Afternoon Delight (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
78 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The film is quite good. Hahn is quite great.
zetes27 July 2014
A charming, touching indie dramedy. I watched it mainly because I really like comedian Kathryn Hahn. I've loved her presence as a character actress since she popped up in Step Brothers a few years back, and she's stolen scenes in movies such as Wanderlust and TV shows such as Parks & Recreation since then. I'd heard it was a bad film, but I thought it was pretty good. Hahn stars as a wife and mother. Her marriage (to Josh Radnor) isn't bad, necessarily, but their sex life has kind of died. One night, on a whim, she decides to have a couples date with her best friend at a strip club (her friend swears that it gets her husband's motor running). There she meets a young stripper played by Juno Temple, and she becomes a little obsessed with the girl afterward. Not sexually, exactly, though there may be an element of that. It's kind of a motherly attention, mixed with a deep curiosity regarding the girl's highly sexual lifestyle. When she finds the girl outside of work, she's basically homeless, so Hahn takes her home, hoping to maybe glean some of her secrets. There isn't much of a plot. It's mostly just a film about people. It really gives Hahn, who is in general a supporting player, a chance to shine, and, man, does she ever. This is a fantastic performance. Temple is quite good, too. The men in the picture are a little underdeveloped. If Radnor had been more of a character, the film might have been great. As it is, it's pretty good.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The characters aren't always supposed to be likable
StevePulaski19 February 2014
If I had a dollar for every time an independent film opened with a man or woman looking lost, listless, and disheveled, I think I'd have about a day's pay. This time, however, the disheveled soul is Rachel (Kathryn Hahn), a stay-at-home mother who is falling into a midlife crisis a bit too early it would appear. Her marriage with her husband Jeff (Josh Radnor) has gone sexless, her child's school events fail to drum up anything besides faux-excitement, and her purpose in life seems to be nothing of any particular significance. Out of the blue, and because of a recommendation from a close friend, she plans a date- night with her husband at a local area strip club to hopefully spice up their sexlife in the bedroom.

Instead of inspiring sexual energy, Rachel finds herself inspired by McKenna (Juno Temple), a beautiful blonde stripper who claims she's nineteen and has found the ins and outs of the exotic dancing world at a young age. Rachel, taken by McKenna's positivity given her situation, which can often be viewed as degrading, and her mature behavior, hires her as a live-in nanny, however, effectively creating tension between Jeff and her family.

Hahn is terrific here as a woman who is in a part of her life that is not only difficult to go through but difficult to portray accurately. The character of Rachel doesn't seem to know what she wants, and because of that, Hahn already has the difficultly of trying to make a character like that not only sympathetic but accessible to the audience. For what she does, Hahn succeeds almost through-and- through, portraying a character who isn't always likable, isn't always friendly, but is consistently human and easy to identify with in the regard that she makes mistakes, sometimes socially-lethal ones, like we all do, and for that we can admire her in her relatability.

While Hahn takes centerstage here, Juno Temple as an actress here and in other films. Temple has frequently kept herself in the role of a working class woman who is trying to do right but finds ways to get herself in situations that pull her in different directions. Her previous films - like Dirty Girl, which beautifully demonstrated her potential as a lead, Killer Joe, and Little Birds - all had those qualities in some particular way, whereas here, she finds ways to be more comfortable with her life choices and not filled with regret or uncertainty. This subtle difference already makes Temple's performance a bit more different than her previous, but the typical lower-income status- quo her character belongs to still echoes the past quite loudly.

It is a shame, however, that with Hahn and Temple assuming the frontlines of the show here that Josh Radnor, a very talented writer/director/actor, is kind of neglected in terms of character and focus here. His only shining-moment is a predictable outburst that occurs late in the film and even that would've worked better if he had more character to him than the neglected husband role who, oh yeah, has feelings.

Furthermore, it's also sad that first time writer/director Jill Soloway decides to have the third act conflict revolve around Rachel in a drunken-haze, spewing "honesty" at all her girlfriends. Such cartoonishness doesn't belong in this picture, and unlike in a film like August: Osage County with wit and unpredictability, Afternoon Delight explores them with triviality and constant predictability.

With that, Afternoon Delight is kind of a jumble, but the pros outweigh the cons just enough that where a mild but present recommendation can be awarded. Not only do Hahn and Temple demonstrate great leading performances, but Soloway bravely shows her captivation with human interest stories. She'd likely be great participating in the mumblecore "movement," something that needs new people to handle some of the attributes of the long-running subgenre.

Starring: Kathryn Hahn, Juno Temple, and Josh Radnor. Directed by: Jill Soloway.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What did we learn?
jfgibson7318 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
An independent movie about a California housewife who befriends a prostitute. Rachel is clearly a privileged woman who is bored, depressed, or both. She meets a sex worker named McKenna and thinks she can help her, inviting her to stay in her home. Following her curiosity about McKenna's life, Rachel goes with her to a session and is disturbed by seeing the reality of prostitution. She hurts McKenna by treating her like a prostitute for the first time, not allowing her to babysit her and her friends' children. McKenna acts out by coming on to the husbands while the wives are out separately, and sleeps with at least one of them. Somehow this turns everyone else's life upside down, but Rachel seems somehow revitalized. I am not sure if I understood everything that was going on, or what the movie might have been saying about any particular character, but it was well acted and filmed. I'll give it 6/10.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth a look
lazarillo10 February 2014
This is an example of film I would never claim is great, but is certainly off the usual beaten (to death) path and therefore at is interesting at least.

The story is about a self-absorbed yuppie mother (Katherine Hahn) who tries to spice up her marriage by going to a strip club and then bringing home a lap dancer (Juno Temple) to be her nanny. I can imagine two movies immediately: it could be some late-night cable sexploitation thing where a hot woman discovers her inner stripper and lives happily (and sexily) ever after, OR it could be some half-assed feminist diatribe where two women from different social classes learn to relate to each other as they come to terms with the commodification of women by the patriarchy, yada, yada. Fortunately, this movie is neither. Instead it's kind of satirical black comedy about a not particularly sympathetic female character who in quest of some kind of sexual liberation makes a complete mess of her life, her new "friend's" life, and generally the lives of everyone around her.

It's also nice to find a movie about strippers that strikes a balance between pure exploitation and the kind "female empowerment" claptrap where Hollywood actresses take on "brave" role as strippers and sex workers, but strictly observe their iron-clad "no-nudity clauses" because that would somehow be giving in to "sexism". Both actresses bravely shed both their clothes and their need to ALWAYS maintain audience sympathy. Juno Temple's character is a proud "sex worker" who does what she does, not because she is either "exploited" or "empowered", but simply because it is a valid career choice. She's totally amoral--kind of like a sexy shark. Hahn's character is a self-loathing Jewish feminist who thinks she has less "hang-ups" than everyone around her when she probably has a lot more.

Hahn at times risks being completely unsympathetic, which may explain a lot of the negative reaction to this movie. It's really hard to dislike Juno Temple, but I think the fact that she's such a desirable little cutie who takes her clothes off in every other role sometimes overshadows what a talented actress she is. Yeah, she gets all the "nudie" roles her prudish American peers won't touch, but if you compare this to "Magic, Magic" to "Cracks" to the British "St. Trinian's" comedies she first appeared in, it's evident she has a lot more range and talent than she's given credit for. This movie is not a comedy masterpiece by any means, but it is certainly worth a look.
46 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Um, it might not be a good idea to bring a sexy siren into your home to live
Wuchakk2 March 2018
RELEASED IN 2013 and written & directed by Jill Soloway, "Afternoon Delight" chronicles events when a bored stay-at-home mom in Los Angeles (Kathryn Hahn) becomes intrigued by a beautiful 'sex worker' (Juno Temple) at a strip club. Surprisingly, she brings her home to live in the extra room and even enlists her as a nanny, which has repercussions. Josh Radnor plays the husband and Jane Lynch the wife's therapist.

This contains some hard R-rated sex-oriented scenes so I encourage you to pass if you find that unsavory. To be honest, I was only interested in "Afternoon Delight" because of the winsome, stunning Juno. This isn't a quirky comedy, but rather a serious drama with amusing touches. The occasional crudeness and overt raciness tempted me to tune out a few times, but I kept watching in the hope that the film had something good to get across; thankfully, it did (see below for details).

THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hours & 38 minutes and was shot in Los Angeles.

GRADE: B-

EXPLANATION (***SPOILER ALERT*** Don't read further if you haven't seen the film):

McKenna (Juno) is a siren, the daughter of a witch. She openly suggests that she's a witch as well. Using her charms, she puts a 'spell' on Rachel (Hahn) at the strip club and so the mesmerized Rachel eventually tracks her down and brings her home. While Rachel sincerely intends on being a positive influence on McKenna and help her get out of the dubious sex business, McKenna intends on luring Rachel into her sleazy lifestyle. McKenna explains to Rachel why she has no qualms about what she does and even justifies it. Rachel is intrigued until she sees McKenna's sordid work up close and rejects it because she discerns that McKenna is unrepentant about her vocation.

Rachel immediately puts the kibosh on McKenna babysitting her friends' girls because she's clearly a bad role model, but the mother has yet to figure out a way to get the prostitute out of the house without making too many waves. That's when the wives go out on the town while the husbands stay home to party with tantalizing McKenna lurking nearby. Needless to say, it's a recipe for disaster and provides a way for McKenna to stick it to Rachel and her 'judgmental' friends.

The negative fallout provokes Jeff (Radnor) to confront Rachel on how she could be so stupid to bring an unabashed whore into their abode. He didn't comprehend Rachel's reasoning: Did she want him to sleep with McKenna? Did SHE want to sleep with her? Jeff failed to grasp that Rachel was under McKenna's "spell" and inadvertently doing her bidding.

Fortunately, Rachel, realizes her error ("waking up" from McKenna's enchantment) and seeks reconciliation with her husband, now fully appreciating her family.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Thought provoking.
bigdaddyactual-453-1697998 February 2014
Stay at home mum and bored housewife Rachel (Kahryn Hayn) tired of kindergarten mom meet ups and help-the-homeless functions receives a boost to her non-existent sex drive when she's jokingly given a lap dance at a strip club courtesy of her workaholic husband Jeff (Josh Radnor). Curious to unravel more of her newly discovered eroticism she secretly revisits the strip bar only to "accidentally" bump into the young woman named Whitney (Juno Temple) who gave her the lap dance and they begin chatting. Many coffees later Rachel slowly becomes aware of Whitney's empowering hold of her own femininity and they soon become friends and, coupled with a cry for help with her own life, Rachel sees an opportunity to help Whitney break free of her inappropriate lifestyle by inviting her into her home and offering Whitney a small position as a live in nanny. When Whitney's OTHER job as a classy escort comes to light things begin to effect Rachel's moral compass and the already precarious family relationship.

Written and directed by Jill Soloway Afternoon Delight is essentially centered on one woman who is desperate for release emotionally, sexually and physically. Working on many levels, this film continually addresses the deep issues most married couples experience and has the ability to keep the mood upbeat and funny. While actually a reasonably good flick the difficulty in portraying the emotional elements onto screen made it hard to become engrossing. Good performances all round.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
So what WAS the point of the story??
mcginnis13 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Okay. A young, bored housewife yearns to reconnect sexually with her often distracted husband. Whatever...On the suggestion of her friend she goes to a strip club and for SOME reason...both of the ladies get lap dances from strippers....Hmmm...while the men just enjoy the view from their seats. Sorry, but I'm not sure how getting a lap dance from a woman is supposed to heat things up with your hubby...but...OK..

She leaves oddly shaken and instead of getting jiggy with her hubby, she heaves into the toilet...OK....??? Left with a curiosity to learn how to shake her money maker, she sneaks on back to "get a coffee" near the strip club only to see McKenna waiting outside...later she is there when McKenna loses her place to live and needs a place to stay.

So, Rachel opens her home to McKenna...without telling her husband...OK..nice move..From here we see McKenna as a thoughtful and caring young woman. She massages Rachel's feet and begins to care for her son. But Rachel can't leave well enough alone..she wants to see McKenna in action. Unfortunately, upon see McKenna do the nasty, she is repulsed and from here on out she rejects McKenna. Her fantasy of a microwave redemption has been shot to hell.

Unfortunately, she has already asked McKenna to take care of some young girls while the ladies have their special night. We see McKenna sweetly preparing kits of make up and nail polish for the girls to have a princess night and seems genuinely excited...Only one problem...Rachel can't allow a "whore" to babysit these sweet young girls...so she does the brave and honorable thing...she asks her husband to go downstairs and tell her!!!! LAME!! Am I supposed to care about the sex life of a woman who doesn't even have the dignity to clean up her own mess.

So McKenna, feeling the sting of rejection, decides to fulfill Rachel's estimation of her and she whores it up with the boys downstairs. Sad and pointless scene. Whatever...in the end..McKenna goes back to wherever rejected strippers go Rachel and her husband rediscover their passion between the sheets..WHAT????

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME....What was the point???
58 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated, well-made drama
thoughtcat-126 August 2022
I found this title on a streaming service and, don't judge me, but I have to admit I was attracted initially by the title and low IMDb rating which promised something a bit cheap and steamy. When I saw however that it starred Katherine Hahn and was written and directed by Jill Soloway I realised it must actually be a pretty good film, and any steam would be a bonus. Soloway was one of the people behind the legendary Six Feet Under as well as Transparent (which incidentally I found patchier but still largely excellent) and this film won't disappoint viewers who loved the realistic dialogue and natural acting of those series. Familiar Soloway territory is explored, namely middle-class people wrangling with issues of sexuality, identity and class in Los Angeles. Hahn plays (superbly, with highly-strung aplomb) Rachel, a married woman having a mid-life crisis. Her nerdy husband buys her a lap dance at a club, which seems to ignite something in her, and later, while buying coffee downtown, she runs into the dancer, McKenna, played by a young and sexy Juno Temple. Rachel befriends McKenna, perhaps thinking some of her laid-back sexiness will rub off on her, and when McKenna gets thrown out of her home, Rachel invites her to stay temporarily in the family home. It turns out McKenna isn't exactly just a dancer and Rachel decides to spice up her non-existent sex life by accompanying her on a home visit to one of McKenna's regular clients. At this point however Rachel's true character comes to the fore as she decides she no longer wants anything to do with McKenna, who in turn also reverts to type during a boys' evening with Rachel's husband and his pals. Ultimately Rachel turns out to be a pretty awful, spoilt middle-class person who doesn't know what she wants and doesn't have a great deal of respect for the working class, so that by the end I was annoyed, not by the film but by her character (though clearly that was the intention). The film is definitely worth more than its current 5.2 IMDb rating (I've seen far more pretentious and tedious films get inexplicably higher scores on here) and also definitely worth investigating - and there is indeed some steam too, if that's what you're looking for.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Confusing objective of lead characters
Sexy-scientist16 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is not for those conservative people who don't want to see the lead characters doing wrong. First of all, this movie shows all-in-all upper class characters and hard to relate to. Secondly, they don't act ideally. Rachel needs something to kill her boredom, so she goes again to the strip again (why?) in daytime. There she "accidentally" sees her lap dance giver (McKenna) and communicates with her. McKenna is a confident prostitute who chose this profession because she wants to and not needs to, although she is shown to be broke and homeless. Rachel trusts her but her trust dwindles when she sees her with her client (why?). So McKenna shows her what a whore can do and try to seduce her and friends' husbands (Why?) and proudly leaves her house. Both of these lead characters are not likable and viewer are never sympathetic to them. Its hard to understand their point of view, especially McKenna's. So, the viewer cannot connect to the story. I don't know if the writer want to show feminism and women empowerment via. McKenna, but if so, this expression is not obvious. This movie leaves me confused what it wanted to say. So, in my opinion, skip it.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Prepared to hate it - somehow I was gripped
thekarmicnomad26 August 2014
My girlfriend put this on as a random choice from Netflix. When I saw the synopsis I put an imaginary gun to my head and pulled the trigger.

Of course I ended up watching it right to the end and wouldn't let her turn it off when she got bored.

This is a character piece about a woman who is going through a mid life crisis and somehow befriends a stripper. You can see this isn't going to end great but I was kept guessing if they were going to go 'Poison Ivy' or 'Thelma and Louise' or another direction. I think you might too.

I couldn't switch off as I desperately wanted to know why the main character was making these bizarre choices.

It didn't hurt that there the film also has a fair amount of nudity, strippers, and that the lovely Kathryn Hahn gets her boobs out.

On a more serious note. Very good acting, great performances and dialogues, good production etc.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"SEX WORKER?!" *screams in WASP*
corvidia1 August 2021
I'm shocked that none of these reviews even for a moment consider how degrading the film is to McKenna and sex workers in general. Is everyone so basic that they think the ridiculous "Sex worker?" "Sex worker?!" "Sex worker?!" campy echo from Rachael's friends isn't utterly banal? What stuffed-up privileged suburban lives do viewers live that they have zero empathy for working girls and the inane social prejudice against them. Are we supposed to like Rachael? Someone who's friends are such tedious, judgmental, normie biddies that they are horrified by her efforts to help Rachael integrate into a healthy job opportunity? The whole execution of this premise is ridiculously condescending. It could have been a good story, but it's just another example of privileged people using those less advantaged than themselves to fix their own broken lives then flushing them like toilet paper. Revolting.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Kathryn Hahn is one of the funniest women actors today but this really shows that she is more then just a comedic force.
cosmo_tiger10 February 2014
"If you think I can help you I promise you're not taking." Rachel (Hahn) is a stay-at-home mom who is bored with her life. In between her trips to her psychiatrist and helping with her son's preschool fund-raisers she is dealing with a non-existent sex life with her husband and repetitive routines everywhere else. One night, trying to spice things up, her and her husband go to a strip club where she meets McKenna (Temple) who she sees as a project and sets out to change her. This is a perfect example of a movie that is not done justice by its trailer. If you watch it you will expect a raunchy sex comedy. What this is a very personal and sometimes depressing movie about how a women goes to drastic measures to change her life. Kathryn Hahn is one of the funniest women actors today but this really shows that she is more then just a comedic force. The movie does have some funny moments in this but do not expect a laugh out loud comedy. This is a true dark dramedy about what a woman will do when she feels trapped. Overall, this is the definition of the saying "be careful what you wish for." A real surprise that I really liked and recommend. I give this an A-.
34 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Definitely worth a look.
sinimannerstuff20 February 2020
Starts off with a lighthearted vibe and you could well imagine it would be a screwball comedy, but quickly descends into some gritty and raw territory. It's good; watch it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Director and Actors were OK, the Script was Terrible
danew1328 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The entire 90 minute run of this film came down to the last 30 seconds...a bored middle class housewife discovers the meaning of life...she finally gets an orgasm.

That about sizes up Afternoon Delight. This is not a comedy, but a doemstic drama. However,I take odds with some other reviews here. The acting was fine and the direction was okay. As almost always in sub par films it was the script that sucked.It's a shame the stalwart best friend Kathyrn Hahn got a starring role in this feeble attempt at serious drama.

The story is boring for two main reasons: It's been told several time before and its a repetition of the same almost real-time domestic life events for much of the film, from parties to card games and dull dialog.

The only life in the film is the card game scene and the only actor worth watching, from a male viewpoint, the the cute and lovely Juno Temple. But,even she isn't given much to work with and her story isn't developed.

The corker, is Jane Lynch as lesbian shrink who breaks down crying to her patient, Hahn, about her lover leaving her during Hahn's session time. That had to be a cinema first.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pessimistic View of the Future of Suburban Californian Women
l_rawjalaurence29 January 2015
In reviewing any film, it's important to keep one's feelings towards the plot and characters separate from one's judgment about the piece as a work of art.

This is especially true of Jill Soloway's low-budget film, whose characters are thoroughly despicable. Rachel (Kathryn Hahn) is a bored homemaker frustrated with her marriage to workaholic Jeff (Josh Radnor): unable to find satisfactory help from her therapist (Jane Lynch), Rachel adopts local hooker McKenna (Juno Temple) as her live-in nanny for her son Logan (Sawyer Ever). For the most part McKenna does a competent job, studiously keeping her personal and professional lives separate, while Rachel makes a good stab of not telling her middle-class friends precisely what she has done. Inevitably, however, the situation ends in tears, with Rachel's uncomfortable secret being discovered, and McKenna moving out amid acrimonious circumstances.

The film resembles DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES with added sexual spice, as it focuses on the empty lives of a group of well-to-do homemakers with plenty of money but little to entertain themselves except going to parent-teacher association meetings, or organizing events at their children's high schools. This boredom is what drives Rachel into the futile task of trying to 'rescue' McKenna. The fact that the younger girl might not want rescuing seems not to enter Rachel's head. At the end director Soloway invites us to reflect on who is the most morally culpable: is it Rachel, her husband, or the group of women she associates with?

Filmed on a low budget, but with a good eye for light and shade (much of the action takes place in bright Californian sunshine, an ambiance that seems especially inappropriate for the morally dubious material in the script), AFTERNOON DELIGHT makes a damning criticism of middle-class life, especially that practiced by people with too much money and very little self-awareness.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1st world problems
drd-0721712 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
There is a reason that film only gets a 5.8 score. Basically this film is about a bored live at home 30 something woman who seemingly has it all. This is not enough for her so she has a mid life (in her 30's???) crisis. She befriends a exotic dancer cum sex worker to add some spice into her life. The dancer ends up living at the family home as she wants to learn about her ways and eventually goes as a spectator to one of the 'dancer's' clients. No one made her go but she acts like she in fact was made to go. What insures is a sex scene with the client as she watches the other lady do her thing. (this is one of the worst sex scenes you will ever witness mainly due to the client's facial contortions, you've been warned!) In the end she alienates most of her friend's because of her new friend and due to her ridiculous excited out burst at a party about her multiple abortions. The husband leaves but they get back together and the 'dancer' moves out. This film is about a woman who is self centered and feels sorry for her self. It also is a very good example of 1st World problems.The film is self indulgent and basically pointless.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent watch
kkingrapstar15 August 2020
Decent movie. Nice story. Good message. And very realistic.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dark turn doesn't fit quirky start
SnoopyStyle26 October 2014
Rachel (Kathryn Hahn) is a smart but bored housewife. She has trouble connecting with her son Logan and has stopped having sex with her husband Jeff (Josh Radnor). Following her friend Stephanie (Jessica St. Clair), she takes her husband to a strip club. Jeff buys her a session in the backroom with stripper McKenna (Juno Temple). Later she tracks down McKenna and befriends her. She takes McKenna in when she runs into problems. Then she finds out that McKenna is a prostitute also. Dr. Lenore (Jane Lynch) is her unhelpful psychiatrist. Jennie (Michaela Watkins) is the bossy school mom.

There are a lot of smart funny women in this. Jill Soloway is mostly a TV writer/producer and she has written some pretty smart stuff. She doesn't really have a directorial style. Kathryn Hahn brings a naturally smart lovely vibe. There is a general oddness with the tone. It's light and cute for the first half. It's even wacky and unreal. Then it tries to go to a darker place which it hasn't earn the right to. It definitely doesn't have the realism to be believable. About an hour into the movie, it takes the turn and it feels unreal. It's almost a different movie. Having so many female comedians may actually hurt this. For example, having Jane Lynch just throws the tone to a different place.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Afternoon Delight" plunges deep into raw, intimate and uncomfortable areas that most films in the same genre would avoid
I'm not married but yet I know for a fact that there's no rulebook to a successful marriage. Nobody knows for sure what will save or end a marriage? The trick or plan that you think will save a marriage may not always work and the most unexpected one might actually help you win over your partner. Sometimes even the dumbest ideas can save a marriage. Focusing on one such dumb idea, Jill Soloway's "Afternoon Delight", is about the story of a couple's marriage that's almost kaput, and if there's anything that could save it, what is it?

Jill could have made one of those cute romantic comedies that we all like to watch so much because in reality, most of our lives are the exact opposite. However, she refrains from the taking the usual path and challenges herself with this sly and rewarding romantic dramedy, sprinkled with occasional humour, that turns out to be a well- intentioned tale of marriage.

In her first leading role, Kathryn Hahn plays Rachel, a suburban housewife who's having problems with her marriage. She hasn't had sex with her husband for, god knows, how long because she has lost count of it. Her marriage is on the brink of collapse when she's offered a dumb idea to visit a strip club with her husband to spice up their marriage.

Rachel convinces her husband Jeff, played by Josh Radnor, to go with her to the strip club, where she's given a lap dance by a 19-year old McKenna, Juno Temple. Following which, Rachel tends to develop a strange feeling for McKenna, and eventually befriends her. And when McKenna doesn't have a place to say, Rachel is kind enough to offer her shelter in her house without even consulting Jeff. But McKenna is not a stripper, but a high end sex worker. How does this impact Rachel, her family and even her friends?

At first, it's tough to understand the relationship between Rachael and McKenna. Did Rachael really care for McKenna when she was homeless, and therefore, she offered her place to say or was it to because she wanted her to spice up her sex life? But it's clearly not the second reason when we see how uncomfortable Rachael feels when she accompanies McKenna to one of her long-term clients. It's only towards the end you realize that Rachael really cared for McKenna but couldn't let her stay with her because her own relationship with her husband was in a mess.

Jill makes a very strong point through the relationship of Rachael and McKenna. She raises the question whether is it acceptable to have a sex worker in your family because you care for her. This is further reiterated in one the scenes when there's a debate about the suitable word to describe McKenna – a sex worker or a prostitute. Otherwise, we have an enjoyable romantic drama with interesting and strong female characters and even better performances that leaves you emotionally uplifting. With a very subtle narrative, Jill addresses domestic issues with unparalleled sensitivity, criticism and wit no debutant filmmaker would dare to attempt.

Although portraying a troubled character, Hahn seemed to have pulled it off with aplomb. I doubt if anyone else could have done justice to her role as much as she did. She is fittingly backed by Juno Temple in her captivating performance of a sex worker. She was so good that sometimes you feel like she is actually one in real life. It's a woman-centric film told from the perspective of a woman, and therefore, men happen to be only making guest appearances in some scenes. Nevertheless, we get a strong performance from Radnor in a role we are so not used to see him in.

"Afternoon Delight" plunges deep into raw, intimate and uncomfortable areas that most films in the same genre would avoid.

Read more reviews at http://movieroundup.in/
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A dull, self-indulgent film
badlydrawnhamster29 April 2014
I've previously been a big fan of the director's work, The United States of Tara and Six Feet Under especially, but this is a tiresome piece which doesn't really go anywhere. Or anywhere interesting, at least.

Bored housewife Rachel (Kathryn Hahn) seems to be trudging through every day life without taking much pleasure in it until she meets a stripper with a heart of gold (or so it seems at first) and invites her in to her home. After discovering that said stripper is also a sex worker she becomes more obsessed with her, until, inevitably, events take a darker turn.

The first half hour of the movie is fairly amusing and well written, albeit with thinly sketched characters that it's hard to care about. But after that the film is painfully self-indulgent, predictable, and transforms in to a tedious mumblecore flick where we're supposed to care for the central leads despite them having no depth at all. An incredibly over long and agonisingly dull party scene seems to go on forever and from that point on everything is hit home with the subtlety of a sledgehammer, until the film eventually ends and you'll wonder why it couldn't all have been summed up within 45 minutes.

Centering around the idea that "You don't appreciate what you've got until you've lost it", it could be of interest if it wasn't for the badly drawn characters and frustratingly predictable plot developments, that ultimately lead to an ending you'll have seen coming a mile off. It's a real shame as the first thirty minutes show promise, but it truly fails to deliver on it.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rachel And The Stranger
atlasmb19 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Rachel is an unfulfilled housewife who suddenly realizes she is searching for something. Unfortunately, when she finally discovers what she seeks, she is frightened by the self-revelation required to utilize her discovery. So, the film falls apart, becoming a story of failure masquerading as success.

The alternate view has to do with accepting one's fate and appreciating life for what it offers. Which is more depressing?

Kathryn Hahn plays Rachel, the housewife. Juno Temple plays McKenna, a stripper who becomes a cause for Rachel. They forge an unsteady friendship that collapses when Rachel defaults on an unspoken rule. Hahn is great in her role and Temple is convincing as the damaged "sex worker" who has learned to adapt to any situation.

All the acting is strong, but the script lets them down, failing to deliver any message that lives up to the promise of the film's first half.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Makes you wonder if cinema in America is actually dead
Mackerson21 November 2013
Making a film is hard, no one disputes that, and I have respect for the filmmaker for making this film. But if this is the best direction of American independent film of 2013 then the answer is simple, cinema is dead. The fact that this film has played almost nowhere in Europe (festival wise) shows the impact it has internationally and the limited view that somewhere like Sundance can have on the current state of cinema. I don't have any ill will towards Ms. Solowayl or her film, but cinema should be there to enlighten, excite, experiment, not play into clichés and formulas (in this case, the indie that really wants to be the next multiplex family train wreck). This film isn't terrible, it's just average, another movie, with some "names," used as a calling card to go on and help Ms. Soloway make more mediocre work. And as the protagonist says in the TV SET, "make the world more mediocre." Hopefully, before her next attempt, she'll actually watch some films (and learn about cinema), think about what she wants to say and try and do something as an artist that is, even mildly, important. And of course "important" is relative, but if this was the last film she could make, would this be the story she would want to tell? Really? If the answer is yes, then not only is cinema dead, but culture as well. In the days of TED talks, Starbucks alternative mix CDs, etc.. this fits in just fine. Something you think is radical, but when you really look at it critically, it's just more suburban POV, that has nothing more to say than, "our life is boring." We know that already. I give her a five, if nothing more, for effort.
68 out of 124 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Earnest, and surprisingly funny
Camoo13 February 2014
Afternoon Delight plays a bit like a Judd Apatow flick, from a female perspective. It's enjoyable, unexpectedly; after the first scene I sighed deeply expecting another film about about L.A. upper middle class problems. The film turned into something much more poignant.

Despite some automated plot clichés, the film plays earnestly and honestly, following a married couple as they struggle to keep the fire going in their relationship - not a plot I would have driven a mile to watch unfold. However the film is (mercifully) very funny, with a good eye for improv and dialogue, and it aims for the heart. For the most part it's on target - and it tackles some complicated grey-area issues that we all face in relationships.

Kathryn Hahn I'd seen (and hardly noticed) in Our Idiot Brother, but here she delivers an effective, multi dimensional performance.

A strong film, made better by the fact that I kind of stumbled upon it without previous expectations.
30 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not quite as bad as people put it
janus-clyde27 January 2014
This movie has it's flaws, but is definitely not as bad as it's made out to be. The acting isn't bad - it's actually even quite good at times and I have to commend Juno Temple's performance for portraying McKenna as a sex worker with quite a bit of emotional depth. Also kudos for the way of dealing with the two core topics: Depression & how money cannot buy you a perfect world.

This movie shows very well how hard and difficult it is to deal with these emotions, yet the stigma of society is "If you have money, you must be happy!" Gracefully the movie handles the consequences of wanting a 'perfect life' while ignoring the obvious problems around you every day, just so we seem normal, and losing track of what is important to us on the way.

Side rant (because I'm sure "prostitutes" love it when you immediately pity & judge them, as some have in their reviews): "Prostitutes" can be happy too and lead normal lives outside their jobs. Not every woman on this planet is coerced into sleeping with men against their will and are just people like you and me with a job and they are 100% fine with this.

Quite frankly, the way Hollywood is overdramatizing every story at the moment annoys me and it is nice to have a movie like this show how life's problems escalate slowly, without us noticing, instead of each turn in a story making everything 10x worse.

My only critique is the ending, which could have ended with a little bit more communication between Rachel & McKenna. I'll avoid saying more due to spoilers.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sanctity of marriage theme undermined by weak premise of bored housewife taking in high-end call girl
Turfseer27 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Jill Soloway's 'Afternoon Delight', won the directing award at the 2013 Sundance Festival. The critics weren't as kind: on Metacritic, there were 4 negative reviews, 10 mixed and only 7 positive. The film is really a dramedy, but more comedy than serious drama. Kathryn Hahn plays 'Rachel', a bored housewife in suburbia who is no longer having sex with her yuppie husband, Jeff.

Rachel is presented as a ditsy do-gooder who decides to drag her husband along to a strip-club in the hopes that this might spice up their sex life. There, Rachel gets a lap dance from the stripper, McKenna, and later seeks her out on the streets, where she offers to put her up at her home, if, in exchange, McKenna works part-time, as a nanny to her young son. Soon Rachel learns that McKenna is more than a stripper— she's a high end prostitute.

This is the premise of the film and it strains one's credulity that Rachel would actually even entertain the notion of putting up a prostitute in her house, a person who could end up harming her child. But Soloway is playing for laughs here—Rachel is a caricature of a do-gooder and Jeff is a passive schlub (the part of Jeff is particularly underdeveloped—he's someone we really never get to know at all).

Soloway gets serious in the second half of the film, contrasting McKenna's lurid lifestyle with Rachel and Jeff's need to restore the sanctity of their marriage. At one point, Rachel freely accompanies McKenna to see one of her long-term clients—and soon realizes it was a big mistake to come along, as she ends up sitting in the bedroom, watching the prostitute and her trick, make love.

In real life, McKenna may have ended up creating a lot more problems for the men she encounters, but here, the wily prostitute gets Jeff and his friends drunk at a poker game, and pulls one of the men into a room and has sex with him. There's some damage when the man's wife finds him with McKenna and makes it clear that their marriage is over.

McKenna almost succeeds in also ruining Jeff and Rachel's marriage, after he finally tells Rachel what a bad idea it was to let her stay with them (one wonders why Jeff didn't put his foot down from the get-go). Sure enough, Rachel realizes the error of her ways, begs forgiveness from her husband and their relationship is restored (as illustrated by the passionate lovemaking they engage in, at film's end).

While the overall story makes little sense, 'Afternoon Delight' has a few scenes here and there that will keep your interest. Particularly good is the interchange between Rachel and her lesbian therapist (in the end, Rachel must console the therapist, who realizes that she had taken her own relationship, for granted). There is also some frank sex talk throughout the film between the housewives, which at least gives the film a modicum of verisimilitude.

Often 'Afternoon Delight', has a sitcomish flavor. Despite this, the moral of the story is well-intentioned: better to work at your marriage, instead of throwing it away for fleeting passions.
19 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed