The Gunman (2015) Poster

(2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
178 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not perfect, but a solid film.
fxdx411 July 2015
In the same grain as "The American" and "The International", "THE (notice a trend?) Gunman" is a international thriller/action. Where the former 2 films focus more on the thrill, and are overall failures, Gunman is more action, and much more entertaining. If you are looking for a fairly low commitment to a 'smart' action movie, then you can do worse.

In 2006, Terrier (Penn) works for a global corporation (that might as well be called Umbrella Corporation) and is asked to kill a high ranking diplomat. The movie then skips ahead to the present where Terrier is not being chased down by unknown assailants. Nothing original there.

Terrier (Penn) is a likable character. Penn tends to be an actor your either hate or love, but he is does a good job as a grittier, more realistic Jason Borne. The movie ties to humanize him, but that side plot is mostly a thud. After Penn, the cast is stellar - however underutilized. It really is the peak of 'hey that guy' British actors. Unfortunately, Elba who gets second billing is in the movie for 2 scenes total and less than 3 minutes screen time, a role that has so little to it that I might as well have played the character. Winstone and Bardem exist, but their talent is mostly wasted.

The movie is a step sideways from a classic action movie. If you like the Borne series and its fast paced action you likely won't enjoy the more 'realistic' violence of "The Gunman". Unfortunately, if you are not interested in the Borne series, this likely won't be of any more interest. I give the movie a 7, because I enjoyed it. It is far from perfect, I feel the movie definitely 'left sometime on the table' in terms of directing and acting, it misses often in character development, and the movie kind of devolves into cliché, but there is enough substance to watch.
47 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Engaging, but only in parts!
namashi_125 June 2015
Based on the novel The Prone Gunman, by Jean-Patrick Manchette, 'The Gunman' is a decent action-thriller, that's engaging, but only in parts. While the action has sharpness to it, the thriller aspect doesn't entirely work.

'The Gunman' Synopsis: A sniper on a mercenary assassination team, kills the minister of mines of the Congo. Terrier's successful kill shot forces him into hiding. Returning to the Congo years later, he becomes the target of a hit squad himself.

'The Gunman' begins with force, but loses momentum mid-way. I wasn't rooting for the hero on the run, after a point. Also, the identity of the culprit, lacks the bite & offers no shock value. Its predictable to the core. But, the action-sequences work! Not only are they sharply choreographed & executed, they also lend toughness to the narrative.

Don Macpherson, Pete Travis & Sean Penn's Screenplay is okay. Though it isn't without merit, it still isn't powerful enough. Pierre Morel's Direction is stylish. Cinematography is impressive. Editing is ordinary. Marco Beltrami's Score is fine.

Performance-Wise: Sean Penn delivers a committed performance, yet again! He enacts the protagonist with complete honesty & his striking physique stands out. He looks terrific here! Jasmine Trinca is nicely restrained. Javier Bardem looks jaded & least interested in the goings-on. Ray Winstone is, as always, competent. Mark Rylance is fair. Idris Elba is wasted.

On the whole, 'The Gunman' is a so-so fare.
28 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Suspenseful Thriller
Hit man Jim Terrier (Sean Penn) assassinates the Congo's Minister of Mines, leaves the country for 8-years, comes back to dig wells for the people and then he's targeted. Now he has to find out who is after him. Oh, and he suffers from PTSD. Let the games begin.

We normally don't see Sean Penn in this kind of action hero role. Maybe that is because Matt Damon hasn't done a Jason Bourne movie in a great while and others have to take up the slack. So the question is who will be the next Jason Bourne? HA !

What we have is a pretty good suspenseful thriller. Here's the thing: we are not sure if Jim Terrier will make it all the way as he gets banged up often. Yes, we are cringing and bandaging ourselves from time to time. Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. The director gave us the suspense and tension all the way through, and we are not sure who Jim Terrier can trust of those who used to work with him back in the day. And his PTSD symptoms crop up at inopportune times (isn't that always the case?) and don't make things easy for him (indeed).

Notables: Javier Bardem as Felix; Ray Winstone as Stanley; Mark Rylance as Cox; and Idris Elba as Barnes. And then there is Jasmine Trinca as Annie, the love Jim Terrier left behind after the shooting of the Minister of Mines. She is nothing but beautiful (you falling in love again?) and she can act.

