Howl (2015) Poster

(I) (2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
194 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Really enjoyable werewolf siege film
alex_van_beek22 October 2015
This is a really well done film that focused on what it was instead of falling for the trap of trying to be more than it could. It didn't try and be some terrifying horror film and nor did it spend too much time on the werewolves. For the most part they're left out of sight or kept to a minimum so as to play well to the claustrophobic element of the film. When they are seen, they look very cool and are really well done.

The acting is good, the characters are likable enough and all contribute something towards the experience of being holed up in a tin can, trying not to be munched on by bloody werewolves.

I was well entertained and didn't find myself fiddling with my phone or anything. It wasn't too long and wasn't too short and left on a decent note.

The storyline alone is fun enough to hold your attention for the duration of the film. It does what it says on the can and doesn't leave you feeling like you wasted your time.

I watch a lot of horror ...and a lot of bad horror subsequently and this film doesn't fall into that substandard category. It's not a great film but it's a good film and especially within the werewolf sub-genre, and there are not too many in there.

That's what I think anyway, check it out and see what you think. I recommend it.
96 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An ordinary horror about werewolves. Although physically they look slightly different ....
peterp-450-29871619 December 2016
Read the title of this horror and you know already what it's about anyway. Nothing like a good werewolf movie from time to time. Although there's still a certain shortage of decent films when it comes to this genre. The last (for me personally) successful werewolf movie that I watched, was "Wer". On the other hand you'll see some abominably bad attempts like "Wolves" and "Night Wolf". "Howl", a movie from the UK, may not be as good as "An American Werewolf in London", but still managed to surprise me. And although it's a low-budget film, you can say that the look of the creatures terrorizing the passengers of the stranded train was successful. Probably the used anatomy will ensure a bit of protest by the followers of the genre, because it seemed like a mix of a wolf and the creature from "Splice." But that first attack with a bloody close-up took my breath away. Brilliant makeup and special effects. They looked at least less ridiculous than the furry creatures of "Late Phases" (a movie in which the acting impressed) with their ears decorated with tassels.

The progress of "Howl" is well considered and balanced. First a comprehensive introduction of all the characters. The middle section with the threatening situation they find themselves in. Followed by the final confrontation with the necessary victims and a predictable turn. Don't be surprised when some of the individuals make some stupid decisions again. However, the end might be a little surprising. Unfortunately, the look of the night creatures, when you can admire them in full regalia, isn't so convincing or frightening. To be honest they looked like individuals who returned from some kind of masked ball. But believe me, the first confrontation was bloody and ruthless. Sheer aggression focused on the terrible creature that struck in a deadly and gruesome way shortly before.

Not only the suspense and tension was a positive element in this film. The performances were enjoyable. A collection of colorful characters displaying that typical reserved British attitude. It surprised me they weren't having a tea break while being attacked by those animals. First, there's Joe (Ed Speleers), an undervalued train guard, whose life is an accumulation of setbacks and adversities. He is despised by colleagues and passengers see him as an incapable figure. His colleague Ellen (Holly Weston) ignores his romantic moves. Kate (Shauna Macdonald) hated Joe the first instance after she had to pay for a new ticket. Adrian (Elliot Cowan) is a cocky guy who in the end just tries to save his own neck. Nina (Rosie Day) is a spoiled brat. And then there's this elderly couple, who won't hide their outrage about the delay, a nerd-like young boy (Amit Shah), an engineer in the making (Sam Gittins) and an obese, lazy football player (Calvin Dean). The introduction sometimes is comical and highly recognizable.

Not only the werewolves provide for the eerie atmosphere. But also the location where the train gets stuck with its dark woods and the typical English fog banks, create a creepy mood. The origin of the creatures isn't explained in detail. Only the older man is aware of other mythical stories about broken down trains and passengers disappearing or being found in a pitiful state. But otherwise, you can only guess where these fast-paced, immensely strong and bloodthirsty creatures come from. Despite being a typical B-movie and the fact that I thought Paul Hyett's film "The seasoning house" was slightly better, this film is worthwhile to give it a try. It's not a top film with werewolves as subject, but it certainly is a movie that can compete with the better ones in this genre.

More reviews here : http://bit.ly/1KIdQMT
28 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not the greatest but watchable
reallyevilboy20 October 2015
Okay, I've seen some miserable horror movies in recent times. I've seen horrors that have made a great fresh start the descended into awful, others that after 5 minutes I've released a deep sigh and pressed the off button.

This is not one of those movies. For that I am thankful.

It's not one of the greatest movies but its not horrible like so many recent horrors.

I enjoyed it a little. at the end I did not groan out loud. Acting was okay, storyline okay. I enjoy English horrors more than their American counterpart as the emphasis is more on suspense and storyline than special effects and action.

Seems an odd way to put a positive review, but that's really how it is with horror.

Watchable, not terrible.
82 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Could be better
panther_husky19 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
We all have our own likes and dislikes which doesn't, at all, mean that the movie is either good or bad. Personal taste.

I give credit to the actors for trying though there were times the dialogue between them was quite amateurish. I got a little fed up listening to childish gibberish between adults. Maybe the writer intended it to be that way, I don't know but it was annoying.

The story line wasn't too bad but you never find out where the werewolves came from apart from a brief story the old man tells though it still didn't explain their existence.

The werewolf effects were great and it lifted the interest of the film a notch and the story taking place on a train may be original to some but there have been horror films that have taken place on a train.

The male protagonist got on your nerves at times along with most of the other characters and the feeling of wanting them dead wasn't such a surprise. You saw it coming.

There were also some scenes which made you frustrated because of the characters stupidity. Again, the director probably did this on purpose but, it just didn't work.

Originality for the rest of the film - zero!

I really didn't want to watch the whole film as I got bored with it but decided to sit through it. I enjoyed the ending - only the ending, seeing the werewolves in their full form. It did leave me wondering though how a woman whose clothes are bloody and tattered, walking in a daze at a train station and nobody seems to care let alone look at her.
27 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Delayed due to werewolves on the line.
BA_Harrison1 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Every carriage is a buffet car for a pack of werewolves when a red-eye train from Waterloo comes to a sudden halt on the track, having hit a stag. Down on his luck guard Joe (Ed Speleers) tries to keep his passengers calm while the driver (Sean Pertwee) inspects the damage, but finds his job more stressful than usual when the lycanthropes lurking in the woods launch an attack.

There are several moments in Howl where one cannot help but roll their eyes, far-fetched elements including the barricading of a carriage using some handy dandy tools, an engineering student who knows how to operate and repair a train, and one dumb sap who wanders off into his fog shrouded surroundings because he hears a plaintive cry for help (needless to say, he doesn't make it back alive).

In its favour, however, are a well-drawn cast of characters, plenty of tense action and atmosphere, a reasonable amount of blood and gore, and some of the most impressive looking cinematic werewolves since Neil Marshall's Dog Soldiers: ugly buggers with glowing eyes, massive maws full of razor sharp teeth, manky skin and matted fur, realised by an effective mix of practical makeup and CGI. So while the script might not rewrite the rules, Howl still has lots to recommend it.
26 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Great start, but dwindles very fast.
paulclaassen28 June 2018
After a brilliantly suspenseful first half, the film deteriorates into silliness. All the characters act stupidly, which is just not normal behavior, and the creatures are more comical than scary. (Great tension and atmosphere in the first half).
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An enjoyable addition to the big hairy puppy people genre
slaine-5206420 October 2015
There is some development for story line and character purposes that is slightly painful to get through but it is not as excruciating as certain ritalin addicts would have u believe. The irritable characters r truly annoying and u really enjoy the scenes when they die horribly. I particularly enjoyed the death of the pre period mouth piece, although it is quite a 180 from the seasoning house.

The ticketmaster plodded along and kept everyone in line until the time came to take command which he managed to do admirably. The creatures were very well done, not as good as underworld but better then crap like wolfcop or the ewok looking fuzzies from wolves. I am not sure where all the hate is coming from but this was a decent horror film sure it was no American werewolf in London but it still entertaining for the hounds out there, British included.
36 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One Howl of a train ride.
amesmonde20 October 2015
A down on his luck train ticket inspector gets more than he bargained for when his train breaks down and creatures that lurk in the surrounding forest lay siege to diverse group of passengers.

Director Paul Hyett keeps the suspense moving at consistent British rail pace. Echoing Severance, an unlikely band of people have to come together to survive, Hyett handles the blood and gore particularly well with excitedly executed guts and intermittent beasties set ups. The practical special effects are fantastic and out shine the visual CGI shots. The creature design is a mix of Dog Soldiers and mid transformation of the Howling's werewolves and comes off quite creepy when remaining hidden in the dim light. The station and forest setting give the film some weight and Paul E. Francis' music adds impact to the train attack segments.

Writers Mark Huckerby and Nick Ostler offer an appealing idea with the stranded train passengers trapped in the middle of where surrounded by werewolf-like creatures. A minor quibble is that at times Howl is a little choppy and uneven and the character are arguably not as polished as they could be. Lead actor Ed Speleers (channeling Max Beesley) is effective enough as he tries to step up to the mark and control the desperate situation as the characters are picked off one by one.

There's a welcomed extended cameo from Sean Pertwee as the train driver Tony. Sam Gittins (a dead ringer of Taron Egerton) is notable as any everyday student who tries to fix the train. The Descent's Shauna Macdonald also appears as Kate and Elliot Cowan (Alexander) puts in a good performance as unscrupulous Adrian.

Against public expectation and trope, refreshingly it omits the quips of Dog soldiers, WolfCop and American Werewolf in London to name a few. And while it isn't quiet as tense or serious to match the Howling, Late Phases or The Descent somber tone it has feet of its own thanks it's original atmospheric train setting, creature design and gore. The creepy old lady makeup stands out as particularly memorable and eerie.

With a modest budget in a sea of werewolf TV shows, DTV and sub-par sub genre films this stands out as one of the better additions.
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Howlingly ordinary....
s327616920 October 2015
Howl had all the right ingredients, a train cutting through a dark and rain swept night, a monster lurking in the woods and a group of unsuspecting travelers. So why is this film so ordinary?

Howl fails for so many reasons but chief amongst these, for me, is a throughly unlikable cast of characters. The trains occupants are a cynical, selfish, rude, nasty bunch. As a result, its hard to empathize with the plight of the travelers, which in turn robs this film of any sense of tension and suspense, as you quickly stop caring what happens to them.

In most other respects, Howl is clichéd fare but, to a degree, that's forgivable. Pretty much any horror scenario you care to name has, to one degree or other, been done before. Howl is no exception. Howls sets are good, the mood reminiscent of an older generation of horror films, and the monster effects convincing. The acting is reasonable too, its a shame so little care went into the overall characterization.

I rate Howl a five out of ten. Its not dreadful but its hardly a masterpiece either.
32 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Low budget but ok
pacman-8119 December 2019
Low budget British horror can spell disaster more often than not. This one gets by but by the strength of the cast. No big names but all put in a convincing shift were you are rooting for some and hope others get killed off. A late night train is halted on the tracks and the driver gets out to investigate. The passangers are then prey for the predators outside hunting them. Not in the same league as the brilliant dog soldiers but a good effort.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not a great movie except animal
alokp-207549 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
In last only one single women is alive and all are dead inside the train.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Solid werewolf horror
phillips-3362321 August 2019
I will be the first to admit, I usually shy away from any werewolf horror movie. They're usually just too unrealistic looking due to poor special effects and makeup, and the plots usually blow... Happy to say not the case with this one! Not only does the werewolf in this film come across as realistic, the setting of being stranded in the dark, foggy English countryside adds a major creep factor, the acting is far above average compared to most horror films, in the plot is actually good. As far as horror movies go, this is right up there with some of my favorite creature features and an overall good movie. A steady 'A' grade here from me. This one is good enough to at least give a shot. Definitely not a waste of time (unlike a great many horror movies unfortunately) by any means!
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
B movies are getting better
rickiemjames26 October 2015
AGAIN , yes it is a b movie with a good budget, all characters are exposed before the "hit", There are no questions about them when the "#@4T" hits the fan! Great writing for a b movie. We have all seen worse. Yes it is predictable to point.

It deserves a viewing

Would like to see a high budget Movie with this "schooled" Character build. and have Actors really work it, from the beginning!

YES 7 for a "B" movie!

need 10 lines? gonna get critical. the over top cam was abit over used on the train.

the tension between the 2 "lets save our selves " could have been pushed abit more- using others adding conflict.

the fuel line break was just silly as they are run in side a cased frame

logic for a break would have been Electrical or jumped rail, Which still happens today!
19 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A werewolf horror movie!!
sauravjoshi856 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is a horror movie about some train passengers attacked by a bunch of werewolves. To start with the concept and story is good but the execution could've been better. The movie has some nice scenes. Acting is good, screenplay could've been better and you can feel that the movie diverts from the topic. Background music supports the ongoing scenario. Film makers are continuing the same decade old theories of turning into creature after bitten by them and this is turning monotonous. Overall this is a nice horror movie which could've been better.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Is it over yet ?
allenandginter19 October 2015
I allowed the initial reviews to influence my decisions. I should have known better.

It seems , more often than not, initial reviews are from fans,friends or cast members rather than people that simply found the movie, watched it and enjoyed/disliked a show.

This show was poorly scripted as far as I see it. The humor was flat and dry, the acting was not even on par with these people's past shows. I have always thought an actor makes the part, not the other way around, but what I saw here were decent actors acting WORSE than in previous roles. Maybe it is a British thing, I dunno.

It is WELL WORTH a .99 rental in order to make fun of, but not to sit and enjoy or be frightened. It will work just as well as an inexpensive sedative....
55 out of 131 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Howl if you hear me
kosmasp17 August 2016
No wait that doesn't make any sense. But with werewolf movies not everything has to make sense. It's the characters compilation (nicely introduced through our card inspector on the train) and the story itself that will matter. And the humor of course, if you are into this kind of thing.

If I have one complaint, it's how the Shauna McDonald story plays out. Some may like the way they chose for her character, some others like me won't. Apart from that, there is a lot to love here. Colorful if a bit predictable turns and twists. And an old school feel (even with added CGI) to the whole werewolf thing. There will be blood and a full moon
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Low budget British werewolf schlock
Leofwine_draca3 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a big fan of werewolf films and I make it my business to check out any new releases. This one's a low budget British effort along the same lines as the recent LAST PASSENGER (a story about a group of characters trapped on a speeding train with a crazed driver) except with werewolves as the villaisn.

It starts off promisingly enough, with some good characterisation and the beginning of various character arcs. There are some genuinely spooky moments along the way. Sadly, the script gets worse and worse as the running time progresses, giving characters dumb things to say and do, and by the end you couldn't really give a fig about any of them, they're that unlikeable. Having the characters running around screaming for half an hour does not make good cinema.

HOWL really is a mixed bag of a film. The cinematography isn't bad but the determination to shoot everything in the dark is a bit trying (and hard on the eyes). The cast isn't as good as it should be; particularly average is Ed Speleers (ERAGON) playing the leading man. He's supposed to be undergoing this heroic character arc but instead he just seems a little whiny and weedy with little reason for the viewer to root for him. When the only recognisable face is old-timer Duncan Preston (from EMMERDALE) you know you're in trouble. Sean Pertwee appears in a cameo but most people will miss him because his face only appears in profile in the dark - what's the point of that?

Really, the only thing that HOWL has going for it are the werewolves. They look FANTASTIC - among the best I've seen. They're muscular, feral, frightening, with glowing eyes that look really creepy. Whenever they're on screen the film really works, but as soon as they're off it just sort of amblesagain. The set-piece train attack is the film's highlight as it plays against type by having the group fight back, but after this promising moment it all descends into the usual again, which is a real pity because HOWL could have - and should have - been something special. It's the best British werewolf film since DOG SOLDIERS, but that's not saying too much given the lack of competition.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Atypical stalking by numbers horror. But howling good fun.....
FlashCallahan1 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Joe, a ticket-collector, is riding the last train out of London with a small group of passengers. When the train brakes violently and comes to a sudden halt deep in the middle of a forest, it seems they have hit something on the line.

But when the driver ventures out to investigate he never returns, leaving the passengers in a state of panic – particularly when Joe sees the driver's mutilated body outside the carriage.

Realising there's something dangerous lurking in the forest, Joe tell the group to secure themselves in the carriage but soon the creature is stalking the train, picking them off one- by-one.

During a vicious battle they manage to kill the creature, revealing it to be a lycanthrope.

However, celebrations are cut short when they hear more howls coming from the forest…

Horror films like this, where it features a confined space and a small cast, always have the same, predictable set up. The 'hero' of the film has just failed on something or lost something, and is having a peerage problem. But they always have an ally with them, and usually it's the girl of their dreams.

Then we are introduced to the rest of the characters one by one, and here, Joe May as well been handing them tickets saying 'you'll get killed', because it's handled pretty clumsily. But it's a trope that features in all 'small groups in peril horrors' so I'll forgive its shortcomings.

What is important in films like these is the mid section, the moment after the scene where it's all quiet for a moment, and then the first victim meets their maker, what happens then on is the meat and potatoes of the narrative, and here it's a lot of fun, but as I've said before, you can more or less guess who's going to get it next.

We have the older couple who won't leave each other's side, the abhorrent teen in the phone, the selfish mother, he rich sleazy snob, an overweight lager lout, a studious nerd, the one who played Eragon who never made it famous because the film flopped, and of course, everyone's favourite, Sean Pertwee.

So for a good hour, it's aware of nerves between the group, whilst we hear the campest howl in the background getting closet and closer. The cast all play their parts well, the characters make some really stupid choices, but it only adds to the fun.

It's a mix of Snakes On A Plane, Dog Soldiers, Creep, with a little bit of Snowpiercer thrown in. But the best thing about Hyetts film, is that it doesn't take itself seriously, it's pretty much self deprecating for the majority of the second act, but keeps it semi serious.

The biggest flaw with the film is the ending, it's doesn't know how to conclude the story, so it just finishes, and it's quite surprising.

But all in all, it's a fun ninety minutes, and it keeps that feeling of claustrophobia you'd expect in a film like this throughout.
26 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A new standard for mediocrity and plain-awfulness
suckerforhorror19 October 2015
A story on stranded train passengers in the middle of the forest at the wee end of the night against unknown blood thirsty creatures makes for a good horror story on paper but when it comes to translating it into a creature feature, screenwriter/director has failed big time.

A very predictable cliché-ridden screenplay with utterly boring action sequences in which none of the characters on the screen garners viewer's interest/sympathy, making it a very dull affair. The film is filled with such ridiculously unbelievable stupid characters/moronic moments from starting frame to the end frame that it's not even comes closer to those films which are so bad that it's good category. This film needs its own category in terms of how awful a creature feature can go.

There are hardly any redeeming qualities that I could find in this unadulterated pathetic excuse for a film of epic proportion.
46 out of 111 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A refreshing and more unique werewolf film
Turtlescout9722 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I feel that this movie is underrated. It doesn't have the greatest set of actors or the best visual effects, but I felt that its premise and werewolf design were unique. I wasn't expecting too much coming into this film, but I was pleasantly surprised by it

I love werewolf movies and this was something I hadn't seen in that genre before. The premise is a late night train in England breaks down in the middle of the woods, and the staff and passengers are slowly hunted down by an unknown creature (werewolf).

The design of the werewolves in this film were like ones I hadn't seen before. They don't appear very wolf-like or have much fur. They look more like mutated humanoids with stretched out skin and long, thinning hair on their heads. They have large, canine-like legs. They have long, bony fingers with claws, pointed ears, and large fangs. Their faces mostly resemble a human's but with wrinkled skin and yellow eyes.

I definitely recommend giving this movie a watch.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No
sophiee1321 October 2015
Britons seems to like making Movies about people on a train. This is the fifth British horror movie where the actors are on a train that I have watched'( so far ).I have to say that this Movie is among the worst of these films. The acting is just horrible, the story is ... horrible and that makes the whole movie ..you might have guessed it ...horrible. The quality of the filming makes me blush with embarrassment. Is it a Child who has made this film or what ? The people who has made this film has no ambition to make a Movie of their own - it consist just a rip off from all the horror Movies they probably have ever seen.
17 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The best werewolf movie in recent memory
8512227 August 2016
Greetins from Lithuania.

"Howl" (2015) is a very effective were werewolf movie. It's bloody, simple story yet effectively told. Sure, story is very simple but who cares if it works, and this movie gave exactly what i wanted from it - a pretty good and scary werewolf movie.

Overall, while writing does not shine in this movie and there are some pretty bad lines, "Howl" is one effective and creepy monster horror movie. Seeing very low 5.2 score at IMDb i expected a trashy movie, but this one surprised me. As there aren't many new movies to say the least about these creatures, this one does it's job, just don't expect much and you will be surprised of how cool this flick is. Recommended for those who loves this genre.
61 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hairy good time
ravenhair70221 October 2015
I am a HUGE werewolf fan...my very first Lycanthrope movie was the 1980 film The Howling. Winner of the Oscar for special effects that year. Only second to that is Kings Silver Bullet...cannot get tired of watching that movie. Even though the werewolf in Silver Bullet looked a bit like an six foot tall hairy puppy. ANYWAY...about this film. I Thought it was great. Not something I would watch over and over like the other two movies I mentioned...but still a movie worth watching. I thought IMDb would have gave it higher marks. Giving it a 5.5 is just a little low in my opinion. If you're a Werewolf fan...I recommend watching it. It may not appeal to you...but it's worth a look.
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"It wasn't a bear. Bears don't howl."
thisseatofmars1 November 2015
The generically named "Howl" is a werewolf movie so bland it borders on tasteless. Seriously--what was up with the fat, slovenly character of this movie? There's a scene when he has to go to toilet, but when he finishes there's no water for him to wash his hands. So we, burdened with the designation of "audience," are forced to look at some of his poop and poopy hands for a few seconds. It's as if the team behind "Howl" knew how boring and lifeless their movie was, so they put moments like this one to add some shock. But showing stool is just a gross-out: a cheap, desperate tactic to get a reaction from the audience. And the worst is that this bathroom scene is the only memorable part about "Howl."

Yeah.

The rest of this clunker is set aboard a train that breaks down as it's passing through the woods. The protagonist is an average-looking man with average intelligence called Joe (Average Joe?) who is as bland as "Howl's" scenery, lighting, dialogue and characters. I guess it's fitting, then, him being as generically named as this movie. (And really: what is up with the title? The premise of a werewolf movie set on a train sounds unique--why not give it a cool, singular name like "Locomotive Howl," or "Fang Train," or something?)

Anyway, Joe's upset because he didn't get the promotion he applied for, which we're told through one of the film's many character-staring-into-the-camera-lens scenes. I've seen this technique before, but in "Howl," it's jarring. For movies that use this technique competently, check out "Rear Window" (1954) and "Pacific Rim" (2013) and anything by Stanley Kubrick. (Search up "Stanly Kubrick stare" to see what I mean.)

So Joe's upset because didn't get that promotion, but why he even applied is beyond me. He seems to hate his job, and I would too if the clientele were always as obnoxious as the ones in this movie. They sneer at him or attack him with sexual harassment lawsuits as he moves through the cars, trying to punch their tickets. It's so obvious Joe's just going through the motions until he's able to finish his duties, head off to an unoccupied car, and catch a quick nap before the werewolves show up. He'll need his energy: the rest of the movie is the cast shouting and running around, looking scared. Predictable.

It's not all bad, though. The werewolves look pretty great... but only when they're in the dark. In the light they look like yeti-costume rejects from "Harry and the Hendersons" (1987.) "Howl" also has a few moments of accidental comedy. When everyone leaves the train upon learning the driver's gone missing (first kill) they see some violently shaking bushes and hear growling. Somebody, in all seriousness, actually says, "Why would the driver be in the bushes?"

...Yes, indeed. Why *would* the driver be camping in those wet, drizzly bushes right after pulling the train's emergency stop? Did he have to take an emergency poo because the train's stall was constantly occupied by that slovenly character? Hmm--but why is he growling so loudly? Maybe not enough fiber? But look--now he's chasing us! God, and he's just bitten that woman on the leg! Wait--wait a minute, I... I don't think that's the driver at all!

Sad face. Yawn.

Other humorous lines include, "it wasn't a bear. Bears don't howl" (ohmygod) and the tedious, predictable, annoying, faux-inspirational speech Joe delivers on the train's intercom towards the movie's end: you can just picture the actors inside stifling yawns and the werewolves outside rolling their eyes. Also, Elliot Cowan's antagonistic character makes me think of OJ Simpson for some reason. I don't know if that's funny or clever.

Anyway: don't waste your time! "Howl" is not even "it's so bad it's good" quality. It's just a predictable pile of bad clichés and poopy, poopy hands.
14 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I Didn't Care Whether They Lived or Died
henrys-8854824 November 2018
The plot was OK but the problem with this film is most of the passengers were rude and selfish, making it difficult to care whether they lived or died. Combine that with the stupid decisions they make, the film fails to rise above mediocrity.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed