"Marple" A Caribbean Mystery (TV Episode 2013) Poster

(TV Series)

(2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Very well done, a solid enough adaptation and stands very well on its own
TheLittleSongbird18 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A Caribbean Mystery isn't among Agatha "The Queen of Crime" Christie's finest works, but even when Christie wasn't at her absolute best she was still pleasurable to read. Of the three adaptations of A Caribbean Mystery(very like with The Mirror Crack'd), I deem this one the best one, Joan Hickson's was very good if sometimes a little dull and I didn't care hugely for Helen Hayes' version. And it is for me one of the better adaptations with Julia McKenzie as Miss Marple(though The Blue Geranium, Pocket Full of Rye and The Mirror Crack'd are on top, with Why Didn't They Ask Evans the worst). It could have been improved certainly, the Ian Fleming part was fun in a way but felt out-of-place, Robert Webb does a decent enough job in his role but doesn't look as comfortable in a serious role than with the comedy that he is very gifted at, the voodoo sometimes got excessive and there are characters(Hillingdon and Jackson especially) that are given very little to do.

There are things though that did come across as an improvement over the book. Lucky is much more interesting, and the method in how she died was less risky(fellow friends of mine who also love Agatha Christie argued that the way the murder was carried out in the book was too much of a risk and I actually agree). Molly is also more sympathetic, and the whole Victoria subplot actually helped make that come across as believable. Palgrave addressing everybody in telling his story was also a change that came off remarkably well, it did make it easier for the murderer to overhear what he's saying. As an adaptation, the adaptation is solidly done and generally faithful in spirit. There are changes of course but this is one such occasion where the changes actually made the storytelling better than distracting from it, in recent memory another adaptation that comes to mind in this respect was the Poirot adaptation of Elephants Can Remember. Where the adaptation succeeds even more is how well it works on its own.

It is very well made, the tropical scenery is just beautiful and the most colourful easily of the three adaptations, and the photography adds to that quality. The music is rich and sensitively orchestrated, nothing overbearing or annoying. The dialogue is thoughtfully written and always engaging, I didn't feel that it was underdeveloped or too much talk. It feels like Christie's writing too which is another plus. The story is gripping and suspenseful, of this, Hickson's and Hayes' I found this one to be the best paced. The acting is excellent, Julia McKenzie is terrific as ever, less shrewish but charming and intelligent. In support, Hermione Norris' wonderfully cold Evelyn, Charity Wakefield's sympathetic Molly and Anthony Sher's touchingly played Rafiel(loved the final scene) stood out the most. Oliver Ford Davies is good in his appearance, his death scene was very cleverly staged and shot, and while the Dysons were slightly overplayed it didn't detract much at all.

Overall, very well done on its own and solidly adapted, one of McKenzie's better outings. 7.5/10 Bethany Cox
31 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
very good adaptation
blanche-223 September 2014
I really enjoyed this version of "A Caribbean Mystery," with Julia McKenzie as Miss Marple. I know I saw the Helen Hayes version, but I don't remember if I saw the Joan HIckson one.

It's a neat story. Miss Marple is visiting St. Honore, a tropical island, to recover from some health problems. She stays at a resort, the Golden Palms, owned by a married couple, Tim and Molly Kendall.

The place is heavily booked, with the Hillingdons and their American friends, the Dysons, a businessman, Jason Rafiel, his assistants, and the gossipy Major Palgrave.

Major Palgrave loves a good scandal, and one night goes into one of his stories. He actually has a photo of a serial killer, he says, and pulls it out. Suddenly, he decides not to show it. The next day, he's dead, supposedly of a heart attack. Too coincidental for Miss Marple, who wants to see that photo, which has disappeared. Before she can solve the case, there are other murders, mistaken identity, and secrets uncovered.

Very good story and well done, with beautiful scenery and production values. Julia McKenzie is a good Miss Marple and close to what I pictured while reading the books: charming, lively, with a keen mind and good powers of observation, based on watching the behavior of people in St. Mary Mead.

There was probably more emphasis on voodoo here than in other adaptations. My favorite here was the gruff Rafiel (Antony Sher) who becomes a real admirer of Miss Marple's intelligence. They have a very genuine and nice relationship. The ending is lovely.

Very good.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Interesting adaptation of Christies "Caribbean Mystery"
carmenjulianna31 May 2020
Julia McKenzies' finest performance as the ever loving Miss Marple.! Good show...! I really appreciated the lovely scenery and the the cast were reasonably good too. An enjoyable Sunday Night tv...😊
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Visually dazzling production
gridoon202416 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is the third filmed version of Agatha Christie's "A Caribbean Mystery"; I don't much recall the Joan Hickson version, but compared to the enjoyable 1983 version with Helen Hayes as Miss Marple, this new effort is significantly superior in one category only: the photography, which vibrantly captures the beauty of the locations. The film does have a Caribbean flavor, although it was shot in South Africa, and the 1950's-style swimsuits and cars are a sight for sore eyes. Knowing who the killer is before watching, I am not exactly qualified to say how hard or easy it will be for someone to guess his or her identity; I will say, however, that if you tend to suspect the character who is, suspiciously enough, never even considered under suspicion, you'll be on the right track! Julia McKenzie continues to excel as Miss Marple (she does A LOT of knitting in this one), while my favorite supporting performance has to be Hermione Norris as Evelyn; she just exudes the strength of her character. *** out of 4.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Bright and vibrant on the surface but underneath it's dark
Sleepin_Dragon7 October 2015
I have a huge fondness for the Joan Hickson version and a surprisingly soft spot for the one with Helen Hayes, this one I thought really came up to the mark, they managed to reinvent it but maintain the essence of it.

It starts off brilliantly, it's visually stunning, Andre Toussaint's 'Calypso Island' sets the tone. It's a total contrast to other episodes in the series, it's very bright and colourful, but this story needed to be. The location is utterly stunning, surprisingly it was South Africa. The costumes are a visual feast, the designers were bang on the money.

Talk of voodoo in a Marple, shouldn't work, but it does, it helps add a smokescreen to the story. It certainly differentiates it from previous versions.

I disagree with those that think the novel was one of her weakest, it's one I really like, it's a perfect holiday read. This production manages to breath life into some of the characters that in the book are a little flat, Lucky seems way more interesting, or possibly it's just the way Myanna Buring played her (brilliantly.)

The acting as always if first rate, I think Julia is the standout once again, her performance seems effortless. Hermione Norris is especially good as Evelyn, she made her as cold as ice, she doesn't overplay it. Charity Wakefield gives us a very fragile and timid Molly, very much in character to the book. Anthony Sher is excellent as Rafiel. I suppose my only slight bugbear would have been Robert Webb's Tim Kendall, he was fair, but I feel he could have been better cast

The Ian Fleming bit apart it's brilliant 9/10
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enjoyably lively
bob the moo31 July 2013
It wasn't too long ago that I watched the Joan Hickson version of this same tale and, while I enjoyed the color of it, I did feel that that version dawdled a bit too much and lacked forward motion, lingering in the characters and losing momentum the more it went on. So with the new ITV version I was pleased to find that the thing I usually dislike about them actually worked in its favor – the color, the liveliness and the pace. The mystery kicks in very quickly indeed and apart from a few sidesteps it more or less keeps things coming so that I felt engaged with the story. As is normal for me, I wasn't right there with the characters when the resolution was revealed, but I did feel like I was at least going with it.

The one exception is an odd moment where James Bond and Ian Fleming make it into the story; it is amusing perhaps but it served no purpose other than, if you're cynical, getting the writer a trip to the location for the sake of a few minutes of screen time. Higson probably deserved it though as he has done a good job as writer, making the story flow and having the material match the heat and color of the setting. The cast mostly get this too. McKenzie is still not really someone I like as Marple, but she is good here and in particular works very well with Antony Sher. The rest of the cast isn't quite that famous but has good turns from Webb, Brown, Wakefield and others.

Overall an enjoyable and lively piece of Sunday night mystery; it has color and energy and comes together pretty well.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Miss Marple, voodoo, Ian Fleming, James Bond and murder
grantss23 July 2016
Miss Marple is on holiday in the Caribbean, at the Golden Palms resort in St Honore. Seated beside her at a dinner, Major Palgrave seems to recognise in the crowd a murderer from a photograph he has. When Miss Marple quizzes him on is comments he refuses to be drawn on the subject and head back to his room. He is found the next day, dead, apparently from a heart attack. Due to the reaction he had the previous night, Miss Marple suspects it was murder.

Reasonably intriguing mystery, with a great setting. The Caribbean vibe and the underlying current of voodoo and general sinister air help the intrigue. Not a particularly complex mystery ultimately, but it will do.

The non-mystery side of the Miss Marple series tends to be pretty dull and uneventful, due to the blandness of Miss Marple's character and the fact that she has no regular secondary characters around her (unlike Poirot with Hastings, Japp and Lemon). However, here we have a reasonably interesting sub-plot involving Ian Fleming, the author, and how he struck upon the name of James Bond for the hero of his books. Unfortunately this sub-plot is quite brief, but it is reasonably entertaining.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A good Marple with zombies!
igorlongo20 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A really excellent episode opens this new Mackenzie season! The tropical atmosphere ,with hurricanes,voodoo and a very stuffy jungle is used perfectly for the creation of a compelling story,very faithful and with some clever new tricks added to the original. I liked particularly the accident about the murdered maid and her own zombie,used by Higson in a very clever way for giving an alibi to the murderer. I think it's the first time that zombies are used in a whodunit as a part of the murdering plot,and they have done it in a very subtle way,simple and particular in its own way. The directing is wonderful,the research of the murdered maid,the death of poor major Palgrave,the final discovery of the guilty party are particularly effective,as Bethany Cox has pointed out. Personally,I liked very much Webb as a caring husband,overwhelmed by his wife's madness. Charles Mesure was an excellent Dyson(I would have preferred it to Barnes-Worrell for Etienne De Sousa ,in Dead Man's Folly),and I liked too the smitten canon played by Rigby with a surprising romantic part at the very happy end. Of course Sher is the best of the lot, gruff,amusing and endearing,and he has a wonderful chemistry with Great Julia (the only reproach I could made to the Hickson version was the absolute lack of chemistry among Great Joan and Great Pleasence,two wonderful actors but in some way having in the movie no mutual empathy at all,I don't know why!) .Ford Davies is a sympathetic major and Norris a wife so strong,determined and highly dramatic that in some way wipes away completely her husband,poor Alastair Mackenzie,a good actor but in this case singularly bland and opaque. Higson is really a good new entry for the series. I hope he will pens other scripts with the same cleverness. Marple must not let us orphans too after Poirot's untimely death. We can't lose them both,someone must remain alive for carrying the holy torch of Agatha on ITV channel! New Marple seasons,please,it's mandatory! We want to see Julia in the Idol House of Astarte and in the Crooked House,under the Postern of Fate ,chasing N or M in a flashback prequel and tasting a swig of Sparkling Cyanide!
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ever wondered where James Bond got his name from?
Coventry28 July 2021
Most people read a good book when they are on holiday, preferably a tense thriller or a captivating murder whodunit. Not Miss Marple, though. She experiences a live murder whodunit, and solves it while at it! "A Caribbean Mystery" is one of the best Miss Marple stories, and one of the best entries in the ITV-series since actress Julia McKenzie took over the titular lead role. It's somewhat odd to see Miss Marple in an exotic setting, since she's so irreversibly linked to British small-town country life, but it provided Agatha Christie with the opportunity to insert a couple of unusual but fascinating themes, like voodoo. Our brilliant writer was a fervent traveler, and spent quite some time in places like Hawaii and Haiti, where she undoubtedly found lots of inspiration for this story and others.

Apart from the sunny beach setting and the occasional margherita-cocktail, all the traditional ingredients are well-represented. There's a holiday resort full of potential suspects, guests as well as servants, clever murders disguised as natural deaths, incompetent police officers, more murders, and a denouement so ingenious that only Miss Marple can explain it in a logical fashion. Great fun.

The most remarkable moment in the film is actually irrelevant to the plot! During an evening lecture, Miss Marple meets a writer who presents himself as Ian Fleming and he tells her he has trouble finding a suitable name for the protagonist of his book. Then the lecturer comes on stage and opens with: "My name is Bond... James Bond". Well, what do you know! James Bond is an ornithologist!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Caribbean mystery till the last scene..
mittoo10 August 2020
In the time of "CORONAVIRUS WORLD WAR - 3" in 2020 when your own life is at the hands of a invisible pandemic it's cinema that breaks all barriers and provides solace and entertainment in the confines of the house,I haven't read this book but have seen all of Agatha Christie's "Movies" based on her bestsellers. Have also seen the play "THE MOUSETRAP" at the St Martins theatre in London.Excellent suspense with subtle murders is the secret that keeps the viewer totally engrossed in the movie.The signature played down style of Miss Marpyle ,the harmless looking old lady is what also adds spice to this who-dun-it which has its villain exposed in the end, a totally non-suspect among the group of suspects.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting but not remarkable
hiskih21 December 2014
Starting from a minor but irritating point: whoever thought it a good joke to include Ian Fleming and James Bond did not think about the chronology. The first Bond book was published in 1953, while this story is set in the post-colonial 1960s - the black police inspector tells Marple and Rafiel that the British are not in charge here any longer.

Otherwise, a fairly good job. I knew it was filmed in South Africa but if I hadn't known I would have bought it as a Caribbean island. I haven't been to either place, though. I also haven't read the novel. I have seen the 1983 version with Helen Hayes many years ago, but don't remember a single thing about it.

IMO Antony Sher gave the best performance as the wheelchair-bound millionaire. MyAnna Buring as Lucky is another cast member I will remember, something striking about her. The plot I already forgot, as with most Christie adaptations. The photography could have been more inspired, now it looked a bit muddy most of the time.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Caribbean Mystery
coltras3524 July 2023
Sent on a recuperative holiday to Barbados, Miss Marple finds the Golden Palm Hotel - a tropical paradise of blue sea, white sand and lush vegetation - a rather dull place where nothing seems to occur. But then murder strikes ... an old Major dies from high blood pressure, so it seems, but the sleuthing spinster thinks otherwise having her interest aroused by an old soldier's yarn about a strange coincidence. Infuriatingly, just as he was about to show her an astonishing photograph, the Major's attention wandered. He never did finish the story...

I liked the Helen Hayes' A Caribbean Mystery, but this 2013 version is more closer to the book - which happens to be one of my favourite Miss Marple novels - yet inventive with some emphasis on voodoo and madness. A solid effort with a good cast of characters, a trail of misdirection and Julie MacKenzie doing really well as Miss Marple.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Hello my name is Bond, James Bond"
ygwerin123 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Miss Marple is transplanted well beyond her safety zone, of the tranquil rural backwaters in the Shires of St. Mary Mead.

Not only that she is bereft of any of her normal travelling companions, and she is forced to have to do all of the leg work herself.

Believe it or not Miss Marple ends up at a lecture with non other than Ian Fleming, who actually tells her that he can't think of a name for his hero. Then a speaker announced himself as James Bond, and said "Hello my name is Bond James Bond.

This story relies on a sort of staple western notions, of the Caribbean that of Voodoo. With the twist of someone who is supposed to be a priest Canon Prescott, apparently resorting to dabbling in the practice himself.

This is the first Miss Marple I have seen with Julia Mackenzie, as the eponymous female sleuth.

I will need to view more episodes of her interpretations before I can have, any real chance to form a proper appraisal of her performance in the role.

Let alone to give me any chance, of comparing her depiction with any other actress.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shame, shame, shame on ITV.
brandisimpsonmiller27 March 2021
I am not sure how this got past you, but within the first six minutes of this episode, you may have noticed the atrocious representation of people of African descent undulating around a fire, making ululations, while savagely tying up a damsel in a plantain palm bikini. This is an intersectional nightmare of female and African jungle tropes. Shame on you! No plot of any story published in 1964 should retain these unsavory elements in 2021.

Shame, shame on ITV for distributing this sort of rubbish.
2 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not as good as the book
impressivesgirl-378574 April 2021
Julia McKenzie is the perfect actress for miss Marple - she is exactly what I have imagined! However, the movie is poorly made and a lot of things are not explained good enough as in the book, hence my rating.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Okay
pwme2 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Through no fault of the actors, this was yet again a poor remake of the excellent original starring Joan Hickson, who played Miss Marple as written by Dame Christie.

Julia McKenzie is a fine actress and certainly more believable than the middling actress who played her so poorly and made a spoof of her.

The writing is very much at fault in these remakes. It's trying TOO HARD to be clever and different at the expense of an already good story line. I found myself waiting for it to be done with so I could turn it off instead of enjoying it. Shame on the network for not truly appreciating Agatha Christie's simple genius of Miss Marple.

I'm sticking with the original series. Joan Hickson was the only TRUE Miss Marple thus far that I've seen.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Different then the one with Joan Hickson
ctyankee126 June 2013
This movie was different than the one with Joan Hickson.

Julia McKenzie is good in this. The similarities were that every couple seemed to be cheating on their mates. It was hard to figure out who was doing the killing and why. The movie was a good mystery with a lot of twist and turns.

The story concentrated on voodoo and it's affects on believers. I do not recall that in the one with Joan Hickson. It had crazy dancing, masks for voodoo rituals and cheesy voodoo costumes. Baloney.

I did not the like the clothes on the women. Some of the bathing suits revealed to much of the female breast. I was enjoying the movie until about 20 minutes toward the end. One of the men in this drama who was a alcoholic and womanizer used the swearing for "god damn" he said it twice. The first part "god" was not very clear but I do believe that is what he said. I find this offensive toward a loving God.

It seems producers do this and put it at the end of the movies like "The Cheap Detective" The same thing happened. That movie was funny and then at the end it swore the same phrase. Just a bunch of creeps making movies and figure if they put this in the beginning a person just won't watch it. They are right.
2 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed