I am not sure what the people who gave this movie a 9 or 10 are smoking. This movie is utter garbage. The first one was bad yes but the second one isn't better. Does a higher body count equal a better movie? Seems like a lot of people think so. Sure this is a low-budget movie like the first one but a bad movie is a bad movie regardless of budget. The acting is a touch better but that hardly makes up for the rest of it. The special effects are not great, the music is bad and the story is bad. A movie like this even having a "story" is laughable at best. The kills aren't even creative either. Do yourself a favor and skip this one.
32 Reviews
Better than the first, but not the glowing 9/10 or 10/10 that the reviews are saying.
ClarkS4029 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I watched the first one, I was curious. It killed an hour and half and wasn't bad-but not good. This one I liked the story of the Frankenstein monsters, so I give it two stars better than the first movie.
It was strange in this movie as well, at one point a boy is watching the first movie at home and apparently that movie was a sort of made-for-tv-rendition of events that happened in their town. Everyone thinks Christopher Robin did all the killings of the first movie and nobody believes him.
I thought the abduction twist and confession was good. The rave murder spree scene was fun I thought.
The special effects were in line with the first one - not good. However I liked it. It isn't one I will ever own or even watch again though.
It was strange in this movie as well, at one point a boy is watching the first movie at home and apparently that movie was a sort of made-for-tv-rendition of events that happened in their town. Everyone thinks Christopher Robin did all the killings of the first movie and nobody believes him.
I thought the abduction twist and confession was good. The rave murder spree scene was fun I thought.
The special effects were in line with the first one - not good. However I liked it. It isn't one I will ever own or even watch again though.
Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 delivers non-stop kills from start to finish, with the story serving as air between moments of carnage
kevin_robbins28 March 2024
I watched the UK film 🇬🇧 Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 (2024) in theaters tonight. The plot explores the peculiar connection between Pooh and Christopher Robin, as Pooh, Piglet, Owl, and Tigger grow weary of human intrusion into their habitat and decide to embark on a killing spree, leaving Christopher Robin as humanity's only hope.
Directed by Rhys Frake-Waterfield (known for Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey), the cast includes Scott Chambers (Chicken), Tallulah Evans (Son of Rambow), Ryan Oliva (The Convent), Marcus Massey (Bunny the Killer Thing), and Lewis Santer.
This sequel surpasses its predecessor in nearly every aspect. The costumes, sets, kills, and gore are vastly improved, indicating a significant increase in budget. The movie starts off with an always entertaining animated segment. While the acting is average, the relentless stream of kills keeps the audience engaged, with the storyline serving as mere intervals between the next gruesome scene. The introduction of Owl as a new character is a standout, providing depth to the narrative, whereas Tigger's portrayal feels somewhat lackluster. The film maintains its momentum in the first half, falters slightly during a club scene, but quickly recovers with its continuous barrage of kills. There's a huge step up in captivating set designs. Despite its flaws, I'm eager to watch future installments in the series.
In summary, Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 delivers non-stop kills from start to finish, with the story serving as air between moments of carnage. I would rate it a 6/10 and recommend it as a must-see for horror enthusiasts.
Directed by Rhys Frake-Waterfield (known for Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey), the cast includes Scott Chambers (Chicken), Tallulah Evans (Son of Rambow), Ryan Oliva (The Convent), Marcus Massey (Bunny the Killer Thing), and Lewis Santer.
This sequel surpasses its predecessor in nearly every aspect. The costumes, sets, kills, and gore are vastly improved, indicating a significant increase in budget. The movie starts off with an always entertaining animated segment. While the acting is average, the relentless stream of kills keeps the audience engaged, with the storyline serving as mere intervals between the next gruesome scene. The introduction of Owl as a new character is a standout, providing depth to the narrative, whereas Tigger's portrayal feels somewhat lackluster. The film maintains its momentum in the first half, falters slightly during a club scene, but quickly recovers with its continuous barrage of kills. There's a huge step up in captivating set designs. Despite its flaws, I'm eager to watch future installments in the series.
In summary, Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 delivers non-stop kills from start to finish, with the story serving as air between moments of carnage. I would rate it a 6/10 and recommend it as a must-see for horror enthusiasts.
Just terrible.
gsknkrr27 March 2024
Please don't waste your money. You would think with a higher budget they might be able to produce something somewhat palatable but alas it did not deliver (not even close). Some of the worst acting I've ever seen, the costumes are awful, the story itself is just bad and the special effects are so very cheap. The death scenes were lacking as well as any sort of character development or decent plot or twists. I don't know why they thought this would work but it most certainly does not. I've seen some bad horror over the years but this one takes the cake. The only thing 'horror' about this is how horrifically terrible it is. Take my advice and DO NOT waste your time.
Worse than the first one
mikemoviefilmhammond28 March 2024
Well, here we are again. We watched this last night in the cinema with about 15 other people. Why do I do this to myself? Because I love horror films. Love them. And I wanted so much to enjoy the first Blood and Honey, and I felt scammed. But with the promise of an increased budget and what appeared to be positive things being said about it, I thought I would give it another go.
The budget has been spent on three things. The costumes have been improved upon. And, they have clearly spent a lot on getting Tiktokers to say good things, and the admittedly clever use of marketing.
But, make no mistake, it's bad. I will say worse than the first, because here we can't try to partially blame a low budget. It falls firmly at the doorstep of bad filmmaking.
The director doesn't seem to know how to make a film scary or interesting or look good or get good performances or frame a good shot or create tension or.... Looking at their IMDB it would appear they have made ALOT of films. How is it that they don't know anything about what makes a film work? The writer shows no skill in creating a cohesive story with some muddled backpedaling to the original idea. It's also strangely boring. We didn't walk out like we did the first, as I had heard there was a rave scene at the end of the film. But it's not worth waiting for. Again, no tension, no scare, just some badly rendered gore, weird camera angles, bad lighting, jarring music and, like the first, kills offscreen.
The acting is bad. Here, one of the producers has cast (or rather mis-cast) themselves as Christopher Robin. I think making Christopher Robin a gay character is an interesting and novel idea. But they make absolutely no mention to it whatsoever. They also have a one expression look throughout and the Pooh confrontation is cringe. All the victims can't even scream with any level of believability. The parents for some reason both mumble their way through their lines (as if they received the script two minutes beforehand). And Simon Callow? Please fire your agent, immediately. You used to make good films.
Luckily there are lots of other good horror films on the horizon, made by people who know what they are doing. Another positive is met some nice other horror fans (who also hated this film btw).
But I am out with these. Officially.
The budget has been spent on three things. The costumes have been improved upon. And, they have clearly spent a lot on getting Tiktokers to say good things, and the admittedly clever use of marketing.
But, make no mistake, it's bad. I will say worse than the first, because here we can't try to partially blame a low budget. It falls firmly at the doorstep of bad filmmaking.
The director doesn't seem to know how to make a film scary or interesting or look good or get good performances or frame a good shot or create tension or.... Looking at their IMDB it would appear they have made ALOT of films. How is it that they don't know anything about what makes a film work? The writer shows no skill in creating a cohesive story with some muddled backpedaling to the original idea. It's also strangely boring. We didn't walk out like we did the first, as I had heard there was a rave scene at the end of the film. But it's not worth waiting for. Again, no tension, no scare, just some badly rendered gore, weird camera angles, bad lighting, jarring music and, like the first, kills offscreen.
The acting is bad. Here, one of the producers has cast (or rather mis-cast) themselves as Christopher Robin. I think making Christopher Robin a gay character is an interesting and novel idea. But they make absolutely no mention to it whatsoever. They also have a one expression look throughout and the Pooh confrontation is cringe. All the victims can't even scream with any level of believability. The parents for some reason both mumble their way through their lines (as if they received the script two minutes beforehand). And Simon Callow? Please fire your agent, immediately. You used to make good films.
Luckily there are lots of other good horror films on the horizon, made by people who know what they are doing. Another positive is met some nice other horror fans (who also hated this film btw).
But I am out with these. Officially.
Hadn't seen the first one going in...
kademan-4096231 March 2024
Starring dollar store 80s slashers and co-starring a protagonist who doesn't really do anything until the final moment of the movie.
Christopher Robin undergoes much character development, but the eventual pay off doesn't amount to much in the end.
As previously aforementioned, Pooh and friends are each essentially dollar store slashers. Pooh is basically Jason Voorhees, with the use of tools as weapons. Tigger is pretty much Freddy Krueger from the later Elm Street's, with puns that aren't puns and only work depending on who you are. Piglet is basically Leatherface, although he offers less in the long run. Owl is probably the most like his TV show counterpart, although that's not saying much.
That nightclub scene was very entertaining and definitely the highlight of the film. It takes itself too seriously alot of the time but it's pretty okay overall.
Christopher Robin undergoes much character development, but the eventual pay off doesn't amount to much in the end.
As previously aforementioned, Pooh and friends are each essentially dollar store slashers. Pooh is basically Jason Voorhees, with the use of tools as weapons. Tigger is pretty much Freddy Krueger from the later Elm Street's, with puns that aren't puns and only work depending on who you are. Piglet is basically Leatherface, although he offers less in the long run. Owl is probably the most like his TV show counterpart, although that's not saying much.
That nightclub scene was very entertaining and definitely the highlight of the film. It takes itself too seriously alot of the time but it's pretty okay overall.
GOLDILOCKS AND THE THREE BEARS: DEATH AND PORRIDGE LOOKS LIKE IT WILL DELIVER! THIS DID NOT
girlshavefun31 March 2024
Again why did they make this ? Ok it made cash but for heavens sake do a proper movie for the fans! I see there are many new children's stories being turned into horror. I have to say the new 'Goldilocks and The Three Bears horror movie looks like it may be serious and please horror fans based on the poster and trailers! I really hope they do not make more of these films in the series they have no place to go with these terrible stories. It was slightly better than the first but that's not saying too much now is it.
This was not a well done film it lacked so much sorry to disappoint again guys!
This was not a well done film it lacked so much sorry to disappoint again guys!
Better than the original in every way possible!
Nightmare-Maker26 March 2024
Winnie The Pooh: Blood And Honey II is a huge improvement in every single way. Obviously, this one has a bigger budget (around 330k in comparison to the meagre 50k for the original) but it really does show. For starters, the creatures no longer look like they are just Halloween masks, they actually do resemble actual hybrid creatures with proper movements thanks to the excellent prosthetics. The acting has massively improved too, with Scott Chambers the new Christopher Robin (he is a standout I must say), Tallulah Evans is great too, and also a turn from established British actor, Simon Callow. There's also a decent story here now as well. The team behind the original have joined up with Matt Leslie, who wrote the brilliant Summer Of '84 and created a very interesting premise for the Pooh universe to expand and bring in further characters for the upcoming Poohniverse which has recently been teased!
There's a hell of a lot crammed in to the 85 minute run time. An interesting story, but there's a lot of fun too! Great set pieces, include a rave scene in which Pooh and friends slice and dice their way through a host of party goers. There's a lot of gore here too, mostly practical, but a bit of CGI too (probably down to the still relatively low budget).
All in all, I had a great time with this. The team need praise for actually showing resilience to come back from the pounding they took from the first one to actually learn from the criticism and come back to make something that is as good as this.
Horror fans should enjoy this, and I'd advise trying to see it in a cinema with like-minded fans for the best experience!
There's a hell of a lot crammed in to the 85 minute run time. An interesting story, but there's a lot of fun too! Great set pieces, include a rave scene in which Pooh and friends slice and dice their way through a host of party goers. There's a lot of gore here too, mostly practical, but a bit of CGI too (probably down to the still relatively low budget).
All in all, I had a great time with this. The team need praise for actually showing resilience to come back from the pounding they took from the first one to actually learn from the criticism and come back to make something that is as good as this.
Horror fans should enjoy this, and I'd advise trying to see it in a cinema with like-minded fans for the best experience!
In for a bloody good time!
licinskil29 March 2024
A sequel that surpasses the original is a rare occurrence and Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 certainly doesn't disappoint in that regard. That being said, once you get past the gratuitous violence and gore that dominates the majority of the plot, there is relatively little left of substance that makes this film work. I would call this a textbook case of the adage that just because one can do something doesn't mean they should. A Winnie the Pooh film that portrays the character as a serial mass murderer is a premise that is more than enough to turn most people away, and even with a higher budget than its predecessor and grander ambitions, this film perhaps bites off more than it can chew.
Just......no
smckenna-7165930 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
While this was clearly better than the first film objectively given it had a considerably bigger budget and more of an actual story, it was still really disappointing, having tried too hard and ended up being pretty contrived and cliched.
The retconning the original into a film-within-a-film was just a cop out, simply because they were too ashamed to admit their mistake of the critical failure that the last film was, and thought it would be funny to go down the self-depreciation route, which just came across and stupid and desperate. I mean if you're going to improve on something at least admit your mistake first. It made no sense to make the original into a film within a film, given that said original film was based off real events that actually happened in the 100 acre wood, with the only reason they made the original a film within a film of this universe being so they could justify the drastically different costume designs and different actor for Christopher Robin who also was drastically different from the previous one. But given that this film picked up where the last film left off, it would have made more sense to keep last year's film real, having just made it more confusing and convoluted making it into a film within a film.
What really annoyed me most of all though was the shoehorned love interest that was simply just not neccessary. I mean her role could have easily been given to his male friend or a family member, and the shoehorned love interests is something that just really annoys me more than anything about films now. However, what annoys me most of all is the fact Christopher's obvious, implied love interest here being a frigging Barbie, being drop dead gorgeous and stunning, just like him, which is something I am sick of seeing in films and everywhere, couples who are just as stunning as each other, and look like models even when there is no need for them too, other than to just make the film look more attractive. What particularly annoyed me all the more is that of course this drop-dead gorgeous, glamorous Lexy who looked like a frigging Barbie to Christopher's Ken, was of course the only character other than Christopher and his little sister to survive of course. It was like they just had her simply so they could have a final girl and of course glamourous love interest of Chris's. Going down the romance route (even if nothing was confirmed) was just very cliched, as it could have easily been just Christopher and his sister left by the end of the film after killing Tigger and Pooh, or like I say there could have been anyone else in her place like his male friend (who unlike her was killed off of course and got less screen time because of course he's not a glamourous barbie girl) or his mum or dad, giving more of a friendship/family focus, like why does everything have to be about romance?! Also, Lexy being one of the few people who stays by Chris's side and the only character outside of Chris and his sister to survive, as well as having actually been able to kill Tigger, and painted as such a nice, kind, caring friend as well as having been gorgeous, looking like a frigging barbie, just made her come off as a Mary Sue to me. It just all came across as really cliched to me, and they could have easily gone down a more unusual route, but no, there always has to be a glamorous, gorgeous love interest to the also very attractive lead.
Overally, it just felt like it tried too hard to be "cool" and changed too much from the original which even with the movie within a movie didn't make sense, such as the crossbreeds having been revealed to actually be somewhat evil when they first befriended Chris, which contradicted the original's opening of how Chris leaving them triggered them to be evil, which just changed the lore entirely. I mean it ended up undermining their original motive. It just felt like it tried too hard, and came off as pretty desperate, with too many inconsistencies, with Chris having been able to kill both Tigger and Pooh like that almost at once having undermined the concept of challenge and struggle that was shown in the previous film were Pooh is clearly really hard to kill. I'm not giving credit to the previous film by any means, just realising that there are inconsistencies and that killing these creatures suddenly seemed so much easier than it originally had been, even if they were going to come back to life, with only one of the villains having survived by the end. It at least would have made sense if they had been killed by all different people, but with Chris having killed both Tigger and Pooh, who are the most brutal of the bunch (with of course the help of his beautiful, girl next door love interest) just seemed a bit ridiculous to me.
Also Tigger just appearing only in the third act, in the nightclub scene seemed a bit weird rather than introducing him with the rest of the gang of villains.
I think I have to admit that most most infuriating part of this film for me was the gorgeous, glamourous, barbie love interest that was shoehorned in, having gone down a really cliched route, which was totally unneccessary, with Lexy having only been there to serve as that very typical love interest/girl next door role, as well as coming off as a Mary Sue, suddenly being capable of killing the most brutal of the hybrids and being the only character to survive of course, other than Chris and his sister. I am so sick of seeing couples who are just as gorgeous and glamourous as each other too-it's like it was just to make it more hollywood-like, and is all superficial too of course. This is just my personal opinion of course, but it is still really annoying and ridiculous.
The retconning the original into a film-within-a-film was just a cop out, simply because they were too ashamed to admit their mistake of the critical failure that the last film was, and thought it would be funny to go down the self-depreciation route, which just came across and stupid and desperate. I mean if you're going to improve on something at least admit your mistake first. It made no sense to make the original into a film within a film, given that said original film was based off real events that actually happened in the 100 acre wood, with the only reason they made the original a film within a film of this universe being so they could justify the drastically different costume designs and different actor for Christopher Robin who also was drastically different from the previous one. But given that this film picked up where the last film left off, it would have made more sense to keep last year's film real, having just made it more confusing and convoluted making it into a film within a film.
What really annoyed me most of all though was the shoehorned love interest that was simply just not neccessary. I mean her role could have easily been given to his male friend or a family member, and the shoehorned love interests is something that just really annoys me more than anything about films now. However, what annoys me most of all is the fact Christopher's obvious, implied love interest here being a frigging Barbie, being drop dead gorgeous and stunning, just like him, which is something I am sick of seeing in films and everywhere, couples who are just as stunning as each other, and look like models even when there is no need for them too, other than to just make the film look more attractive. What particularly annoyed me all the more is that of course this drop-dead gorgeous, glamorous Lexy who looked like a frigging Barbie to Christopher's Ken, was of course the only character other than Christopher and his little sister to survive of course. It was like they just had her simply so they could have a final girl and of course glamourous love interest of Chris's. Going down the romance route (even if nothing was confirmed) was just very cliched, as it could have easily been just Christopher and his sister left by the end of the film after killing Tigger and Pooh, or like I say there could have been anyone else in her place like his male friend (who unlike her was killed off of course and got less screen time because of course he's not a glamourous barbie girl) or his mum or dad, giving more of a friendship/family focus, like why does everything have to be about romance?! Also, Lexy being one of the few people who stays by Chris's side and the only character outside of Chris and his sister to survive, as well as having actually been able to kill Tigger, and painted as such a nice, kind, caring friend as well as having been gorgeous, looking like a frigging barbie, just made her come off as a Mary Sue to me. It just all came across as really cliched to me, and they could have easily gone down a more unusual route, but no, there always has to be a glamorous, gorgeous love interest to the also very attractive lead.
Overally, it just felt like it tried too hard to be "cool" and changed too much from the original which even with the movie within a movie didn't make sense, such as the crossbreeds having been revealed to actually be somewhat evil when they first befriended Chris, which contradicted the original's opening of how Chris leaving them triggered them to be evil, which just changed the lore entirely. I mean it ended up undermining their original motive. It just felt like it tried too hard, and came off as pretty desperate, with too many inconsistencies, with Chris having been able to kill both Tigger and Pooh like that almost at once having undermined the concept of challenge and struggle that was shown in the previous film were Pooh is clearly really hard to kill. I'm not giving credit to the previous film by any means, just realising that there are inconsistencies and that killing these creatures suddenly seemed so much easier than it originally had been, even if they were going to come back to life, with only one of the villains having survived by the end. It at least would have made sense if they had been killed by all different people, but with Chris having killed both Tigger and Pooh, who are the most brutal of the bunch (with of course the help of his beautiful, girl next door love interest) just seemed a bit ridiculous to me.
Also Tigger just appearing only in the third act, in the nightclub scene seemed a bit weird rather than introducing him with the rest of the gang of villains.
I think I have to admit that most most infuriating part of this film for me was the gorgeous, glamourous, barbie love interest that was shoehorned in, having gone down a really cliched route, which was totally unneccessary, with Lexy having only been there to serve as that very typical love interest/girl next door role, as well as coming off as a Mary Sue, suddenly being capable of killing the most brutal of the hybrids and being the only character to survive of course, other than Chris and his sister. I am so sick of seeing couples who are just as gorgeous and glamourous as each other too-it's like it was just to make it more hollywood-like, and is all superficial too of course. This is just my personal opinion of course, but it is still really annoying and ridiculous.
BLOODY, BEAUTIFUL, BRUTAL AND SOLID BLOOD AND HONEY 2 DELIVERES THE HONEY AND BLOOD WITH A PLAQUE
kmkevinn-6473326 March 2024
Winnie-The-Pooh BLOOD and Honey 2 After walking out of the movie theater, this is without a doubt one of the BLOODIEST, THE BEST, BEAUTIFUL AND BRUTAL LOW BUDGET HORROR Films of this year and does an excellent job. This independent international film from the first film yes I did think two characters from the first film did made it perfect as possible which they did. This film on Winnie-The-Pooh BLOOD and Honey 2 had better cast, better practical effects, Christopher Robin's Flashback, the young Winnie-The-Pooh looks very well done. The dialogue from Tigger sounds similarly to Freddy Krueger and I find that heartwarming, The other dialogues from Owl, Piglet and POOH themselves are definitely the scariest voices that ruins my sisters nightmare forever. The story, writing and script was definitely better as well as cinematography I'd love this film to death and I am excited where this film is going to be in the future, we will see. This 10 Jars of BLOOD & HONEY out of 10 is that perfection. I will see this film again when it comes out on VOD. Winnie-The-Pooh BLOOD and HONEY 2 is definitely one of the best films of this year, Forget SCREAM 6 last year, Winnie-The-Pooh does it incredible and beautiful.
Maybe too much of an upgrade from the original?
SlashedProductions29 March 2024
The first Blood and Honey was not good, but not as bad as everyone says and I also found it amusingly watchable. This sequel is not only watchable, but also passable as a "real" movie. The gore is great, costumes look solid, and we get a back story on the creatures which absolutely works in this type of universe. It takes it self seriously, but didn't come off as too serious like the first film.
But is Blood and Honey 2 maybe too good? I couldn't help but think this sequel felt in its own universe, and completely unrelated to the first film. Take the look of Pooh. He looks much better, yes. But the character looks nothing like the first movie which takes me out a bit. There's also a sequence where characters are watching the first movie! Is this sequel pulling a Human Centipede 2? Or are they pulling a Scream/Stab? I lean towards the ladder, but then don't use footage from the first movie!
Yes, these complaints seem petty, but continuity issues that are insanely easy to fix bug me. That said the only real issue I have is there's almost no honey eating. In the first movie, Pooh was eating honey every chance he got!
Overall, this movie is pretty fun and dare I say it's even good. The gore is great, featuring an epic opening scene and climax (bit of a lull in the middle). I'm fully on board for this Poohniverse nonsense.
"It's Poohin' time!"
But is Blood and Honey 2 maybe too good? I couldn't help but think this sequel felt in its own universe, and completely unrelated to the first film. Take the look of Pooh. He looks much better, yes. But the character looks nothing like the first movie which takes me out a bit. There's also a sequence where characters are watching the first movie! Is this sequel pulling a Human Centipede 2? Or are they pulling a Scream/Stab? I lean towards the ladder, but then don't use footage from the first movie!
Yes, these complaints seem petty, but continuity issues that are insanely easy to fix bug me. That said the only real issue I have is there's almost no honey eating. In the first movie, Pooh was eating honey every chance he got!
Overall, this movie is pretty fun and dare I say it's even good. The gore is great, featuring an epic opening scene and climax (bit of a lull in the middle). I'm fully on board for this Poohniverse nonsense.
"It's Poohin' time!"
Better than the First Installment, but not so Much
nizarsalim6 May 2024
In Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2, there are some things that are better than the original. But despite that, the movie remains below normal rqgarding its level.
In the movie, I praised the story and the more elements and revelations it has than the original, visual and sound effects, which were a lot better than the first installment, screenplay, cinematography, and ending, which paves the way for the next films in the Twisted Childhood Universe.
But the other elements, like the performances of the cast, soundtrack, and direction were very normal, even below than normal. Even the elements that I praised, although they are better in this installment than the first one, they did not reach an excellent level like the movies of these days. That is why when it comes to the score, I give Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 5 out of 10.
In the movie, I praised the story and the more elements and revelations it has than the original, visual and sound effects, which were a lot better than the first installment, screenplay, cinematography, and ending, which paves the way for the next films in the Twisted Childhood Universe.
But the other elements, like the performances of the cast, soundtrack, and direction were very normal, even below than normal. Even the elements that I praised, although they are better in this installment than the first one, they did not reach an excellent level like the movies of these days. That is why when it comes to the score, I give Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2 5 out of 10.
6.5/10. It's a Good Time!
andrew_loveday1 April 2024
This is by no stretch of the imagination the best horror film ever made, but it's also by no stretch of the imagination the worst horror film ever made. If you enjoy slasher horror films, you will definitely get a kick out of this (think Saw, I Spit On Your Grave, Hostel- or anything by Eli Roth really, if you enjoy those, check this out). It includes a couple of twists that keep the story engaging enough for the run time, and it avoids following the same formula as the first film. There are a couple of comedic lines/scenes, as is to be expected. However, it's mostly an on par slasher horror film, that uses its exisiting characters creatively, and the new ones sparingly to keep them interesting. The writing, directing and acting is not Oscar worthy, but it is definitely better than a lot of what is being put out right now. Despite the amusing and silly premise of Winnie the Pooh slaughtering people, this film is surprisingly entertaining. It delivers on what it promises, quality time with your mates without bending the mind! If you grab a couple beers, I'm sure you won't hate this. Just remember to appreciate it for what it is. It's not trying to win awards. It's trying to entertain you.
Complete upgrade from the 1st film
booperkins-6815426 March 2024
You can really see the work that has gone into this movie. The characters, the story, there's just so much more to it comparing it to the last one. To be fair I liked the 1st one, it was fun and it was gory but I guess it didn't have as much depth.
Give these lads a bigger budget and just look what they have gone and created!
I think the story within a story is great and really brought the film to life!
The characters are much more endearing, Scott Chambers playing Christopher Robin worked so well!
The masks were so much more creepy and realistic even down the hairs you could see on Poohs face! Loved the new characters Owl and Tigger too!
A really good film and looking forward to the next instalment already!
Give these lads a bigger budget and just look what they have gone and created!
I think the story within a story is great and really brought the film to life!
The characters are much more endearing, Scott Chambers playing Christopher Robin worked so well!
The masks were so much more creepy and realistic even down the hairs you could see on Poohs face! Loved the new characters Owl and Tigger too!
A really good film and looking forward to the next instalment already!
Horror Spin, Not For Kids
stevendbeard27 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I saw Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2, starring Scott Chambers-Megalodon: The Frenzy, The Hippopotamus; Tallulah Evans-Son of Rambow, Penelope; Ryan Oliva-Midnight Peepshow, Petroleum Spirit and Lewis Santer-this is his first movie.
This is a sequel to the 2023 horror reinvention of Winnie_the_Pooh and friends, created by A. A. Milne. If you are wondering about how they can do these movies-horror-the characters are now in the public domain. Scott plays Christopher Robin-there was a different actor in the first one-who is now a doctor and going through therapy after the events of the first movie. Tallulah is his girlfriend. The town has been trying to find the crazed animals in the woods but so far, they have eluded them. Ryan plays Winnie_the_Pooh and Lewis is Tigger. Yes, there are more animal friends in this one-The Owl is pretty fierce looking. Anyway, Pooh and company have decided that they have had enough and want to take the fight to the town. They go on a killing spree, maiming and killing everyone they find. There is a little bit told in flashbacks about a doctor and how he created the monstrosities. Before the movie starts, the creators of the film talk about the next movie-yes, there will be a part 3-and other movies with a horror spin that they have lined up. They include Peter Pan, Pinocchio, Bambi-they show a clip from Bambi-and an Avengers style cross over called Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble, which has all the a fore mentioned characters in it.
It's not rated but it contains violence, gore, language and sexual content-partial nudity-and has a running time of 1 hour & 40 minutes.
I enjoyed it and would buy it on DVD but if you are a fan of Winnie_the_Pooh-like my wife is-or little kids, you should probably avoid it.
This is a sequel to the 2023 horror reinvention of Winnie_the_Pooh and friends, created by A. A. Milne. If you are wondering about how they can do these movies-horror-the characters are now in the public domain. Scott plays Christopher Robin-there was a different actor in the first one-who is now a doctor and going through therapy after the events of the first movie. Tallulah is his girlfriend. The town has been trying to find the crazed animals in the woods but so far, they have eluded them. Ryan plays Winnie_the_Pooh and Lewis is Tigger. Yes, there are more animal friends in this one-The Owl is pretty fierce looking. Anyway, Pooh and company have decided that they have had enough and want to take the fight to the town. They go on a killing spree, maiming and killing everyone they find. There is a little bit told in flashbacks about a doctor and how he created the monstrosities. Before the movie starts, the creators of the film talk about the next movie-yes, there will be a part 3-and other movies with a horror spin that they have lined up. They include Peter Pan, Pinocchio, Bambi-they show a clip from Bambi-and an Avengers style cross over called Poohniverse: Monsters Assemble, which has all the a fore mentioned characters in it.
It's not rated but it contains violence, gore, language and sexual content-partial nudity-and has a running time of 1 hour & 40 minutes.
I enjoyed it and would buy it on DVD but if you are a fan of Winnie_the_Pooh-like my wife is-or little kids, you should probably avoid it.
They did it! And it's brilliant 👏
kangascrew26 March 2024
The first film was on a tight budget and went viral, this film is exactly what they promised.
Bigger budget, more death and gore. The characters are so good and the cgi well put together.
It's got everything required to be a great horror and more, whoever thought about giving Winnie a flamethrower chainsaw was a genius If you saw the first rendition of Blood and Honey, this is for you, guaranteed the plot and storyline will surprise you and the death toll will not disappoint, great acting from the Christopher Robin (Scott Chambers) and fantastic narrative from Simon Callow
Well done, highly recommended 👍
Bigger budget, more death and gore. The characters are so good and the cgi well put together.
It's got everything required to be a great horror and more, whoever thought about giving Winnie a flamethrower chainsaw was a genius If you saw the first rendition of Blood and Honey, this is for you, guaranteed the plot and storyline will surprise you and the death toll will not disappoint, great acting from the Christopher Robin (Scott Chambers) and fantastic narrative from Simon Callow
Well done, highly recommended 👍
This movie is the best movie I ever see😱
danieledri-7266826 March 2024
I'll save on words and just tell you that this movie is excellent. You didn't expect that, did you? Me neither. When I went into the movie I thought to myself that it would be the worst movie I'd ever see in my life, but it turns out that it's the best movie I've ever seen in my life.you need to see this movie ! If you love horrors movies go watch in this movie ! If you love to scared go to this movie ! If you hate movies go to watch this movie ! This movie was grate I want all the movies in the world be like this movie . I see yesterday the first movie and he was better more then I remembered. Go to see the best movie in the world🔞😰🍯
Wow wow wow
nessperkins-0288826 March 2024
I was lucky enough to be invited to the premiere of Winnie the Pooh Blood and Honey 2 in London. I didn't know quite what to expect after the first Winnie the Pooh Blood and Honey film, however after seeing the trailer of the second film with Winnie the Pooh and Piglet characters looked quite frightening and not look like they were wearing masks as in the first film so I was expecting better things second time around. I must say I wasn't disappointed from the first five minutes of the film to the end there was plenty of blood and gore and covering my eyes with my hands. To sum it up briefly a bigger budget has definitely given the team the ability to improve the feral characters, storyline and actors.
Worth The Budget!
jamalb-3861827 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Within the first movie it lacked costumes and everything else, but the budget went towards the blood. This movie fixed what it was lacking from the first movie and made the storyline better and had real costumes this time. My rating was a 9.5 stars, but I just wished that Tigger and Piglet had more screen time for more kills. The movie just focuses on Pooh and Owl. But this movie has raised a high rating for me within other horror films that I've seen. I can't wait to see what the future holds for the universe of the films and also I was able to see a sneak peek of the Bambi movie. Worth every penny and a great time. Make sure that you can handle all the blood that the movie gives. Not for the faint of heart of people that can't handle blood.
BEST BEST BEST .ONE OF THE BEST HORROR MOVIES OF THIS YEAR
zefree-4499728 March 2024
The come back of Winne the Pooh Blood and Honey movie is very great and wonderful. I'm waiting for Blood and Honey 2 when I've seen the previous movie. The previous Movie Blood and Honey 1 is not good in vfx,acting, script. However,it makes me feel that want to watch more movie sequel of it. In now part 2, unbelievable......the script,the acting ,the bloody killing,the storyline are awesome. I swear guys Winne the Pooh Blood and Honey 2 is one of the best horror moves of this year. Don't think and watch it. Blood and Honey 1 is really weak movie. But not 2. Everything is really improved in part 2. So I'm waiting for Winne the Pooh Blood and Honey 3 for next year. Guysss DON'T THINK AND WATCH IT!!
BEST HORROR SEQUEL EVER!
pinkviola27 March 2024
Was expecting more than I had seen from the first movie just based on the trailer, but I never would have guessed that I would be completely blown away! I may never judge a sequel movie based on its predecessor ever again. As weak as the first movie was, that's how strong this film was. Almost every detail was flawless, from the foreshadowing, the acting, the writing, the plot twists, the use of camera angles, and even filling in the blanks from the first film. I enjoyed every second of this movie and even if you hated the first one, you have GOT to see this one! I will recommend this film to any fellow horror junkie, no matter how much they scoff!
Great Improvement
sarmientobrayan-0547327 March 2024
I Will Say Although I Still Like The First Movie It Was Definitely A Major Improvement Over The Original And It Did Not Disappoint. It Was Definitely Entertaining The Death's Were Brutal And Gory There Were Some Great Casting And Having Pooh Bear Piglet Owl And Tigger Talk In This Film Made It Scarier I Would Say My Favorite Were Either Pooh Bear Tigger Or Owl The Soundtrack For The Film Was Definitely Terrific Great Job To The Blood And Honey Cast And Crew For Making This Film I Can't Wait To See Every Twisted Childhood Universe Film That Will Be Coming Out Highly Recommend You To See It In Theaters.
VERY GREAT
ozturkhanife-8281521 April 2024
The movie is absolutely magnificent bravco bravo such a first has never been seen, it is definitely better than dune 2, it is the best movie I have seen in my life, even the best movie in the world, joke joke, it is not such a good movie, but it is still very good, for example, instead of the masked men, real make-up is used and this gives the movie a big plus, but the cgi is really terrible, so it is 7.5 out of 10, but I give the movie 10 because some people give 1 point without watching the movie with nostalgic feelings and the movie drops the score even though it does not deserve it, anyway good day!
MASTERPIECE OF HORROR UNDERGROUND
tcmcritizprod27 March 2024
The significantly enhanced sets and staging make this film a more immersive and polished experience! With increased financial resources, Scott and Rhys promise much more beautiful and meticulously crafted films for the future of their universe.
In WTP B&H 2, the death scenes are delightful, quite gory, well-shot, well-acted, and obviously better than in the first film (which was already quite good for the budget).
As for the dialogues, they are much more engaging, better written, and better executed, thanks to a talented cast including Scott Chambers (Jeffrey), Simon Callow, Ryan Oliva as Winnie, Eddy MacKenzie as Piglet, Marcus Massey as Mr. Owl, and Lewis Santers as Tigger, all delivering exceptional performances in their respective roles.
The dialogues, like those of Tigger, are both amusing, uninhibited, and very chilling... and it works perfectly! It's a perfect balance. For the character of Piglet, it's a solid acting performance despite limited screen time...
Nicola Wright, in the role of Christopher Robin's mother, is absolutely incredible. She brings a funny, simple, and light touch to the character!
Special mention to Peter DeSouza-Feighoney, who brilliantly portrays a young Winnie the Pooh. At just 12 years old, his performance is absolutely fascinating! He manages to capture the innocence and curiosity of our favorite yellow bear, while adding a touch of animosity and disdain for storyline reasons.
His character offers a unique perspective to see Winnie through his ages and desires... Unfortunately, there is officially no storyline arc centered around the character of Tigger.
However, despite this shortcoming, the 1 hour 40 minute film passes by very quickly, almost too quickly. You really don't want it to end!
Despite this speed, the film still manages to successfully address sensitive topics, demonstrating its ability to captivate the audience and generate interest even in the absence of specific character development.
Andrew Scott Bell's music is undeniably one of the film's major strengths. With carefully crafted composition, Andrew manages to perfectly capture the essence and atmosphere of each scene, adding an extra dimension to the cinematic experience.
His haunting melodies and subtle arrangements help reinforce the emotions conveyed on screen, whether it's suspense, tenderness, or even action.
Thanks to his musical talent, Bell fully immerses the viewer in the world of "Winnie The Pooh Blood And Honey 2", making the soundtrack an essential element of this cinematic work.
"Winnie The Pooh Blood And Honey 2" offers a captivating cinematic experience with enhanced sets and staging, as well as remarkable performances by the actors. Despite the absence of a dedicated storyline arc for the character of Tigger, the film successfully addresses sensitive topics.
Note: Yes, there is a post-credits scene. I won't say more.
In WTP B&H 2, the death scenes are delightful, quite gory, well-shot, well-acted, and obviously better than in the first film (which was already quite good for the budget).
As for the dialogues, they are much more engaging, better written, and better executed, thanks to a talented cast including Scott Chambers (Jeffrey), Simon Callow, Ryan Oliva as Winnie, Eddy MacKenzie as Piglet, Marcus Massey as Mr. Owl, and Lewis Santers as Tigger, all delivering exceptional performances in their respective roles.
The dialogues, like those of Tigger, are both amusing, uninhibited, and very chilling... and it works perfectly! It's a perfect balance. For the character of Piglet, it's a solid acting performance despite limited screen time...
Nicola Wright, in the role of Christopher Robin's mother, is absolutely incredible. She brings a funny, simple, and light touch to the character!
Special mention to Peter DeSouza-Feighoney, who brilliantly portrays a young Winnie the Pooh. At just 12 years old, his performance is absolutely fascinating! He manages to capture the innocence and curiosity of our favorite yellow bear, while adding a touch of animosity and disdain for storyline reasons.
His character offers a unique perspective to see Winnie through his ages and desires... Unfortunately, there is officially no storyline arc centered around the character of Tigger.
However, despite this shortcoming, the 1 hour 40 minute film passes by very quickly, almost too quickly. You really don't want it to end!
Despite this speed, the film still manages to successfully address sensitive topics, demonstrating its ability to captivate the audience and generate interest even in the absence of specific character development.
Andrew Scott Bell's music is undeniably one of the film's major strengths. With carefully crafted composition, Andrew manages to perfectly capture the essence and atmosphere of each scene, adding an extra dimension to the cinematic experience.
His haunting melodies and subtle arrangements help reinforce the emotions conveyed on screen, whether it's suspense, tenderness, or even action.
Thanks to his musical talent, Bell fully immerses the viewer in the world of "Winnie The Pooh Blood And Honey 2", making the soundtrack an essential element of this cinematic work.
"Winnie The Pooh Blood And Honey 2" offers a captivating cinematic experience with enhanced sets and staging, as well as remarkable performances by the actors. Despite the absence of a dedicated storyline arc for the character of Tigger, the film successfully addresses sensitive topics.
Note: Yes, there is a post-credits scene. I won't say more.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