We do see some very good landscapes in London, the Congo and in Spain that also gave us a bullfight arena. No CGI as the fights were all real natural stunts and very cringe worthy (Ouch. Ouch. Ouch.) (7/10)

Violence: Yes. Sex: No. Nudity: No. Language: Yes, at times.
22 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very dull action movie by Sean Penn.
bbickley13-921-5866424 March 2015
I don't think I ever saw Sean Penn do an action movie.

Not sure if he's at that point in his career were he does not care or he just feels he can't be a well diverse actor without having this on his resume.

Either way he does a good performance as one, and was impressively built but not overdone for the role.

The movie does go over some political satire with his character playing a Metaphor of the guilt we all should all feel about our own involvement in what's going on in the Congo.

Guess he felt this will be a better way to spread his word to the masses. Penn was wrong about that. I got very little from this flick.

Although the movie is mostly laid with espionage and sprinkled with action, neither elements got my pulse pounding.

Javier Barton is good in this movie. He's a great actor and it's fun to see him on the big screen as Penn's rival for the affections of a woman.

But if you are fans of Idris Elba, like I am, don't let his top billing fool you. He's barely in it, and his role does nothing to help the film.

I like the film but I snoozed though it. Penn brought nothing new to the genre and I was hoping he would but he did not.

Catch on DVD.
75 out of 133 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A generic but enjoyable action movie
Dr_Aristotle2 August 2015
I was pleasantly surprised by this film given the negative reception that it had received.

For the most part, the acting ranges from serviceable to good. Sean Penn falls in the latter, as he embodies the typical action hero role in a believable manner. Jasmine Trinca is okay, though to be fair it's not like she's given much to work with from the script. And Javier Bardem has a lot of fun with the role, though at times his acting is more theatrical, and seems like it should be in a different movie. And to those who wish to see the movie solely due to Idris Elba, I have to warn you he's in the movie for about a total of 10 minutes.

The characters aren't particularly deep, and they most certainly all fall within clichés (ex. killer who regrets his past and is trying to make amends), however for the most part I found the characters to be entertaining. Annie was the weakest character as the stereotypical love interest, which hurts the movie as it wants the audience to care about the relationship between her and Terrier.

Just as the characters are all that well fleshed out, neither is the story. It's pretty basic and easy to follow, and the movie goes along the familiar beats of the genre. At first I hated a certain plot point concerning a certain character's head trauma, but it ended up making for a more interesting movie as it helped make a character less invincible and also has a vital affect on the story.

The action is well done, with it being pretty easy to follow and nice to look at. It's not too bombastic, and consist more of hand-to-hand combat, surprise attacks, and use of the environment. I found it very refreshing how both the protagonist and antagonist utilized the environment, as it made the action more interesting and exciting to watch. Terrier also isn't a one man wrecking crew killing 30 guys with no effort; he dispatches some easily, but as the movie goes on, there are times when he meets an equal and is harmed. At the beginning the fights have a bit of shaky cam to them, but that quickly goes away, which ends up working in the movie's favor.

Despite the very standard characters and plot, I had a fun time with this movie. I'd certainly recommend it for anyone who's a huge fan of action, as it's a good way to past the time and have some fun.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A bloody Bourne look alike that doesn't add up to much
slothhead5416 March 2015
'The Gunman' opens with the BBC footage that civil war has erupted in the Democratic Republic of Congo between rebel militia and governmental forces locked in a bloody civil war for the control of the country's prized natural resources. Enter Jim Terrier (Sean Penn), a NGO worker providing security while an airstrip is being built. In the middle of chaotic Congo, Jim has fallen in love with Annie (Jasmine Trinca), a Doctors Without Borders volunteer. Annie has attracted the heart of not only Jim but also co worker Felix (Javier Bardem). Felix's jealousy is readily apparent and can only spell disaster for Jim and Annie's relationship. Only a few minutes into the film we discover that both Jim and Feliz are living dual lives. Jim is a hired assassin for a multinational mining company, which is set on protecting their interests in the war torn Congo. Felix is the civil liaison for the foreign mining companies and Sean Penn's assassin team. When the Minister of Mining in the Congo nullifies all mining contracts with foreign companies, Jim is activated by his employer who wants the politician assassinated. The team of four assassins is lead by Cox (Mark Rylance) who announces to his sharp shooters that Felix will decide which of the assassins will take the fatal shot and then said assassin will have to flee the continent immediately after. No surprise Felix chooses Jim to take the shot and having accomplished the mission, Jim is forced to leave Africa and Annie without so much as a goodbye. 8 years later Jim has reunited with the African continent as a UNICEF employee drilling wells when suddenly his past assassination comes back to haunt him. For the next hour and a half, Jim must circumvent Europe to track down who has knowledge of his past deeds and understand why he is wanted dead. Without giving any spoilers, the reason 'The Gunman'never gets off the ground is because the film is unable to sustain any intrigue. Jim is a glorified henchman for a multinational corporation, he is hardly the hero that you want to root for. Jim's character is drawn so thin you know very little about him to care enough whether he lives or dies. Additionally his relationship with Annie earns so little screen time before being abruptly halted that you invest almost nothing in the possibilities of Jim and Annie rekindling at some later date. The questions that Jim seeks answer to could have easily been solved with a couple phone calls, but instead his contacts send him on a treasure hunt around Europe. Apparently the information Jim needs is only accessible with a change of location at each turn. Each new venue invites its share of killers and combat. While Jim is on his mission for answers, we catch wind that Interpol, headed by Idris Elba, has Jim on their surveillance. Interpol seems one step ahead of Jim in terms of solving the puzzle, however they are convinced Jim is the linchpin to cracking the case. The final act of the movie is very predictable not to mention familiar and even a bit silly. Sean Penn's physique in the film is impressive and we are constantly reminded how much the actor got in shape for the role considering how much screen time his giant biceps earn. There are hardly any production credits that are distinguishable and worth mentioning here. Ultimately, the film underwhelms and feels like it wants to cash in on the fan base of the retired Bourne franchise.
77 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid action from a favourite director
Leofwine_draca20 November 2015
THE GUNMAN is the latest action thriller from Pierre Morel, the French director who helmed the outstanding TAKEN and DISTRICT 13. Since then he wobbled a bit with FROM Paris WITH LOVE with its silly, jokey storyline, but he's back on form with this deadly serious international thriller that has much in common with the modern-day likes of the Swedish HAMILTON films.

The story is clichéd and predictable but the film delivers more than adequate thrills and some great action sequences. Sean Penn is a former assassin who's trying to find out which of his former colleagues has betrayed him and sent a hit squad to take him out. To make him a bit more vulnerable, he's studying from a rare form of concussion which makes him lose it every time his head gets knocked about.

THE GUNMAN is quite a lengthy film but it keeps you watching throughout and the location photography in the Congo and Barcelona is well handled. The supporting cast is also a good one with turns for reliably solid Idris Elba, Javier Bardem, and quite surprisingly Mark Rylance, who fits well into the genre despite being better known as a theatre actor. Sean Penn isn't my favourite guy around thanks to his outspoken political views but even I can admit he's a good choice for the part in this.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Potential Not Reached: The Gunman Is Realistic, but Boring
rgkarim21 March 2015
When you hear a movie titled the Gunman what do you think of? For me I think of a few scenarios that come to mind: an action pack shoot em up movie, something on the lines of James Bond, or following down the rogue agent Bourne pathway. So I can't help but say I was excited for this movie this weekend, especially with Sean Penn leading the cast. With few trailers to give me insight, I eagerly headed to my local theater to give this film a try.

Unfortunately the movie did not go down the expected path, and even worse it took the wrong direction for this reviewer. For those uncertain of the plot, Gunman is about a sniper named Terrier who is targeted for assassination by an unknown group. In order to save himself and his loved ones, he must dig deep into a convoluted scheme that may related back to an incident. I know sounds awesome right, if old hat, but Gunman held some promise of action mixed in with good old fashioned spying.

Not the case my friends. Gunman is actually a snooze fest, being one of the first movies to make me nap in almost half a year. It starts with the pace of the movie, not necessarily too slow, but just enough that you start to lose interest. For me, it wasn't that the plot was boring, but the details they tried to lay out for us were very convoluted, many details ambiguous and confusing in their presentation. May of the scenes involved him obsessing over his former love, which after a few arguments and an unnecessary sex scene, started to grow staler than month old bread. Now don't get me wrong, convoluted plots can be a good thing, but they require a good presentation that keeps one engaged in the movie. And this film did not do it for me.

Perhaps I could have been entertained more if the action had lived up to my, I'll admit, high expectations. The opening shot scene was nothing special, but the following skirmish held some promise for excitement down the line. And in truth, two or three battles brought the flash in the pot, bang in your ear entertainment that I so crave. Despite being an elite shooter, Terrier didn't have perfect accuracy, and had to pull some creative stunts to take down his killers, who by the way could actually hit him. Taking away our hero's invincibility was a smart move, but some battles get led down the wrong path, or are a repeat of an earlier fight. Kills are graphic, the camera not shying away from someone's head getting a new hole, as torrents of red litter the ground. If you are up for this kind of stuff, then by all means stop reading this review and head down to the theater. Looking back over the movie though, I can't say the action was as on point or exciting as I had hoped, nor as fast as these scenes sometime need to be.

Helping save this movie from complete failure was the acting. Sean Penn as Terrier was good. The actor was able to transition across the emotional spectrum, being a relief worker with a little troublemaker streak to an angry killer on the loose. Penn has always had a talent for playing well developed characters, and while annoying as this role is, he still plays it well. Jasmine Trica as Annie was a decent addition to the cast, though I must say her character could have been much stronger than they made her. Trica's main talent involved huffing, puffing, and crying as people died. Her dialog was too shallow for me and they threw her as nothing but an object for Terrier to protect. Javier Barden brings his Hispanic background back to the screen, but his role was very short and unfortunately very sad as a love obsessed, drunk who loses his min. Not my favorite role, but again he does okay. As for Idris Elba, he is hardly in the film for fifteen minutes, really only to bring some "coded" advice and a means to end the movie. No offense Elba, but had you been tailing Penn for the whole movie, I might have boosted your score.

Special effects wise the editing worked for me in this movie. Stable camera angles and detailed fighting helped bring the action to life. The battlefields that became the stage for our fights were also beautiful, crafted or located in a variety of settings. Some were cool like a mansion, and others were ridiculous, like at a matador arena. Nevertheless we had an epic soundtrack to add some slight touches of excitement to the mix, as well as high definition pings, twacks, and booms to nearly deafen your ears. Unfortunately the team's cuts of the footage were nowhere near perfect for me, even though they were under the 2 hour mark. I don't know why they kept half of the dialog heavy scenes in, especially when they kept us going in circles. Oh what a waste of good film..

The Gunman is not the movie I expected it to be, and despite the assembled cast of actors, the potential is lost to fast production. With an overly ambiguous plot, and a pace that moves like a snail, the execution of this movie was below par. Those who are fans of extreme violence and profanity, as well as shots of poverty Africa are at home in this film, but otherwise skip this film for something better. A trip to the theater is not recommended from me, but we all know enough desire can make you see anything. Overall my scores for Gunman are:

Action/Crime/Drama: 6.5 Movie Overall: 5.5
67 out of 117 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good, relevant story, execution is a bit uneven. Corruption in the Congo.
TxMike29 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I found this movie on Netflix streaming. Sean Penn looks good and buff for a man in his 50s. The movie was directed by the same one who did the Liam Neeson "Taken" (2008) so many similarities are understandable.

It starts in 2006, the Congo, Sean Penn as Jim is there nominally for airstrip building but has a dark job on the side as a mercenary. A large corporation needs the Minister of Minerals killed and a team is put together. It is a motorcade of sorts, Jim gets the signal, his shot is perfect, but he has to be whisked out of the country quickly.

He has to leave behind his girlfriend, pretty (and 30-something) Jasmine Trinca as Annie, with no explanation. But their team member and friend, Javier Bardem as Felix, promises to watch over her. He does more than that, when Jim locates them 8 years later in Barcelona they are married.

But just before that Jim is back in the Congo, this time purely for humanitarian reasons. he is working to drill a water well for the locals when some armed men show up, clearly to kill Jim. With his special OPs training he manages to escape but leaves the area for London. There he looks up old cronies, members of the assassination squad, and finds 2 of them already dead. It is a systematic hunt and kill, those who know what went down in 2006 need to be eliminated.

Ray Winstone is really good in a somewhat small role as Jim's buddy, Stanley. And Idris Elba has a small role as an Interpol agent, Barnes.

The overall story is a good one, the last 1/3 of the movie is a complex chase and hunt with lots of gunfire and lots of people dying. It gets a bit messy and in a way partially obscures the good build-up.

SPOILERS: Jim does manage to get the best of all those trying to kill him and, with Interpol, exposes the truth, but Jim has to go to prison for his crime. Felix was one of those killed so the last scene has Jim showing up in the Congo, meeting Annie, once he is out of prison. A feel-good ending.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not that good
mohancraig27 March 2015
Some performances were better than others, the ultimate goal of the movie took forever to get off the ground (like the first half)... I miss the old Sean Penn who took roles displaying his raw talent over these emotionally enriched character development stories which quite frankly come off as emotionally supercharged in my book.

The film has some good shootout sequences and Javier Bardem is a joy to watch but the story just isn't there for any kind of connection to the rest of the characters, I'm kind of surprised this emo-fest wasn't the brainchild of Clint Eastwood to begin with.

What action sequences there are well done but there are far too few for a movie called "The Gunman".
57 out of 108 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Best use of bull
ferguson-619 March 2015
Greetings again from the darkness. Sean Penn becomes the latest addition to the AARP action hero club … a very crowded club these days. Unfortunately for Mr. Penn, he lacks the smirky charm of Bruce Wills, the uber-cool of Denzel Washington, and he fails to generate the empathy of Liam Neeson. He simply doesn't come across as a very likable guy, and certainly not someone we can root for.

Based on the novel of Jean-Patrick Manchette, the movie starts out in the Democratic Republic of Congo where Penn is a mercenary disguised as part of a mining security detail. The first 20 minutes are convoluted and introduce numerous characters and sub-plots that leave us wondering if there are any good guys here … other than Penn's idealistic doctor girlfriend played by Jasmine Trinca. A sure sign of a weak script is a film that is bookended by "newscasts" to explain both what is going to happen as well as what just happened.

Pierre Morel directed the first Taken movie, and his cast is stellar: Sean Penn, Javier Bardem, Idris Elba, Ray Winstone, and Mark Rylance. Somehow that combination delivers a hokey, over-acted, cheesy dialogue mess featuring absurd shoot-outs and action sequences that try to convince us Penn is some kind of quasi-superhero. His transformation from geopolitical hit-man to humanitarian is tough to buy, and it's downright chuckle-inducing to see the times he manages to show off his sculpted torso. We can only assume his personal trainer received a bonus for each shirtless scene.

The story bounces from Africa to London to Barcelona to Gibraltar and back to Barcelona. It does include the best use of a live bull so far this year, though the actual bullfighting is somehow one of the least gruesome segments of the entire film. The film isn't as sneaky as it thinks it is in making a statement about multinational corporations raiding Third World resources. Evidently, the message is that former assassins can be forgiven if they are re-born as committed to humanitarian causes, but capitalistic companies cannot possibly justify their work in impoverished areas.

All of the above could be shrugged off if so many wasted opportunities didn't consistently frustrate. Penn has scenes with all of the other actors mentioned above, but there is almost no interaction between the others. Why no confrontations between Idris and Javier? How about one sequence with Penn, Javier and Winstone squaring off? So many fun actors, but so little cross-over. Frustration may be the best overall description for this one, and it encompasses everything from script to dialogue to camera work.
80 out of 142 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A solid 7 leaning 8 for a "realistic" action film.
me-939-33560121 March 2015
This is my first review. I have finally gotten tired of fake reviewers and haters rating films poorly because they don't like the actor and likely never saw the film. Reviewers are offended because he was working outside without a shirt on or because his shirt sleeves were short? Give me a break. I've seen plenty of 1 and 2 star movies, but, this was not one of them.

What I want to know from a review is whether or not a movie is worth watching. I do like action films and I don't dislike Sean Penn. This review comes from that angle.

You're not going to find cars jumping between sky scrapers, people falling 100s of feet and walking away or phony cliffhangers in this film. What you will find is an attempt to show necessary action in a mostly realistic way.

Sean Penn's role is more like Rambo than Superman. The action was original, clever and well executed. The dialogue was realistic and the acting was believable.

The only reason I didn't give it an 8 or 9 is because I felt it tried to do too much in too little time. That having been said making the movie longer wouldn't have worked because it would have taken 5 hours to do it right. The first 20 minutes could have been its own 2 hour film.

That having been said it all made sense. I didn't leave the theater wondering why or how anything happened. I would have cut several of the longer scenes short in order to tell more of the back story.

If you are looking for something fun to do on a Saturday afternoon you won't go wrong by seeing this film.
219 out of 339 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Borrowed from Bourne, but Great, great, great
Eric_Cubed29 July 2015
Man, why is everyone so down on this one? The first thing we realize is that Sean Penn has the most perfectly chiseled and polished body of any 54 year old in existence. And I do mean that sincerely. I don't even think Brad Pitt is gonna have that body, and those pecks, and those gloriously six packed abs, when he is Sean's age. In spy/espionage movies, there is something that never, ever gets old. And that is the highly trained and skilled super agent working undercover, laying low--waiting--who suddenly needs to kick some serious ass at the right time and place (Kiefer Sutherland in 24, Jason Statham in Homefront, Matt Damon in Bourne). And in this regard, Sean delivers admirably, as good as Statham did in the gas station scene in Homefront (one of my favorite movie scenes of all time). He has the guileless, hapless and social awkwardness when he is not in his element and the ferocious, vicious killer agent when the need arises. And the shocked faces of all who though he was just a normal, run of the mill humanitarian worker? Priceless. This movie does borrow heavily from Bourne, but isn't that a little like saying Dylan borrowed heavily from Guthrie? I mean, the awesomeness produced outweighs the little bit of plagiarism here and there. I say go for it, with little expectations, it's a blast.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Terrible Misfire
There's nothing much to say about 'The Gunman', but I'll keep going until I've said too much for an action flick that deserves an assessment no more than a "disaster".

It will be a real wonder to be able to find something that is of any interest through the movie's entire two hours. The film itself strikes as a mere guessing game that pushes the audience to asking themselves which asset (if there's any) it actually aims to present: the bad-ass hit-man story the writers seem to claim the film has, or Sean Penn's overexposed shirtless bulging physique. Unfortunately, two hours isn't enough to achieve a sensible answer, as both eventually grow to become extremely irritating toward the end of the film. A handful of overqualified actors and aesthetic settings may come across as efforts to salvage the wreckage, but none of this attempts seems to have manifested an evident result. The plot is plagued with predictability and clichés, but bears no real shocker twists to shake its overly familiar course.

'The Gunman' feels like just another attempt to make another Liam Neeson out of another over-50 star. Unfortunately, with its utterly thin and convolutedly-written material, the result is neither near 'convincing', nor far from 'misfire'. OK, I've said more than too much already.
109 out of 203 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I would say this is almost a perfect movie.
puchuasusual10 June 2016
At first it is hard to imagine Sean Penn in an action film and harder in a lead marksman role, but then I watched this . Wow, but I don't get how such a good almost full in all aspects action film could get 5.8 !!!! May be people lost their taste of a realistic action film. It's certainly 7-8 stars. If we consider Penn's role only, it's flawless, the other actors could have done better job.

Except Sean Penn other actors kind of look faded, a bit more prominent action star group could have made this film better. The guys in negative role did an okay job but kind of pulled down the overall hotness of the film. The beginning of film seemed kind of a bit too little too short and a little more action and length in the beginning context would certainly do more favour to the overall story line.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Brilliant no, but nice to watch
prohibited-name-176127 March 2015
I wasn't expecting much but I have to admit the movie was entertaining. My score of 7 is based on the fact that it was nice to watch. The movie is average but you won't get bored and there is enough action to keep you focused.

If you expect brilliance from the script and the plot you will be disappointed. If you are simply looking for a nice action movie, you will have fun

Some parts were a little overdone, like running with an extended magazine in the handgun. Sean running spraying bullets around like a madman while the magazine wouldn't contain that much bullets and the next second in the same scene there was no extended magazine in the gun.

I enjoyed the movie
46 out of 101 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't waste your hard earned money on this movie
bolarai21 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Sean Penn is too old to play these roles and very unsuitable. The love interest was only used to show her skin, not much of an actress, how she got cast in the movie is baffling. They both looked terrible and the plot was barely able to hold the movie. Two men fighting over a woman, lots of sex and clothes coming off. Sean Penn thought making another 80s cliché movie would make comeback, he was clearly wrong. All in all an awful movie, awful cast, awful acting. Very deserving of the Razzie award. I would not recommend this movie to anyone. How it ever hit the screens is perplexing. The only good acting was by Javier Bardem which shows that only he was able to bring some flavour to it but then his role is minimal.
100 out of 186 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Penntentious Action Thriller
zardoz-1330 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Taken" director Pierre Morel's bullet-riddled conspiracy thriller "The Gunman" has so many things going for it that it's a shame the whole shebang isn't as good as its best parts. A buff, fiftysomething Sean Penn, who produced and co-scripted the film, surrounds himself with a first-rate cast that includes Javier Bardem, Idris Elba, Ray Winstone, Peter Franzén, and Mark Rylance. Morel orchestrates several kinetic shootouts in a variety of striking locations. Penn and his co-stars behave like they've been coached in wielding firearms because they display far more competence than the usual gunmen in archetypical action movies. It's always harrowing when guys armed with guns pause to reload in a firefight, and reloading sometimes isn't as leisurely in "The Gunmen" as it is in some actioneers. Morel emphasizes realism to a larger degree than he did in his earlier epics "District B13," "Taken," and "From Paris with Love." Penn and company aren't acrobatic, gravity-defying combatants. Often it requires more than one shot to dispatch an adversary. Moreover, some fights degenerate into savage slugfests with knives. Everybody sports body armor so shooting and killing one's opponent isn't always effective. Morel doesn't rely on his usual ultra-fast editing either to heighten the violence or to make you flinch. If you don't immerse yourself in action movies, you will probably flinch when our hero skewers a tenacious thug in the neck with a serried knife. Similarly, Morel generates suspense by making our hero vulnerable. He suffers from head injuries that constitute his Achilles heel, and this makes his encounters with his foes suspenseful. In some ways, the Penn protagonist is comparable to Nicolas Cage's terminally afflicted CIA agent in "Dying of the Light." Head trauma issues hamper both these heroes. Predictably, Penn's head trauma interferes with his endeavors. In "The Gunman," our hero experiences so much trouble with his memory that he records anything on his smart phone. Later, this video diary saves his bacon. Our hero scrambles through in a number of scenic locations, ranging from Africa, to London, to Barcelona, and finally Gibraltar at the southern end of the Iberian Peninsula. "800 Bullets" lenser Flavio Labiano makes the scenery appear stunning. Lastly, "The Gunman" wraps up its shoot-on-sight shenanigans with a happy ending; the hero triumphs over the villains who die melodramatically.

In French writer Jean-Patrick Manchette's 1981 crime novel "The Prone Gunman," the protagonist's first name was Martin. Presumably, Penn preferred playing a protagonist with Jim as his first name instead of Martin. Incidentally, Manchette's novel bears partial resemblance to its cinematic adaptation. Indeed, in the novel, Martin Terrier doesn't carry out the long-range execution of a political figure, and a shadowy American spy agency employs him. Further, the woman he adores, Annie, finds him broke, boring, and bails out on him. Manchette's novel takes place in France instead of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In the film, a predatory international corporation strip-mines the country's minerals with avaricious abandon. Simultaneously, the corporation maintains a team of mercenaries on its payroll. Not only are they around to protect their workers, but they also watch over the humanitarian workers attending to the natives. When the Congo's mining minister decides that this strip-mining doesn't serve the best interests of his homeland, he moves to shut down the corporation. Jim Terrier's supervisor, Felix (Javier Bardem of "Skyfall"), receives orders to eliminate the meddlesome minister, and he orders Terrier to perforate him. As a long-range sniper, nobody surpasses Terrier, and he ices the mining minister with one, extraordinary shot. Significant as the shooting is, Felix insists Terrier must clear-out of the Congo pronto. When he has to vamos, Terrier leaves behind his gorgeous girlfriend, Annie (Jasmine Trinca of "Romanzo Criminale"), who toils tirelessly as a physician in a field hospital. Clearly, a jealous Felix assigned Terrier the job so he could have Annie all to himself.

Eight years elapses, and the guilt-ridden Terrier returns to the Congo to drill water wells rather than politicians. During one outing, Terrier encounters two machete-toting maniacs and another armed with an assault rifle. Predictably, our hero disposes of his antagonists with customary aplomb. Afterward, he notices two empty vials on one man's corpse. Jim realizes with horror that this man had intended to fill those vials with his blood as verification of death. Evacuating himself from the Congo, Terrier visits his former associates to inform them about the attempt on his life. He fears some corporate kingpin has decided to clean house. Naturally, his instincts are proved correct as an army of shooters pursue him. Morel and scenarists Don MacPherson of "The Avengers" (not the Marvel Comics masterpiece), Pete Travis of "Vantage Point," and Sean Penn are obsessed with corruption on an international scale. The anonymous villain in the background that we never see is an enigmatic corporation that exploits the Congo's mineral-wealthy resources for billions. As laudable as this anti-corporate ideology is, it gets lost in this nimble actioneer and its fusillades of gunfire. Basically, the upper echelon villains are never shown when Interpol arrests them. Desperately, "The Gunman" aspires to be another "Blood Diamond," but it fails miserably by comparison. This message laden potboiler bogs down in its own pretentious pabulum. Everything that occurs between the shrewdly staged gunfights is designed to baffle if not bore you. Simultaneously, the biggest actors are squandered, too! First, Oscar winner Javier Bardem dies about an hour into the fracas. Second, you catch glimpses of Idris Elba, but this magnetic British actor is sidelined essentially until the last quarter-hour. Third, cast as a stereotypical damsel-in-distress, Jasmine Trinca makes only a minor impression as Penn's love interest. Whoever groomed Trinca's hair should go back to the canine spa that he or she quit. Talk about a bad hair day! Whatever scintillating sexuality the shapely Italian actress projected in her previous films never materializes here. Despite its enviable cast, exotic locales, and energetic action scenes, this Sean Penn shoot'em up stovepipes like a pistol that misfires.
42 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Same old same old boring yawn.
kotchjk22 March 2015
Boring, predictable and not much to see. Penn, comes across as an old guy who would be very unlikely to pull off 1/2 of the movies plot. Very disappointed. If you nothing else to do and feel like throwing your money away, you might consider seeing it. Just another rehashed shoot um up bang bang special effects looser. How many times are they going to take the same plot, add different names and characters and call it a new movie? The same plot has been done to death. No creativity here folks, move on to something else. The cast ties their best, but there isn't much to work with here. I would have preferred to stay home and get some rest.
99 out of 189 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
basic action movie
pilot100926 April 2019
Not great but better than many and at least coherent ie does have a plot though not a strong one. Eminently watchable as a easy no frills action mavie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Below Average
hasan-mirza-7197525 March 2015
From start to finish, this movie was out of sorts. It couldn't build up a head of steam and thus in the process failed to deliver any sort of impact. Javier Bardem was on point in his brief cameo, and even Sean Penn managed to pull off the traditionally burly action hero enigma, but everything else was frail and flavorless. I usually watch my movies with concentration, but this one was hard to pay attention to, thus I allowed myself some shut eye in between. The protagonist's motive to fight was not strong, and things were happening too conveniently for my liking. The action sequences were somewhat realistic, and the cinematography was nice. But that's almost it. Pretty disappointing.
58 out of 108 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Whew... Great...
dongillette12 July 2015
I'm not a huge Sean Penn fan. To my way of thinking, his best performance up until this movie was as Bradford Whitewood, Jr. in "At Close Range," but right now, after just having watched The Gunman, I've got to say, "Wow..." I never thought of Sean Penn as any sort of "action" star and I certainly never imagined him doing a film like this. But he can sure pick them. And picking this one was a stroke of genius. Some folks might see it as formulaic or routine, but I guarantee you that whoever wrote the screenplay either did more research than he should have or knows more about it than he should. It was almost perfect.
67 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty decent action
LetsReviewThat265 August 2023
The gunman is a pretty good film. It's decent in its plot and action and it feels sort of realistic as the characters get injured and stay that way without getting back up and ready within a minute. An aging Sean Penn plays terrier, an assassin for hire who's target is the Congo's mining minister. It effects him in a weird way and years later he comes back but now people are after him while he tries to find some redemption. Javier Bardem is here as well playing Felix. The husband of a woman that Penn has the hits for. Overall there is some good action and the characters are written well. An enjoyable movie overall.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
In tense...
Thanos_Alfie8 November 2021
"The Gunman" is an Action - Crime movie in which we watch a sniper trying to hide and survive after killing the minister of mines of the Democratic Republic of Congo. After some years and when he returns to the Democratic Republic of Congo a new era of survival begins.

I liked this movie because it had an interesting plot accompanied with plenty of action. The interpretation of Sean Penn who played as Terrier was good but I believe that he did not reach his potential. Some other interpretations that need to be mentioned were Mark Rylance's who played as Terrance Cox, Jasmine Trinca's who played as Annie and Javier Bardem's who played as Felix. Finally, I have to say that "The Gunman" is a good action movie to spend your time but if you have high expectations by it I advise you to lower them otherwise you will be disappointed.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Well Played Out Suspense Film
torstensonjohn25 January 2019
Sean Penn has been known as a brilliant writer/director/producer, and some of his acting has been top notch as well. "The Gunman" stakes a claim as a riveting suspense thrill ride from start to finish. It is engaging with it's complex plot and well written characters.

The storyboard revolves around a man (Penn) who is a mercenary/Special Forces/sniper who is tasked with a job in the Congo, but is forced to leave the continent when completed and go into hiding. Some time later (Penn) returns to the Congo under humanitarian circumstances but is immediately hunted for the assassination and is forced to go into hiding again and find out who and why.

I feel this is a relatively powerful storyline that circumvents action, suspense-thriller. The action sequences are done decently and there are some good fight scenes as well. I though Penn did a fabulous job as writer/director/producer and star. This film will keep you invested for the running time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed