ Linda Richman.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An... Actual good ceremony? What?
aheaney-8578720 March 2023
The 2023 Oscar ceremony was... actually good? What? Yeah, I'm shocked too. Especially after last year's disaster (even if the slap did not happen, the 2022 ceremony was awful!).

Jimmy Kimmel surprisingly did a half-decent job at hosting with minimal filler and a pretty solid opener, even if there still was some cringe jokes in the ceremony, especially the cringeworthy "Malala" moment, but there was a lot less bad jokes than usual.

Not a fan of them presenting a trailer for The Little Mermaid in the middle of the ceremony.

As for the winners, most of them were fantastic! I'm so happy with most of the wins. Especially all but one of Everything Everywhere All at Once's wins, Brendan Fraser (The Whale) winning Actor, Top Gun winning Sound, and Avatar: The Way of Water winning VFX, and Naatu Naatu (from RRR) winning Song. These wins were all phenomenal and monumental!

The wins I'm not happy with are Jamie Lee Curtis' winning Supporting Actress over Kerry Condon (The Banshees of Inisherin), Pinocchio winning Animated Feature over Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, Navalny winning Documentary Feature over... any of the other nominees, and All Quiet on the Western Front winning Production Deisgn and Score over Babylon.

The rest of the wins, including Black Panther: Wakanda Forever winning Costume Design, All Quiet on the Western Front winning Cinematography and International Feature, and The Whale winning Makeup/Hairstyling, were all good wins.

Most of the speeches were great too! Ke Huy Quan, Brendan Fraser, and Michelle Yeoh's speeches were especially fantastic and legitimately uplifting!

Honestly, a good ceremony. One of the very few I've seen. The only one I've seen on par with this is the 2020 ceremony where Parasite swept, and that one did have more cringe in the ceremony (especially the Cats reference... yuck).
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Everything is awful.
ThunderKing619 March 2023
Censorship continues I see.

Apparently I can't hate awful films and award shows. And this is a review site. Oh my gosh.

It's not like important people even read my reviews.

IMDb wants me to like awful films and lie and say I love them. Fact is I'm not a wooden puppet. I tell the truth.

Honestly the Oscars were hash. The Everything movie was a hash. I didn't like it.

Iunno how am I supposed to like these films is there a technic?

Anyways... Oscars were another dud. Boring award show for nothing. In a couple days we forget unless the TV brings it up.

The host is annoying. I'm tired of that guy. He isn't funny.

Most to all. Movies were awful. There was nothing here that caught my eye. Imagine falling asleep to one movie.

If you watch this you may fall asleep to 100s of bad movies.

How bout dat?!
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
THE OSCARS AND POPULISM
haldunarmagan16 March 2023
Eight years after #OscarsSoWhite movement the Academy took steps toward racial and cultural diversity in its structure. Today however we continue to debate on exclusion, which I think stems from selected overrate and selected overlook.

Award winners Ke Huy Quan and Michelle Yeoh are undeniably good actors but what about Cate Blanchett or Austin Butler and the movies like Tar and Elvis? The little multiverse mudder Everything Everywhere All At Once is a mediocre film lacking a heart to relate. Academy maybe demonstrated its stance for diversity but also overlooked the artistic merits as sole benchmark for awards.

My personal awards this year go to Tar, Elvis and Belgium film Close.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Travolta's heartfelt depiction of loss cannot make up for the poor winner(s) and an overall rather forgettable Academy Awards show
Horst_In_Translation15 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Yep it was Oscar night again and here I give you my thoughts on what happened last night in Los Angeles. Or at least what stayed in the mind for me. There will not be a great deal of structure, but oh well, let's take the brainstorming route. Here we go: Glenn Weiss was once again in charge of the direction and the show ran for slightly under three hours not counting commercial breaks, so the entire thing was probably closer to four hours than three hours in total. This is why watching it the next day is maybe not the worst choice, especially if it not shown live in one of your local theaters. This was the 95th edition now in 2023, so this means that the centennial anniversary is just half a decade away, but they surely have to step things up until then if they wanna get it right. You see from my rating that I was not particularly big on the outcome here, but at least it was a bit better than last year's show which was a total disaster. Not only because of Will Smith winning and punching, but also because of him. The 2023 event was fairly harmless in comparison, almost tame you could say. The host was Jimmy Kimmel again and with him probably most remember the mess with the Best Picture (non-)winner "La La Land" and the actual winner "Moonlight", but there was no controversy really this year. Some people did not like the comment he made about a deceased actor when it came to his omission in the in-memoriam segment and no matter if the man was guilty or now, it was a bit harsh I would say. The real problem, however, there was that it was not funny either. Then he could have gotten away with it better, but the "send this and that to some number" talk was just not entertaining.

Apart from that, Kimmel had fairly solid material this time and also his delivery was not totally bad. I honestly cannot stand him at all because of stuff he has done in the past, so I was not happy when I read a weak ago or so that he would be hosting, but I think it could have gone way worse in this department. I mean he is a full-on liberal like most people in Hollywood (except those in disguise) and he had to let it out once when mocking a Republican party member, but he even talked about Joe Biden and his son Hunter when he compared Rogen and Spielberg to them, so it was not direct criticism directed at the older Biden at least, actually it was none at all against PotUS, but it was also not super kind and normally we are really used to Kimmel and the gang just finding everything super awesome that the Democrats do and ignoring their crimes. So it is fairly telling that Biden is so disliked in America right now that even Hollywood slightly leashes out at him. I thought it was funny, also how Spielberg and Rogen reacted to it, but generally I still think politics should be excluded from shows like this. Luckily, there was no major focus on Russia and the Ukraine here or none even I think unless I missed it. No bizarre out-of-place interview with the Ukrainian leader here. Back to Kimmel, other moments I liked were when he joked twice about the running time, especially the recent change and how the Oscars get one additional hour this way and I also liked his brief talk reference to what happened least year that this is the point of the show where you hope for an escalation like this. Oh well. So yeah, he was alright, but honestly I also would not have minded the show going hostless again. We will see what they do next year. Not every line from him was a winner though. I mean the female-empowering shot at James Cameron I didn't like too much.

But he was bearable, probably also because he did not have really a gigantic amount of screen time. It was just right number-wise. He also brought a donkey once, was it really the one from "The Banshees of Inisherin"? I am not too sure. But donkeys are the best, so I appreciate the inclusion. If it had to get on a plane, then I hope it coped well with the situation. Otherwise, these few seconds on the big stage would not have been worth it no matter how many millions were watching. Now away from Kimmel: I already mentioned the in-memoriam segment and seeing John Travolta tear up there in the light of his former co-star's recent death was heartbreaking and touching. Surely the best moment of the show to me. It felt authentic. Or if it wasn't, then at least Travolta is still a brilliant actor. In general, I think it is a good idea to bring somebody there who has a connection with one of the deceased. Do it in 2024 again! With Lenny Kravitz's song afterwards I am not so sure actually if I liked it. Have to let it settle a bit. Could have been better, could have been worse. I think it was a bit of a change this year that they did not end the segment with a really big name as they usually do unless I missed it. It is okay. The order should not imply anyway that one is better or more memorable than others. Also difficult for me to pick one who I will miss more than others here. Burt Bacharach would definitely be a contender though. Also fairly heartbreaking that one of the key players behind the new "All Quiet on the Western Front" died too at a not old age at all, so she did not live to see the success anymore. I would have liked it if one of the winners from this film would have paid tribute to her, but oh well. Maybe it would have happened if the film had won Best Picture and you can say that with how the BAFTAs, but also the Oscar night went, that AQotWF was in second place.

But the big winner this Oscar ceremony was "Everything Everywhere All at Once" and this way the Academy keeps honoring movies with an Asian background. We all still remember "Parasite". I do like Asian films, but if I am completely honest, I am not big on either of the two and EEAaO winning so big this night was the worst aspect from the entire show for me. This also has nothing to do with me being German and frustrated that "our" film did not win as I am really not a huge fan of this one either. There are others I would have preferred, but I guess that with Jamie Lee Curtis' win early on we already had a safe indicator who would be winning Best Picture. The race there was probably not as open as it was in other years. JLC's win was for me personally maybe the worst of the night. I do not like her one but. She does not feel authentic to me and also I don't see a lot of range with her, so no surprise that she wins an Oscar for such a forgettable effort. Condon would have been a great winner, Bassett would have been tolerable as well. On the men's side, in terms of supporting, the win went to the same movie and this was much safer there. Quan only lost the BAFTA and otherwise dominated the awards season. His speech did not impress me either, especially when he starts talking about his immigrant past, but oh well, if there is anybody who deserves it from the film, then it was him. The two directors were just the epitome of embarrassing to me. The punk jacket one was wearing oh well. I mean I don't care about clothes or fashion at all, but this was just a mess, also the cool aggressive gesture he made towards the camera before one commercial break before turning all into smiles. Very bizarre all along. Before I move on to other films, let me say that JLC referencing her Oscar-nominated parents on stage was also not exactly a glorious moment. Oh yeah, Yeoh won of course too unfortunately. Well, I will always remember her for being a Bond girl. I don't think she did anything really special in this EEAaO film here and I would have preferred Blanchett to win. I read somebody say Yeoh was on autopilot for most of the film and I would agree.

Now a few words on the other categories: Short film winners were fine and even if I was not cheering for the Irish film there, it was still nice to see one win at least after it wasn't meant to be for Banshees and the one in the foreign language category. The little birthday song from the crowd was cool too. By the way, Banderas and Hayek presented the aforementioned category this year and I liked them both, especially Banderas, but it was a bit forgettable. The harmless nominee winning animation short was nice too, even if they had to get in a joke on one of the other nominees. Never in doubt. The screenplay wins I am not a fan of at all. Maybe worst of the decade for me. The Best Picture winner beating EEAaO was bad enough already and sadly also "Women Talking" won and I was not really big on this film either. Polley has a unique career though, sadly not a good acceptance speech from her. Kazuo Ishiguro winning would have been amazing, but it wasn't mean to be. Nighy I also would have preferred to win over Fraser, but I can live with Fraser. With the exception of Mescal, all Best Actor nominees were pretty cool. Fraser's triumph was in a way indicated also early on already as his movie beat "Elvis" in a bit of a surprising fashion for make-up and also Farrell, who only had small chances anyway, had to bury his dream when Banshees lost Screenplay, if not before that already. But he got the nomination at least finally, whoch is cool and deserving too. Just like Gleeson for whom I am even happier. In general, there was not a lot of love for "Elvis" from the Academy. It was a favorite, even if not an overwhelming one, in two categories and lost them both. "Babylon" did also worse than expected, not just financially how Kimmel told us.. Hurwitz had to feel the reality there, while I felt how odd it was to see a German composer win an Oscar while being nominated against John Williams. But yeah, like Kimmel said, William's win record is really not too great. He won one nomination out of ten in a category of five nominees. Animated feature went to Pinocchio and del Toro in perhaps the safest win of the night. Or maybe that was Avatar. The end of the review is near. I could go on and on, but let me finish it by saying that I am glad Lady Gaga didn't win this time again. I give the 2023 Oscars a thumbs-down.
5 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed